logo
Barbaric dad set sleeping daughter, two, on fire in desert in 'heinous' act

Barbaric dad set sleeping daughter, two, on fire in desert in 'heinous' act

Daily Mirror05-06-2025
Murderer Shawn Grell, 50, killed his two-year-old daughter in the most "heinous, cruel and depraved way" after setting her alight in the desert, according to the Arizona Supreme Court
A barbaric and "cruel" dad who set fire to his two-year-old daughter while she was sleeping in the desert has died in jail. Murderer Shawn Grell, 50, was discovered by prison officers in the Arizona Prison Complex on April 19. No details were disclosed about his death.
'All inmate deaths are investigated in consultation with the county medical examiner's office,' the Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry said in a statement.

The killer had spent 26 years in jail after he picked up his daughter, Kristen Salem, from childcare on December 2, 1999, and took her to McDonald's. After they left, he told her they would see Christmas lights, but he drove to Target to purchase a petrol can and some diesel.

Grell drove to a desert in Arizona, laid Kristen on the ground, poured diesel on her and set her on fire, according to harrowing court documents. She briefly woke up and stumbled before falling to the ground.
After the "heinous, cruel and depraved" killing of his daughter, he drove to a nearby store and purchased some beer. Grell drove for hours before eventually calling police and turning himself in. He confessed to killing her the next day, with no trace of emotion.
'I took the gasoline and I poured it on her,' he told investigators during a police interview. 'I took the match and threw it on her."
The court ruled the horrendous killing was committed in an 'especially heinous, cruel, and depraved manner' and Grell was charged with first-degree murder and sentenced to the death penalty.
However, this was overturned by the Arizona Supreme Court in 2013, which said his death sentence was "cruel and unusual punishment."

It came after the Supreme Court in 2022 determined that it was a violation of the Eighth Amendment to administer the death penalty to people with "mental deficiencies."
'Because of their disabilities in areas of reasoning, judgment, and control of their impulses, however, they do not act with the level of moral culpability that characterizes the most serious adult criminal conduct,' the Supreme Court ruled.

It comes after another father allegedly smashed his one-year-old daughter's head on the floor in a drunken rage because she wouldn't stop crying, according to police.
Suresh Dore, 40, was taken into custody by authorities on Sunday after he was accused of murdering his daughter during a violent drunken outburst.
Police in India allege the man killed the little girl by smashing her head on the floor after he was irritated by her crying. The suspect tried to flee the scene but was quickly captured by police.
"If he had fled, it would have been difficult to nab him as he doesn't own a mobile phone and is a daily wager," police inspector Prasad Pandhare said. Dore, who has four children from three wives, has been accused previously of violence in the home, police say.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nicola Sturgeon's legacy may be defined by Isla Bryson
Nicola Sturgeon's legacy may be defined by Isla Bryson

The Herald Scotland

time3 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Nicola Sturgeon's legacy may be defined by Isla Bryson

Nicola Sturgeon has said she was 'like a rabbit caught in the headlights' when asked if double rapist Isla Bryson was a woman. In her new book, the former first minister said she was 'completely blindsided' when the case prompted a public outcry. 'I had no advance warning that the case was pending,' she wrote in Frankly. 'To this day, I do not understand how no one in the Scottish Prison Service (SPS) or Scottish government officialdom thought it important to flag it up to me.' Read more from Unspun: Bryson was convicted at the High Court in Glasgow in 2023 of raping one woman in Clydebank in 2016 and another in Glasgow in 2019. He began identifying as a woman only after being charged and has not legally changed gender. Although the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service expected Bryson to be sent to Barlinnie, the SPS initially moved him to the women's prison at Cornton Vale. It was only after a backlash, and Ms Sturgeon's intervention, that Bryson was transferred to HMP Edinburgh. The row came just weeks after MSPs passed the controversial Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill. Although the Bill never became law, the SPS had for years allowed prisoners to self-identify their gender. Which is why nobody flagged it to the first minister. Despite the Bryson scandal, subsequent policy changes, and the Supreme Court case, the SPS continues to house dangerous, biological men in the women's estate. Its post-Bryson 2023 Policy for the Management of Transgender People in Custody states that a transgender woman 'will not be eligible to be considered for admission or transfer to a women's prison' if convicted of serious offences such as murder, assault, robbery, abduction, rape, and sexual harassment. However, the policy includes an exception: the SPS Risk Management Team can approve transfers if there is 'compelling evidence' the prisoner does not present an unacceptable risk. What is unacceptable risk? Research by the Murray Blackburn Mackenzie (MBM) policy collective found that prisoners currently in the women's estate include Alan Baker (also known as Alex Stewart), convicted of murder in 2013 and held in the female unit at Greenock prison. So too is Richard McCabe, also known as Melissa Young, who was convicted of murder in 2014. While on remand at Cornton Vale, they assaulted a female officer, biting her stomach Peter Laing, who now goes by the name Paris Green, was also convicted of murder and torture in 2013. They were still in the female estate in 2024 and recently charged with assaulting a female guard. Do these prisoners represent acceptable risk? The Scottish Human Rights Commission (SHRC) helped draft the new SPS policy. MBM has repeatedly called on the SHRC to withdraw its submission. In June 2023, they were told their request was being considered. Despite chasing in August and October 2023, they received no reply. As reported in The Herald, they wrote again in April 2025, following the Supreme Court case, renewing their call. Almost three months later, SHRC executive director Jan Savage responded. Part of the delay, she said, was due to the prison service. On May 22, 2025, the SHRC wrote to the SPS asking how it was monitoring the impact of its policy, whether it had published data, if the policy would be reviewed, and if it collected information on sex and gender. More than two months on, the SPS has yet to reply. When asked, an SPS spokesperson told me: 'We value the important role of the Scottish Human Rights Commission and will respond to their correspondence in due course. 'We have received the Supreme Court's judgement and are actively considering its impact.' With Frankly, Ms Sturgeon attempts to define her legacy. The truth is, the chaos in Scotland's public sector, and Scotland's prisons in particular, could well define it for her.

Mum takes own life while kids at school after GP said she 'wasn't suicidal'
Mum takes own life while kids at school after GP said she 'wasn't suicidal'

Daily Mirror

time5 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Mum takes own life while kids at school after GP said she 'wasn't suicidal'

Amy Manning explained to her doctor that she was experiencing 'chronic suicidal thoughts' but her GP told the inquest into her death that she wasn't considered 'actively suicidal' A mum who took her own life while her two children were in school had been told by a doctor that she was not "actively suicidal". ‌ An inquest into the death of tragic Amy Manning, 32, has heard how a GP ruled she would not put herself in danger before was discovered dead in her Somerset home by her police officer partner. ‌ The hairdresser had been working with Citizen's Advice Bureau to get to the bottom of her money problems, a coroner was told. The court also heard the woman had been diagnosed with Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorder, and had been using cocaine before her death last year. It comes after the NHS warns mouth symptom could be life-shortening disease. ‌ Her doctor explained how the parent had 'chronic suicidal thoughts' but was not considered 'actively suicidal', saying she had a desire to remain alive for her children, something the medic considered a 'protective factor'. Her partner Sam Plumley said she had begun drinking more, and was struggling with her mental health before she took her own life. Explaining how she went to Amy's home and found her unresponsive, before "hugging her" as he for paramedics to arrive. ‌ Avon and Somerset Police said in a statement that there were no suspicious circumstances surrounding Ms Manning's death. They said they found nothing "sufficiently alarming that leads us to believe any criminal offence or anything undue was done by Sam". ‌ Assistant Coroner Stephen Cavell, who recorded a verdict of suicide, issued a report detailing how the "committed mother" with a "good work ethic" had a strong good relationship with her family, before he noted her EUPD diagnosis. Following her death, the woman's father Daniel Manning organised a charity rave event supporting CALM and Winston's Wish in honour of his 'beautiful daughter' in December. 'This has left a massive hole in our lives,' he said. 'As well as nationally, in our local area we have lost too many people to suicide in recent times. "This is our first year without her coming up to Christmas and she loved Christmas and everything about Christmas. "This event is in honour of our beautiful Amy who we all miss each and every day, there are lots of families out there who sadly will be without a loved one this Christmas and these two charities provide an incredible service to help people in crisis and families and children dealing with grief." Whatever you are going through, you don't have to face it alone. Call Samaritans for free on 116 123, email jo@ or visit for more information.

Drivers warned over car finance scammers after court ruling
Drivers warned over car finance scammers after court ruling

The Independent

time8 hours ago

  • The Independent

Drivers warned over car finance scammers after court ruling

Drivers have been warned to watch out for scammers that are seeking to take advantage of the recent landmark ruling on mass instances of car finance mis-selling in the UK. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has told motorists that it will be consulting on a compensation scheme for those who have been affected by the issue, which it says could cost finance lenders up to £18 billion. A Supreme Court ruling earlier in the month found that lenders are not liable for hidden commission payments in car finance schemes. The decision means that many contested claims will not go ahead, but the most serious claims will be eligible for compensation. Many cases in a separate strand of the car finance mis-selling case, which was not part of the Supreme Court ruling, are also set to receive payouts. More details of the FCA-led compensation scheme should arrive in the coming months, with the watchdog confirming that any payments will begin in 2026. A new warning from authority says that anyone who believes they are affected should not share their details with anyone pretending to be linked to a compensation scheme or car finance lender. The FCA says it put out its warning following 'reports of scammers contacting people.' It added: 'These fraudsters are asking individuals for personal information including their name, address, date of birth and bank details. They then falsely claim that these people are owed compensation.' The only action those who have been affected have been advised to take is to complain directly to their provider now. The FCA has shared more information on how to do this. Am I eligible for the car finance compensation scheme? The proposed scheme firstly targets issues arising from Discretionary Commission Arrangements (DCAs), which were outlawed in January 2021 and not involved in the recent Supreme Court case. Individuals who entered into personal contract purchase (PCP) or Hire Purchase (HP) deals before the ban are likely to have been unknowingly subjected to DCAs. However, those with 0 per cent interest rates or very small commissions are unlikely to qualify for compensation under this strand. The newer element of the mis-selling case, relating to the Supreme Court ruling, stems from commissions which the FCA explains were "unfair and therefore unlawful.' Unlike the DCA cases, these require individual assessment, making them harder to define. Factors in the payout may even include how vulnerable a person is, and therefore whether it can be considered more unfair for the commission to have been so high. The FCA estimates that most individuals making claims through the scheme will receive "less than £950 in compensation per agreement". The final cost to the industry will ultimately depend on the final details of the scheme.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store