logo
Canada-U.S. trade war could spark an 'immediate crisis' in Ontario's landfills

Canada-U.S. trade war could spark an 'immediate crisis' in Ontario's landfills

CBC5 days ago

Social Sharing
Doug Ford's government is blaming U.S. tariffs for the expansion of a controversial landfill project in southwestern Ontario — but experts say the conflict should serve as a wake-up call that time is running out to find long-term solutions to the province's rapidly-filling landfills.
Ford's government has repeatedly raised the spectre of the U.S. President Donald Trump tariffing, or cutting off, garbage shipments to the U.S. as the rationale to reopen the York1 landfill site near Dresden, Ont.
While it's unclear if Trump has made such a threat publicly, or privately, the province has depended on the U.S. to take millions of tonnes of its trash for decades.
"It's about being self-reliant when it comes to waste management and all matters economic," Ontario's Environment Minister Todd McCarthy said in question period recently while defending the York1 project.
Ontario sent one-third of its waste to three American states between 2006 and 2022, with 40 million tonnes going to Michigan alone. Ontario generates between 12 and 15 million tonnes of trash annually and while the government's concerns are legitimate, one landfill will not solve the problem, said York University professor Calvin Lakhan.
"If, for whatever reason, the U.S. administration decided to close their borders to Canadian waste … we would face an immediate crisis that we simply do not have the infrastructure to manage," Lakhan said.
Conservative MPP speaks out against proposed Dresden landfill
13 days ago
Duration 3:08
Ontario will exhaust its landfill capacity over the next decade
The province's auditor general and the association that represents the province's waste and recycling sector have warned for years that Ontario's landfill capacity will be exhausted over the next decade.
A 2023 report from the Association of Municipalities of Ontario showed that while waste diversion rates increased in the preceding five years, so too did the amount of garbage generated by the province's growing population.
Even before Trump took office, Ontario faced major challenges disposing of its own garbage, said Lakhan, who is director of York's Circular Innovation Hub. But, he says the Dresden landfill, which the company says will take only non-hazardous construction and demolition materials, won't be enough to solve the crunch.
"Adding additional capacity to one landfill in the province is like putting a Band-Aid on a gaping wound," he said. "At best, it provides us a temporary reprieve."
Late last month, NDP environment critic Peter Tabuns slammed the government for failing to take earlier action on the file.
"In 2021, the Auditor General reported Ontario was facing a landfill crunch," he said. "This is not news, and the government did nothing about it."
AG warns businesses, institutions not doing enough to divert waste
At the time, the then-auditor general Bonnie Lysyk issued a damning report which laid some of the blame for the landfill crunch at the feet of businesses and institutions provincewide. They generate 60 per cent of Ontario's waste — that's at least 7.2 million tonnes of waste annually — and 98 per cent don't recycle, she said.
WATCH | Changes to who pays for recycling in Ontario:
Who pays for recycling collection in Ontario is changing, and corporations aren't happy
1 year ago
Duration 2:13
In 2017, the previous Liberal government set a goal to divert half of all waste generated by the province's residential and business sectors by 2030, and 80 per cent by 2050. As of 2021, Lysyk said the province was not on track to hit those targets.
As a result, she warned, "Ontario will be faced with questions about where to put all this waste and how to pay for it in the very near future."
A follow up audit from Lysyk's office in 2023 showed the government had made little progress on her 2021 recommendations. Green Party Leader Mike Schreiner said the government has shown little interest in tackling the problem.
"What this really shows is the Ford government's utter failure to bring forward a zero waste strategy for Ontario to hit waste diversion targets," he told CBC Toronto in a recent interview.
Trade war an excuse to loosen rules, says environmentalist
Karen Wirsig, senior program manager for plastics with Environmental Defence, said she's concerned the government will use Trump's tariffs as an excuse to push ahead with new or expanded landfills and to loosen environmental assessment rules around their creation.
"What worries me — and what it probably signals — is a broader intention by the government to use the sense of emergency to override local planning, local decision-making and local wishes," she said.
Ontario should use this moment to build consensus on a variety of waste diversion strategies that prolong the life of its current landfills, Wirsig said. It could also create a plastic bottle deposit program to encourage recycling and get behind "right to repair" efforts to keep electronics in use for years, she added.
"This is the low hanging fruit," Wirsig said, stressing that pursuing an organics diversion program amongst businesses, institutions and multi-unit residential properties would keep food waste out of landfills.
Lakhan said the province may have to consider expansion of waste to energy facilities that burn trash to create electricity. While the technology remains controversial in Ontario, he said Europe, Japan and Southeast Asia are turning to it.
"It's not necessarily considered a desirable end-of-life outcome," he said. "But the reality is that it's probably one of the only economically and technologically feasible short-term solutions that could potentially address this waste crisis."
The association that represents Ontario's waste and recycling sector said it too is concerned about the spectre of tariffs on garbage shipments.
It can take eight to 10 years for a new landfill to become operational, so enhanced disposal and diversion methods are needed, said Waste to Resource Ontario spokesperson Sophia Koukoulas.
A spokesperson for Minister McCarthy said the York1 project near Dresden is the landfill that can "mobilize the quickest" to reduce reliance on the U.S.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lowered expectations? Young Albertans most financially stressed but no more worried about being 'left behind'
Lowered expectations? Young Albertans most financially stressed but no more worried about being 'left behind'

CBC

time25 minutes ago

  • CBC

Lowered expectations? Young Albertans most financially stressed but no more worried about being 'left behind'

Social Sharing EDITOR'S NOTE: CBC News commissioned this public opinion research to be conducted immediately following the federal election and leading into the second anniversary of the United Conservative Party's provincial election win in May 2023. As with all polls, this one provides a snapshot in time. This analysis is one in a series of articles from this research. Mark Patzer is among a minority of Albertans his age; he's very confident he'll have enough money saved for retirement. "I just started planning at a young age," said Patzer, 27, who works as an environmental scientist in Calgary. "I have an RRSP. I prioritized putting money toward that over other things for the hope of one day retiring." He credits his financial situation to decisions he made in his early 20s: "Living at home for a while, living with roommates for a while, just doing the uncomfortable situations for as long as possible to get ahead financially, because it's harder to do nowadays." He also counts himself lucky to have found a good job shortly after graduating. "I started making a livable salary right out of school, which sometimes takes people a while," he said. In the past, a livable salary for a post-secondary graduate may have been an expectation. But these days, it's less of a given for young folks like Patzer. His perspective might help explain a puzzling result from a recent poll conducted for CBC Calgary. On the one hand, young people are more likely than older people to say they're having trouble meeting their monthly expenses. That's not too surprising. Young people also tend to be less confident when it comes to having enough money saved for retirement. Again, not surprising. On the other hand, young people are just as likely as older Albertans to agree that, "If things keep going the way they are, people like me will get left behind." That's the surprising bit. "When we asked people about feeling left behind, we thought we'd see a generational difference in there — and we didn't see that," said pollster Janet Brown, who conducted the public-opinion research for CBC News. "One of the first things we do is we look for those subgroup differences. But sometimes when you don't see subgroup differences, that can be interesting too." So what is going on here? A statistical analysis of the poll results suggests young people's thoughts on being "left behind" are tied less to their personal financial situation, compared to older folks. It's hard to say definitively why that is, but some of it may have to do with different expectations than previous generations when it comes to work and life, a sense of camaraderie with others going through the same struggles, and good old youthful optimism that there's plenty of time to turn things around. The data differences Brown said the survey questions were designed to track a wide range of Albertans' sentiments and examine the relationships between those sentiments. The "left behind" question, in particular, was deliberately worded in a way that could leave respondents with some room for interpretation. "It's about getting at that fundamental value of whether they feel there's something that's inherently unfair for people like them," said Brown. That broader question was accompanied by much more specific questions about individual financial situations. You can see the results from those questions in the charts below. Quite clearly, the below results show younger people are more worried than older folks about both their short-term and long-term finances. John Santos, a data scientist with the Janet Brown Opinion Research polling firm, says you can see a relationship in the poll results between Albertans' sense of financial security and their sentiments about being "left behind" — except among the youngest Albertans. Among the oldest folks, those who worried more about their personal finances were also much more likely to worry about being "left behind." However, Santos says that statistical relationship diminishes as respondents get younger, to the point of disappearing altogether. When it comes to 18-to-24-year-olds, in particular, there was no statistically significant difference in their responses to the "left behind" question, whether they were comfortable about their retirement savings or not. It's possible, Santos said, that retirement just seems so far off for many young people that other considerations may be top of mind when answering the "left behind" question. Young folks may also feel "they have time to make up any kind of lost financial ground," he said, while the reality of what retirement looks like may be more apparent for older folks. Brown also believes it has a lot to do with where people are compared to where they figured they would be at this point in their lives. "We think it has to do with expectation," she said. "When people got their education or training, what kind of an income were they expecting and are they getting that?" And this brings us back to Patzer and his "livable salary" at age 27. Grading on a curve? Young people these days have adjusted their expectations to fit with the reality they face, Patzer believes. So while many might be struggling to find good jobs, buy houses and save for retirement, there's a sense of camaraderie in the struggle. Patzer offered an analogy that would be familiar to university and college students: "If you fail a test, but your friend also fails, then you don't feel as bad, because you're both in the same position." Especially for people in that 18-to-24 age range who are looking around at each other, he said, everyone might seem to be going through the same kinds of challenges, so no one seems "left behind." "I think that was the case when we were all 23, 24, and no one really had that clear path yet," he said. "People were starting jobs, but the financial differences weren't that apparent." But a few years later, he's already starting to see that change. "Now that I'm 27, turning 28, I think that separation of what people's salaries are, is becoming a lot more evident," he said.

Mexican President Sheinbaum seeking meeting with Trump at G7
Mexican President Sheinbaum seeking meeting with Trump at G7

CBC

time30 minutes ago

  • CBC

Mexican President Sheinbaum seeking meeting with Trump at G7

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum says she hopes to have a pull-aside conversation with U.S. President Donald Trump when the two North American leaders travel to Alberta next week for the G7 summit. Her trip north comes as both Canada and Mexico grapple with Trump's persistent tariffs and economic threats, which have also stressed the Canada-Mexico relationship; Ontario Premier Doug Ford has suggested Canada go it alone with the U.S. on trade. Mexico is not part of the G7, but other leaders are often invited for discussions around the global leader summit. Last month, Sheinbaum confirmed she was invited but wasn't sure if she'd attend. "I have decided that I will attend the G7," Sheinbaum said in a statement Monday. "The foreign affairs minister is working on setting up bilateral meetings — it is likely that we will have one with Trump." Prime Minister Mark Carney's office has signalled he is hoping to reach a deal around tariffs and trade around the G7 meetings, taking place in Kananaskis, Alta., from June 15 to 17. The prime minister has also said he wants to make progress on bilateral issues with the U.S. before talks take place on the trilateral Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA). A review of that deal is officially slated to start in 2026, although Mexican officials have suggested they expect a review to start earlier than that.

Canada plans to hit NATO spending target early and reduce US defense reliance, Carney says
Canada plans to hit NATO spending target early and reduce US defense reliance, Carney says

Globe and Mail

timean hour ago

  • Globe and Mail

Canada plans to hit NATO spending target early and reduce US defense reliance, Carney says

TORONTO (AP) — Canada will meet NATO's military spending guideline by early next year and diversify defense spending away from the United States, Prime Minister Mark Carney said Monday. Carney said Canada will achieve NATO's spending target of 2% of gross domestic product five years earlier than it had previously planned. 'Our military infrastructure and equipment have aged, hindering our military preparedness," Carney said. "Only one of our four submarines is seaworthy. Less than half of our maritime fleet and land vehicles are operational. More broadly we are too reliant on the United States." According to NATO figures, Canada was estimated to be spending 1.33% of GDP on its military budget in 2023, below the 2% target that NATO countries have set for themselves. Canada previously said it was on track to meet NATO's spending target by the end of the decade. 'Our goal is to protect Canadians, not to satisfy NATO accountants,' Carney said. The announcement of increased spending came as Canada is about to host a summit of the Group of Seven leading industrialized nations in Alberta on June 15-17, and before the NATO summit in Europe. It also comes as NATO allies are poised to increase the commitment well beyond the 2% target. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said last week that most U.S. allies at NATO endorse U.S. President Donald Trump's demand that they invest 5% of gross domestic product on their defense needs and are ready to ramp up security spending even more. Carney has said that he intends to diversify Canada's procurement and enhance the country's relationship with the EU. 'We should no longer send three quarters of our defense capital spending to America,' Carney said in a speech at the University of Toronto. 'We will invest in new submarines, aircraft, ships, armed vehicles and artillery, as well as new radar, drones and sensors to monitor the seafloor and the Arctic.' Canada has been in discussions with the European Union to join an EU drive to break its security dependency on the United States, with a focus on buying more defense equipment, including fighter jets, in Europe. Carney's government is reviewing the purchase of U.S. F-35 fighter jets to see if there are other options. Carney said that the U.S. 'is beginning to monetize its hegemony: charging for access to its markets and reducing its (relative) contributions to our collective security.' 'Middle powers compete for interests and attention, knowing that if they are not at the table, they will be on the menu," Carney said. Trump's calls to make Canada the 51st U.S. state have infuriated Canadians, and Carney won the job of prime minister after promising to confront the increased aggression shown by Trump. Carney said that the long-held view that Canada's geographic location will protect Canadians is becoming increasingly archaic. European allies and Canada have already been investing heavily in their armed forces, as well as on weapons and ammunition, since Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store