logo
'It's sad and embarrassing': Rumors and pornography accusation disrupt Cincinnati parish

'It's sad and embarrassing': Rumors and pornography accusation disrupt Cincinnati parish

Yahoo2 days ago

Months of tension between Catholic parishioners and their priests at a West Side parish boiled over last weekend with a disruption during Mass, accusations about pornography and a plea from Cincinnati's archbishop to end "sinful" rumors and gossip.
The problems burst into public view Saturday at Our Lady of the Visitation in Green Township, when police officers escorted a man who'd interrupted the afternoon service out of the church.
The incident occurred moments after Archdiocese of Cincinnati Chancellor Jason Williams read a statement from Archbishop Robert Casey defending a Visitation priest, Martin Bachman, and its pastor, Don Siciliano.
Casey's statement referred to accusations and complaints about the priests as unfounded and unfair.
'Several concerns have been brought to the attention of the archdiocese,' Casey wrote. 'These have been investigated, and no wrongdoing – either criminally or ecclesiastically – has been substantiated.'
Casey then urged parishioners to avoid spreading falsehoods about anyone, including their parish priests. 'Rumors which quickly spiral out of control have the potential to severely harm the good reputation which each of us should enjoy,' he wrote. 'Consequently, like gossip, the spreading of rumors is sinful, and we should all work to overcome this tendency of our fallen human nature.'
Jake McQuaide, a Visitation parishioner and NFL player, stood to protest after Williams read Casey's statement, shouting at Williams and demanding, specifically, that he address an allegation that Bachman had accessed pornography on a computer at the church.
'We want to put these rumors to rest,' McQuaide said. 'Can you answer this for me?'
'This is not the time,' Williams responded.
Williams then said the accusation against Bachman was false, but the back-and-forth continued until Green Township police officers approached McQuaide and walked him out of the church.
Police Capt. Mitch Hill said the archdiocese had asked police to attend the service in case there were disruptions. He said McQuaide, who could not be reached for comment, was not detained or charged with a crime.
Bachman did not respond to calls or an email seeking comment. But an archdiocese spokeswoman, Jennifer Schack, said the allegation that Bachman used a parish-owned computer to access pornography is false.
Casey said in his statement that Bachman would begin a sabbatical in July, which he said was planned prior to the accusations and is unrelated to them.
Todd Zureick, the Visitation parishioner who filed a complaint with the archdiocese about the pornography allegation, said he saw images on the computer that included thumbnail links to adult pornography sites and other sites with explicit content. He said he received the images from a third party, whom he has not identified, and then shared them with the archdiocese in April.
Zureick said he does not believe the images are illegal but that they are inappropriate for a workplace, especially a church.
He said the archdiocese failed to adequately investigate the complaint, which has resulted in the public airing of accusations and more frustration among parishioners.
'It's sad and embarrassing that the lack of institutional control and leadership at Visitation has led to this,' Zureick said.
Casey, however, said in his statement that the matter was investigated thoroughly and that no misconduct was revealed.
'Both Father Siciliano and Father Bachman are priests in good standing in the Archdiocese of Cincinnati,' Casey wrote. 'There are no ecclesiastical investigations being conducted related to their conduct.'
He also described some of the accusations that have been made as 'defamatory statements' and said Green Township Police have found no criminal misconduct related to any priest at Visitation.
Hill confirmed his department has found no criminal wrongdoing. But police records show they did investigate an unrelated complaint in late 2023 with connections to Visitation.
The name of the person who filed the complaint is redacted, because of a state law that conceals the names of crime victims. But The Enquirer found the property listed on the complaint is owned by the archdiocese and matches Bachman's address.
According to a police report, the man who filed the complaint said he had been encouraged by an unknown person he'd met online to deposit money into an investment account. By the time he realized it was 'a scam,' the police report said, he had deposited $58,000.
Weeks later, the man who filed the complaint said he'd been contacted again by the person he'd met online, and this time she was threatening to reveal sexually explicit conversations he'd had with her 'to his parishes' if he didn't pay more money.
Hill said police, who investigated the matter as a telecommunications fraud, don't know if that threat was carried out. But he said the $58,000 investment was never recovered.
Schack did not respond late Monday when asked if archdiocese officials were aware of the fraud investigation.
Casey's statement also does not mention the fraud investigation.
Long before the uproar last weekend, parishioners at Visitation, St. Jude in Bridgetown and St. Joseph in North Bend had expressed concerns about leadership in their parishes. All three parishes are part of a 'family of parishes' that is overseen by Siciliano and Bachman.
The parish family was created a few years ago as the archdiocese began consolidating parishes and schools into groups that could share resources and priests. Those changes have, at times, upset parishioners.
A change.org petition started early this year listed a string of complaints and concerns from parishioners at Visitation, St. Jude and St. Joseph about the operation of their parishes and parish schools.
'We … are deeply concerned about the current direction of leadership and decision-making within our parish,' the petition states. It goes on to request better communication from church leaders, more transparency in parish finances, more autonomy for school faculty and protection from retaliation for parishioners who speak out.
As of Monday, the petition had 651 signatures.
Maggie Lysaght, the Visitation parishioner who started the petition, said the concerns expressed in the petition are based on input from more than 200 parishioners. She said the problems they reveal shouldn't be overshadowed by the pornography accusations that arose at the church last weekend.
'There are a lot of unhappy parishioners,' she said.
In his statement, Casey indicated he's aware the consolidation of parishes might be a challenge for some parishioners.
'Times of change can be difficult,' he wrote. 'We may not like some decisions that are made, and things may not always unfold according to our personal preferences.'
This article originally appeared on Cincinnati Enquirer: Rumors and pornography accusation disrupt Cincinnati west side parish

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Get ready for a flurry of activity from the Supreme Court
Get ready for a flurry of activity from the Supreme Court

USA Today

time2 hours ago

  • USA Today

Get ready for a flurry of activity from the Supreme Court

Get ready for a flurry of activity from the Supreme Court Show Caption Hide Caption Protesters line up outside Supreme Court birthright citizenship hearing Protesters shouted "birthright citizenship belongs to us!" outside the Supreme Court in Washington D.C. WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court is picking up the pace as it announces some of its most consequential decisions of the term before adjourning for the summer. The next cluster of opinions will drop on June 5, though the biggest outstanding decisions may not come until later. Those include whether the court will allow President Donald Trump to enforce his changes to birthright citizenship while his new policy is being litigated and whether the court will uphold Tennessee's ban on gender affirming care for minors. In addition to the court dispensing with the cases it debated in oral arguments in recent months, the justices are continuing to field an unusual number of emergency requests from the Trump administration to intervene in the many legal challenges to the president's policies. That could push the regular work of the court into July. Here's a look at the decisions expected in the coming weeks: Limiting challenges to Trump's executive authority Trump's executive order limiting birthright citizenship has been put on hold by judges across the country who ruled it's probably unconstitutional. During the May 15 oral arguments, none of the justices voiced support for the Trump administration's theory that the president's order is consistent with the 14th Amendment's citizenship clause and past Supreme Court decisions about that provision. But several of the justices have expressed concern about the ability of one judge to block a law or presidential order from going into effect anywhere in the country while it's being challenged. It was unclear from the oral arguments how the court might find a way to limit nationwide – or 'universal' – court orders and what that would mean for birthright citizenship and the many other Trump policies being challenged in court. Religious expression versus separation of church and state Of the three cases the justices heard about the First Amendment's protections for the right to practice religion, the biggest was the Catholic Church's bid to run the nation's first religious charter school. But the court deadlocked 4-4 over whether they could do that. That left in place a lower court's rejection of the school but without setting a precedent that must be followed for similar attempts in the future. More: Supreme Court blocks Catholic charter school in big setback for religion advocates In the other cases about the free exercise of religion, the court is likely to side with Catholic Charities in a dispute over when religious groups have to pay unemployment taxes. And the court's conservative majority sounded sympathetic to Maryland parents who raised religious objections to having their elementary school children read books with LGBTQ+ characters. The battle over transgender rights Transgender rights cases were already making their way to the Supreme Court from state actions and now the Trump administration policies regarding transgender people will accelerate that trend. The court has already granted the administration's emergency request that it be allowed to enforce its ban on military service by transgender people while that restriction is being challenged. In one of the court's biggest pending decisions, the justices will decide whether states can ban minors from receiving puberty blockers and hormone therapy. During December's oral arguments, a majority seemed to agree states can do that. But how they reach that conclusion will affect how much their decision applies to other transgender rights case including those about transgender athletes, whether health plans have to cover gender affirming care, where transgender inmates must be housed and if transgender people can serve in the military. Implications for parental rights While the court seems likely to rule against the parents challenging Tennessee's ban on gender affirming care for minors, they sounded poised to back the Maryland parents who want their elementary school children excused from class when books with LGBTQ+ characters are being read. And in a case about Texas' requirement that websites verify users are 18 or over, one justice expressed her own parental frustration over trying to control what her children see on the internet. Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who has seven children, said she knows from personal experience how difficult it is to keep up with the content blocking devices that those challenging Texas' law offered as a better alternative. But while the justices were sympathetic to the purpose of Texas' law, they may decide a lower court didn't sufficiently review whether it violates the First Amendment rights of adults so must be reconsidered. Gun cases could bring mixed results In one of the court's biggest decisions so far this year, a 7-2 majority upheld the Biden administration's regulation of untraceable 'ghost guns,' ruling that the weapons can be subject to background checks and other requirements. But the court is expected to reject Mexico's attempt to hold U.S. gunmakers liable for violence caused by Mexican drug cartels armed with their weapons. A majority of the justices sounded likely to agree with the gunmakers that the chain of events between the manufacture of a gun and the harm it causes is too lengthy to blame the industry. Neither case is directly about the Second Amendment's right to bear arms. And the court narrowly decided against taking up two cases about that right – Maryland's ban on assault-style weapons and Rhode Island's ban on high-capacity magazines. More: Supreme Court won't review bans on assault-style weapons and high-capacity magazines Planned Parenthood, but not abortion directly, is an issue Unlike last year when the court considered two cases about abortion access, that hot button issue is not directly before the court. But the justices are deciding whether to back South Carolina's effort to deprive Planned Parenthood of public funding for other health services because it also provides abortions. The issue is whether the law allows Medicaid patients to sue South Carolina for excluding Planned Parenthood from its Medicaid program. If the court says the patients can't sue, other GOP-led states are expected to also kick Planned Parenthood out of Medicaid. And anti-abortion advocates are pushing for the same action nationwide. Conservative challenges to Obamacare and internet subsidies The court is considering conservative challenges to Obamacare and to an $8 billion federal program that subsidizes high-speed internet and phone service for millions of Americans. The justices seemed likely to reject an argument that the telecommunications program is funded by an unconstitutional tax, a case that raised questions about how much Congress can 'delegate' its legislative authority to a federal agency. The latest challenge to the Affordable Care Act takes aim at 2010 law's popular requirement that insurers cover without extra costs preventive care such as cancer screenings, cholesterol-lowering medication and diabetes tests. Two Christian-owned businesses and some people in Texas argue that the volunteer group of experts that recommends the services health insurance must cover is so powerful that, under the Constitution, its members must be appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. Multiple discrimination challenges The court is deciding a number of cases about alleged discrimination in the workplace, at school and in drawing congressional boundaries. The justices appeared likely to rule that a worker faced a higher hurdle to sue her employer as a straight woman than if she'd been gay, a decision that would make it easier to file 'reverse discrimination' lawsuits. The court may also side with a Minnesota teenager trying to use the Americans with Disabilities Act to sue her school for not accommodating her rare form of epilepsy that makes it difficult to attend class before noon. It's less clear whether the court will agree with non-Black voters in Louisiana that the state's congressional map, which includes two majority-Black districts, discriminates against them. Decisions in all the cases are expected by the end of June or early July.

YES Communities Announces 2025 Building Futures Arrupe Jesuit High School Scholarship Winner
YES Communities Announces 2025 Building Futures Arrupe Jesuit High School Scholarship Winner

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

YES Communities Announces 2025 Building Futures Arrupe Jesuit High School Scholarship Winner

YES Communities Announces 2025 Building Futures Arrupe Jesuit High School Scholarship Winner YES Communities Announces 2025 Building Futures Arrupe Jesuit High School Scholarship Winner Denver, CO, June 04, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Denver, Colorado, June 2nd, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- - YES Communities, a Denver-based operator of manufactured housing, has named Agustin R., a student at Arrupe Jesuit High School, as one of the 2025 recipients of its Building Futures Scholarship. As a recipient, Agustin will receive a $5,000 scholarship to help support his college education. 'We are excited to provide our fifth scholarship to another talented Arrupe Jesuit student,' said Julie Elkins, CFO of YES Communities. 'At YES, we're dedicated to creating opportunities for growth. Assisting these outstanding students in furthering their education reflects our ongoing commitment to developing the leaders of tomorrow.' Agustin is a senior at Arrupe and will attend Santa Clara University this fall to pursue his dreams of becoming a mechanical engineer. "At Santa Clara University, I'm committed to building a supportive community through leadership, dedication, and hard work, not just to improve my own future, but to help others succeed too. By studying mechanical engineering and connecting with fellow first-generation students, I hope to create a community where we lift each other up, both academically and personally." said Agustin. Arrupe Jesuit deeply appreciates the continued support YES Communities provides to our students,' said Michael J. O'Hagan, President of Arrupe Jesuit. 'We are thankful for the scholarship awarded to Agustin and the opportunities it creates for his future. Our partnership with YES Communities has a meaningful and lasting impact on the lives of our students.' Since the inception of the partnership with Arrupe Jesuit High School in 2010, YES Communities has provided 64 Corporate Work Study opportunities and 5 Building Futures Scholarships to students. About Arrupe Jesuit High School: Arrupe Jesuit High School is a Catholic, college preparatory school offering students with limited economic resources a premier educational experience through rigorous academics, formation in faith and discernment, and a unique work study program – fostering community, leadership, personal growth, and opportunity for all. To learn more, visit About YES Communities: YES Communities is a nationwide leader in the manufactured housing industry, offering high-quality, attainable housing solutions across the United States. Through meeting the unique needs of residents, our mission is to enhance the quality of life for everyone who calls a YES community home. For more information, visit Attachments YES Communities Announces 2025 Building Futures Arrupe Jesuit High School Scholarship Winner YES Communities Announces 2025 Building Futures Arrupe Jesuit High School Scholarship Winner CONTACT: Vanessa Jasinski YES Communities 1-833-625-0269 vjasinski@ in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Just 3 Lions remain from pre-Brad Holmes/Dan Campbell era after Ragnow retirement
Just 3 Lions remain from pre-Brad Holmes/Dan Campbell era after Ragnow retirement

USA Today

time3 hours ago

  • USA Today

Just 3 Lions remain from pre-Brad Holmes/Dan Campbell era after Ragnow retirement

Just 3 Lions remain from pre-Brad Holmes/Dan Campbell era after Ragnow retirement The Detroit Lions are saying goodbye to one of their longest-tenured players in center Frank Ragnow. Ragnow announced his retirement on Monday, bringing the franchise closer to fully phasing out the previous management regime's players -- for better or worse. Ragnow was one of four remaining players from before Brad Holmes and Dan Campbell took over in Detroit. These players powered through a lot of losses both with former head coach Matt Patricia and in the first couple of seasons under Dan Campbell. They're now the veterans of the franchise with Ragnow on his way out. Jack Fox Jack Fox began his career on the Kansas City Chiefs practice squad before the 2019-20 season, but ended that year on the Lions' practice squad. Fox won the starting job at punter to begin the 2020-21 season. He's since earned First-Team All-Pro, Second-Team All-Pro, and two Pro Bowl appearances for the Lions. Taylor Decker The Lions selected Taylor Decker with the 16th overall pick in the 2016 NFL Draft. Decker has been a staple of the offensive line that Holmes came in and built around to become the strength of the team. Decker, like Ragnow, has dealt with a handful of injuries in Detroit but ultimately has managed to stay on the field and anchor the offensive line while the pieces around him were moved around. He was named to his first Pro Bowl in 2024. Tom Kennedy Wide receiver Tom Kennedy has stuck with the Lions despite often moving back and forth between the practice squad and active roster. Kennedy began his career as an undrafted free agent who signed with the Lions in the 2019 offseason. It wasn't until October 2021 that he received his first NFL catch, though he ended up being waived and re-signed with the practice squad about a month later. Kennedy signed a reserve/future contract with the Lions in January 2025. Honorable mentions Graham Glasgow, Anthony Pittman, and Dan Skipper all began their careers with the Lions prior to the arrival of Holmes and Campbell, but spent time with other franchises before returning to play in Detroit later on.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store