Barrister's standing to bring case for Islamic Cultural Centre must be clarified, judge tells court
High Court
judge has said he wants to be satisfied that a barrister acting in a challenge to a new board of the company running the
Islamic Cultural Centre of Ireland
has the required status to do so.
Mr Justice David Nolan said he was not prepared to hear
the case relating to control of the Al Maktoum Foundation CLG,
which owns the centre in Clonskeagh, Dublin, until barrister Joseph Sallabi, who says he is in-house counsel for the company, satisfies the court as to his legal standing to bring the case and that he is employed by the foundation company.
The judge adjourned the matter to next week for clarification on his standing from the legal services providers' watchdog, the Legal Services Regulatory Authority (LSRA).
The dispute arose over what Mr Sallabi told the court was the
unlawful appointment of new directors to the foundation company.
READ MORE
Mr Sallabi brought the case on behalf of
Meath-based consultant, Dr Abdel Basset Elsayed,
who said he has been a director of the foundation company since 2012 but says the purported appointments of four new directors to the board were invalid and did not follow the requirements of the company's constitution.
The new directors, who are notice parties in the case, dispute the claims and argue Dr Elsayed cannot bring the case as he does not have instructions on behalf of the board.
There are five notice parties: Ahmad Tahlak, Hesham Abdulla Al Quassim, Khalifa Aldaboos, Mohamed Musabeh Dhahi and Zahid Jami, all of Roebuck Road, Clonskeagh.
The court previously heard the mosque and school at the centre have closed and that the matter required an urgent hearing.
The case came before Mr Justice Nolan on Friday when Lyndon MacCann SC, for the notice party directors, said his side did not accept Mr Sallabi's claim that he had instructions from the company which has its own law firm who have not given him instructions.
Mr Sallabi said their case alleges that there has been fraud in company law in the way in which the only other board member at the time called a meeting, excluding Dr Elsayed, and set up a new board. He said the company was essentially stolen.
Mr Justice Nolan said he was concerned about Mr Sallabi's legal standing to bring the case as it is disputed that he was in-house counsel, that he was acting on the instructions of Dr Elsayed alone and would only be able to present the case if he had instructions on behalf of the company.
He was concerned about the fact he claimed to be in-house counsel when he had his own business in Dublin and was acting as in-house counsel for another party. He was also concerned that Mr Sallabi said he was paid to act in cash by Dr Elsayed.
Mr Sallabi later in the day provided the judge with material which he said showed he received payments for his work which he lodged in his account as coming from the company.
However, the judge said he wanted to hear from the LSRA next week and if they said they cannot help, then so be it.
He refused Mr Sallabi's request to join the Attorney General to the case in relation to his standing rather than the LSRA as counsel said the LSRA had told him it does not give legal advice.
The judge said he would not do so because the Attorney General only acts in the public interest and this was a private interest matter.
Mr Sallabi also asked the judge to recuse himself because counsel felt 'you did not handle it fairly and you clearly favour the other side'.
The judge gave him liberty to bring a recusal application.
When Mr Sallabi said 'full impartiality', the judge said counsel did not understand the issues before the court and it was not the case the court had made any decision. He added he had to be satisfied as to Mr Sallabi's legal standing and from what he had seen made him very worried about his standing.
Earlier the judge said while he had been told this case involved fraud he was 'not sure which way the fraud runs and I will wait and see'.
He also said he thought Mr Sallabi was 'out of your depth' and his client should consider that he needed some help as he was 'someone so young in practice'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
27 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Independent ministers seek changes to inheritance tax system for adults with no children
Independent Ministers have pushed for changes to the inheritance tax system for the beneficiaries of estates left by people with no children. A campaign group known as Edit (End Discrimination in Inheritance Tax) has been contacting politicians as part of efforts to bring about reforms to the capital acquisitions tax (CAT) regime, which it says is 'grossly unfair'. Independent Ministers of State Michael Healy-Rae and Marian Harkin have raised the issue with Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe . Their separate interventions are included in records released under the Freedom of Information Act. CAT applies at a rate of 33 per cent on gifts or inheritances above certain tax-free thresholds that depend on the beneficiary's relationship to the person that gives them the gift or inheritance. READ MORE For spouses and civil partners, inheritances are free of tax. Children inheriting from a parent can receive up to €400,000 tax-free. For other relatives a tax-free threshold of €40,000 applies, while non-relatives can receive up to €20,000 tax free. Edit argues the thresholds that apply to the beneficiaries of the estates of childless adults are 'discriminatory'. One option Edit has proposed would be allowing people to inherit a home tax-free and to abolish the thresholds in favour of an across-the-board 10 per cent levy on all other assets. Mr Healy-Rae and Ms Harkin highlighted Edit's campaign in contacts with Mr Donohoe last March. Kerry TD Mr Healy-Rae included correspondence from Edit by saying it is a 'genuine campaign for people who do not have children', who are being 'unfairly' treated by the tax system. He said the information he enclosed 'may be helpful in future budgets'. This week Mr Healy-Rae said 'this is something I am very much pursuing and would like to see changed', though he did not offer specifics on what he would like to see happen. Mr Healy-Rae also said: 'I am acutely aware of the pressures on the upcoming budget', including 'the threat of tariffs to our economy' and issues such as the proposal to cut the VAT rate for the hospitality sector. 'I will continue to push for change on this and while it may not be possible for this upcoming budget it's something I'm focused on for the lifetime of this Government,' he said. In her email to Mr Donohoe, Sligo-Leitrim TD Ms Harkin told the Minister she received representations from a number of constituents on inheritance tax for couples who do not have children. She asked that the issue be reviewed 'with a view to increasing the threshold'. A spokesman for Ms Harkin said she has 'no further comment on the issue'. The Department of Finance said: 'It is a long-standing practice of the Minister for Finance not to comment in advance of the budget on any tax matters which might be the subject of budget decisions.' It noted that inheritance tax was covered in this year's Tax Strategy Papers, in which department officials set out options that inform the budget process. Government backbenchers Aindrias Moynihan and Shay Brennan of Fianna Fáil and Barry Ward of Fine Gael asked Mr Donohoe about CAT in parliamentary questions last month. As part of his answer, Mr Donohoe said: 'There would be a significant cost in making any further substantial changes to CAT' and 'the options available for setting CAT thresholds must be balanced against competing demands'.
The Journal
33 minutes ago
- The Journal
Ireland's biggest landlord sells 16 apartments for €6.6m and welcomes new rental regulations
IRELAND'S BIGGEST PRIVATE residential landlord sold 16 apartments for €6.6 million in the first half of this year, netting €1.6 million over their book value. Ires Reit's chief executive said that the Dublin-based company had achieved 'in excess of 25% premium to book value' in the sale of the underperforming assets. Advertisement The sales of the properties are part of the company's asset disposal programme. 'The first six months of the year have seen a step change in our operational and financial performance leading to significant improvements in margins and earnings,' said Eddie Byrne. He also said the company was 'well positioned to capitalise on the improving regulatory and market backdrop,' referring to the government's reforms that allow landlords to reset rent between tenancies. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
An Post ‘continuing' work to rectify customer direct debits ‘error'
An Post said it is still working to rectify an issue that is holding up direct debit payments for some of its around 90,000 current account customers. The State-owned postal group confirmed on Thursday evening that it was 'working to correct an error' that led to some direct debits being recalled incorrectly, meaning vendors did not receive customer payments despite the money appearing to leave their An Post Money accounts. On Friday morning, a spokeswoman for An Post said that 'work is continuing to rectify the issue' and that it will update on progress later. She said the postal operator continues to expect the error to be resolved by midday on Friday. READ MORE It is not clear how many customers have been impacted by the error. An Post had some 90,000 current account customers in 2024, according to its most recent annual report, but the postal service said the issue only affected those with direct debit payments scheduled for Thursday. [ An Post chief 'absolutely furious' at Cabinet leak as Taoiseach expresses 'full confidence' in company Opens in new window ] The spokeswoman said the error affected only a 'small number' of An Post Money account holders. One customer told The Irish Times they were alerted to the issue when their mobile phone network operator did not receive a regular payment from their An Post Money current account. The money had left the account, they said, but had not been received by the vendor, and An Post was unable to tell them when the money would be returned. The customer said they were advised by An Post to pay the vendor directly instead. The spokeswoman for An Post said: 'We are not advising [and never did advise] customers to make payments directly to any vendors.' The Central Bank of Ireland, which regulates An Post Money, was approached for comment.
