‘I'm a millionaire fleeing Britain – a Reeves U-turn would stop me leaving'
I have a spreadsheet open in front of me on my computer, detailing the exact number of days I have left to stay in the UK this tax year. The reason? Labour's changes to non-doms inheritance tax rules.
The changes are so costly that they have forced me to reconsider where I live. When my days in the UK run out, I will not spend time in some tax haven; I'll just go back home to South Africa and work out the next steps.
If Rachel Reeves reverses the inheritance tax change for non-doms, I would unequivocally stay and grow my venture capital business in the UK.
I know so many other millionaires in my situation. Many have left but still have properties here and have not yet completely settled in their new homes.
Half of these people would rush back if the rules around paying inheritance tax on worldwide assets changed, because we are all upset to leave and feel forced.
But the Chancellor must act quickly before it is too late.
I want to keep investing in growth companies like I did with quantum computing start-up Oxford Ionics, which last week sold for $1.1bn (£820m) to a US firm.
But after raising £500m to invest in Britain's most exciting start-ups since I arrived here in 2019, my future investment will now be elsewhere.
This money will likely help grow companies in mainland Europe instead. It is a shame, as Oxford and Cambridge are where the most exciting cutting-edge projects are happening.
But I am sadly certainly not going to bring any more money to the UK if I cannot stay.
I know people will say: 'It's just inheritance tax. What does it matter if you are dead?'
My businesses are my life's work. I want them to secure my sons' futures.
I grew up with very little, fleeing communist Poland as a child refugee with my parents and two siblings when the country started running out of food in the early 1980s.
The only way to get out was to flee with fake papers.
We spent the whole of 1981 in a migrant camp in Austria, where my parents applied to countries accepting refugees.
We ended up in South Africa without knowing anything about the country or the apartheid regime. We didn't speak English and had $500 to our name.
In the next years, we were just about surviving. I studied actuarial science at university because that was the only way to get a bursary, and we had no money for schooling.
After working for a couple of insurance companies, I realised I'm not diplomatic enough to be a corporate employee.
So I ended up in the world of start-ups and decided to start my own company. I gambled everything on it, putting my house up as collateral.
It is today one of South Africa's large financial services groups.
I came to the UK for security reasons in 2019, after speaking out against corruption in Jacob Zuma's government and being left fearing for my life.
London has become my home. I had hoped to live here for the rest of my life. Being forced to leave for reasons outside my control feels much like grief.
The impact goes beyond just my own personal circumstances. I have had to let 12 casual household staff go – gardeners, cleaners, builders.
While I still have a venture capital firm, Braavos, in Britain, I will not hire anyone new here. Over time, I may have to think about relocating it.
I put my flat in Kensington on the market five months ago, but because so many like me are leaving there are hardly any buyers.
I'm considering putting my house that I love up for sale too, but for now I am holding out for a miracle.
If there is none, I will be forced to go once my 90 days in Britain this tax year are up. I'm leaving on the strong advice of my tax advisers, as the new rules around inheritance are unworkable for me.
For one, South Africa has foreign exchange controls. That means if I were to die under current rules, South Africa may refuse to release the funds to settle a huge inheritance tax bill in Britain.
Even ignoring the difficulty of getting the money out, my wealth is mainly held in the form of shares in the financial services company Sygnia, which I founded and built in South Africa.
My sons would be forced to sell those shares quickly. If you want to sell anything fast, you'll have to do so with a big discount, which would devalue the company.
How can this be good for the economy?
If Reeves changes her mind, I would immediately cancel my plans to leave. I could rehire all of my household staff, take my property off the market and focus on raising funds for another investment fund to boost British growth companies.
My message to the Chancellor is this: you came into power to fix the economy, so don't destroy growth by putting politics before economics.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Birmingham council leader insists net zero ambitions are not being ‘sidelined'
The leader of Birmingham City Council has insisted the organisation's net zero ambitions are not being sidelined. The council declared a climate emergency in 2019, saying it would aspire to become net zero carbon by 2030 - or as soon as possible thereafter. The authority said its net zero ambitions were about reducing and removing greenhouse gases to mitigate against increasing climate risk. READ MORE: Watch tense moment Birmingham council leader faces bins strike fury as man asks 'would you' The term specifically means achieving a balance between the greenhouse gas emitted into the atmosphere and the greenhouse gases removed from it. The council's annual net zero report covering 2023 said last year the authority was making 'good progress' in tackling its emissions and had brought together its key teams working on climate change. But during a meeting this week, Green Party councillor Julien Pritchard asked why the annual report for 2024 had not been brought before full council yet - and questioned whether the council's climate work was still a key focus. During the last two years, the net zero reports were published ahead of meetings at the start of the year in either January or February. 'We have a rather crowded agenda of reports that have been coming through city council,' council leader John Cotton told the meeting of the city council yesterday, June 17. 'The intention was to bring the [net zero] report to this meeting - unfortunately, some other issues of business meant that had to be moved back. 'But that will be brought to the next meeting of city council.' Coun Pritchard responded that it was 'a bit disappointing' they would have to wait until July for the report. 'It doesn't fill people with a lot of confidence that the council is living up to its climate change commitments when it can't even report on its progress once a year,' he said. 'Can you reassure us that the council's climate work isn't being sidelined?' READ MORE: Birmingham set to welcome more Afghan refugees amid 'perilous conditions' under Taliban rule Coun Cotton said he was aware 'we live in political times where there's someone to question the whole concept of net zero'. 'That is not a position that this administration of this council will ever take,' the Labour councillor continued. 'The reasons why we've not brought the annual report to council is purely around the pipeline of business that comes before this meeting. 'I can absolutely assure him the work to ensure net zero takes place in this council 365 days a year.' In last year's report, the council said it took numerous important steps on the road to net zero. This included securing funding to improve the energy efficiency of 2,076 council homes; delivering the £1.7m natural rivers and green corridors project; and installing 828 electric vehicle charge points across the city. 'We are proud of our successes to date,' the council said in early 2024. 'We look forward to working with our city's stakeholders and citizens in delivering our climate change, nature and net zero programme, reducing our emissions and improving our resilience to climate change.'


CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Singer Nezza explains why she sang US National Anthem in Spanish at Dodgers game; says team objected
Amid the ongoing protests across the country over the weekend and continued frustrations in Los Angeles over US Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids, one singer decided to take a stand with her performance at a Dodgers game. Nezza, whose full name is Vanessa Hernández, performed the song Saturday. She said she was first planning on singing the US National Anthem in Spanglish, but, with the ongoing immigration raids, she decided to do the song in Spanish only. She says a team employee told her not to. That didn't deter her, and she performed the song in Spanish anyway. 'I didn't really see an issue with it and I wanted people to know that I'm with them and I'm standing by them,' Nezza told CNN on Tuesday. An unidentified person, who Nezza says is a Dodgers employee, can be heard on a video saying to the singer, 'We are going to do the song in English today, so I'm not sure if that wasn't relayed.' That video, which Nezza shared on TikTok, now has over 12 million views. About two weeks before the game, Nezza said that she and her team sent an email to the Dodgers team asking to sing the National Anthem in both languages. 'As everything started to unfold and we got closer to the day, the raids – like everything, it was like a couple days before that – I was like, actually, I'm going to do it fully in Spanish,' Nezza said. In response, Nezza said, the Dodgers sent a PDF file that went through the song guidelines, but they never said no to her request. In the email to the team, Nezza said her managers included the history of the song and why she felt it was important to sing that version. The version of the song is titled 'El Pendón Estrellado' and was written by Clotilde Arias after the Division of Cultural Cooperation of the Department of State asked for submissions for translations of the 'Star Spangled Banner' in 1945 in Spanish and Portuguese, according to the Smithsonian. It was all part of President Franklin D. Roosevelt's 'Good Neighbor Policy' toward Latin America. Following her performance, the Dodgers employee – who she will not name – called Nezza's manager almost immediately and told them to never call or email them again, and that their client was not welcome back, according to the singer. The Dodgers have not responded to any of CNN's questions, but said in a statement that there were 'no consequences or hard feelings' regarding Nezza's performance. Nezza said she hasn't been contacted by the team and doesn't plan on attending the stadium again. 'I don't feel welcome to come back,' she said. Her parents are immigrants from Colombia and the Dominican Republic, who Nezza says became US citizens when she was younger. Her parents are 'overjoyed' with her performance, the singer said. Nezza added that many of the team's fans are Latino, saying, 'The lyrics are the same, I was still singing that I'm a proud American.' Her performance took place the same day that demonstrators filled streets across the country for the 'No Kings' protest and as frustrations in Los Angeles continued because of ICE raids that took place within the past few weeks. While the team hasn't outwardly spoken on the ongoing frustrations of the ongoing immigration crackdowns ICE raids that have been happening in the city, star player Dodgers player Kike Hernández, a native of Puerto Rico, showed his support for Los Angeles in an Instagram post. 'I am saddened and infuriated by what's happening in our country and our city,' Hernández said in part. 'Los Angeles and Dodger fans have welcomed me, supported me and shown me nothing but kindness and love.' 'This is my second home. And I cannot stand to see our community being violated, profiled, abused and ripped apart,' He added. 'ALL people deserve to be treated with respect, dignity and human rights.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The £1bn cost of the National Insurance raid that Reeves ignored
Rachel Reeves's National Insurance tax grab has left councils facing a seven-figure shortfall with more at risk of bankruptcy, MPs have warned. The Chancellor raised employer contributions to 15pc during her Budget, but a Public Accounts Committee (PAC) report on Wednesday said ministers had failed to properly assess another £1.1bn of potential costs. MPs said the Government had not carried out an assessment of the true costs, and demanded it review the short- and long-term impact on providing services. Councils are now facing the risk of private providers passing on their increased costs and handing back social care contracts they can no longer afford to deliver, it said. The report added that local government finance was in a 'perilous state', with budget deficits putting many councils at risk of effectively going bankrupt. The Local Government Association (LGA), which represents councils, has already warned that more than half of councils are on course for insolvency next year. The National Insurance contribution rate for employers rose from 13.8pc to 15pc in April following changes in October's Budget. The salary threshold also dropped from £9,100 to £5,000, as the Government tried to raise tax for public spending. Ministers set aside £4.7bn to support the public sector, including £502m for councils to cover increases in their direct employment costs. However, the LGA calculated the actual cost to be £637m. It also warned of £1.1bn in extra costs for councils passed on by service providers they had commissioned. The PAC report said: 'Some local authorities may be able to provide financial support to service providers for these increases in costs, but it is unacceptable that the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government and HM Treasury have not assessed how much impact this could have on local authorities.' It added: 'Spending on special educational needs and disabilities (Send) has outstripped the money available from the Department for Education to pay for it. Local authority deficits from these overspends are expected to be between £2.9bn and £3.9bn a year by the end of 2027–28. 'The mechanism which allows local authorities to keep these deficits off their books is due to run out in March 2026, and without it, many local authorities are at risk of effectively going bankrupt.' The charity, Mencap, which supports more than 4,000 people with learning difficulties, also told the committee it could be forced to hand back social care contracts after a potential £18m annual increase in costs due to National Insurance and national living wage rises. It comes as council tax is expected to rise again to fund major commitments announced earlier this month in Ms Reeves's first spending review. Rates are already at record levels, with nine in 10 areas across England enduring the maximum 4.99pc council tax rise this year, and parts of Scotland and Wales slapped with even higher increases. A spokesman for the County Councils Network, which represents local authorities, said the Government's compensation covered less than half of the increased costs in National Insurance. He said: 'This year, county and unitary councils are having to make an unprecedented £1.2bn in savings due to rising demand for services, compounded by recent government decisions. One of those was the decision to raise employers' National Insurance contributions, which has adversely impacted on councils. 'Our recent survey found that the Government's compensation covered just 40pc of the costs of this policy for county and unitary councils this year, meaning they will have to make up the shortfall through service reductions and other efficiencies.' Councillor Louise Gittins, chairman of the LGA, said the spending review had left councils under continued financial pressure. She said: 'Many will continue to have to increase council tax bills to try and protect services, but still need to make further cutbacks. While the Government faced tough choices, future funding for adult social care is good news but a lack of significant extra government money needed to meet immediate pressures is worrying.' Jim McMahon, of the Ministry of Housing, said the PAC's claims were not supported by the evidence. He said: 'The spending review provided over £5bn of new grant funding for local services, and that's on top of the £69bn we have already injected this year to boost council finances. 'The results speak for themselves. Over 95pc of audited accounts were submitted for the deadline we set, no S114 were issued by councils as a result of financial distress, and claims against Exceptional Financial Support were £1bn less than the previous year.' Sign in to access your portfolio