
Banned Russian media sites ‘still accessible' across EU, report finds
After Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, EU authorities banned Kremlin-controlled media from broadcasting in the bloc, including online, to counter "disinformation".But more than three years on, "sanctioned outlets are largely still active and accessible" across member states, said a report released by the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD), a London-based think tank."Russian state media continues to maintain a strong online presence, posing a persistent challenge to Western democracies," the report said, with blocks by internet service providers "largely ineffective".
EU sanctions banned RT, previously known as Russia Today, and Sputnik media organisations as well as other state-controlled media accused of "information warfare".
The ISD report covered Germany, France, Italy, Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovakia, testing the top three internet service providers in each.
It identified 26 media under sanctions and tried to view 58 associated domains. In 76% of tests, providers failed to block access.
EU member states are responsible for ensuring blocks are applied by internet service providers.
But the ISD report criticised the European Commission for its "failure" to maintain a "definitive list of different domain iterations" – or website addresses – associated with each media outlet.
It said this left countries and internet service providers "without the guidance needed for effective and targeted implementation".
"The issue is when they sanction Russian state media, they mention the outlet that they are sanctioning – so Russia Today, Sputnik, etc – but what they don't list is what domain falls under this entity," said the report's author, Pablo Maristany de las Casas.
"If the European Commission were to list the different domains that are known to be linked to these entities, that would make it much easier for member states and the internet service providers in those member states to enforce these blocks," he said.
The report urged the EC to post a "continuously updated and publicly accessible list" and include it in sanctions packages and on its online sanctions dashboard.
A Commission spokesperson told AFP: "It is up to the relevant providers to block access to websites of outlets covered by the sanctions, including subdomains or newly created domains." Grey zone and mirrors Enforcement needs to be more agile because Russia has sought to circumvent sanctions, the report's author said.
"Some outlets, for example, RT, use so-called mirror domains" where they "simply copy the contents of the blocked site into a new URL – a new link – to circumvent those sanctions," he said.
The report found that Slovakia, whose Prime Minister Robert Fico is known for his pro-Russia positions, performed the worst on enforcement, with no blocks at all.
Slovakia's legal mandates to block pro-Russian websites expired in 2022 after lawmakers failed to extend them.
Poland was the second worst, while France and Germany were most effective overall.
Most sanctioned domains had little traction in the bloc, with under 1,000 monthly views, but Germany, with its large Russian diaspora, was the exception: three domains including RT had over 100,000 monthly visitors from there.
The report's author spotted another "loophole": numerous accounts on X posting links to banned media, mainly aimed at French and German speakers.
In May, such accounts posted almost 50 thousand links, almost all to RT-affiliated sites, the report found.
X largely blocks official media accounts, the author said, but "with these anonymous accounts that only repost this kind of content, there seems to be a grey zone and it seems not be withheld in the EU."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euractiv
an hour ago
- Euractiv
Socalists, Greens and Left MEPs call for action on Gaza ‘genocide'
The European Parliament's Socialists and Greens have signed up to a statement with the Left that accuses Israel of committing genocide in Gaza, and calls on the EU's leadership to take urgent action. "There is clear evidence that a genocide is being committed in Gaza," the letter obtained by Euractiv states. "The European Commission and the European Council have so far failed to respond with the urgency and resolve that our treaties, values and responsibilities demand." It is signed by the leaders of the three political groups, the S&D's Iratxe García, the Greens' co-leaders Bas Eickhout and Terry Reintke and the Left's co-leaders Manon Aubry and Martin Schirdewan, and it is addressed to European Council President António Costa and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. The letter makes eight demands to the EU's leadership, including immediately suspending the bloc's special trade relationship with Israel, stopping weapons sales from the EU, expanding sanctions on West Bank settlers, and approving targeted sanctions on Israeli authorities which break international law. The letter is a significant ramping up of pressure from the Parliament since it is signed by two groups – the Socialists and the Greens – who have strong contingents of MEPs from Germany, a country that has been Israel's strongest ally in the EU, and has shielded it in Brussels, among some other countries, from any sanctions so far. (jp)


Euractiv
4 hours ago
- Euractiv
Lithuania presses NATO to fix air defence gap amid Baltic drone incursions
Vilnius has once again called on its military allies for support in the form of additional air defence capabilities, following a series of drone incursions into its airspace that officials suspect are linked to Russia. On Tuesday, Defence Minister Kestutis Budrys wrote on X that a Russian military drone had "violated Lithuanian airspace" earlier last week. It was "the second such incident in less than a month." Last Friday, the Lithuanian army also discovered what it believes to be a Russian aircraft at a military training base, following a similar incident earlier in the week. Budrys said that he and Foreign Minister Kęstutis Budrys had sent a letter to NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte 'calling for immediate measures to enhance air defence capabilities in Lithuania accelerate the full implementation of the rotational air defence model.' This request echoes earlier efforts. As Euractiv reported two years ago, the Baltic countries had already been pushing for a rotational model of air defence deployments from NATO allies, rather than occasional or ad hoc support. The renewed plea highlights that, despite heightened European focus on air defence since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, long-standing gaps in the Baltic region remain unaddressed. Germany, for instance, has sent its Patriot systems to Lithuania. However, Budrys did not specify the timeline requested by Vilnius for setting up a rotation of air systems. Air defence systems are among the most expensive and sophisticated pieces of defence equipment. A single Patriot battery costs around $1 billion, with each missile priced at $4 million. Delivery times are measured in years. Lithuania is located in the Baltic region and borders both Russia's Kaliningrad exclave and Belarus. In an interview with Euractiv, Andris Sprūds, the defence minister of neighbouring Latvia, said that NATO's policing missions in the Baltics should be extended to include drone surveillance, as well as monitoring aircraft. Drones have become a key part of modern warfare since Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine in the winter of 2022. (de)


Euractiv
4 hours ago
- Euractiv
US trade deal doesn't touch EU tech laws, Brussels vows (again)
The European Commission said today that the bloc's landmark tech laws, the Digital Services Act (DSA) and Digital Markets Act (DMA), remain untouched in an upcoming statement on the EU-US trade deal. On Tuesday, the Commission reiterated that the bloc's flagship digital laws, specifically the DSA and the DMA, will not even be mentioned in an upcoming joint statement on the EU-US trade deal, expected to be published imminently. "What we're not doing is changing our rules," said a senior EU official during a briefing for journalists on the upcoming trade agreement. "None of the things are touched," the official also emphasised, referencing the DSA and DMA. The sister regulations were only formally adopted by the EU back in 2022 and it's fair to say that enforcement (especially of the DSA) remains a work in progress. In an interview with Euractiv earlier this week, the European Parliament's top trade lawmaker, Bernd Lange, warned that "there is a risk" that EU digital laws could be scrapped to appease the US administration. President Donald Trump's administration has repeatedly attacked foreign laws which take aim at US tech giants as unfair digital taxes. But speaking to Euractiv on Tuesday, German EPP lawmaker Andreas Schwab, who was the rapporteur of the DMA, said he's not worried – predicting, on the contrary, that "confirmations" the Commission has given parliamentarians "will be upheld". "Digital to legislation is part of European Regulatory Competition Policy. It's in the interest of everyone, also of American companies," he went on, before further emphasising "there is no change in the application of rules just because of trade policy issues." Despite the repeated assurances of the Commission's commitment to the digital rulebook, US counterparts have continued to put out polar opposite claims. In interview on CNBC last week, US Commerce Secretary, Howard Lutnick, said that the EU's digital services taxes and 'attack' on US tech firms was still 'on the table.' The DSA, which regulates harmful content online, has also been repeatedly attacked by Republican lawmakers. Most recently, a US delegation led by MAGA politician Jim Jordan, visited Brussels after releasing a report branding the law a "censorship" tool. Likewise, Meta's Joel Kaplan (an ex-Republican politician) has slammed the DMA, the bloc's Big Tech regulation, as an attempt to "handicap successful American businesses." (nl)