‘We have listened': Revised workers compensation reform in NSW passes milestone, challenges remain
A revised version of the proposed plan to reform workers compensation was introduced to parliament on Tuesday by Industrial Relations Minister Sophie Cotsis.
The initial proposal faced fierce backlash when it was unveiled earlier this month from unions and industry groups who slammed many of its provisions, including a 31 per cent threshold for damages for permanent impairment from psychological injury.
A requirement that someone seeking damages from psychological injury due to sexual or racial harassment or bullying require a court or tribunal finding was removed.
The Minns state government hopes the proposal will instil a 'culture of prevention' in the workers compensation scheme, while also securing it financially for years to come.
Treasurer Daniel Moohkey told an inquiry into the proposal earlier this month he would no longer be authorising payments to the Treasury managed Fund, the state's self-insurer, into which billions of dollars had been poured by successive governments.
Introducing the Bill, Ms Cotsis said that until now 'psychological injury has been left largely undefined in the Workers Compensation Act'.
'The Bill introduces new definitions for psychological injuries to make sure workers and employers have certainty on what the scheme protects,' she said.
'Clear definitions will mean less time spent on disputes and more time on prevention.'
Ms Cotsis revealed the government would establish a tripartite review – which had been pushed for by Unions NSW – to review and monitor the changes and 'to help guard against unintended consequences'.
'The review will be run by a panel of experts, with at least one expert recommended from Unions NSW, Business NSW and the NSW government,' who will also determine its terms of reference, Ms Cotsis said.
Ms Cotsis outlined the changes to the Bill parliament on Tuesday.
'The relevant event that caused the injury must have a real and direct connection with employment,' she said.
'Real and direct connection does not necessarily mean the relevant event has to occur in the physical workplace.
'New evidentiary requirements will support insurers to make objective and timely decisions in relation to claims.
'Relevant events include, but are not limited to, bullying, sexual harassment and indictable criminal conduct, including threats of violence and assault.'
Ms Cotsis said the intent was to target workers compensation toward events and behaviours, and preserved 'in no uncertain times' compensation for PTSD caused by trauma or exposure to traumatic events.
She defended the 'objective test' for bullying, excessive work demands, and racial or sexual harassment claims as 'reducing the reliance on the worker's perception', and said the Bill would provide employers with certainty around what is acceptable in the workplace.
'Interpersonal conflict and work stress are typical and reasonably expected to occur on almost a daily basis in all modern workplace,' she said.
'In contrast, bullying, excessive work demands, racial harassment or sexual harassment unacceptable in any workplace and should never be expected.
'The Bill amends the employer defences to psychological injury claims that were the result of reasonable management action.'
Psychological claims for bullying or harassment would also be expedited under the Bill, including if there is a dispute to the claim.
Addressing concerns about the 31 per cent WPI threshold, Ms Cotsis said 'we are listening' and that there would be a 'stepped transition'.
The Bill will not apply to coal miners or frontline service workers, including police and paramedics, save for a few of the amendments.
Unions pushback against workers compensation reform
Unions NSW and a range of other unions, including the NSW Nurses and Midwives Association and the NSW Teachers Federation, rallied outside of parliament on Monday morning in opposition to the reforms, which they said was being rushed through.
Industry groups, including in the legal and sports physiotherapy sectors, as well as activist groups have also voiced opposition to the Bill, with Australians for Mental Health on Tuesday pleading with the government to 'slow down' the proposed reforms.
'We welcome the revisions the government has made. It shows our policymakers are listening, but still requiring someone to be so unwell that they can barely function before receiving the long-term support they need is alarming,' chief executive Chris Gambian said.
'We agree the current workers compensation system is unsustainable, but overhauling it so quickly could take away vital support for the likes of first responders, teachers, nurses and social workers; people who are exposed to traumatic experiences every day.'
At the same time, the NSW government will also propose sweeping changes to workplace health and safety.
Among the proposed changes are plans to empower the NSW Industrial Relations Commission to issue 'stop-bullying' orders as well as the Tribunal's ability to resolve industrial disputes, give new powers and manpower to SafeWork NSW – in particular, around compliance – and codify workplace accountability and codes of practise.
The changes come after an $344m package from the state government and were welcomed by Ms Cotsis as a way to 'further strength the Industrial Relations Commission's ability to resolve disputes and to now resolve issues arising from Work Health and Safety legislation.
'It proposes major reform particularly around gender equality. The elimination of workplace bullying and sexual harassment are new key objectives of the IR Act.
'Workplace bullying causes serious harm to worker health and organisations. According to the Productivity Commission, bullying is estimated to cost up to $36bn annually in Australia.
'The amendments establish a 'one-stop shop' for handling complaints through the IRC and enhance its powers to resolve disputes and support injured workers' return to work.
'This legislation follows the passing of laws in 2023 which restored the independent industrial umpire, creating the structure needed to deliver meaningful improvements to the working lives of hundreds and thousands of workers in the state.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Canberra Times
5 hours ago
- Canberra Times
AI regulation at the heart of the public sector's roundtable pitch
A pause on changes to the National Construction Code and a plan to clear a backlog of housing approvals could also be on the agenda, according to leaked Treasury documents that Treasurer Jim Chalmers and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese have both played down.
Sky News AU
5 hours ago
- Sky News AU
'Danger' Labor could target critical tax concessions after upcoming economic roundtable, AMP's Shane Oliver warns
There is a 'danger' Labor could target tax concessions after the economic roundtable, increasing the tax burden on high-income earners, a leading economist has warned. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has invited business leaders, union figures and government officials to the roundtable where Australia's productivity, tax system and growth will come under the microscope. Ahead of the event, the Treasury has shared its roundtable material that mentions some of the largest tax concessions, such as the capital gains discount and those through super contributions, disproportionately benefit higher income earners. It also notes Australia's indirect tax intake, from taxes such as the GST, tobacco and fuel excises, will continue to fall while income tax intake will also decline. AMP's chief economist Shane Oliver warned the information in the document could create a case for implementing changes to tax concessions. 'That's the danger here - it lays the groundwork for finding more ways to raise revenue and part of that could be winding back the concessions,' Mr Oliver told Mr Oliver stressed that high income earners received 'the bulk of the benefit' from the concessions as they paid the 'bulk' of income tax. It comes as about 50 per cent of income tax is paid by the top 10 per cent of income taxpayers. 'The paper seemed to make an argument that we could wind back these concessions as a way to make the budget more sustainable,' Mr Oliver said. 'The problem with that is it then further increases the tax burden on high-income earners and would act as a further disincentive for work effort for high-income earners.' Concerns about changes to tax concessions also came from Wilson Asset Management portfolio strategist Damian Boey who is among the many Australians against Labor's plan to tax unrealised gains on large super accounts. He warned the government could be looking at changes to tax which implement a similar 'blanket approach' as the super tax. 'I think now that there's been a discovery that (blanket approach) is kind of the thinking behind it, there'll be more along the lines of trying to more intelligently tax capital gains or certain forms of saving,' Mr Boey told 'But not necessarily that blunt approach.' Mr Oliver warned the government had become too reliant on bracket creep – which occurs when inflation and rising incomes cause individuals to move up tax brackets, increasing their tax burden without improving real take home income. This would only worsen, he argued, as large government spending persists. 'At the moment we're just relying on bracket creep to bring revenue up to the level of government spending,' he said. 'But government spending is running at much higher levels than was seen prior to the pandemic.' He called for the government to index the tax brackets or reduce them so that it would be in a better position to target tax concessions. 'I do think there is a case to reduce the capital gains tax discount because it is too generous at 50 per cent but I'd only do that in the context of bringing down the overall tax brackets,' Mr Oliver said. 'I don't think you can ... do one in isolation.' Mr Chalmers on Wednesday said the government's policy was to cut taxes this term when asked about possible changes to taxes. "We've got a tax agenda which is to cut income taxes," the Treasurer said on Sky News. "No doubt people will bring all kinds of ideas on tax to the Economic Reform Roundtable. "We've tried not to artificially narrow or limit the contributions that people make, we will listen respectfully, but our focus and our priority on tax is cutting taxes for 14 million Australians." At next week's event, Mr Chalmers will be joined by the heads of major business bodies including AI Group, the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, the Business Council of Australia and the Council of Small Business Organisations of Australia. Other business figures include Atlassian co-founder Scott Farquhar, Commonwealth Bank of Australia chief executive Matt Comyn and Woodside board member Ben Wyatt. The Treasurer has also invited teal independent Allegra Spender, shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien and multiple members from the Australian Council of Trade Unions.
West Australian
19 hours ago
- West Australian
Chalmers slams ‘grumps and cynics', insists roundtable aims for genuine ideas not rubber stamping Labor plans
Treasurer Jim Chalmers has hit out at 'grumps and cynics' of this week's economic roundtable and insisted the motive is not to rubber stamp Labor-choreographed policies. It comes as Anthony Albanese told reporters in Perth he was upbeat about the 'full suite of issues' on the agenda, flagging 'jobs of the future' and 'responsible fiscal policy' as priorities. The duo used Sunday media appearances to lambast Opposition skepticism that the roundtable was a 'stitch up' orchestrated to endorse predetermined outcomes, insisting the Government was open to any ideas put forward. 'There will always be the usual kind of grumps and cynics who say the usual grumpy and cynical things about this,' Dr Chalmers said. The PM added he would 'make no apologies' for 'opening up to ideas'. 'What we're doing is inviting people to come in, from business, from unions, from civil society, to put forward their ideas about how we deal with the economic challenges of boosting productivity,' Mr Albanese said. The Coalition intensified their concerns about the event after the ABC on Thursday published details of a leaked Treasury document which included recommended outcomes from the event. The leaked pre-written list included advice to pause changes to the National Construction Code, a National AI plan, and clearing a backlog of home approvals under dated environmental laws. It made no mention of big tax reform. But the Treasurer stressed the Government had not pre-empted any outcome and insisted the briefing was prepared based on ideas already put forward. 'We're not pre-empting or predetermining the outcomes of the discussions that we're having in the coming week, but we are preparing for them,' Dr Chalmers said at a press conference in Queensland on Sunday. 'I think it is entirely unsurprising that when people put literally hundreds of ideas to us, that the Treasury does the work on that. 'We'll see if there's consensus and momentum around some of those ideas. 'Not pre-empting the discussion in the coming week but certainly preparing for it.' The Treasurer also flagged that his government had slashed hundreds of ''nuisance tariffs' on imports. 'There are good reasons to swim against the tide a bit when it comes to tariffs, some of these nuisance tariffs in our economy, risk doing more harm than good,' he told Sky News on Sunday. 'We're very proud of that progress that we've been able to make unilaterally, because tariffs push up compliance costs on business.' Shadow industry minister Alex Hawke slammed the Government for using minor policy tweaks to mask their lack of ambition on major policy reform. 'This Government doesn't seem to have a big agenda on tax and the economy,' Mr Hawke said. 'They say, 'oh, look, we've done these 10 tiny little things here that don't impact a lot of people and they don't raise any money, and that's reform'. 'Well that is just a clean up of some pretty low hanging fruit and that isn't a substitute for actual meaningful things that will get productivity moving.' Shadow industrial relations Minister Tim Wilson warned the Government were not going to find 'courage sitting around a round table'. 'You need to actually put proposals forward, debate them and take the Australians together,' he said. Already, 9000 submissions have been received ahead of the three day event, which kicks off in Canberra on Tuesday. Mr Hawke also slammed the guest list, accusing the Government of sacking it with Labor and union affiliates, saying 'the union movement' was 'aggressively front-running this summit'. Nine of the 24 people invited are either current or former Labor MPs, union officials, or party-aligned professionals. It includes former WA Labor treasurer Ben Wyatt, NSW Labor treasurer Daniel Mookhey, former QLD Labor treasurer Andrew Fraser and four union officials. Dr Chalmers on Sunday said he was unsure of who had first pitched the idea between him and the PM but claimed the two were on the same page about their ambitions for it. It comes after the pair had made contradictory statements in the lead up to their level of ambitions for the boardroom blitz, which was first labelled a productivity roundtable by the PM before being altered by Dr Chalmers to an 'economic reform roundtable'. 'It came from a couple of discussions after the election. I'm not sure who first raised it, but we've been on the same page on this throughout,' the Treasurer said.
