
Dozens of supercars worth more than £7m seized by cops in sting after one owner had ‘only been in UK for 2 hours'
More than 70 luxury motors were nabbed in the crackdown - including one from an owner who had been in the UK for just two hours.
6
6
6
The collaborative operation saw forces from the Metropolitan Police join with those from the Motor Insurers' Bureau (MIB) to respond to the rise in anti-social and dangerous driving in London.
A flurry of expensive cars were seized across Hyde Park, Kensington, and Chelsea in the capital, including from luxury brands Ferrari, Porsche, and Mercedes-Benz.
Two identical purple Lamborghinis - which were uninsured and had been flown into Britain for their owner's summer trip - were also impounded.
One of the two drivers had been in the UK for just two hours, and behind the wheel for just 15 minutes, before being caught.
The MIB explained that several of the seized vehicles had been brought into Britain from abroad.
Many of these vehicles' drivers were relying on motor insurance from their home countries, failing to verify if those police provided valid coverage in the UK.
In total, the operation led to the impounding of 72 motors, many of which were uninsured or inadequately covered.
Officers also detected a range of other criminal activity in their investigation.
This included individuals wanted for actual bodily harm and criminal damage, for drug offences, for stolen vehicles, for immigration offences and for fraudulent insurance policies, known as " ghost broking".
Cops also issued countless tickets for a range of other offences, including driving without a valid licence, using a mobile phone while driving, and failing to have a valid MOT.
6
6
6
Tickets were also doled out to those who had illegally tinted windows, who were not wearing a seatbelt, and those who were operating vehicles in a dangerous condition.
Officers also identified individuals who had made often-innocent mistakes, such as updating DVLA about the use of a personalised number plate but failing to notify their insurance provider.
The operation provided an opportunity for the motorists to rectify their errors whilst demonstrating just how vigilant the police are to these issues.
Seventy-five officers from the Met's Special Constabulary and Vehicle Enforcement Team took part, using several methods to identify uninsured drivers.
Special Chief Officer James Deller from the Metropolitan Police, who attended the operation, said: "The Met is committed to tackling anti-social behaviour.
"This operation was set up to respond to resident, business and visitors' concerns about high-value vehicles causing a nuisance in known hotspot areas in central and west London.
"Already the Met has reduced neighbourhood crime by 19 per cent compared to the same time last year and we're addressing anti-social behaviour caused by uninsured drivers.
"This has been a great opportunity to work with the Motor Insurers' Bureau and for officers to speak with members of the public about the work we do, educate drivers and enforce the law.
"We've had some real success - thank you to Special Constable colleagues who volunteer their time to help drive down crime across London."
Martin Saunders, Head of Uninsured Driving Prevention at MIB, reinforced the dual goals of enforcement and awareness: "We urge all motorists to check their insurance policy is in place, is appropriate for their needs and to reach out to their insurer if they are unsure on any part of their policy.
"While many offenders knowingly violated the law, others fell victim to simple mistakes such as bounced payments, failed renewals or incorrect details.
"With growing concern over seasonal hotspots and tourist-linked offences, the Met and MIB plan to continue enforcement and education efforts throughout the year.
"We don't want any driver to become uninsured in the first place.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
21 minutes ago
- Sky News
Facial recognition vans to be rolled out across police forces in England
The police's use of facial recognition technology is to be significantly expanded in an attempt to catch more offenders, ministers have announced. Under the plans, 10 live facial recognition (LFR) vans will be used by seven forces across England to help identify "sex offenders or people wanted for the most serious crimes", according to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper. The tech, which has been trialled in London and south Wales, will be subject to strict rules, the Home Office said, but human rights groups have warned it is "dangerous and discriminatory". Amnesty International UK said the plans should be "immediately scrapped", with facial recognition proven to be "discriminatory against communities of colour". "It has been known to lead to misidentification and the risk of wrongful arrest," said Alba Kapoor, the charity's racial justice lead, "and it's also known to be less accurate in scanning the faces of people of colour." The Home Office said the LFR vans will only be deployed when there is "specific intelligence", and will be operated by trained officers who will check every match made by the cameras. The vehicles will also only be used against bespoke watch lists, compiled for each use under guidelines set by the College of Policing. The vans will be operated by police forces in Greater Manchester, West Yorkshire, Bedfordshire, Surrey and Sussex (jointly), and Thames Valley and Hampshire (jointly). 'The most serious offenders' Ms Cooper has said ministers are focused on making sure "there are proper safeguards in place". As part of the plans, the home secretary has announced she will be launching a consultation on how and when the cameras should be used, and with what safeguards, which the government will use to draw up a new legal framework for the use of the cameras. Ms Cooper said the tech had been used in London and South Wales "in a targeted way", and helped catch "the most serious offenders, including people wanted for violent assaults or for sex offences". According to the Metropolitan Police, the tech has led to 580 arrests for offences such as rape, domestic crime and knife crime in the space of 12 months. The government has pointed to independent testing by the National Physical Laboratory, which it said found the tech was "accurate" and showed "no bias for ethnicity, age, or gender". Liberty has welcomed the government's decision to create a statutory framework for using facial recognition, but said that should be in place before the tech is rolled out. "There's no reasonable excuse to be putting even more cameras on our streets before the public have had their say and legislation is brought in to protect all of us," said a statement. The civil liberties charity cited how more than 1.6 million people have had their faces scanned in South Wales, mostly on football match days in Cardiff city centre. But Lindsey Chiswick, from the National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC), has said the expansion "is an excellent opportunity for policing", and will help officers locate suspects "quickly and accurately".

Leader Live
28 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Police seize supercars worth £6m in anti-social driving crackdown
Seventy-two luxury vehicles, including Ferraris, Lamborghinis and Bentleys, were taken off the streets last weekend in an operation targeting nuisance driving in London's West End. The Metropolitan Police said the cars were either unroadworthy or being driven illegally. The operation was launched following complaints from residents, businesses and visitors about high-value cars causing disruption in and around Hyde Park, Kensington and Chelsea. Officers worked with the Motor Insurers' Bureau to issue tickets for a range of offences including driving with no insurance, no licence, disqualification, false documentation and fraudulent number plates. Several stolen vehicles were recovered, with 10 others found to have no valid MoT and 11 without road tax. Eight people were arrested for offences including actual bodily harm (ABH), criminal damage, drug offences, theft and immigration breaches. Those arrested include a 22-year-old man from Hammersmith, held for ABH and criminal damage, who was remanded in custody. Another man, aged 25 and from London, was charged with possession of a class B drug. A 27-year-old man from Watford was arrested for theft of a motor vehicle and released under investigation. A 23-year-old man from Twickenham was remanded after being arrested on suspicion of theft of a motor vehicle, dangerous driving, failing to stop for police, driving without insurance or a licence, and drug-driving. Three men, aged 26, 35 and 39, and a 23-year-old woman, all from London, were arrested on suspicion of immigration offences. Special Chief Officer James Deller said the operation responded to concerns over 'high-value vehicles causing a nuisance in known hotspot areas in central and west London'. He added: 'The Met has already reduced neighbourhood crime by 19% over recent months and we're addressing anti-social behaviour caused by uninsured drivers. 'This has been a great opportunity to work with the Motor Insurers' Bureau and for officers to speak with members of the public about the work we do, educate drivers and enforce the law.'


Sky News
39 minutes ago
- Sky News
Police ordered to consider revealing ethnicity of suspects
Police should consider disclosing the ethnicity and nationality of suspects when they are charged in high-profile and sensitive cases, new national guidance says. Coming into force today, it says there must be a policing reason to release the information, such as where there are high levels of disinformation, if it will improve public safety, or if it is significantly in the public interest. A Home Office spokesperson told Sky News they will support the new guidance by authorising the release of relevant accompanying immigration information if appropriate. The change comes after two men charged over the alleged rape of a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton were reported to be Afghan asylum seekers, sparking protests. Warwickshire Police did not confirm the immigration status, leading to Reform UK accusing them of a cover-up, something the force strongly denied. Responding to the row, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said last week she wanted police to be more transparent, and that new guidance was being worked up. 2:41 How high-profile cases sparked debate When considering what information to release, police must consider contempt of court laws which aim to give defendants a fair trial, as well as media guidance from the College of Policing. Until now, the media guidance said once a suspect has been charged, police can give out information such as their name, date of birth and address. It did not mention anything about ethnicity, nationality, or immigration status. The Southport murders committed by Axel Rudakubana last July led to speculation about his ethnicity and immigration status, fuelling riots in many parts of the country. While the details were not initially released in that case, when a car ploughed into crowds celebrating Liverpool's Premier League win earlier this year, Merseyside Police were quick to say the suspect was a white British man. In the Nuneaton case, Reform leader Nigel Farage said retaining the "basic and sober facts" was "a cover-up that in many ways is reminiscent of what happened after the Southport killings". Warwickshire Police said officers "did not and will not cover up such criminality", and followed national guidance. How will new guidance work? The new guidance says it is at the discretion of the police force to decide whether to release ethnicity and nationality details, and that they must consider the ethical and legal implications. It says it is not the job of police to verify a suspect's immigration status, which rests with the Home Office. The advice has been developed by the National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) and the College of Policing, in consultation with the Home Office and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). Deputy chief constable Sam de Reya, the NPCC lead for communications and media, said: "We saw during last summer's disorder, as well as in several recent high-profile cases, what the major, real-world consequences can be from what information police release into the public domain. "We have to make sure our processes are fit for purpose in an age of social media speculation and where information can travel incredibly quickly across a wide range of channels. "Disinformation and incorrect narratives can take hold in a vacuum. It is good police work for us to fill this vacuum with the facts about issues of wider public interest." 3:31 'A chilling message' The guidance is interim, and will be considered as part of a wider review of the College of Policing's authorised professional practice for media relations later this year. Chief constable Sir Andy Marsh, the college's CEO, said officers will continue to police "without fear or favour". But the guidance is likely to provoke backlash from anti-racism campaigners. Last week, the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants warned that revealing ethnicity and migration status would "send a chilling message: that some people are inherently more 'suspect'". 'Public trust requires transparency' A Home Office spokesperson told Sky News they welcome the new guidance, adding: "Public trust requires transparency and consistency from the authorities that serve them." They added: "The public, and police forces themselves, want greater clarity on when, why and how information is released and the legitimate and compelling reasons it may need to be withheld. "The Home Office will support that effort by authorising the release of relevant accompanying immigration information in future cases, where it is appropriate to do so, and where the police have requested it. All cases will of course take account of consultation with the police and CPS. "The government also asked the Law Commission at the end of February to speed up the elements of its review around the law of contempt in relation to what can be said publicly ahead of a trial."