S&P/TSX composite rises Tuesday, U.S. stock markets also higher
TORONTO — Canada's main stock index rose Tuesday, helped by gains in base metal stocks, while U.S. markets were also higher, holding onto the gains from Monday's rally as the next deadline for U.S. tariffs looms in just over a week.
Investors are waiting for clarity and details on what's coming April 2, as the scope and nature of tariffs from U.S. President Donald Trump keeps shifting, said Kevin Headland, chief investment strategist at Manulife Investment Management.
"We even got some more news over the weekend and coming into this week that perhaps there's going to be more targeted April 2 tariffs, still room for negotiations, so there's still a lot of uncertainty there," said Headland.
That's why the market has been "bouncing around," he said.
The S&P/TSX composite index closed up 35.40 points at 25,339.51.
All the uncertainty has had markets zigzagging on a daily basis in recent weeks, with the major indexes recovering some of what they lost in the initial reaction to tariffs being enacted.
But after the 'yo-yo effect' of the past few weeks amid a steady stream of tariff announcements, threats and rumours, markets appear to be in a 'wait and see period,' said Headland.
The latest report on U.S. consumer confidence came in weaker than expected, especially for the short term, showing how the uncertainty over tariffs is affecting Americans.
'There's been a material shift in sentiment,' said Headland, after starting 2025 with strong economic data coming off the worst of the inflation fight.
'I feel like the pendulum has swung completely to the opposite side ... and I think that's feeding through to some of the market performance here.'
Recent economic data in the U.S. has been coming in on the weaker side, noted Headland.
Canada started the year on a weaker note, and stands to take a hit to economic growth from tariffs even as they threaten to pull inflation higher.
In New York, the Dow Jones industrial average was up 4.18 points at 42,587.50. The S&P 500 index was up 9.08 points at 5,776.65, while the Nasdaq composite was up 83.26 points at 18,271.86.
The Canadian dollar traded for 69.95 cents US compared with 69.84 cents US on Monday.
The May crude oil contract was down 11 cents US at US$69 per barrel and the May natural gas contract was down eight cents US at US$3.88 per mmBTU.
The April gold contract was up US$10.30 at US$3,025.90 an ounce and the May copper contract was up 12 cents US at US$5.21 a pound.
— With files from The Associated Press
This report by The Canadian Press was first published March 25, 2025.
Companies in this story: (TSX:GSPTSE, TSX:CADUSD)
The Canadian Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
14 minutes ago
- Forbes
Fusion Energy May Be The Key To World Hegemony
What would it take for the United States to lose its hegemony to a rising power like China? Right now, America appears to be ahead economically and militarily. However, there is a stark difference between America's national strategy (insofar as one exists) and China's. The US under President Trump calls for regression. It seeks to restore a manufacturing economy that peaked in the 1950s—like an elderly man trying to restore hair where it hasn't grown for decades. It is doubling down on domestic oil, gas and coal. Through tariffs, disparagement of NATO and aggression towards allies like Canada and Denmark, the administration has alienated partners that long supported a US-led world order. China, meanwhile, has a tremendous lead in developing the economy of the future. It has a near monopoly on rare earth minerals, which are needed for electronics, renewable energy systems, defense technologies and more. China leads in solar, wind and batteries, the energy systems growing at the fastest rate. It is ahead in electric vehicles, industrial robotics and drones as well. It probably has achieved parity in artificial intelligence and may surpass the US soon. If China were to take Taiwan, it would control the global market for advanced chip manufacturing. In the background, but probably most importantly, China may be on track to commercialize fusion energy before the US or its disgruntled allies. Unlike the US, China has no domestic energy industry with vocal lobbyists (and purchasable politicians) to slow progress. It is funding fusion as a national strategy while private fusion companies in the West are at the mercy of investors that, for the most part, chase low risk and quick returns. Fusion promises cheap, plentiful, baseload energy without carbon emissions. AI, data centers and industrial robotics powered by fusion would produce goods and services at much lower costs than value chains dependent on fossil-fired electricity. Militaries built on swarms of small, cheap, electronic drones and robots—powered by small, distributed fusion facilities deep underground, safe from attack—would have an edge over competitors using large, expensive, petroleum-powered vehicles with vulnerable supply chains. I cannot overstate the ramifications of China developing fusion first. As an analogy, imagine if Japan and Germany had uncovered vast reserves of oil at home in the 1920s. American and Soviet oil gave the Allies a strategic advantage over the Axis powers. Had the situation been reversed, World War II could have ended differently. While private fusion companies in the West have raised about $8 billion total, China is investing at least $1.5 annually into fusion projects—double what the US government spends. Japanese and German investments in fusion don't even come close. Canada, for the record, has no fusion funding strategy. Moreover, the government of British Columbia, home of industry leader General Fusion, seems not to understand the value of this crown asset.* On all fronts nuclear, China is leaping ahead. In April, its scientists added fresh fuel to an operational thorium molten salt reactor—a first. The thorium reserves found in Inner Mongolia, an autonomous region of China, could theoretically meet Chinese energy demand for thousands of years. The kicker: this reactor design originated in the US. As project lead Xu Hongjie put it, 'The US left its research publicly available, waiting for the right successor. We were that successor." Moreover, in January, China's Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST) sustained a fusion reaction for 1,066 seconds, setting a new record. Its Burning Plasma Experimental Superconducting Tokamak (BEST) fusion reactor could come online by 2027 and is expected to produce five times the amount of energy it consumes. When BEST announces this milestone, Western fusion companies may be announcing that they've run out of funding. To China, fusion is not a startup project—it's a matter of national interest and security. Its scientists are patenting more fusion-related technologies than any other single country and graduating more doctorates in fusion-related fields. And because China is the top refiner and exporter of the critical minerals needed in fusion reactors (e.g., for magnets), no external force is going to slow their progress. In the meantime, China has a cheap gas station next door—Russia—supplying all the fossil fuels China could need in exchange for support in its war with Ukraine. That support includes critical minerals needed by Russian arms manufacturers. Is fusion energy, along with other Chinese-dominated technologies, enough to end US hegemony? In 1988, historian Paul Kennedy published The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers, a book that tried to explain the relative success (and failure) of powerful states. According to Kennedy, their rise and fall '…shows a very significant correlation over the longer term between productive and revenue-raising capacities on the one hand and military strength on the other.' Essentially, states must balance economic prosperity with strategy. Technological breakthroughs are vital to both. Innovation creates wealth, which enables the state to invest in defense and win wars. While underinvestment in defense leaves the state vulnerable to other powers, overextension and overspending on defense can run an economy into the ground, leaving it unable to sustain a strong military. Now, picture a great power—China—with a military to rival the US and fusion reactors that provide virtually unlimited energy. Imagine the clout China would have in establishing ports, military bases and consumer markets around the world if it could license that fusion technology. A China that exceeds the US in energy, industry, intelligence, mobility and defense is positioned to usurp it. Of course, China could bungle its advantage. Authoritarian regimes have a habit of mismanaging internal dissent, falsifying reality and making preventable mistakes. The rise of China is inevitable, but the self-inflicted decline of the US and its allies isn't. Rather, it's a choice reflecting how societies invest their resources and envision their future. *Disclosure: The author is an investor in General Fusion and sits on its board of directors.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Quantum Breakthrough: D-Wave Soars Over 1,000% in a Year
D-Wave Quantum Inc. (NYSE:QBTS) stock surged more than 10% on Friday, extending a rally that tops 150% this month. The gains reflect progress across hardware, software and enterprise deployments. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with QBTS. Over the past year, QBTS has climbed about 1,281%, far outstripping the Internet Software industry's 35% rise and the S&P 500's 12%. Rigetti Computing (NASDAQ:RGTI) and IonQ (NYSE:IONQ) have also jumped but lag D-Wave, up 840.6% and 402%, respectively. In Q1 2025, D-Wave's 1,200-qubit Advantage2 prototype solved a complex magnetic simulation in minutes, a task estimated to take one million years on the Frontier supercomputer. That real-world demonstration of quantum supremacy underscored the firm's annealing approach. The company also scaled up its Advantage2 system to more than 4,400 qubits, boosting coherence times and connectivity for tackling optimization tasks and AI challenges. D-Wave unveiled a Proof of Quantum Work model suggesting blockchain energy use could drop by up to 1,000x. Corporations such as Ford Otosan and NTT DOCOMO are piloting D-Wave's systems for manufacturing and telecom optimization. Investors may view these advances as validation of the technology's commercial potential. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia, Meta, Apple Lead Tech Rebound After Robust Jobs Data
June 6 - Stocks climbed after May's U.S. jobs data beat estimates, sending indexes higher. The Dow Jones Industrial Average jumped about 510 points, or 1.2%. The S&P 500 also added roughly 1.2%, reaching the 6,000 mark for the first time since late February. The Nasdaq Composite rose 1.4%. Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) led gains among major names, jumping more than 3% after tumbling the previous day amid a public spat involving Elon Musk. Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA), Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META) and Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) also traded higher. Nonfarm payrolls rose by 139,000 in May, topping economists' projections of 125,000 but coming in slightly below April's revised 147,000 gain. The jobless rate remained at 4.2%. Today's jobs report may not prompt the Fed to cut rates, said Eric Merlis, co-head of global markets at Citizens. He noted that while other indicators point to a softer labor market, demand for workers remains stable as firms adapt to policy shifts. Earlier this week, weekly unemployment claims came in above forecasts, and ADP data showed private payrolls grew by just 37,000 in May, missing estimates. For the week, the S&P 500 and Dow are up nearly 2% and 1.5%, respectively, while the Nasdaq is more than 2% higher. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
