logo
Labour drops plans to restrict LTNs in ‘secret war on motorists'

Labour drops plans to restrict LTNs in ‘secret war on motorists'

Telegraph17 hours ago
Labour has renewed its ' war on motorists ' by dropping plans to limit new Low Traffic Neighbourhoods and 20mph zones.
Ministers have quietly ditched reforms that would have curbed council powers to restrict traffic and levy 'unfair' fines and parking charges.
The Conservatives, which drew up the changes, branded the move 'a kick in the teeth to motorists' and warned it would hit struggling high streets.
But Labour ministers dismissed the proposals as 'speculative suggestions' and said they 'would have made no positive difference for drivers'.
Sir Keir Starmer has been repeatedly accused of pursuing heavy-handed policies against motorists, most notably in London and Wales.
In the latest example, Labour-run Southwark council on Sunday was forced to admit it illegally fined thousands of people for driving in bus lanes.
Richard Holden, the shadow transport secretary, said scrapping the Tory plans represented a 'secret war on drivers' that was not in Labour's manifesto.
'Labour has been caught red handed as it steps up its targeted war on motorists,' he said.
'Conservatives led the charge against unfair and over-zealous enforcement but our work has been ripped up in underhand attacks without any public consultation or manifesto pledge.
'This is a kick in the teeth to motorists, set to punish beleaguered local high streets and will slam the brakes on the economy even more than Rachel Reeves has done so far.'
Rishi Sunak announced a 'Plan for Drivers' in October 2023, which would have made it harder for local councils to introduce anti-car schemes.
It included draft guidance on the introduction of LTNs, which would have forced councils to focus more on the views of local residents and businesses.
As a 'minimum' authorities would have had to hold a series of public meetings with residents and to leaflet every household in the affected area.
The changes were planned over concerns councils have been railroading through LTNs on the back of support by green and pro-cycling groups.
Ministers have now confirmed that the draft guidance, which was not formalised in time for last year's general election, has been effectively shelved.
Lilian Greenwood, the roads minister, said that as a result, work had been 'put on hold and the Government is now considering appropriate next steps'.
'As has always been the case, local authorities are responsible for managing their roads and are accountable to their communities,' she said.
Lord Hendy, a transport minister, also suggested that the Government does not plan to change the current guidance in force on LTNs.
'Traffic management measures such as low traffic neighbourhoods are a matter for local authorities as they know their areas best,' he said.
The last Tory government had planned a series of pro-driver reforms, including new guidance to 'prevent inappropriate blanket use of 20mph zones'.
The Tories sought to roll out more pro-driver policies in the wake of the Labour administration in Wales controversially enforcing a default 20mph zone across all formerly 30mph areas in 2023.
Following a huge outcry the Senedd is now reviewing the policy, with the architect of the scheme admitting 'more common sense' should have been deployed.
Ms Greenwood said the Government has 'no current plans' to review the guidance around the setting of 20mph speed limits in England.
'We believe that traffic authorities are best placed to decide where lower limits will be effective on the roads for which they are responsible, and that consultation and community support should be at the heart of the process,' she added.
Other planned Tory measures that would have limited the use of '15-minute cities' have also been ditched.
Under those measures, Conservative ministers would have revoked council's access to DVLA data, which they use to enforce traffic filters.
The 15-minute city concept were designed so residents could access all basic services within a quarter of an hour walk or bike ride from home.
It has become controversial with some on the Right who see the car as pivotal to freedom and attempts to curb driving as the spread of state control.
'No positive difference'
Mr Sunak also pledged to reduce 'unfair' traffic fines, such as yellow box penalties, including by restricting councils' ability to raise revenue from them.
Under the measures new guidance would have been brought forward giving residents the formal right to challenge their council's parking policies.
Labour ministers confirmed that all three proposals had been dropped.
'Those policies in 'The Plan for Drivers' that would have made no positive difference for drivers have been discontinued,' Ms Greenwood said.
Mr Holden said that Sir Sadiq Khan would be 'licking his lips now he has been given the green light to hammer drivers even more'.
The Mayor of London has overseen a rapid expansion of LTNs in the capital and the introduction of blanket 20mph limits across the city.
The Department for Transport was approached for comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Former Farage adviser claims Britain should not have fought in WW2
Former Farage adviser claims Britain should not have fought in WW2

The Independent

timea minute ago

  • The Independent

Former Farage adviser claims Britain should not have fought in WW2

An adviser who helped Nigel Farage to boost his social media presence has suggested that the UK would have been better off had it not got involved in World War 2, rather than deciding to fight Nazi Germany. In his personal blog, Jack Anderton also suggested Britain should not support Ukraine in its fight against Putin's illegal invasion, saying: 'Russia is not our enemy'. The 23-year old, who helped to run Mr Farage's TikTok account, has never been an official Reform UK employee. The blog, first revealed by the Observer, also saw Mr Anderton claim the UK could 'regain' former colonies such as Australia, Canada and South Africa, as well as suggesting the UK should copy the policy of mass incarceration carried out in El Salvador, which has been condemned as a breach of human rights. In a post from June 2024, titled 'A Self-Interested British Foreign Policy', Mr Anderton wrote: 'Britain spent nearly £3trn on WW1 and WW2. What did we get for that? We are no longer the great power we once were, we don't even get a thanks anymore. 'We impoverished ourselves for decades, we didn't finish paying the loans off to America until 2006. 'Our economy stagnated, we lost an empire, and we are pushed around by America. And Germany, a country we beat, has been richer than us since the 1970s.' He said the only wars that were truly in Britain's interests were the Falklands war and the invasion of Egypt for control of the Suez Canal, adding: 'If Britain had not fought in WW1 and WW2, it would not have had to rely on America for economic support, and it would have had the independence to act accordingly. 'Britain could have developed India, Cyprus, Fiji, Malta, Saint Lucia, Seychelles, The Bahamas, Australia, Canada, South Africa, Ireland and New Zealand. In the coming Meritocracy, perhaps Britain could regain some of these nations.' Suggesting Britain should not be supporting Ukraine, he wrote: 'Whilst yes, we are not at war with Russia, we are sending billions of pounds (that we cannot afford) to prop up a country that we have no allegiance to. 'Russia is not our enemy, they have not attacked Britain. It's perfectly acceptable and preferable to state that Russia is not our enemy, but they are not our friend either, we treat them with suspicion, but we do not escalate a conflict with them. 'Why are we fighting a European war? We do not border any of these countries. In their pursuit of all that is good and a handshake from Zelensky, the British ruling class is pushing this country into a war that we have nothing to do with.' He added: 'At least in WW1, we got some land in the Middle East, we get nothing in return for our support of Ukraine.' In a second post from, also from June 2024, Mr Anderton issues an endorsement of Nayib Bukele's policies - the president of El Salvador who has been accused by Amnesty of committing 'massive human rights violations, including thousands of arbitrary detentions and violations of due process, as well as torture and ill-treatment'. At least 18 people have died in state custody, the organisation said. Seemingly endorsing his policies, Mr Anderton said: 'Extraordinary times require extraordinary measures. I'd even argue the measures aren't that extraordinary and should be in place in times of normalcy.' He added: 'El Salvador is perhaps a lesson for those in Britain who wish to take back control of their country. Power works, and it is all that matters. State power when used effectively is basically omnipotent. 'The meritocracy will be established, criminals and corrupt officials will be jailed, immigration will drop to zero, houses will be built, and our citizens will once again feel proud of the country they call home.'

British horse racing set for unprecedented strike over betting tax changes
British horse racing set for unprecedented strike over betting tax changes

The Independent

timea minute ago

  • The Independent

British horse racing set for unprecedented strike over betting tax changes

British racing will stage an unprecedented one-day strike on 10 September in protest at a proposed rise in taxes on horserace betting. The four scheduled fixtures at Carlisle, Uttoxeter, Lingfield and Kempton will not take place after agreements between the owners of the courses and the British Horseracing Authority, making it the first time the sport has voluntarily refused to race in modern history. The BHA set up the 'Axe the Racing Tax' campaign in response to proposals to replace the existing three-tax structure of online gambling duties with a single tax, with fears the current 15 per cent duty on racing could be increased to the 21 per cent levied on games of chance. Brant Dunshea, chief executive at the British Horseracing Authority, said: "We have decided to take the unprecedented decision to cancel our planned racing fixtures on September 10 to highlight to Government the serious consequences of the Treasury's tax proposals which threaten the very future of our sport. "British racing is already in a precarious financial position and research has shown that a tax rise on racing could be catastrophic for the sport and the thousands of jobs that rely on it in towns and communities across the country. "This is the first time that British racing has chosen not to race due to Government proposals. We haven't taken this decision lightly but in doing so we are urging the Government to rethink this tax proposal to protect the future of our sport which is a cherished part of Britain's heritage and culture. "Our message to Government is clear: axe the racing tax and back British racing." The four tracks involved are operated by the Jockey Club and the Arena Racing Company, with both backing the move. Jim Mullen, CEO at the Jockey Club, said: "We hope this pause for reflection will enable the Government to truly understand the economic impact of horseracing and its cultural significance to communities across the UK, as well as the world-class racing festivals we host. "After this period of reflection, we hope the full implications will be understood, and we can prevent the irreparable damage that threatens a sport the nation is, and should be, proud of." Martin Cruddace, CEO at ARC, added: "We have always been taxed and regulated differently, and it is imperative for our future that we continue to be so. "If the Government wants Britain to be a world leader in online casino and a world pauper in a sport at the heart of its culture, then tax harmonisation will achieve that aim." While the four meetings will be rescheduled, Paul Johnson, chief executive of the National Trainers Federation, underlined the "sacrifice" in calling a halt to the sport for a day. He said: "Cancelling fixtures is a huge sacrifice by racing and should serve as a stark reminder to the Government of the impact its tax raid will have on our sport. "Thousands of jobs are at stake alongside the loss of millions of pounds to the British economy." A Treasury spokesperson said: "We are consulting on bringing the treatment of online betting in line with other forms of online gambling to cut down bureaucracy - it is not about increasing or decreasing rates, and we welcome views from all stakeholders including businesses, trade bodies, the third sector and individuals."

Nigel Farage blasted by Angela Rayner over plans to axe key law - 'failing women'
Nigel Farage blasted by Angela Rayner over plans to axe key law - 'failing women'

Daily Mirror

time2 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Nigel Farage blasted by Angela Rayner over plans to axe key law - 'failing women'

Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner says women would be left at risk of revenge porn under Reform UK's plans to scrap new provisions in Online Safety Act Angela Rayner has warned Nigel Farage risks "failing a generation of young women" over plans to scrap new online safety laws. ‌ The Deputy Prime Minister said women would be left at risk of revenge porn - intimate image abuse - without Online Safety Act provisions. She also warned axing the new law would "open the floodgates of abuse". ‌ Under new rules online platforms such as social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children from accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. Labour said it also protects women and makes the sharing of intimate images without consent a 'priority offence' - the most serious class of online crime. It comes after Mr ‌ READ MORE: Nigel Farage under pressure to distance himself from 'racist' Ant Middleton rant Ms Rayner is the latest senior Labour figure to clash with the ex-Ukip leader Mr Farage since Reform UK vowed to repeal the law. The right-wing party has said it would use a different means to protect kids online - but failed to explain how they would do this. Ms Rayner said: 'Intimate image abuse is a devastating crime and contributes to a vile misogynistic culture on social media that we know translates into physical spaces too. Nigel Farage risks failing a generation of young women with his dangerous and irresponsible plans to scrap online safety laws." She added: "Scrapping safeguards and having no viable alternative plan in place to halt the floodgates of abuse that could open is an appalling dereliction of duty. It's time for Farage to tell women and girls across Britain how he would keep them safe online." Earlier this week the Technology Secretary, Peter Kyle, also stood by his assault on the Reform UK leader after a huge row erupted when he said Mr Farage is on the side of predators like Jimmy Savile. He told The Mirror, the Reform UK leader 'should have regrets about the position he is taking and the hole he's digging himself into". ‌ He continued: 'Nigel Farage wants to overturn that legislation without saying one single word in practical terms how he will keep children safe so he should be deeply regretting the fact that he is causing anxiety to parents and just with his words, risking putting children in deep, deep harm's way." Reform's Westminster councillor Laila Cunningham responded, claiming: "Women are more unsafe than ever before thanks to Labour. Starmer has released thousands of criminals back onto the streets early with no regard for women's safety. I am calling on Jess Phillips to debate me on women's safety - she ignored the grooming gangs scandal and now she's wilfully deceiving voters on this issue. Reform will always prioritise prosecuting abuse but will never let women's safety be hijacked to justify censorship."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store