Billionaire Johnson Family's VC Fund to Exit China Tech Holdings
A venture capital fund backed by Fidelity Investments' billionaire Johnson family plans to unload its Chinese technology holdings amid heightened tensions between Beijing and Washington, according to people familiar with the matter.
Eight Roads, Abigail Johnson's family firm that was an early investor in China's internet sector, began exploring the sale of all its investments in about 40 Chinese tech companies earlier this year, the people said, asking not to be identified discussing a private matter.
The companies are being sold at a discount ranging from 60% to 80% of their peak valuation, which was about $1 billion combined, the people said. The negotiations are ongoing and could be subject to change, the people added. The stakes include that of self-driving car company Pony AI Inc., which Eight Roads still holds due to a lockup period, the people said.
Growing geopolitical tensions were a key driver behind the move, after the US imposed restrictions on investments in China's advanced technology sector in January, the people said. Since then, trade friction has escalated after US President Donald Trump hiked duties on Chinese goods, prompting retaliation from Beijing.
Eight Roads made a decision last year to not actively pursue new investments in China tech companies in response to the changing regulatory environment, a spokesperson said in a statement to Bloomberg News. A smaller team will continue to manage the firm's existing portfolio, and focus on its health-care business in China, the company added, declining to comment further.
The firm has invested more than $1.1 billion in about 130 companies in China, according to its website. Globally, the fund that was started in 1969 by the Johnson family has backed some 500 companies in markets including India and Japan. Eight Roads has more than $11 billion in assets under management.
The sell-down follows a broader pullback by the firm in China. About a year ago, Eight Roads let go more than a dozen people on its China tech team, leaving a handful to take care of its existing portfolio, a person familiar with the matter said. The most recently announced China tech deal by Eight Roads was in 2023.
According to Eight Roads' website, more than 20 people out of its some 30 staff in China focused on health care, while four focused on tech.
Eight Roads' retreat underscores the challenges US investors face in China. Investment exits via public markets have been tightly controlled, as many startups need a nod from China's securities watchdog even when seeking to list offshore.
In Hong Kong, recent blockbuster deals like the listing of the Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. revived sentiment for initial public offerings. Yet longer term investors are still waiting for more conviction to return to the region, especially for early-stage tech firms confronting an economy under deflationary pressure.
Some investors have shown renewed interest in the country's AI scene, with more on-the-ground visits after DeepSeek's advances stunned Silicon Valley. But many are cautious committing new capital. Investors who have shown interest in Eight Roads's assets include some Chinese tech-focused private and venture capital funds and a Hong Kong-listed financial firm, the people said.
After a separation in 2019 from Fidelity International, which is backed by the Johnson family, Eight Roads said it still counts on the Fidelity network for funds and had no plans to raise third-party money.
Abigail Johnson is the chief executive officer of FMR Corp., the parent of Fidelity Investments. She has a net worth of more than $39 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
R&D? Rarely
Dependence in critical areas makes the nation vulnerable. Strategic interest must prevail over economic sense Germany's crude reserves are so small, they won't last three months in an emergency. So how did Hitler wage war for five years? By turning coal into petrol. Over 92% of the Luftwaffe's aviation fuel was synthetic. As the world grapples with China's rare earth curbs, there's a useful lesson here. While the rare earths crisis that started with China's export curbs on April 4 may be blowing over – Trump announced on Truth Social yesterday, 'Full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China' – it will have a once-bitten-twice-shy effect. Over the past few weeks, Western carmakers have considered producing cars minus some components that use rare earths. At home, Maruti's had to scale back production plans for its first EV due to a global shortage of rare earth magnets. As our second Op-Ed explains, these magnets contain about 25% of a rare earth element called neodymium. It's one of the so-called 'light' rare earths that are available in India, but we don't produce enough of it because cheap Chinese supplies made investment in this area unattractive. While you can make motors without rare earths, other devices like TV screens, computers and MRI machines can't do without them. That's why India needs to build a large rare earths industry. And with the world's fifth largest rare earth reserves, it's well-placed to do so. Likewise, it needs to end its dependence on China for 70% of active pharmaceutical ingredients or APIs, because while buying from the cheapest supplier makes economic sense, it's a strategic risk. The aim must be to reduce dependence because dependence, especially in critical products, is vulnerability. About 90% of our crude is imported. An electric future will take care of that, but not if it means 100% dependence on China for lithium batteries. To find alternatives – like Germany's WW-II 'synfuels' – we need big investments in R&D, which is not our strong suit. As a nation, we invest only 0.6% of our $4tn GDP in research. China invests 2.4% of $18tn, US 3.5% of $29tn. And our private sector is even stingier, accounting for only a third of the national R&D spend, as against 70% in US and S Korea. The rare earth crisis is a brief distraction, the real issue is India's rare investment problem, and it needs national attention now. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email This piece appeared as an editorial opinion in the print edition of The Times of India.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Indian govt report in 2022 foresaw China rare earth export crisis
As Indian manufacturers are scrambling to deal with supply-chain disruptions caused by China's restrictive policies on the export of rare earth metals, in many of which it has a near monopoly, experts are pointing to an early warning of this — in a 2012 strategy paper prepared by a steering committee headed by the then mines secretary Vishwapati Trivedi after a similar crisis caused after Beijing restricted supplies of the critical materials that are needed in the auto, space and clean energy industries. Also Read: 'China deal done': US to lower tariffs to 55%, allow Chinese students for higher ed Back then, they added, India felt the heat of Chinese squeeze and on August 9, 2011, the government set up an 11-member steering committee to develop a strategy paper on status and availability of rare earth elements (REE) and energy critical elements (ECE). The committee was chaired by the mines secretary and co-chaired by chairman of the Centre for Study of Science Technology (C-STEP). Members included senior officials and experts from the Department of Science & Technology (DST), the Geological Survey of India, the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC), the Department of Atomic Energy, the Defence Research & Development Organization (DRDO) and the chairman of India Rare Earth Ltd. Also Read: China can't afford double standards in fight against terror: S Jaishankar The forward of the committee's report titled ''Rare Earths and Energy Critical Elements: a Roadmap and Strategy for India', published in July 2012, said: 'In view of the increased demand of REE and near monopoly of supply from China, there is a need to develop national policies and implementation strategies for ensuring indigenous supply of REE… A Steering Committee was constituted by the ministry of mines with the ultimate intention of preparing a strategy paper for the government, providing short, medium and long term options along with proposals for specific policy & legislative interventions.' Also Read: 'Gratitude to Indian Navy': China on rescue of crew aboard cargo ship which caught fire off Kerala coast The report was blunt about Beijing's approach. 'China has been the major supplier of rare earths all over the world. Even though it has only 37% of global RE resources, it has captured the worldwide market to the extent of 97%. The low cost and efficient production process enabled China to monopolize the rare-earth market, forcing rare earth operations around the world to close down. Indian Rare Earths Ltd (IREL), which was once a leader in export of rare earth compounds had to shut down its operation in 2008,' the report added. 'Over the last couple of years China has imposed restrictions and curtailed its export by over 30% citing domestic demands as the reason. This unexpected decline has restarted rare earth operations once again throughout the world,' the report said. The same thing is happening again. Indian industries are suffering due to shortage of the critical minerals. According to a Reuters report published in Hindustan Times on Wednesday, automobile majors such as Maruti Suzuki have cut near-term production targets because of rare earth shortages. 'Government departments, particularly the ministry of commerce and industry, are holding hectic meetings with industry and other stakeholders to resolve the supply crisis. Government is using diplomatic channels asking Beijing to relax supply curbs for the Indian industries,' one of the people mentioned in the first instance said. The ministries of mines, commerce and external affairs did not respond to an email query on this matter. China's curbs on exports of rare earth materials have been officially raised through diplomatic channels by India, especially in view of the impact on manufacturers of electric vehicles, people familiar with the matter said. The issue reportedly figured in a meeting between Indian ambassador Pradeep Rawat and China's vice foreign minister Sun Weidong in Beijing on June 5. 'China's move was primarily aimed at the US and the impact on India was collateral damage. We are hopeful that the matter will be resolved soon,' one of the people said. It is not clear how China's deal with the US —the two countries reached a framework agreement that will now have to be approved by their respective Presidents —will affect this. The matter is expected to figure in discussions during a visit to India by Sun Weidong, a former Chinese ambassador to New Delhi, beginning on Thursday, the people said. Sun is visiting India to continue discussions with foreign secretary Vikram Misri aimed at normalising bilateral ties following the end of the military face-off in the Ladakh sector of the Line of Actual Control (LAC) last October. Auto manufacturers affected by the curbs on rare earth exports too have sought to reach out to Chinese authorities but without much success so far, the people said. Two days after India and China reached an understanding on withdrawing forces from the two remaining 'friction points' on the LAC last October, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Xi Jinping met in the Russian city of Kazan and agreed to revive several mechanisms to restore normalcy in ties and to address the long-standing border dispute.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Alarm bells in textile recycling hub Panipat over suspension of Bangladesh rags supply
Traders and manufacturers in Panipat, India's largest textile recycling hub that receives discarded clothing from multiple countries for recycling and resale, have raised concerns over the suspension of shipments from Bangladesh, the top source of rags for recycling in India, The Indian Express has learnt. 'Rags and recycled items were not part of the restriction on garments through the land border route that the government announced in May. Traders in Panipat are complaining that the shipments from Bangladesh have been halted but it is unclear why this step has been taken,' a person aware of the development said. While traders plan to raise the issue with the government, they remain unsure about the reason for the halt in exports. But the development comes amid heightened trade tensions between India and Bangladesh after Dhaka's Chief Adviser Muhammad Yunus called for the extension of the Chinese economy around the strategically important North-East India region. This assumes significance as over 200 tonnes of rags are recycled in Panipat every day, with 150-200 mills operating in the sector. Their key sources of rags include discarded clothing from Western countries, but Bangla-desh alone generates over 0.5 million metric tonnes of textile waste from its factories each year. The suspension of exports of rags and textile waste coincides with Bangladesh attempts at seeking Generalised Scheme of Preferences Plus (GSP+) status in the European Union, which would result in the removal of tariffs on over 66 per cent of EU tariff lines. The EU is one of Bangladesh's biggest export markets, but the country is set to lose concessions in 2026 after graduating from the Least Developed Country (LDC) status. To qualify for the GSP+ scheme, Bangladesh must enhance its domestic recycling capabilities and meet specific conditions related to labour rights and governance. According to news agency Reuters, increased local recycling could save Bangladesh around $700 million annually in import costs, as several countries, including India, ramp up their textile recycling capacities. India recycles or reuses approximately 4.7 million tonnes, or about 60 per cent, of its textile waste. Political and economic tensions between India and its largest trade partner in South Asia have been growing, especially as the Union government in May imposed a series of import restrictions on goods from Bangladesh, particularly on ready-made garments, the country's largest export item and a key source of foreign exchange. This followed earlier signs of deteriorating ties, including New Delhi's decision in April to terminate the five-year-old transhipment facility for Bangladesh's export cargo – a mechanism that enabled Dhaka to ship goods to several Western countries using Indian land routes and airports. Notably, Bangladesh also imposed port restrictions on Indian yarn exports via land ports, allowing such exports only through seaports. This move, an official said, was ostensibly in response to demands from Bangladeshi textile mills – despite the fact that the land route offers the quickest and most cost-effective yarn supply to the ready-made garments industry in Bangladesh. Yarn exports to Bangladesh account for 20 per cent of India's total exports to the country, which were valued at $11.38 billion in FY25. Official data showed that cotton yarn and handloom product exports to Dhaka stood at $2.39 billion during the last financial year. Meanwhile, India imports ready-made garments from Bangladesh valued at over $700 million annually. Ravi Dutta Mishra is a Principal Correspondent with The Indian Express, covering policy issues related to trade, commerce, and banking. He has over five years of experience and has previously worked with Mint, CNBC-TV18, and other news outlets. ... Read More
