Texas school districts hopeful lawmakers will help plug $1.7 billion gap in special education funding
Texas school districts are hoping changes under consideration at the Texas Legislature will help them keep up with the rising number of Texas students in special education programs — and the costs to support them.
Education advocates and school administrators say the proposals would help narrow the large funding gap between what Texas and the federal government provide schools for special education services and what public school districts have to pay themselves. That gap stands at about $1.7 billion, according to the Texas Education Agency.
Under changes proposed in the Texas House and Senate, the amount of funding a school receives for special education for each student would be based on students' individual needs.
That approach would be a significant departure from the current system, which directs special education funding to schools based on how much time a student spends in a particular setting. For example, two students who are placed in the same classroom but require different levels of support receive the same dollars under the current settings-based funding model.
Proponents say the new system would better serve special education students with widely varying needs — a deaf student, for example, may require a different level of support than a student with attention deficit disorder or dyslexia — and provide schools more funding to pay for those services. In some states that already have a 'tier-based' funding system for special education, schools receive more money to support students who require one-on-one instruction than for children who need more periodic help.
Other changes in the bills include giving partial reimbursements to schools when they initially evaluate students' special education needs, which can sometimes cost school districts thousands of dollars per student. The demand for initial special education evaluations has skyrocketed in recent years.
In addition, House Bill 2 — the Texas House's priority school finance bill this session — would include an additional $615 million in special education funding for the 2025-26 school year. Senate Bill 568, a more narrow special education funding bill advancing in the Senate, does not outline similar additional funding.
District leaders welcome the potential changes, which they say are much needed to provide relief to Texas schools that have been increasingly burdened with budget deficits and inflation-related cost hikes. Schools in Texas and across the country are required by law to provide special education services to students who need them. They often have to pull money away from other programs if they don't receive enough funding from the state and federal government.
'We would welcome, appreciate and encourage any additional funding provided by the state for our special education students,' said Bryan Guinn, the chief financial officer for Fort Bend Independent School District, the sixth-largest school district in the state. 'They're the students that have the greatest needs.'
The number of Texas students receiving special education services has grown rapidly in the past decade. During the 2014-15 school year, 8.6% of all Texas public school students participated in these programs. Almost 10 years later, that figure has gone up to about 14%, representing close to 800,000 Texas children last school year.
Much of that growth occurred after 2017, when the Texas Legislature ended an unofficial TEA policy that effectively prevented schools from providing special education services to more than 8.5% of their students.
In Fort Bend ISD, just southwest of Houston, the number of students in special education programs has more than doubled since the 2014-15 school year, according to a 2023 report by the Texas Council of Administrators of Special Education. Last year, more than 11,000 students in the district were enrolled in special education programs, representing almost 14% of all students and a more than 6,500-student increase from almost a decade ago.
Though Fort Bend ISD receives substantial funds from the state and federal government to pay for special education services required by law, they were not enough to cover the costs.
This past school year, state and federal funding covered close to three-quarters of the district's special education costs, but Fort Bend ISD was left on the hook to pay the remaining $33.6 million, Guinn said. Footing the rest of the bill has become a trend in recent years, he added. Since the 2019-20 school year, Fort Bend ISD has had to pay about $28 million each year for special education services out of its own pocket, Guinn said.
Higher special education costs in recent years have come as the district has had to hire more diagnosticians, speech-language pathologists, licensed school psychology experts and other aides to support the growing number of students in these programs, Guinn said.
Like many other school districts in the state, Fort Bend ISD also provides personalized special education programs. These services sometimes require multiple school employees to work with the same student at the same time, Guinn said. He believes the changes lawmakers are considering, which would base the special education funding schools receive on students' individual needs, will better help with his district's costs.
In addition, Guinn was pleased with HB 2's proposal to help schools cover the costs of special education evaluations they conduct. Like in many other Texas school districts, Fort Bend ISD staff evaluate children and decide whether they require special education services. Students generally receive these evaluations, with parental or guardian consent, before districts decide whether they need special education services.
HB 2 would reimburse schools $1,000 for every initial special education evaluation they conduct. Guinn said that amount might not cover the full cost of every evaluation but 'any funding is going to be helpful.' His district conducted more than 1,000 special education evaluations in the past year, he said — including follow-up evaluations that would not be covered by the House or Senate's proposals. Schools are generally required to cover the costs of these evaluations — not parents of students. The Senate proposal, SB 568, would reimburse schools $500 per initial evaluation.
The proposed reimbursements also come at a time when the House's school voucher bill — which would give families taxpayer funds to subsidize their children's private education — would put more pressure on public schools to conduct special education evaluations. Federal law already requires public schools to fund and conduct evaluations for private school students under certain circumstances, but the House's voucher proposal, House Bill 3, would mandate that public schools do so within 45 days.
Like in Fort Bend, Round Rock ISD Superintendent Hafedh Azaiez said high special education costs have become a heavy burden for his district. Last school year, nearly 6,100 students were receiving special education services in the district, an increase of about 25% from five years prior, according to a report from a consulting group. The cost of the special education services the district provided was $60 million, out of which Round Rock ISD had to pay about $20 million from its own pocket. The district has an 'obligation to take care of the students, regardless of the cost,' Azaiez said.
The district has had to make some 'difficult decisions' — like cutting several positions in the central office in recent years and increasing class sizes — to make up for rising costs from special education and other areas, Azaiez said.
'We have been creative in a way to offset the lack of adequate funding from the state,' he said. 'But it's getting harder and harder now to kind of make ends meet.'
Special education advocates have applauded the changes on the table this session. They have pushed harder for funding reforms like the ones in HB 2 and SB 568 as the number of special education students in the state has risen.
Two state special education task forces in recent years have recommended the state provide different levels of funding to schools depending on individual student needs.
Changes proposed in both major pieces of legislation are consistent with the main recommendations that one task force outlined in a 2022 report for revamping the special education funding formula: base funding on students' individual needs and give schools more money to cover the cost of special education evaluations and transporting special education students.
Rep. Mary González, D-Clint, who was part of one of the task forces and who has filed her own bill to reform special education funding this year, said all of those recommendations made it into HB 2. She said her constituents have told her that the 'state has been suffocating schools' by not adequately funding them.
HB 2 — the House's priority public school finance bill — also proposes a broader funding boost that would increase the base amount schools receive for every student by $220. Some education advocates and school leaders recently said they'll accept any new funding the state wants to provide, though others complained the proposed hike is too low and does not account for high inflation in recent years. The base amount of per-student funding that Texas schools get from the state has not been increased since 2019.
It seems unlikely that the Senate will propose its own increase to that base amount, which stands at $6,160 per student. Instead, senators have proposed a targeted funding increase that would raise teacher pay. Late last month, the Senate passed Senate Bill 26, which would establish pay raises for teachers based on years of experience.
But when it comes to special education, the proposed funding model would likely help close the current funding gap, according to Sabrina Gonzalez Saucedo, director of public policy and advocacy at The Arc of Texas, a disability advocacy group.
'In theory, with this new updated formula that considers all of these really important pieces, ISDs would be getting a more appropriate amount for providing the services that they're already doing and are federally required to do,' she said.
Some advocates have said they worry the bills as written will put the new system in place too quickly. The changes to special education funding in both HB 2 and SB 568 would go into effect at the start of the 2025-26 school year. Andrea Chevalier, director of governmental relations for the Texas Council of Administrators of Special Education, said making the changes too hastily could result in a difficult transition for school districts.
'Our advocacy has been, 'Please wait. Give us a year because there's going to be a lot of new data elements and data collection,'' Chevalier said. 'That would be the downside of it if the implementation piece of it is muddy, overly cumbersome or burdensome, and then it doesn't actually lead to improvements — at least not right away.'
She also expressed concern that both bills delegate power to the TEA commissioner, an unelected official, to decide what the different tiers of funding based on students' needs will be. The bills' authors should consider incorporating public comment or an advisory committee into that decision-making process, Chevalier added.
Other criticisms have centered on changes the bill does not include.
At a Senate Committee on Education K-16 hearing Tuesday, Ryan Wheeler, executive director of special education at Channelview ISD, asked lawmakers to amend SB 568 to include reimbursements not just for initial special education evaluations but for follow-up ones. Under federal law, he said school districts like his own are required to reevaluate students in special education programs at least every three years.
Also Tuesday, several individuals — including special education advocates and school officials — called on lawmakers to end a funding 'penalty' that causes schools to lose some general funds if students in special education programs spend time outside the general classroom.
Misty Odenweller, president of the Conroe ISD board of trustees, said her district would be able to recoup an additional $18.5 million without the penalty. That policy, she added, 'disproportionately affects our ability to serve all students.'
Still, advocates are optimistic about the proposals and hopeful they will alleviate Texas school districts' financial burdens.
'This is one of the most transformational bills this session,' Gonzalez Saucedo testified Tuesday. 'These reforms are a crucial step toward ensuring equitable and adequate funding for students with disabilities across Texas.'
Disclosure: Arc of Texas has been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.
We can't wait to welcome you to the 15th annual Texas Tribune Festival, Texas' breakout ideas and politics event happening Nov. 13–15 in downtown Austin. Step inside the conversations shaping the future of education, the economy, health care, energy, technology, public safety, culture, the arts and so much more.
Hear from our CEO, Sonal Shah, on TribFest 2025.
TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
21 minutes ago
- Fox News
ESPN star unleashes on 'out of control' Padilla for crashing Noem press conference
ESPN star Stephen A. Smith slammed Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., on Friday after the lawmaker disrupted Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem's press conference, which led to him being forcibly removed and handcuffed. "Here you have this Sen. Alex Padilla – Can Kristi Noem speak? Could you have waited till she finished to ask your questions, to shout your questions?" he said on "The Stephen A. Smith Show." "You are a senator, right? You couldn't wait? So that was just you out of control because you were just losing it, huh. You, a United States senator, couldn't compose yourself and let the head of Homeland Security finish her thoughts before you ask the question. Couldn't do that, huh? Couldn't do it, huh?" Smith added. The DHS endorsed Smith's statements on X after releasing a statement addressing Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass's criticism of their handling of Padilla. "What @stephenasmith said," the account said, with the video of Smith. DHS also tweeted, "Senator Padilla chose disrespectful political theatre and interrupted a live press conference without identifying himself or having his Senate security pin on as he lunged toward Secretary Noem. Mr. Padilla was told repeatedly to back away and did not comply with officers' repeated commands. "@SecretService thought he was an attacker and officers acted appropriately. Secretary Noem met with Senator Padilla after and held a 15 minute meeting." Smith went on to slam Padilla for "propping" himself up. "That's why you should be looking at Governor Wes Moore of Maryland, you should be looking at Josh Shapiro, governor of Pennsylvania," Smith said. "You know, the people that don't engage in this kind of nonsense. You're talking about propping yourself. It's all nonsense. It's all used as a tool to divide us." Padilla, the first Latino elected to the Senate from California, sparked a media firestorm Thursday over the press conference incident where his office says he was trying to ask Noem a question before he was "forcibly removed by federal agents, forced to the ground and handcuffed" in the wake of the Los Angeles riots. While Noam was speaking, Padilla attempted to shout over the Trump administration official. Law enforcement intervened to impede Padilla's advance. The video of officers removing and then bringing Padilla to the ground quickly spread among lawmakers on Capitol Hill, with some senators watching the spectacle unfold on the Senate floor. Democratic lawmakers universally condemned the level of force used to remove Padilla, and staged a march to the offices of both House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., in protest. Some demanded that Noem resign from her post. Padilla was blasted by his Republican colleagues for potentially breaking the law and making "a spectacle of himself" rather than fulfilling responsibilities.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Done deal: Florida legislators reach a budget agreement
House budget chief Rep. Lawrence McClure, left, and Senate budget chief Sen. Ed Hooper, right, answer budget questions on June 13, 2025. (Photo by Jay Waagmeester/Florida Phoenix) Amid looming federal cuts, legislators finalized the state spending plan for the next fiscal year Friday, announcing they expect to take a final vote on the budget Monday evening. As of Friday evening, the budget had not been printed, but Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Ed Hooper, R-Clearwater, told reporters the spending plan is about $500 million less than what Gov. Ron DeSantis' proposed $115.6 billion budget for state fiscal year 2025-26. Friday marked the 102nd day of this year's legislative session, which was extended because of the legislative leaders' failure to pass a budget. Disagreements over the size of the budget and what approach to take on tax cuts created a rift that pushed lawmakers to come back to Tallahassee to pass a budget before June 30 to avoid a government shutdown. House Budget Committee Chair Lawrence McClure, R-Dover, said the debate took longer than it should have, but put the blame in part on special sessions on immigration called prior to the start of the 2025 legislative session. 'That took a lot of bandwidth from both chambers, membership and staff. So I'm not excusing that we're delayed in getting this budget done, but there were contributing factors that largely were out of the control of either chamber,' he said. 'I'm glad we did the work on immigration. It was important work. But I'm thankful we were as thorough as we were,' on the budget. McClure also stressed the leaner budget. He emphasized the $1.5 billion set for reserves over the next two fiscal years, which the GOP-led Legislature is touting as an answer for a potential recession. 'For starters, it's a smaller supplemental list than many years prior,' McClure said, adding, 'we've put a bunch of recurring money in reserve stabilizing the long-term future.' Lawmakers last dipped into the Budget Stabilization Fund, which currently has $4.4 billion, during the Great Recession. Still, President Donald Trump's plan to phase out the Federal Emergency Management Agency after this year's hurricane season worried Hooper, he said. The Senate agreed to provide $23 million for the Florida State Guard — DeSantis had requested $62 million — keeping in mind the civilian volunteer force's role in responding to emergencies. 'We heard yesterday that, from our friends in Washington, after this hurricane season, there may be no more FEMA,' Hooper said. 'We may be on our own someday, and that would not be the time to start thinking about what should we plan ahead. … Just the state guard is an important part of making sure our state has the resources because the National Guard; it could be called anywhere.' The Florida State Guard has mainly been part of DeSantis' messaging against illegal immigration, particularly in sending troops to Texas' southern border. Hooper also expressed concerns about the multi-billion-dollar cut to Medicaid that Congress could enact. About 44% of federal funds coming into the state are for Medicaid. 'We hope they never change the formula of the Medicaid reimbursement,' he said. 'We're in trouble if they do.' Legislators earmarked nearly $560 million for local projects important to members. The supplemental funding was included on so-called sprinkle lists the chambers released Friday. But those hundreds of millions went to more than local projects. The powerful nursing home industry was able to secure significant Medicaid rate increases for long-term care facilities on both the House and Senate sprinkle lists. In the aggregate, the chambers agreed to a $176 million hike, of which about $18 million is recurring. That's on top of a near $110 million rate increase the chambers had already agreed to put in the budget. The increase in funds is expected to be coupled with new requirements on nursing homes that will be addressed in separate legislation, known as the conforming bill. It will be one of a spate of issues contained in SB 2514 the health care conforming bill. The House targeted $23.3 million in state and federal funds to a Medicaid managed care program for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. The program is a priority of House Speaker Daniel Perez, R-Miami, who pushed this year to take the small pilot program available in two Medicaid regions statewide. Republican Senate President Ben Albritton, of Wachula, had to give up his dreams for a $200 million 'Rural Renaissance' to invest in the state's underdeveloped and economically challenged communities. But he managed to keep most of the money for tackling food insecurity. Before budget negotiations fell apart earlier in the year, the Senate's budget included two grant programs through the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services: $12 million to expand the infrastructure of food banks in rural communities, and another $38 million to help food banks buy products from Florida farmers. In this final deal, Albritton gets to keep $10 million for food bank infrastructure and $28 million for farmers to feed communities. Food bank networks across the state counted on this investment following the loss of millions in federal funds they used to buy fresh produce. The Senate included in its sprinkle list $300,000 for an 'Intellectual Freedom Survey,' half for the State University System and half for the Florida College System. The survey is meant to 'compile and analyze the annual intellectual freedom and viewpoint diversity survey.' The House included $7.5 million for Florida Polytechnic University to increase its enrollment to 3,000 students. Its fall 2024 enrollment was more than 1,770. The chambers agreed to fund $42.4 million to Florida State University for operational funding, the most of any institution. Florida International University would receive $35 million under the proposed budget for operation enhancement. Between the two chambers' sprinkle lists, $10 million has been allocated to security for Jewish day schools. In its Friday offer, the Senate rejected a House proposal to require private universities to meet performance metrics to accept scholarships for in-state students. The House included in its sprinkle list $4 million for Florida State University, half for the newly created Institute for Pediatric Rare Diseases and half for Sunshine Genetics Pilot Program. In the sprinkle list, the Senate was more amenable to DeSantis' requests. Aside from including funds for the State Guard, the upper chamber also included $25 million for the Florida Job Growth Grant Fund, an initiative to encourage public infrastructure projects. In total, the budget includes $50 million out of the $75 million in DeSantis' proposed budget. Cancer funding has been a priority for the DeSantis administration which pushed this year for a number of changes to how the state funds cancer research. While the DeSantis administration fell short on its efforts to redirect $127 million in cancer funds it did succeed on other fronts. The Legislature agreed to appropriate $50 million for a research incubator for cancer and another $60 million increase in innovation funds awarded by the First Lady Casey DeSantis as part of her cancer initiative. The budget is complete but the tax reduction plan is not. Legislators are also expected to hammer out a tax cut package that will include a reduction in business rent taxes as well as other changes designed to assist Florida families. While the chambers have agreed to spending levels and the fine print that goes along with how the money should be spent they still haven't finalized the conforming bills. The Legislature is using budget conforming bills to pass substantive policy. Unlike the budget, which expires in a year, conforming bills change statutes. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Local lawmakers react to Israel's military strikes on Iran
TERRE HAUTE, Ind. (WTWO/WAWV) — Multiple lawmakers from Indiana and Illinois have been reacting to Israel's military strikes on Iran. Senator Todd Young, who represents Indiana in the United States Senate, released a statement where he said, 'Iran's nuclear ambitions threaten world peace and stability. I stand with Israel as it confronts this existential threat.' Israel attacks Iran's nuclear and missile sites, Iran responds with drone strikes In a social media post, Senator Jim Banks, who also represents Indiana, said, 'America supports Israel's right to protect itself. Tonight, we pray for the peace of Jerusalem.' Representative Mark Messmer, who represents Indiana's 8th congressional district in the U.S. House of Representatives, said, 'May God Bless Israel as they fight for their survival against those who want to eliminate them from existence. I am also praying for the brave American service members serving overseas, protecting our country from the front lines. Iran must not touch a hair on their heads.' On the other side of the state line, Illinois Senator Tammy Duckworth said, 'I am closely monitoring the developing conflict between Israel and Iran as well as keeping the safety and security of U.S. forces, personnel and citizens in the region in mind. I encourage both sides to seek de-escalation in this dangerous moment for the Middle East and for global stability.' Trump says Iran has 'second chance' to come to nuclear deal after Israeli strikes devastate Tehran Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.