Protests in 'ghost town' where £400m ships don't fit the harbour
The new vessels cost quadruple their original price tag, one was delivered seven years late, the other is still being built, and both are too big to fit the main harbour for their daily journeys to and from the Isle of Arran.
But in this latest chapter of the scandal, the unbelievable is very much part of the script. And, as Sky News has been hearing, the consequences are brutal.
"It is completely and utterly nuts," one exasperated campaigner exclaims as we stand overlooking the deserted Ardrossan Harbour on Scotland's mainland.
Ardrossan, on the Ayrshire coast, has been the main port for the ferry service to and from Arran for decades. It is the quickest, most efficient route.
But the 30-year-old ferry serving the islands for generations is failing and two new bespoke-designed ones were ordered, with them due to enter service from 2017.
The original £100m cost ballooned to £400m, the shipyard was bought by taxpayers amid financial crisis, one vessel finally started carrying passengers in January 2025 while the other is still being built.
And to add insult to injury, both are too big for Ardrossan Harbour's jetty to cope with and require an £80m upgrade.
In the meantime, services are being diverted along the coast to Troon.
Protest as tensions rise in 'ghost town'
Ardrossan was promised it would remain the primary port for connectivity to Arran. But now the community is in limbo and is fearing for its future.
Christine Cowie, from Save Ardrossan Harbour, told Sky News: "It is completely and utterly nuts.
"Why anybody would commission a ferry which doesn't fit the harbour for the route it is meant for is crazy. I cannot understand it at all.
"Ardrossan is like an extension of Arran. A lot of people come here to the dentist and use other businesses they don't have on the island which are losing money since the ferries have gone away."
A botched design process, mismanagement and a string of costly blunders have given the project the label of one of the biggest procurement disasters in the history of Scottish devolution.
People from Arran are joining Ardrossan campaigners on the mainland for a protest on Saturday. Hundreds are expected to gather as tensions boil over.
The group's chairwoman Frances Gilmour said Ardrossan has become a "ghost town".
She said: "It is so quiet. It is spooky. It's frankly a disgrace. Businesses are suffering.
"Economically, this is the route. This is the economic route. We have the infrastructure. We just need the berths fixed."
The 33-year-old MV Caledonian Isles, which has been away over the winter for extensive repairs, is expected to return to Ardrossan next month. But locals question how reliable and sustainable that vessel is.
On the edge of the once bustling harbour carpark is the Bute MOT garage.
Manager Scott Revans says they rely on customers from Arran previously hopping off the ferry and leaving their car for repairs at their centre.
He told Sky News: "The harbour is a ghost town. We'd get the passing trade doing whatever customers need from batteries to punctures. It has had an impact on us."
Could taxpayers pick up the bill?
Ardrossan Harbour is owned by private company Peel Ports.
The Scottish government is currently exploring buying the port, but the talks are a secret, with campaigners feeling left in the dark.
No one involved in the discussions would answer questions from Sky News about when they expect to alert communities to the next steps.
A spokesman for the Scottish government agency Transport Scotland said: "We absolutely understand people and communities' views in favour of retaining Ardrossan as the mainland port and remain committed to ensuring the Arran ferry service is fit for the future.
"The Scottish government has instructed officials… to explore options on purchasing Ardrossan Port.
"We will of course update parliament once there is progress and an outcome to report, however, it would be inappropriate to get in the way of these complex and sensitive discussions."
Jim McSporran, port director at Peel Ports Clydeport, said: "Peel Ports Group welcomes the Scottish government's statement that it intends to explore the potential purchase of Ardrossan Harbour.
"Regardless of the outcome of this process, our willingness to invest in the harbour remains steadfast. We take comfort that the port continues to operate this lifeline route and that it remains the port of choice for the people and businesses of Arran and Ardrossan."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Edinburgh failing to honour childcare commitments
FAMILIES have been left paying thousands of pounds a year for childcare because Edinburgh City Council has reneged on a flagship Scottish Government policy that promises all children more than 1000 hours of free care at a nursery of their choice, it has been claimed. Under the policy, children aged three to five years old are entitled either to 30 free hours per week during term time or 22.8 hours per week for 50 weeks per year – a total of 1140 hours a year. These state-funded hours can be either a council-run nursery or a council-approved private one or with a registered childminder, according to the Government's Funding Follows The Child approach. Many working families say they choose privately run nurseries because they typically have longer opening hours and operate during school holidays, while some council nurseries are only open during school hours or term time, which don't fit with most work schedules. READ MORE: Fix visa problems to allow Gaza students to study in Scotland, Keir Starmer told However, in 2024, problems arose for families who were using private nurseries in Edinburgh but living in a bordering local authority area, when City of Edinburgh Council decided it would no longer fund free childcare in these circumstances. These cross-border families, who use Edinburgh nurseries either because they work in the city or because it is closest to their home, were told they could either find a new nursery in their own local authority or a council-run one in the city. But a group of impacted parents, many of whom were unable to find anything that met their childcare needs and working hours, are now claiming the move breaches both governmental policy and child rights, while discriminating against working parents. City of Edinburgh Council insists it is meeting statutory guidelines and claims its cross-border policy will lead to savings of £1 million. But the parents' group disputes this claim. It has shared freedom of information requests with The Ferret which the parents claim show savings are as little as £36,650 because almost as many children living in Edinburgh claim free places from nurseries in other local authorities. Several parents also shared emails from other councils willing to reimburse Edinburgh if cross-border private nursery places there could be granted. 'It had a real impact on his confidence' The Ferret spoke to families impacted – some living just metres outside the City of Edinburgh Council border – who were facing annual fees of more than £7000 if they did not remove their child from their private nursery. But some say they have been unable to find a nursery outside of Edinburgh that is open before they have to leave for work, or closes before they can return for pick-up. Others have been offered insufficient hours at council nurseries in Edinburgh, given work commitments, or have only been offered available hours at nurseries further away that would add hours on to already long commutes. Some had to cut working hours or ship in grandparents from other parts of the country. In one case, a mother was forced to give up her lunch break so she could pick her three-year-old up from a council nursery, where he had a free place for five mornings, and take him to a private nursery for the afternoon, as it was the only way she could find additional hours. Some parents have considered legal action and, backed by a leading professor in child law, they are calling for the Scottish Government to intervene. Private and third-sector nurseries – such as those run by charities and community groups – said they were also impacted. Claylands Nursery, in the western outskirts of Edinburgh, closed last July, after Edinburgh council decided that children attending from West Lothian, just a few miles away, would not receive funded places. It had asked the council for an exemption from the ruling, claiming the number of cross-border families that would be forced to leave would make their business unsustainable. Kirsten, a mother who has asked us not to use her surname, said her child was attending Claylands three days a week when she received an email giving five days' notice of its closure. She lives 'minutes' from the City of Edinburgh Council boundary. 'It was a really stressful time as more than 50 people were looking for last-minute places all at once,' she said. 'We looked at one nursery in West Lothian, but because of our working patterns, it would have added about an hour to our commute, and we would have to pay for a second car to make pick-ups and drop-offs possible due to our hours, so we went with an Edinburgh nursery which was much closer.' Though Kirstin felt 'lucky' to find a nursery she is happy with, the sudden move had a big impact on her then almost two-year-old, who went from being content at drop-offs to 'screaming and crying and clinging to us'. 'It was horrible,' she said. 'It had a real impact on his confidence.' The family got through a difficult transition with the help of additional leave from work. Now almost three, her son has settled and 'loves the nursery and the staff', but his place will not be funded by Edinburgh Council. Kirstin has decided not to move him again this year. Instead, the family will make 'sacrifices' to afford £10,000 worth of fees over the next two years, though they will reassess in her son's preschool year. 'It's hugely frustrating,' she added. 'The council took this decision [about cross-boundary funding] without assessing the impact on children, and it's been left to parents to sort it out. I feel it should be up to the council and the Scottish Government should recognise that its policy is not being upheld.' Father Sam Illingworth lives in West Lothian, just metres from the City of Edinburgh Council boundary. His youngest daughter was settled in a private nursery just over the Edinburgh boundary. But since she has turned three, they have been unable to secure funding for her place there. They found a council nursery nearby, but as it doesn't have enough hours available, they had to 'top-up' their hours by continuing to use the private one. He has gathered testimonies from other parents whose work patterns rule out available council nurseries and others unable to find funded places that work with their commute. Earlier this month, he set up a petition calling on Edinburgh City Council to reversve its decision on funding. 'The frustration is that West Lothian was willing to reimburse Edinburgh in terms of the funding,' he said. 'We understand that council budgets are stretched – of course we do – but we dispute that they can make the savings they claim. It feels like this decision is ideological.' Sharon Fairley, chief executive of the Scottish Private Nurseries Association and owner of the Little Flyers chain, claimed the problems stemmed from the decision to move away from the centralisation of funding in 2020. 'It means that councils are nursery providers but are also making decisions on who gets funding,' she said. 'This is a conflict of interest. This can be solved by moving back to a centralised payment system.' She claimed there had also been widespread issues in other council areas, with 'unfair' payment funding distribution. In recent years, hundreds of third sector and private nurseries have closed, with many blaming problems on a lack of 'fair funding'. Bruce Adamson, a professor in child law at the University of Glasgow, said the issue was about 'children's rights and fairness'. 'The high cost of living in Edinburgh means that many parents and carers who work in Edinburgh live in neighbouring local authorities, but need childcare close to their work,' he added. 'The City of Edinburgh Council's decision to block funded nursery places for children living outside the city risks breaching children's rights. 'We should be making it easier – not harder – for children to get high-quality early learning and childcare. The Scottish Government needs to step in to protect families and uphold children's rights.' Women, he claimed, were more likely to 'bear the brunt of childcare gaps'. A study by the Fawcett Society from November 2023 found that almost a quarter of a million women had left their jobs due to the difficulty of balancing work and childcare. Anna Ritchie Allan, executive director of charity Close the Gap, which campaigns on gender-based inequality in work, said: 'It's clear the childcare system isn't working for women and their families, especially those on low incomes. Local variation in how funded hours are delivered further penalises many women.' READ MORE: Protesters go on strike in Israel demanding ceasefire and hostage releases However, councillor James Dalgleish, the education, children and families convener at Edinburgh City Council, insisted it 'follows national guidance in offering funded early learning and childcare (ELC) for children in Edinburgh and work in partnership with a range of providers to ensure that all parents and carers in Edinburgh are able to access quality funded early learning and childcare'. City of Edinburgh Council does offer its own local authority nursery provision to families living in neighbouring local authorities, he added, though it is currently not accepting new private or third sector providers as partner nurseries. A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Local Authorities have a statutory duty to make available funded early learning and childcare to the children residing within their own area and are also responsible for meeting the statutory guidance requirements in relation to cross-boundary placements. 'We encourage local authorities to work with neighbouring areas to ensure publicly funded services meet the needs of families and prioritise children's wellbeing, including those who need cross-boundary placements.'
STV News
2 hours ago
- STV News
Swinney calls on UK Government to enable Gaza students to travel to Scotland
Scotland's First Minister has called for 'urgent action' from the UK Government to ensure students from Gaza can take up their places at Scottish universities. John Swinney said that other countries have successfully evacuated Gazan students to enable them to continue their studies. And he called on the UK Government to do 'everything in its power' to enable students to travel from Gaza to Scotland. The UK Government has said it is doing everything it can to find a solution. Mr Swinney spoke out after the Sunday Mail reported on a Palestinian student who has a place at Edinburgh University, but has not been able to leave Gaza to start her course next month due to visa processing issues. Mr Swinney said: 'I am appalled at the situation the students from Gaza are facing. We must see urgent action from the UK Government to support them in taking up their university places in Scotland. 'The people of Gaza are already suffering unimaginably at the hands of the Israeli government – the idea that these students could also be denied the chance to take up the university places in Scotland they have worked so hard to attain is not acceptable to me. 'I am aware that other countries including France, Ireland and Italy have managed to successfully evacuate students, so the UK Government cannot simply duck its responsibilities here. 'Where there is a political will, a resolution can be found – and failure to act is quite literally putting these people's lives at risk.' Scotland's Education Secretary Jenny Gilruth has written to the UK Home Secretary and UK Secretary of State for Education calling for action to support the students impacted and for urgent discussions. Mr Swinney said: 'I am clear that the international community must put a stop to Israel's killing in Gaza and that we must see the immediate recognition of a sovereign, independent Palestine. 'But until that point, the UK Government must do everything it can to ensure ordinary Gazans are not punished further. 'Scotland looks forward to welcoming students from Gaza seeking to take their places at our universities – the UK Government must do the right thing and do everything in its power to allow them to get here.' A UK Government spokesperson said: 'We are aware of these students and are actively considering how we can best support. 'Of course, the situation on the ground in Gaza makes this extremely challenging but we are doing everything we can to find a solution.' The normal arrangements for non-British nationals requiring a visa are to make an online visa application and submit their biometrics at a Visa Application Centre, prior to travel to the UK. The UK Government said biometrics are an essential part of the immigration process as they enable it to confirm the identity of the person and assess whether they pose a risk to public safety. Where an applicant cannot travel to a Visa Application Centre (VAC) to enrol their biometrics, they can contact the UK Government to explain their circumstances, so it can consider all the options. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
SNP councillor hits back at 'lie' he defected to Reform UK
Alexander McLellan was listed as a member of Nigel Farage's party on the local authority's website. It has now been changed back to list the Tillydrone, Seaton and Old Aberdeen representative as a member of the SNP. The glitch emerged after Luis Cook, a right-wing influencer, posted on Twitter/X that McLellan was the 'first (direct) defection from the SNP to Reform'. Cook's post has since been deleted. READ MORE: Police Scotland 'breaching human rights to subdue Palestine protests' McLellan was quick to hit back at the claims as a 'lie' and told the Herald the issue had been 'reported to senior officials and is being investigated'. On Twitter/X, McLellan wrote: 'These people are so desperate for attention that they will fabricate nonsense about whatever, and whomever, they can. 'The problem they have is that defamation laws exist in the UK for a reason, and if this post isn't taken down then they will likely find that out.' Reform UK Scotland also responded to the post, writing: 'Absolute nonsense. We have never spoken with this councillor and have zero knowledge of his wish to defect.' So far, 13 councillors in Scotland have defected to Reform – the overwhelming majority from the Scottish Conservatives. Jamie McGuire became the first councillor to defect from Scottish Labour to Farage's party in June. He serves the Renfrew North and Braehead ward on Renfrewshire council. McGuire announced the move during Farage's visit to Scotland ahead of the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election, where the Reform UK leader hid from the Scottish press and faced protests outside of the party's local campaign offices. In April, Reform claimed that their membership numbers in Scotland had passed 10,000 people, making them the country's third largest party. Polling published in May suggested Farage's party could overtake Scottish Labour at the Holyrood 2026 election, suggesting they could return 19% of the vote on the constituency ballot and 20% on the regional list.
