Duck River, Tennessee waterways could see regulation rollbacks under two proposed bills
John McEwan, whose family has lived on the banks of the Duck River since the 1860s, skips stones on the Duck. (Photo: John Partipilo)
Tennessee conservation groups that support the preservation of the Duck River are warily watching two bills that they say would put the state's waterways at serious risk.
One bill would strip state protections from wetlands that are no longer protected by federal law. Another would scrap a required 2-mile buffer between designated scenic rivers and landfills.
While both bills would have implications for waterways throughout the state should they pass, the Duck River has taken a central role in discussions about their effects.
The Duck River is Tennessee's longest river and the most biodiverse freshwater river in North America. It also serves as the primary water source for roughly a quarter million residents in fast-growing Middle Tennessee.
Environmentalists and advocates have fought for stronger protections for the waterway for years: through court battles, water utility permit appeals and legislative action. Gov. Bill Lee raised the Duck to a level of statewide concern in fall 2024 with an executive order shaping a new advisory committee to balance the river's health with increasing water needs.
It's not clear whether the bills' sponsors intend to pursue their passage this legislative session, and the bills may still be amended.
Collierville Republican Rep. Kevin Vaughan is back this session with another version of his 2024 bill seeking to roll back protections on hundreds of thousands of acres of wetlands.
Vaughan's original bill faced staunch opposition from environmental advocates and was ultimately sent to a legislative summer study session. The Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) presented its report to the Senate Energy, Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee with recommendations for wetlands regulation updates in October.
Developers, seeking to gain from building boom tied to Ford plant, push for weaker wetland rules
Vaughan's 2025 bill appears to be substantially the same as his 2024 proposal. It would prevent TDEC from classifying property as a wetland unless that property is defined as a wetland by federal law. A Supreme Court decision in 2023 constricted the number of federally protected wetlands, cutting out wetlands that are 'isolated,' or do not have surface connections to other federally protected bodies of water.
Vaughan did not respond to requests for comment, but said in 2024 that his bill would have no impact on 'real wetlands,' only small areas created by tractors or livestock. Those, he said, should not be subjected to cumbersome regulations requiring developers to seek permits and complete mitigation efforts to build on or disturb wetlands.
George Nolan, director of the Southern Environmental Law Center's Tennessee office, said the legislation would have a far broader reach.
'That bill, if it passed, would remove all state-level protections for more than 300,000 acres of wetlands,' Nolan told the Lookout. 'That would have tremendous impact, because wetlands help keep us all safe and healthy.'
Wetlands slow down and soak up flood water — Nolan said an acre of wetlands can hold more than a million gallons of water — and they filter water as it moves into the groundwater system to replenish aquifers that provide drinking water. Wetlands also serve as ecologically diverse habitats.
The Harpeth Conservancy, working with data from mapping data firm Skytec, estimates there are roughly 16,000 geographically isolated wetlands that could lose protection along the Duck River. Around 80% of those wetlands take up less than one acre. A little more than half are a quarter acre or less.
'In Middle Tennessee, a hot spot for wetlands is in the upper reaches of the Duck River watershed. The Duck River depends on the groundwater system to recharge that water body,' Nolan said. 'If we destroy wetlands in the upper Duck River watershed, we are going to hurt the river during times of drought.'
The Duck River runs 'right smack dab through the middle' of Hickman County in Dickson Republican Rep. Jody Barrett's district. His constituents are passionate about protecting the river's natural resources and beauty.
Barrett is a real estate attorney and said he understands what Vaughan may be trying to do from a development standpoint, but Barrett still has concerns about the bill. He draws a comparison to a blank canvas. Twenty or 30 dots on that canvas may not look like much, but make it 20,000 to 30,000, and 'it starts filling in pretty quickly.'
'That's what I would fear from this bill,' Barrett said. 'Yes, on its face, it may seem innocuous — that we're only affecting a really small piece of ground — but when you do that multiple times across the entire state, then eventually that's going to really start having an impact.'
Barrett's district doesn't have the type of development that Vaughan's bill might be trying to address, but his constituents recognize that, eventually, growth will reach Hickman County. He's concerned that upstream decisions — including potential destruction of wetlands — could have negative effects for downstream counties like Hickman.
Yes, on its face, it may seem innocuous — that we're only affecting a really small piece of ground — but when you do that multiple times across the entire state, then eventually that's going to really start having an impact.
– Rep. Jody Barrett, R- Dickson
'If we're going to start touching these wetlands, which act as filters and catch basins that slow that rage of water down, what measures are we requiring to be put in their place to make sure that downstream counties, populations and farmers are still being protected,' Barrett asked.
Madison County Republican Rep. Chris Todd said he's not sure if he will advance a bill removing landfill buffers for scenic rivers this session, but he's 'leaning toward it.'
A spokesperson for Calhoun Republican Sen. Adam Lowe, the sponsor for the bill's senate version, indicated it would not run this year.
But Todd said he doesn't intend for the bill to undo protections bestowed on portions of the Duck River in 2023 as a company sought to place landfills on Maury County property that was once owned by agrochemical company Monsanto. Hohenwald Republican Sen. Joey Hensley and Culleoka Republican Rep. Scott Cepicky carried that legislation.
Trinity Business Group sought permits from TDEC to install two landfills on the property, a federally designated Superfund site containing hazardous substances from its Monsanto days. Maury County officials and residents moved quickly to block the permits, citing a law requiring local approval for landfills.
Louisiana landfill company pushes back on Duck River protections
The company sued, and the case remains ongoing.
If he does move the bill forward, he told the Lookout that he'll add an amendment grandfathering in protections approved under the existing law.
Todd's district in Madison County is dozens of miles away from the Duck River, and he said he doesn't have any concerns about a similar situation playing out on West Tennessee rivers.
Todd sees the landfill protections applied to portions of the Duck River a few years ago to be an abuse of the state's Scenic Rivers Act, which was 'never meant to be used like this,' he said. This bill has more to do with the principle than the specific river, he said.
'This bill was only related to the Duck River, maybe in a few people's minds, in that this law that I intend to change has been weaponized in the past to circumvent … our solid waste laws that are already in place and bypass the normal processes for landfill approvals,' Todd said.
Barrett said Todd's bill is 'in direct contrast' to a bill he's proposed that would classify the section of the Duck River that lies within Hickman County as a Class II scenic waterway. The classification would allow private landowners the option to participate in environmental and development protections to ensure the land stays pastoral as Middle Tennessee grows.
Barrett said he hasn't spoken to Todd about the bill and he doesn't know what Todd's motivations are, 'but certainly his bill would be contradictory to the interests of the citizens of Hickman County that are seeking to protect our river from all sorts of future development — not just landfills, but other issues that might eventually have negative impacts.'
Grace Stranch, CEO of nonprofit conservation group Harpeth Conservancy, disagrees with Todd's characterization of scenic river protections being 'weaponized.'
'The legislative intent behind the Tennessee Scenic Rivers Act was to protect rivers with outstanding qualities for present and future benefit to the people,' Strach wrote in an email to the Lookout.
The legislature added the provision prohibiting landfills within two miles of a scenic river in 1990.
'The Duck River, North America's most aquatically biodiverse river, clearly meets the criteria for designation,' Stranch wrote. 'The timing of new designations is irrelevant if they are fulfilling the legislative intent. Removing the landfill prohibition that has been in place for over 30 years erodes the purpose and necessary protections for our outstanding rivers.'
Freshwater mussel shells glisten in the sunlight in just a few inches of water in the Duck River. (Photo: John Partipilo/Tennessee Lookout)
Rep. Jody Barrett, a Dickson Republican, at right with landowner Doug Jones, is concerned potential destruction of wetlands could have negative effects for downstream counties in his district. (Photo: John Partipilo/ Tennessee Lookout)
A portion of the Duck River, Tennessee's longest river, in Coffee County. (Photo: John Partipilo)
Todd said he wouldn't have concerns about putting a landfill less than two miles from the Duck or other rivers because of the 'tight control TDEC has on landfills.'
Environmental advocates think otherwise.
Nolan said having a landfill near the river would carry 'a big risk of harmful pollution impacting the river as well as the scenic beauty of the river being harmed.'
Duck River Conservancy Chairman Doug Jones said the bottom line is 'landfills leak.' He and his group know that landfills are necessary and Middle Tennessee needs them, but said the river needs protection.
'It's just common sense,' Jones said. 'You don't build landfills by scenic rivers … or any river for that matter. You're just asking for trouble.'
Todd also rebuffed rumors that he has nefarious intentions toward the Duck River, or would renege on his pledge to amend the bill so it's not retroactive. He's heard concerns that another bill he's proposed this session that would require water and waste regulations to be based in 'sound science' is related to his proposed landfill legislation. He says that's false.
When asked, Todd said he's not aware of any standing Tennessee regulations that were not based on sound science.
'It's just a topic I've heard discussed and thought, 'That may be something we need to look at,'' he said.
Stranch said even if the bill is amended to grandfather in rivers that already have landfill buffers in place, other rivers would suffer.
'Landfills pose unique risks to our outstanding rivers; allowing them so close to our rivers will ensure future rivers designated Class II under the Tennessee Scenic River Act will not have the same necessary protections for our present and future generations,' she said.
Anita Wadhwani contributed to this story.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Says 'Bring in the Troops' as LA Riots Escalate
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump called for troops to enter Los Angeles amid rioting in the Californian city that stemmed from protests against immigration enforcement. The Republican president is deploying 2,000 California National Guard troops to L.A. to quell the intense violence, despite opposition from Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom. "Looking really bad in L.A. BRING IN THE TROOPS!!!" Trump posted to his Truth Social platform in the early hours of Monday morning. This is a developing story. Updates to follow.


Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
BlackRock, State Street to urge dismissal of collusion case, Bloomberg says
BlackRock (BLK), Vanguard Group, and the asset management arm of State Street (STT) are headed to court over a lawsuit brought by Republican state attorneys general claiming they colluded to reduce coal output, Josh Sisco and Silla Brush of Bloomberg reports. Lawyers from the companies are set to urge a federal judge to dismiss the case. The suit claims the firm have large stakes in coal producers and profited when energy prices soared. Confident Investing Starts Here:
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Unsubstantiated 'chemtrail' conspiracy theories lead to legislation proposed in US statehouses
BATON ROUGE, La. (AP) — As Louisiana Rep. Kimberly Landry Coates stood before her colleagues in the state's Legislature she warned that the bill she was presenting might 'seem strange' or even crazy. Some lawmakers laughed with disbelief and others listened intently, as Coates described situations that are often noted in discussions of 'chemtrails' — a decades-old conspiracy theory that posits the white lines left behind by aircraft in the sky are releasing chemicals for any number of reasons, some of them nefarious. As she urged lawmakers to ban the unsubstantiated practice, she told skeptics to 'start looking up' at the sky. 'I'm really worried about what is going on above us and what is happening, and we as Louisiana citizens did not give anyone the right to do this above us,' the Republican said. Louisiana is the latest state taking inspiration from a wide-ranging conspiratorial narrative, mixing it with facts, to create legislation. Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee signed a similar measure into law last year and one in Florida has passed both the House and the Senate. More than a dozen other states, from New York to Arizona, have introduced their own legislation. Such bills being crafted is indicative of how misinformation is moving beyond the online world and into public policy. Elevating unsubstantiated theories or outright falsehoods into the legislative arena not only erodes democratic processes, according to experts, it provides credibility where there is none and takes away resources from actual issues that need to be addressed. 'Every bill like this is kind of symbolic, or is introduced to appease a very vocal group, but it can still cause real harm by signaling that these conspiracies deserve this level of legal attention,' said Donnell Probst, interim executive director of the National Association for Media Literacy Education. Louisiana's bill, which is awaiting Republican Gov. Jeff Landry's signature, prohibits anyone from 'intentionally" injecting, releasing, applying or dispersing chemicals into the atmosphere with the purpose of affecting the 'temperature, weather, climate, or intensity of sunlight.' It also requires the Department of Environmental Quality to collect reports from anyone who believes they have observed such activities. While some lawmakers have targeted real weather modification techniques that are not widespread or still in their infancy, others have pointed to dubious evidence to support legislation. Discussion about weather control and banning 'chemtrails' has been hoisted into the spotlight by high-profile political officials, including Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene. Recently, Marla Maples, the ex-wife of President Donald Trump, spoke in support of Florida's legislation. She said she was motivated to 'start digging' after seeing a rise in Alzheimer's. Asked jokingly by a Democratic state senator if she knew anyone in the federal government who could help on the issue, Maples smiled and said, 'I sure do.' Chemtrails vs. contrails Chemtrail conspiracy theories, which have been widely debunked and include a myriad of claims, are not new. The publication of a 1996 Air Force report on the possible future benefits of weather modification is often cited as an early driver of the narrative. Some say that evidence of the claims is happening right before the publics' eyes, alleging that the white streaks stretching behind aircrafts reveal chemicals being spread in the air, for everything from climate manipulation to mind control. Ken Leppert, an associate professor of atmospheric science at the University of Louisiana Monroe, said the streaks are actually primarily composed of water and that there is 'no malicious intent behind' the thin clouds. He says the streaks are formed as exhaust is emitted from aircrafts, when the humidity is high and air temperature is low, and that ship engines produce the same phenomenon. A fact sheet about contrails, published by multiple government agencies including NASA and the Environmental Protection Agency, explains that the streaks left behind by planes do not pose health risks to humans. However, the trails, which have been produced since the earliest days of jet aviation, do impact the cloudiness of Earth's atmosphere and can therefore affect atmospheric temperature and climate. Scientists have overwhelmingly agreed that data or evidence cited as proof of chemtrails 'could be explained through other factors, including well-understood physics and chemistry associated with aircraft contrails and atmospheric aerosols,' according to a 2016 survey published in the journal Environmental Research Letters. In the survey of 77 chemists and geochemists, 76 said they were not aware of evidence proving the existence of a secret large-scale atmospheric program. 'It's pure myth and conspiracy,' Leppert said. Cloud seeding While many of the arguments lawmakers have used to support the chemtrails narrative are not based in fact, others misrepresent actual scientific endeavors, such as cloud seeding; a process by which an artificial material — usually silver iodide — is used to induce precipitation or to clear fog. 'It's maybe really weak control of the weather, but it's not like we're going to move this cloud here, move this hurricane here, or anything like that,' Leppert said. Parker Cardwell, an employee of a California-based cloud seeding company called Rainmaker, testified before lawmakers in Louisiana and asked that an amendment be made to the legislation to avoid impacts to the industry. The practice is an imprecise undertaking with mixed results that isn't widely used, especially in Louisiana, which has significant natural rainfall. According to Louisiana's Department of Agriculture and Forestry, a cloud seeding permit or license has never been issued in the state. Geoengineering While presenting Louisiana's bill last week, Coates said her research found charts and graphics from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration on spraying the air with heavy metals to reflect sunlight back into space to cool the Earth. The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2022 directed the Office of Science and Technology Policy, with support from NOAA, to develop an initial governance framework and research plan related to solar radiation modification, or SRM. A resulting report, which Coates holds up in the House session, focuses on possible future actions and does not reflect decisions that had already been made. SRM 'refers to deliberate, large-scale actions intended to decrease global average surface temperatures by increasing the reflection of sunlight away from the Earth,' according to NOAA. It is a type of geoengineering. Research into the viability of many methods and potential unintended consequences is ongoing, but none have actually been deployed. Taking focus In recent years, misinformation and conspiratorial narratives have become more common during the debates and committee testimonies that are a part of Louisiana's lawmaking process. And while legislators say Louisiana's new bill doesn't really have teeth, opponents say it still takes away time and focus from important work and more pressing topics. State Rep. Denise Marcelle, a Democrat who opposed Louisiana's bill, pointed to other issues ailing the state, which has some of the highest incarceration, poverty, crime, and maternal mortality rates. 'I just feel like we owe the people of Louisiana much more than to be talking about things that I don't see and that aren't real,' she said. ___ Associated Press writers Kate Payne in Tallahassee, Florida, and Jack Dura in Bismarck, North Dakota, contributed to this story.