Duck River, Tennessee waterways could see regulation rollbacks under two proposed bills
John McEwan, whose family has lived on the banks of the Duck River since the 1860s, skips stones on the Duck. (Photo: John Partipilo)
Tennessee conservation groups that support the preservation of the Duck River are warily watching two bills that they say would put the state's waterways at serious risk.
One bill would strip state protections from wetlands that are no longer protected by federal law. Another would scrap a required 2-mile buffer between designated scenic rivers and landfills.
While both bills would have implications for waterways throughout the state should they pass, the Duck River has taken a central role in discussions about their effects.
The Duck River is Tennessee's longest river and the most biodiverse freshwater river in North America. It also serves as the primary water source for roughly a quarter million residents in fast-growing Middle Tennessee.
Environmentalists and advocates have fought for stronger protections for the waterway for years: through court battles, water utility permit appeals and legislative action. Gov. Bill Lee raised the Duck to a level of statewide concern in fall 2024 with an executive order shaping a new advisory committee to balance the river's health with increasing water needs.
It's not clear whether the bills' sponsors intend to pursue their passage this legislative session, and the bills may still be amended.
Collierville Republican Rep. Kevin Vaughan is back this session with another version of his 2024 bill seeking to roll back protections on hundreds of thousands of acres of wetlands.
Vaughan's original bill faced staunch opposition from environmental advocates and was ultimately sent to a legislative summer study session. The Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) presented its report to the Senate Energy, Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee with recommendations for wetlands regulation updates in October.
Developers, seeking to gain from building boom tied to Ford plant, push for weaker wetland rules
Vaughan's 2025 bill appears to be substantially the same as his 2024 proposal. It would prevent TDEC from classifying property as a wetland unless that property is defined as a wetland by federal law. A Supreme Court decision in 2023 constricted the number of federally protected wetlands, cutting out wetlands that are 'isolated,' or do not have surface connections to other federally protected bodies of water.
Vaughan did not respond to requests for comment, but said in 2024 that his bill would have no impact on 'real wetlands,' only small areas created by tractors or livestock. Those, he said, should not be subjected to cumbersome regulations requiring developers to seek permits and complete mitigation efforts to build on or disturb wetlands.
George Nolan, director of the Southern Environmental Law Center's Tennessee office, said the legislation would have a far broader reach.
'That bill, if it passed, would remove all state-level protections for more than 300,000 acres of wetlands,' Nolan told the Lookout. 'That would have tremendous impact, because wetlands help keep us all safe and healthy.'
Wetlands slow down and soak up flood water — Nolan said an acre of wetlands can hold more than a million gallons of water — and they filter water as it moves into the groundwater system to replenish aquifers that provide drinking water. Wetlands also serve as ecologically diverse habitats.
The Harpeth Conservancy, working with data from mapping data firm Skytec, estimates there are roughly 16,000 geographically isolated wetlands that could lose protection along the Duck River. Around 80% of those wetlands take up less than one acre. A little more than half are a quarter acre or less.
'In Middle Tennessee, a hot spot for wetlands is in the upper reaches of the Duck River watershed. The Duck River depends on the groundwater system to recharge that water body,' Nolan said. 'If we destroy wetlands in the upper Duck River watershed, we are going to hurt the river during times of drought.'
The Duck River runs 'right smack dab through the middle' of Hickman County in Dickson Republican Rep. Jody Barrett's district. His constituents are passionate about protecting the river's natural resources and beauty.
Barrett is a real estate attorney and said he understands what Vaughan may be trying to do from a development standpoint, but Barrett still has concerns about the bill. He draws a comparison to a blank canvas. Twenty or 30 dots on that canvas may not look like much, but make it 20,000 to 30,000, and 'it starts filling in pretty quickly.'
'That's what I would fear from this bill,' Barrett said. 'Yes, on its face, it may seem innocuous — that we're only affecting a really small piece of ground — but when you do that multiple times across the entire state, then eventually that's going to really start having an impact.'
Barrett's district doesn't have the type of development that Vaughan's bill might be trying to address, but his constituents recognize that, eventually, growth will reach Hickman County. He's concerned that upstream decisions — including potential destruction of wetlands — could have negative effects for downstream counties like Hickman.
Yes, on its face, it may seem innocuous — that we're only affecting a really small piece of ground — but when you do that multiple times across the entire state, then eventually that's going to really start having an impact.
– Rep. Jody Barrett, R- Dickson
'If we're going to start touching these wetlands, which act as filters and catch basins that slow that rage of water down, what measures are we requiring to be put in their place to make sure that downstream counties, populations and farmers are still being protected,' Barrett asked.
Madison County Republican Rep. Chris Todd said he's not sure if he will advance a bill removing landfill buffers for scenic rivers this session, but he's 'leaning toward it.'
A spokesperson for Calhoun Republican Sen. Adam Lowe, the sponsor for the bill's senate version, indicated it would not run this year.
But Todd said he doesn't intend for the bill to undo protections bestowed on portions of the Duck River in 2023 as a company sought to place landfills on Maury County property that was once owned by agrochemical company Monsanto. Hohenwald Republican Sen. Joey Hensley and Culleoka Republican Rep. Scott Cepicky carried that legislation.
Trinity Business Group sought permits from TDEC to install two landfills on the property, a federally designated Superfund site containing hazardous substances from its Monsanto days. Maury County officials and residents moved quickly to block the permits, citing a law requiring local approval for landfills.
Louisiana landfill company pushes back on Duck River protections
The company sued, and the case remains ongoing.
If he does move the bill forward, he told the Lookout that he'll add an amendment grandfathering in protections approved under the existing law.
Todd's district in Madison County is dozens of miles away from the Duck River, and he said he doesn't have any concerns about a similar situation playing out on West Tennessee rivers.
Todd sees the landfill protections applied to portions of the Duck River a few years ago to be an abuse of the state's Scenic Rivers Act, which was 'never meant to be used like this,' he said. This bill has more to do with the principle than the specific river, he said.
'This bill was only related to the Duck River, maybe in a few people's minds, in that this law that I intend to change has been weaponized in the past to circumvent … our solid waste laws that are already in place and bypass the normal processes for landfill approvals,' Todd said.
Barrett said Todd's bill is 'in direct contrast' to a bill he's proposed that would classify the section of the Duck River that lies within Hickman County as a Class II scenic waterway. The classification would allow private landowners the option to participate in environmental and development protections to ensure the land stays pastoral as Middle Tennessee grows.
Barrett said he hasn't spoken to Todd about the bill and he doesn't know what Todd's motivations are, 'but certainly his bill would be contradictory to the interests of the citizens of Hickman County that are seeking to protect our river from all sorts of future development — not just landfills, but other issues that might eventually have negative impacts.'
Grace Stranch, CEO of nonprofit conservation group Harpeth Conservancy, disagrees with Todd's characterization of scenic river protections being 'weaponized.'
'The legislative intent behind the Tennessee Scenic Rivers Act was to protect rivers with outstanding qualities for present and future benefit to the people,' Strach wrote in an email to the Lookout.
The legislature added the provision prohibiting landfills within two miles of a scenic river in 1990.
'The Duck River, North America's most aquatically biodiverse river, clearly meets the criteria for designation,' Stranch wrote. 'The timing of new designations is irrelevant if they are fulfilling the legislative intent. Removing the landfill prohibition that has been in place for over 30 years erodes the purpose and necessary protections for our outstanding rivers.'
Freshwater mussel shells glisten in the sunlight in just a few inches of water in the Duck River. (Photo: John Partipilo/Tennessee Lookout)
Rep. Jody Barrett, a Dickson Republican, at right with landowner Doug Jones, is concerned potential destruction of wetlands could have negative effects for downstream counties in his district. (Photo: John Partipilo/ Tennessee Lookout)
A portion of the Duck River, Tennessee's longest river, in Coffee County. (Photo: John Partipilo)
Todd said he wouldn't have concerns about putting a landfill less than two miles from the Duck or other rivers because of the 'tight control TDEC has on landfills.'
Environmental advocates think otherwise.
Nolan said having a landfill near the river would carry 'a big risk of harmful pollution impacting the river as well as the scenic beauty of the river being harmed.'
Duck River Conservancy Chairman Doug Jones said the bottom line is 'landfills leak.' He and his group know that landfills are necessary and Middle Tennessee needs them, but said the river needs protection.
'It's just common sense,' Jones said. 'You don't build landfills by scenic rivers … or any river for that matter. You're just asking for trouble.'
Todd also rebuffed rumors that he has nefarious intentions toward the Duck River, or would renege on his pledge to amend the bill so it's not retroactive. He's heard concerns that another bill he's proposed this session that would require water and waste regulations to be based in 'sound science' is related to his proposed landfill legislation. He says that's false.
When asked, Todd said he's not aware of any standing Tennessee regulations that were not based on sound science.
'It's just a topic I've heard discussed and thought, 'That may be something we need to look at,'' he said.
Stranch said even if the bill is amended to grandfather in rivers that already have landfill buffers in place, other rivers would suffer.
'Landfills pose unique risks to our outstanding rivers; allowing them so close to our rivers will ensure future rivers designated Class II under the Tennessee Scenic River Act will not have the same necessary protections for our present and future generations,' she said.
Anita Wadhwani contributed to this story.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
11 minutes ago
- New York Times
Texas Governor Will Deploy National Guard to Immigration Protests
Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas said late Tuesday that he would deploy National Guard troops across the state, making him the first governor to do so as protests against the Trump administration's immigration crackdown spread across the United States. Mr. Abbott, a Republican and a vocal supporter of President Trump's immigration agenda, said on social media that he would not tolerate violence as protests are planned in San Antonio on Wednesday. The protests that began in Los Angeles last Friday against federal immigration raids have spread to more than a dozen U.S. cities, including Dallas, Austin, Houston and San Antonio. While many of the protests have been peaceful, police have clashed with demonstrators at some of them. Mr. Trump has threatened to override governors who don't want to send National Guard troops to stop protests, like the president did in California, where he sent nearly 5,000 National Guard troops and Marines over the strong objections of state leaders. That has made California ground zero for Mr. Trump's immigration agenda, which includes ramping up deportations of undocumented immigrants with the help of local law enforcement agencies and, in a rare action, active-duty military forces. Mr. Abbott's announcement said that the Texas National Guard will 'use every tool & strategy to help law enforcement maintain order.' 'Peaceful protest is legal,' he added. 'Harming a person or property is illegal & will lead to arrest.' The announcement did not specify where and when the troops will be deployed. Mr. Abbott's office, the San Antonio Police Department, the Texas National Guard and U.S. Northern Command did not immediately respond to requests for comment. On Monday night, more than a dozen protesters were arrested in Austin during a demonstration at the Texas Capitol in Austin, Mr. Abbott had said. Law enforcement officials used tear gas and pepper ball projectiles, the Texas Department of Public Safety said.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US cities brace for more protests as parts of Los Angeles placed under curfew
By Brad Brooks, Phil Stewart, Idrees Ali and Dietrich Knauth LOS ANGELES (Reuters) -Several U.S. cities braced for protests on Wednesday against President Donald Trump's sweeping immigration raids, as parts of the country's second largest city Los Angeles spent the night under curfew in an effort to quell five days of unrest. The Governor of Texas, Republican Greg Abbott, said he will deploy the National Guard this week, ahead of planned protests. Protesters and police in Austin clashed on Monday. Trump's extraordinary measures of sending National Guard and Marines to quell protests in Los Angeles has sparked a national debate on the use of military on U.S. soil and pitted the Republican president against California's Democrat governor. "This brazen abuse of power by a sitting president inflamed a combustible situation, putting our people, our officers and even our National Guard at risk. That's when the downward spiral began," California Governor Gavin Newsom said in a video address on Tuesday. "He again chose escalation. He chose more force. He chose theatrics over public safety. ... Democracy is under assault." Newsom, widely seen as preparing for a presidential run in 2028, and the state of California sued Trump and the Defense Department on Monday, seeking to block the deployment of federal troops. Trump in turn has suggested Newsom should be arrested. Hundreds of U.S. Marines arrived in the Los Angeles area on Tuesday under orders from Trump, after he also ordered the deployment of 4,000 National Guard to the city. Marines and National Guard are to be used in the protection of government personnel and buildings and not in police action. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said the deployments were not necessary as police could manage the protest, the majority of which have been peaceful, and limited to about five streets. However, due to looting and violence at night she imposed a curfew over one square mile of the city's downtown, starting Tuesday night. The curfew will last several days. Police said multiple groups stayed on the streets in some areas despite the curfew and "mass arrests" were initiated. Police earlier said that 197 people had already been arrested on Tuesday - more than double the total number of arrests to date. Democratic leaders have raised concerns over a national crisis in what has become the most intense flashpoint yet in the Trump administration's efforts to deport migrants living in the country illegally, and then crack down on opponents who take to the streets in protest. Trump, voted back into office last year largely for his promise to deport undocumented immigrants, used a speech honoring soldiers on Tuesday to defend his decision. He told troops at the army base in Fort Bragg, North Carolina: "Generations of army heroes did not shed their blood on distant shores only to watch our country be destroyed by invasion and third-world lawlessness." 'FULL-BLOWN ASSAULT' "What you're witnessing in California is a full-blown assault on peace, on public order and on national sovereignty, carried out by rioters bearing foreign flags," Trump said, adding his administration would "liberate Los Angeles." Demonstrators have waved the flags of Mexico and other countries in solidarity for the migrants rounded up in a series of intensifying raids. Homeland Security said on Monday its Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) division had arrested 2,000 immigration offenders per day recently, far above the 311 daily average in fiscal year 2024 under former President Joe Biden. Protests have also taken place in other cities including New York, Atlanta and Chicago, where demonstrators shouted at and scuffled with officers. Some protesters climbed onto the Picasso sculpture in Daley Plaza, while others chanted that ICE should be abolished. Texas Governor Abbott said late on Tuesday that he will deploy the National Guard, which "will use every tool & strategy to help law enforcement maintain order." "Texas National Guard will be deployed to locations across the state to ensure peace & order. Peaceful protest is legal. Harming a person or property is illegal & will lead to arrest," Abbott posted on X. South Texas organizations are expected to hold anti-ICE rallies on Wednesday and Saturday, CNN reported local media as saying. About 700 Marines were in a staging area in the Seal Beach area about 30 miles (50 km) south of Los Angeles on Tuesday, awaiting deployment to specific locations, a U.S. official said. California Attorney General Rob Bonta told Reuters the state was concerned about allowing federal troops to protect personnel, saying there was a risk that could violate an 1878 law that generally forbids the U.S. military, including the National Guard, from taking part in civilian law enforcement. "Protecting personnel likely means accompanying ICE agents into communities and neighborhoods, and protecting functions could mean protecting the ICE function of enforcing the immigration law," Bonta said. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement on Tuesday posted photos on X of National Guard troops accompanying ICE officers on an immigration raid. Trump administration officials have vowed to redouble the immigration raids in response to the street protests. The last time the military was used for direct police action under the Insurrection Act was in 1992, when the California governor at the time asked President George H.W. Bush to help respond to Los Angeles riots over the acquittal of police officers who beat Black motorist Rodney King.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk says he 'regrets' some of his posts about Donald Trump
Elon Musk has said he "regrets" some of his posts about Donald Trump, saying they "went too far". Musk posted a series of tweets on X last week in a fiery exchange between the pair. Among them, the Tesla and SpaceX chief executive described the president's sweeping tax and spending bill as a "disgusting abomination". Last Thursday, the billionaire also posted on X saying the president . The post was deleted by Sunday, along with some others accusing the president of wrongdoing. The White House dismissed Musk's Epstein claims at the time, with press secretary Karoline Leavitt saying: "This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill [a Republican tax and spending bill] because it does not include the policies he wanted. "The president is focused on passing this historic piece of legislation and making our country great again." Musk did not specify which posts he regretted. Read more from Sky News:Trump and Musk's extraordinary spat minute-by-minute7 things you may not know about Elon Musk In another post last Thursday, Musk attacked Mr Trump's tariffs, saying they "will cause a recession in the second half of this year." In response, President Trump said Musk had "lost his mind" in an interview with , threatened to cancel government contracts with Musk's companies and said he had asked the billionaire to leave the White House. But yesterday, Musk's father Errol Musk told Sky News' Moscow correspondent Ivor Bennett: "It's like any argument. Everybody at some point says I'll never make up, but then they do later." He said the argument likely happened because of "emotions welling out of hand". "They've had five months of intense day and night, hardly any sleep, and anybody who went through that would know your nerves are pretty much shredded after that time." He also said his son text him saying: "Don't worry, we're sorting it out". The spat hit shares, which closed down 14.3% last Thursday, losing about $150bn (£111bn) in value. They've since regained much of their value compared to the beginning of the month.