Euro Auctions Group acquires Headingley auto auction firm
Euro Auctions Group has acquired Associated Auto Auction Ltd., based in Headingley, and its specialist collector car auction brand (Coast2Coast).
Neither party would disclose the deal's cost. Associated Auto Auction's staff — roughly 10 people — will stay on board and leadership will remain in place.
In time, construction equipment will join the Headingley offerings. Euro Auctions Group encompasses Michener Allen Auctioneering Ltd., which sells industrial equipment in Canada; Michener will relocate to Headingley.
Associated Auto Auction is the latest in a string of Canadian auction sites to join the European corporation. North Toronto Auction was bought in May; Jardine Auctioneers in New Brunswick joined in March. Michener Allen Auctioneering was onboarded in October 2023.
'(There's) a great deal of opportunity in North America,' said Barry Walker, Euro Auctions communications lead.
Equipment auctioning is an international business, he underscored.
Euro Auctions Group contacted Associated Auto Auctions about a potential merger. Efficient shipping is among the benefits to joining a large group, said Janelle Collingridge, who bought the Headingley locale with her business partners in 2020.
Associated Auto Auctions runs four auctions per month. It was launched in 1971.
— Free Press staff
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Calgary Herald
42 minutes ago
- Calgary Herald
Lorne Gunter: Carney taking lessons from Trump and it's bad for Canada's bottom line
As much as U.S. President Donald Trump loves to exercise power by executive order, rather than leaving lawmaking up to the U.S. Congress, it is becoming increasingly obvious that Canada's very own Prime Minister Mark Carney loves governing by the Canadian equivalent – the order-in-council. Article content Consider for a minute Carney's refusal to have Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne bring down a budget until November or December. Rather than a budget and enabling legislation to authorize nearly half a trillion dollars in spending, Carney prefers to rule (and spend) by cabinet decree. Article content Article content Article content Before April's election, parliamentary budget officer Yves Giroux estimated the federal deficit for the current fiscal year would be just about $47 billion. That's bad enough, but a significant decrease from the $62-billion deficit that the Liberals had to admit to before Christmas for last year. Article content But as Giroux pointed out at the time, his sum was only 'a baseline.' His number was only what the deficit would be before any of the political promises the winning party carried through on. Article content Since the Liberals were re-elected, Giroux has estimated for reporters that the Carney government's campaign goodies would raise the 2025-26 deficit to between $60 billion and $70 billion 'in the absence of spending cuts elsewhere.' That, of course, is as bad or worse than last year's Liberal amount. Article content Mark Carney intends for his government to spend more money than Justin Trudeau's, and without a budget or proper accountability to Parliament. Article content Article content But even Giroux's latest guestimate doesn't include measures the Carney Liberals have taken since the end of May without recourse to the House of Commons or a budget. Article content Article content Enter Toronto's C.D. Howe Institute. Article content The non-partisan think tank calculates that with measures announced by the Liberals since the election (right up to the cancellation of the digital services tax last weekend), the deficit this year will be $92 billion in the current fiscal year, $75 billion next year, $73 billion the year after that and $71 billion in 2028-29. Article content That's a total of $311 billion in extra public debt in just four years. It took the Trudeau government 10 years to add $600 billion. That's a rate of extra debt about 20 per cent faster than the rate built up by Justin Trudeau and his cabinets. Article content You may take comfort in the fact that Carney is a former central banker and international financier. I don't. Canada already has a higher-than-average debt-to-GDP ratio for a developed nation. Carney's orgy of spending will only make it worse.
Edmonton Journal
an hour ago
- Edmonton Journal
Lorne Gunter: Carney taking lessons from Trump and it's bad for Canada's bottom line
As much as U.S. President Donald Trump loves to exercise power by executive order, rather than leaving lawmaking up to the U.S. Congress, it is becoming increasingly obvious that Canada's very own Prime Minister Mark Carney loves governing by the Canadian equivalent – the order-in-council. Article content Consider for a minute Carney's refusal to have Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne bring down a budget until November or December. Rather than a budget and enabling legislation to authorize nearly half a trillion dollars in spending, Carney prefers to rule (and spend) by cabinet decree. Article content Article content Article content But as Giroux pointed out at the time, his sum was only 'a baseline.' His number was only what the deficit would be before any of the political promises the winning party carried through on. Article content Since the Liberals were re-elected, Giroux has estimated for reporters that the Carney government's campaign goodies would raise the 2025-26 deficit to between $60 billion and $70 billion 'in the absence of spending cuts elsewhere.' That, of course, is as bad or worse than last year's Liberal amount. Article content Mark Carney intends for his government to spend more money than Justin Trudeau's, and without a budget or proper accountability to Parliament. Article content Article content But even Giroux's latest guestimate doesn't include measures the Carney Liberals have taken since the end of May without recourse to the House of Commons or a budget. Article content Article content Enter Toronto's C.D. Howe Institute. Article content The non-partisan think tank calculates that with measures announced by the Liberals since the election (right up to the cancellation of the digital services tax last weekend), the deficit this year will be $92 billion in the current fiscal year, $75 billion next year, $73 billion the year after that and $71 billion in 2028-29. Article content That's a total of $311 billion in extra public debt in just four years. It took the Trudeau government 10 years to add $600 billion. That's a rate of extra debt about 20 per cent faster than the rate built up by Justin Trudeau and his cabinets. Article content You may take comfort in the fact that Carney is a former central banker and international financier. I don't. Canada already has a higher-than-average debt-to-GDP ratio for a developed nation. Carney's orgy of spending will only make it worse.
Toronto Sun
3 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
GOLDSTEIN: Canada's retaliatory tariffs having little impact on U.S.
Prime Minister Mark Carney greets U.S. President Donald Trump during an arrival ceremony at the G7 Summit in Kananaskis, Alta., on June 16, 2025. Photo by STEFAN ROUSSEAU/POOL / AFP via Getty Images The practical problem Prime Minister Mark Carney faces in negotiating a new trade and security deal with President Donald Trump is that Canada is firing blanks with its retaliatory tariffs against the U.S. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account The issue, as Carney noted in explaining why 'dollar-for-dollar' tariffs against the U.S. won't work — after he initially supported them while running for the Liberal leadership — is that the U.S. economy is 10 times the size of Canada's. That means that Canadian counter tariffs on $95.4 billion worth of U.S. goods to date, along with the 'buy Canadian' campaign urged by the federal government, are having little real-world impact on the U.S. economy. Writing in The Hub last month, University of Calgary economics professor Trevor Tombe, said that in April — the latest data available — the total economic decline in the U.S. due to Canada's retaliatory measures, 'represents about $3.8 billion in missed Canadian purchases from U.S. firms. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'While that sounds substantial, the scale of the U.S. economy puts it into perspective: with a nominal GDP of nearly $30 trillion in U.S. dollars — or about $41 trillion in Canadian dollars — this loss amounts to just 0.1% of monthly economic activity' meaning, 'these early signs suggest the impact on the U.S. economy is minimal.' Regarding the voluntary consumer boycotts of American-made products, and buying Canadian ones instead, Tombe wrote: 'While individual choices may have shifted behaviour at the margins, the data reveal no consistent or large-scale changes in imports outside of tariffed goods. 'More data in the months ahead may tell us more. But for now, the conclusion is clear: while retaliatory tariffs had measurable effects on Canadian trade flows, and consumer boycotts — however well-intentioned — reflected genuine public anger with the U.S., neither has yet produced any meaningful economic impact south of the border', which was the Carney government's stated aim. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Similarly, Carleton University economics professor Vivek Dehejia told iPolitics in February that politicians urging Canadians to buy Canadian-made products over U.S. ones was 'tokenism'. 'It's a nice idea and it's nice there's been an uptick in patriotism and nationalism, but I don't think it's realistic. 'We simply can't replace everything that we import from the U.S. because we're a much smaller economy. 'I don't think it's going to cause much damage to the U.S. economy … it's not going to fix our problem.' That's why Carney, criticized by former Liberal cabinet minister Lloyd Axworthy for taking a 'bootlicking' approach to Trump's demands — easy for him to say since he's not on the hot seat — has already made numerous concessions to the U.S. president in order to avoid an all-out economic war which Canada would lose. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The latest was Carney scrapping Canada's digital services tax last Sunday, after Trump threatened to end trade and security negotiations with Canada over the DST last Friday. Carney has also delayed retaliation against Trump doubling tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to 50% last month, pending the outcome of the now-resumed negotiations for a trade and security deal between Canada and the U.S. by July 21. In other measures to appease Trump: Carney introduced the 'Strong Borders Act' to 'keep our borders secure, combat transnational organized crime, stop the flow of illegal fentanyl, and crack down on money laundering' in deference to Trump's demands about border security. He announced Canada would meet its long-neglected NATO target of spending 2% of annual GDP on defence by March 31, 2026, another Trump demand, and said Canada would also comply with Trump's demand to increase spending on defence to 5% of GDP by 2035. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. He suspended counter-tariffs on some U.S. goods for six months on the grounds Canadian industries needed time to adjust. None of this is surprising given that Canada is the smaller economic partner in negotiations with the U.S. It appears to have succeeded — at least temporarily — in avoiding the full range of tariffs that Trump could launch against Canada, which Carney hopes to avoid by reaching a deal with him by July 21. Read More This prior to the launch of negotiations on the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade scheduled for next year. To be fair, Trump launched this trade war against Canada and many other countries, not the reverse, and he thinks nothing of violating existing trade agreements. That said, Carney's actions on this issue since becoming prime minister are fundamentally different from the 'elbows up' rhetoric he campaigned on during the federal election. RECOMMENDED VIDEO Crime Toronto Blue Jays Canada Other Sports Editorials
