Woman who denies mushroom murders accepts she served death caps for lunch
But Erin Patterson said the 'vast majority' of the fungi came from local stores.
She denies three counts of murder and one of attempted murder over the beef Wellington meal she served to her parents-in-law and her estranged husband's aunt and uncle at her home in July 2023.
Don Patterson, Gail Patterson and Heather Wilkinson were taken to hospital and died after the lunch in the rural town of Leongatha in the Australian state of Victoria.
Heather's husband, Ian Wilkinson, was gravely ill but survived.
Patterson's lawyer earlier told the Supreme Court trial that the poisoning was a tragic accident but prosecutors said it was deliberate.
If convicted, she faces a sentence of life imprisonment on the murder charges and 25 years in jail for attempted murder.
Long queues formed outside the Latrobe Valley Courthouse on Tuesday after Patterson took the stand, which was the first time she had spoken publicly since the deaths.
During several hours of evidence on Tuesday, Patterson, 50, told the court she began foraging fungi during the Covid-19 lockdown of March 2020, witnessed only by her children.
'I cut a bit of one of the mushrooms, fried it up with some butter and ate it,' she said. 'They tasted good and I didn't get sick.'
Patterson said she also fed foraged mushrooms to her children, chopped up 'very, very small' so they could not pick them out of curries, pasta and soups.
She developed a taste for exotic varieties, joined a 'mushroom lovers' Facebook group, and bought a dehydrator to preserve her finds, Patterson said.
Her lawyer, Colin Mandy SC, asked if she accepted that the beef Wellington pastries she had served to her lunch guests in 2023 contained death caps.
'Yes, I do,' said Patterson.
The accused told her lawyer most of the mushrooms she used that day came from local supermarkets. She agreed she might have put them in the same container as dehydrated wild mushrooms she had foraged weeks earlier and others from an Asian food store.
Mr Mandy in April told the court his client had lied when she initially told investigators that she had never foraged before. But he denied that she had deliberately sought out death cap mushrooms and said she disposed of her dehydrator in a panic about the accidental deaths.
Earlier Tuesday, Patterson became tearful when she was asked about expletive-filled messages she had sent about her in-laws in December 2022 in a Facebook group chat that she described as a 'safe venting space' for a group of women.
'I wish I'd never said it. I feel very ashamed for saying it and I wish that the family didn't have to hear that I said it,' said Patterson. 'They didn't deserve it.'
Patterson, who said she had tried to have her parents-in-law mediate a dispute with her estranged husband, Simon, about school fees, said she was feeling hurt, frustrated and 'a little bit desperate'.
The couple formally separated in 2015 after earlier temporary splits, the court has heard. Simon Patterson was invited to the July 2023 lunch but did not attend.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Barbaric dad set sleeping daughter, two, on fire in desert in 'heinous' act
Murderer Shawn Grell, 50, killed his two-year-old daughter in the most "heinous, cruel and depraved way" after setting her alight in the desert, according to the Arizona Supreme Court A barbaric and "cruel" dad who set fire to his two-year-old daughter while she was sleeping in the desert has died in jail. Murderer Shawn Grell, 50, was discovered by prison officers in the Arizona Prison Complex on April 19. No details were disclosed about his death. 'All inmate deaths are investigated in consultation with the county medical examiner's office,' the Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry said in a statement. The killer had spent 26 years in jail after he picked up his daughter, Kristen Salem, from childcare on December 2, 1999, and took her to McDonald's. After they left, he told her they would see Christmas lights, but he drove to Target to purchase a petrol can and some diesel. Grell drove to a desert in Arizona, laid Kristen on the ground, poured diesel on her and set her on fire, according to harrowing court documents. She briefly woke up and stumbled before falling to the ground. After the "heinous, cruel and depraved" killing of his daughter, he drove to a nearby store and purchased some beer. Grell drove for hours before eventually calling police and turning himself in. He confessed to killing her the next day, with no trace of emotion. 'I took the gasoline and I poured it on her,' he told investigators during a police interview. 'I took the match and threw it on her." The court ruled the horrendous killing was committed in an 'especially heinous, cruel, and depraved manner' and Grell was charged with first-degree murder and sentenced to the death penalty. However, this was overturned by the Arizona Supreme Court in 2013, which said his death sentence was "cruel and unusual punishment." It came after the Supreme Court in 2022 determined that it was a violation of the Eighth Amendment to administer the death penalty to people with "mental deficiencies." 'Because of their disabilities in areas of reasoning, judgment, and control of their impulses, however, they do not act with the level of moral culpability that characterizes the most serious adult criminal conduct,' the Supreme Court ruled. It comes after another father allegedly smashed his one-year-old daughter's head on the floor in a drunken rage because she wouldn't stop crying, according to police. Suresh Dore, 40, was taken into custody by authorities on Sunday after he was accused of murdering his daughter during a violent drunken outburst. Police in India allege the man killed the little girl by smashing her head on the floor after he was irritated by her crying. The suspect tried to flee the scene but was quickly captured by police. "If he had fled, it would have been difficult to nab him as he doesn't own a mobile phone and is a daily wager," police inspector Prasad Pandhare said. Dore, who has four children from three wives, has been accused previously of violence in the home, police say.
Daily Mirror
35 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Mum 'serves deadly mushrooms to in-laws then made herself throw up with dessert'
A woman accused of poisoning and murdering her in-laws with death cap mushrooms, has said she made herself throw up after eating the lethal meal, during an Australia trial The 'mushroom murder' trial in Australia has seen the accused, Erin Patterson, 50, give her third day of testimony. The mum of two stands accused of three counts of murder, and one of attempted murder - all of which she denies, pleading not guilty to all four charges. Erin prepared a beef Wellington lunch for her guests in July 2023, before deliberately including and feeding them poisonous death cap mushrooms, the court heard. However, her legal team is arguing that the inclusion of the toxic ingredient was nothing more than a terrible accident, which had tragic consequences. Three of her lunch guests died after eating the meal; her former parents-in-law, Don Patterson, 70, and Gail Patterson, 70, and her ex-mum-in-law's sister Heather Wilkinson, 66. The fourth guest, Ian Wilkinson, 71, survived, but spent weeks in hospital receiving treatment. The court heard Erin claimed that after eating a small portion of the poisoned main course, she binged on dessert - making herself "over-full" and vomit. She only had "a quarter, a third, somewhere around there" of the beef Wellington, she reportedly said, but once her guests headed home, she gorged on an orange cake her former mother-in-law had brought to the lunch. "I ate another piece of cake, and then another piece," she said, before eventually finishing the cake. "I felt sick… over-full so I went to the toilets and brought it back up again." "After I'd done that, I felt better," she said. Over three days the court heard Erin admit she lied to her guests about having cancer, because she wanted help looking after her children whilst she underwent gastric bypass surgery. "I remember thinking I didn't want to tell anybody what I was going to have done. I was really embarrassed by it," she claimed. Erin told the court she had spent quite some time deciding what to cook her guests, before landing on beef Wellington - a dish that had sentimental connotations from her childhood, as it was something her mother would make for special occasions. However, she claimed the mushrooms she included had little taste, so she added some dried mushrooms that she had previously purchased from an Asian food shop in Melbourne months before, and that she kept in a container. When asked if there could have been other sorts of mushrooms in there too, she said: "Now, I think there was a possibility that there were foraged ones in there as well." Since 2020, the accused has been regularly foraging for wild mushrooms. She said when she went to the hospital two days after the lethal lunch - for medical attention after developing stomach issues - that she was "shocked but confused" when she was asked if she might have consumed death cap mushrooms. The mushroom murder trial in Australia has captured international attention and testimony and the six-week trial has seen 50 people take the stand to provide evidence. Erin claimed during her testimony that her ex-husband, Simon Patterson, asked her if she used her food dehydrator to poison his parents, which caused her to panic, and throw the appliance away at the tip near her home. A conversation that her ex denies happened. She also erased all the data from her phone more than once, even when the police were actively searching her home - with the court hearing this was because she was afraid they would see images of the food dehydrator and the mushrooms themselves. "I had made the meal and served it and people had got sick," Erin told the court. "I was scared that they would blame me for it."
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Trump aims to build a MAGA judiciary, breaking with traditional conservatives
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump is signaling a new approach to selecting judges in his second term, departing from his first-term formula of younger up-and-comers, elite credentials and pedigrees in traditional conservative ideology and instead leaning toward unapologetically combative, MAGA-friendly nominees. The president turned heads last week by launching a searing attack on Leonard Leo and the conservative legal network known as the Federalist Society, which played a major role in selecting and steering 234 Trump-nominated judges, including three Supreme Court justices, through Senate confirmation during his first term. Trump's transformation of the federal courts and the creation of 6-3 conservative Supreme Court majority, which led to the overturning of the landmark abortion rights case Roe v. Wade in 2022, was possibly his biggest achievement in his first term. But Trump slammed Leo as a 'sleazebag' in late May after a panel of judges, including one he appointed, blocked some of his tariffs. 'I am so disappointed in the Federalist Society because of the bad advice they gave me on numerous judicial nominations,' he wrote on Truth Social. Leo, who declined an interview request, praised Trump's first term judicial appointments, saying in a statement that they will be his 'most important legacy.' Of Trump's early judicial nominees in his second term, much attention has been focused on his decision to tap Emil Bove, his former personal criminal defense lawyer and current Justice Department official, to serve on the Philadelphia-based 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. 'What's different about him is that MAGA world is very excited about him because it sees him as someone who has been ruthlessly implementing the White House's wishes,' said Ed Whelan, a veteran conservative judicial nominations analyst who works at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. The president's early actions have raised warning signs among conservative lawyers who favor a nonpartisan judiciary. 'It's potentially a watershed moment in the relationship between Trump and the traditional conservative legal movement,' said Gregg Nunziata, former chief nominations counsel to Senate Republicans who now leads the Society for the Rule of Law, a group of right-leaning lawyers that has been critical of Trump. 'There are allies and advisers to the president who have been agitating for a different kind of judge — one more defined by loyalty to the president and advancing his agenda, rather than one more defined by conservative jurisprudence.' Nunziata warned that the president is 'turning his back on' his first-term legacy of prioritizing conservative jurisprudence. Trump's social media posts were welcomed by some conservatives who want a new approach to judicial nominations in his second term — including Mike Davis, another former Senate GOP chief counsel for nominations, who runs the conservative Article III Project advocacy group and offers his suggestions to the White House on judicial nominees. Trump needs to avoid 'typical FedSoc elitists' who were 'too weak to speak out' on issues like what MAGA world perceives as lawfare against Trump during the Biden years, Davis said. 'We need to have evidence that these judicial nominees are going to be bold and fearless for the Constitution, and there were plenty of opportunities for them over the last five years to demonstrate that,' he added. Jonathan Adler, a professor at Case Western Reserve University School of Law who mixes in Federalist Society circles, said some federal judges may have concerns about stepping down if they are not convinced Trump will replace them with someone they consider to be qualified. Certain judges, Adler said, want to be succeeded by 'someone that understands the judicial role, understands that their obligation is to follow the law and apply the law, as opposed to someone that is seen as a political hack and is going to rule in a particular way merely because that's what their team is supposed to want.' Whelan said he has heard a sitting judge express such concerns. "I recently heard from a conservative judge who has decided not to take senior status because of concerns over who would be picked as his or her successor," he said. He declined to name the judge. GOP senators steer clear of Trump-Leo clash During the first term, Leo played a key role in advising Trump on whom to pick. He helped come up with a list of potential Supreme Court nominees during the 2016 election, when some on the right were worried Trump would not pick a justice who was sufficiently conservative to replace Justice Antonin Scalia, who died earlier that year. In Trump's second-term, the deputy White House counsel for nominations, Steve Kenny, has daily oversight of judicial nominations with input from chief of staff Susie Wiles, White House counsel David Warrington and Trump himself, among others. Like Davis, Kenny previously worked for Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, on the Senate Judiciary Committee. 'In choosing these judges, we are looking for judges who are constitutionalists, who won't be judicial activists on the bench,' a senior White House official said. The administration is looking for judges whose judicial philosophy is similar to conservative Supreme Court justices such as Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, the official added. Both are seen within MAGA world as more aligned with Trump than his own appointees to the court: Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. Despite the alliance with Leo delivering achievements that many Senate Republicans take pride in, few were willing to jump to his defense in the wake of Trump's personal attack. 'I'm not going to get involved in those personality conflicts,' said Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, a senior member of the Judiciary Committee. Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., another Judiciary Committee member, pleaded the Fifth: 'That's between Leonard and the president.' But, he added, 'I like the Federalist Society.' Grassley praised Trump's initial slate of nominees. 'Republicans remain laser-focused on putting strong conservatives on the federal bench,' he said. 'President Trump's first five judicial nominees, who all came before the Judiciary Committee this week, are high-caliber legal minds who will faithfully defend the Constitution and serve the American people well.' Despite the first-term success, there were already indications once Trump was re-elected that his second-term approach to judicial nominations would differ. Leo is no longer advising Trump, and both the president and his allies have been sharply critical of judges who have ruled against the administration in its early months over its aggressive use of executive power. Barrett has been one target, as have some lower court judges. 'Federalist Society lawyers are very bright. They're very intellectual, kind of the academic side of the law. This Trump White House is looking for more practical judges,' said a senior Republican lawyer close to the White House. 'A second element is there are some decisions that have been made by Amy Coney Barrett, in particular, that really disappointed the Trump administration, and Trump people more broadly, and that has filtered down to some of these lower court decisions," the lawyer added. For Democrats, Trump's public break with the Federalist Society — along with another move to refuse to cooperate with the American Bar Association, which traditionally provides recommendations on judicial nominees — are part of the same trend. "They don't want anyone looking over the shoulders of nominees to find out what they believe, what they've said and what they've done," Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said Wednesday during the first hearing for Trump's new wave of nominees. 'The Trump 1.0 Federalist Society mode' So far, Trump has announced two nominees to the influential federal appeals courts, as well as nine district court nominees. In addition to Bove, the other appeals court nominee is Whitney Hermandorfer, who has been tapped for a seat on the Cincinnati-based 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. While Bove is not viewed as the type of nominee Leo might suggest, Hermandorfer is seen as a traditional Federalist Society pick. She served as a law clerk for Barrett and Alito, as well as for Kavanaugh when he was an appeals court judge. Hermandorfer has also been involved in some culture war litigation while serving under Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti. She is 'very much in the Trump 1.0 Federalist Society mode,' said Russell Wheeler, a scholar at the nonpartisan Brookings Institution who tracks judicial nominations. Five of Trump's district court nominees are from Florida, and four are from Missouri. Hermandorfer, joined by the Missouri nominees. appeared at the confirmation hearing Wednesday where she said her job would not be to do the president's bidding. "That would not be my role. My role would be to carry out my oath,' she said. Hermandorfer called the Federalist Society, of which she is a member, a "wonderful place" to discuss issues with other lawyers. According to the federal judiciary, there are 49 pending vacancies, with only three of them on the appeals courts. Another three have announced plans to step down. The Republican lawyer close to the White House said it is a little early to know how different Trump's second-term picks will be from the first because the president got off to a slow start in nominating his first batch of judges. Trump may struggle to match the numbers of his first term, in part because this time around there are not as many vacancies as there were in 2017. Then, Trump benefited from a Republican Senate that blocked many of President Barack Obama's picks, including his nominee to replace Scalia, Merrick Garland. Legal activists tend to focus more on federal appeals court nominees than district court nominees because they have more power to change the law and are often more likely to be tipped for potential slots on the Supreme Court. There are currently 24 Republican-appointed appeals court judges in total who are eligible for retirement, according to Wheeler. Generally, judges are more likely to step down when a president of the same party who appointed them is in office. 'Activist judges with an agenda' Even if Trump wants to depart from the Leo playbook, he will find it difficult to find qualified conservative lawyers who do not have some links with the Federalist Society, Whelan said. 'If you are looking for talented lawyers with the sort of experience that would make them good judges, most of the people you are looking at are going to be Federalist Society types,' he added. Kenny, for example, who holds daily oversight over nominations at the White House, 'is definitely a proud member of the Federalist Society,' the lawyer said. 'But he's also going to follow the administration's lead on the kinds of judges they want.' Nunziata said it's up to GOP senators to push back on nominees like Bove, warning that acquiescing would send a signal to Trump that he has a 'free hand' to nominate more individuals like him, including to a possible Supreme Court vacancy. 'I hope there will be pushback. Time will tell,' he said, citing former Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell's key role in steering Trump's first-term judicial nominees. 'I would expect him to be alarmed by this turn and to fight against it with his remaining time in the Senate.' McConnell's office declined to comment. Democrats say that with nominees like Bove, Trump is making it more explicit that he simply wants loyalists. 'He's putting in all the people that will support him, or have a relationship to him,' Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, said. 'That's what it's all about for the president. … He just wants people who will support what he wants.' 'Of course not,' she said.
