City Council to mark 10 years of New Orleans smoking ban
NEW ORLEANS (WGNO) — It's hard to believe that it has been 10 years since smoking was banned in bars and casinos in New Orleans.
We take a look at the effects of the smoking ban and work left to do to make us healthier.
Smoking was still allowed in bars and casinos until January of 2015 when then mayor Mitch Landrieu signed the NOLA Smoke-Free Ordinance, making us a healthier New Orleans.
Head of New Orleans Recreation Development Commission speaks on conditions of recreation facilities
'It basically required what is called a 'comprehensive smoke free policy.' Comprehensive means that it closes that loophole in the state law to cover bars, casinos, music venues and other things that would be covered under that,' said Regional Manager of Tobacco Free Louisiana New Orleans region Bradley Wellons.
According to recently released data from the New Orleans Health Department, 75% of residents report life in the city is better because of the Smoke Free Air Act.
Wellons said many of our treasured musicians were on the front lines fighting for their health and that of patrons as well.
'They were one of the driving forces behind getting this passed Craig Klein, Deacon John,' said Wellons.
While the City Council will honor this 10 year milestone Thursday, April 17, Wellons says there is still work to be done, especially among young people with vaping.
Chilling video shows underground tunnel of abandoned Charity Hospital
'It's the biggest one we're seeing. That along with what we call alternative tobacco products and flavors. The new nicotine pouches, such as Zyn, would be one of the ones that most people would have heard about. Those are the tobacco products are actually increasing in use,' said Wellons.
Resources on helping you quit and health screenings are available at the Tobacco Free Living website.Conservation group names Mississippi River 'most endangered,' cites proposed FEMA cuts
City Council to mark 10 years of New Orleans smoking ban
Pelicans name Joe Dumars Executive Vice President of Basketball Operations
Boasberg moves to hold Trump administration in contempt over deportation flights
GOP's legal threats sink Democrats' billboard attacks over Medicaid
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
The Bulletin June 4, 2025
The rundown: Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s vow to "Make America Healthy Again" could fall short when it comes to chronic disease, experts have warned. Here's how. Why it matters: Nearly 130 million Americans are estimated to have at least one form of chronic disease, which could be heart disease, cancer, diabetes, obesity or hypertension, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The proposed cuts to Medicaid funding and work requirements for eligibility to the benefits, which are set to come as part of the broader GOP budget bill, could leave many with chronic disease without access to vital care. As many as three in four adults enrolled in Medicaid report having one or more chronic conditions, and many are unable to work the hours needed to meet the new eligibility requirements, according to nonprofit health policy research and news organization, KFF. So, while some may be medically exempt, others will lose their health coverage, meaning their conditions could worsen without access to care. Read more in-depth coverage: Health Experts Call Out RFK Jr. Policy Changes: 'New Inconsistency Every Day' TL/DR: Experts told Newsweek that, while the Trump administration's ambition to "defeat" the "epidemic" is clear, whether its policies will help or hinder chronic-disease patients remains to be seen. What happens now? Ross Brownson, director of the Prevention Research Center at Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri, told Newsweek that Medicaid cuts would "likely have a detrimental effect on chronic disease risk among the most vulnerable populations," adding Medicaid-enrolled adults have significantly higher rates of chronic disease than individuals privately insured. Deeper reading Can Trump Tackle US 'Chronic Disease Crisis'? Experts Weigh In
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Activists protest possible Medicaid cuts outside KS Rep. Derek Schmidt's Topeka office
TOPEKA (KSNT) — Kansans are speaking out against lawmakers who are voting to cut Medicaid. The GOP-led One Big Beautiful Bill Act passed the US House by a razor thin margin. 215 House members voted to pass it, while 214 voted against it. Local Kansas activists are calling out Rep. Derek Schmidt, a Republican who voted to pass the bill. A group of protesters gathered outside of Schmidt's office in Topeka Thursday afternoon and expressed concerns about cuts to Medicaid. 'Today is life or death,' protester Dillon Warren said. 'We voted someone in there that we shouldn't have. He doesn't support us.' The Congressional Budget Office estimates that if the bill passes, at least 7 million people will lose Medicaid coverage. For that reason, many Kansas voters are making their voices heard. Chiefs and Royals stadium bill deadline approaching as Kansas and Missouri fight for the teams 'We need Medicaid for medical equipment,' protester Rick Macias said. 'These chairs are $200,000 if not more. So, it's very important that Medicaid sticks around.' 27 News reached out to Schmidt, who was unavailable for comment. A spokesperson for the congressman provided 27 News with a written statement. 'Congressman Schmidt is a strong supporter of Medicaid for people the program is designed to help: those who are disabled, in nursing homes, pregnant, raising small children, or otherwise in need. Unfortunately, some states have abused the program by providing benefits to illegal aliens, millions of healthy young adults who choose not to work, or people who are not eligible to receive taxpayer-funded benefits from the program. That is the main reason why Medicaid spending has exploded by more than 50 percent since just 2019: an unsustainable rate of growth that puts benefits for Americans who need them most at risk. By addressing this abuse of the program, Congressman Schmidt is protecting both the traditional Medicaid recipients who rely on benefits and the taxpayers who pay the bills.' Spokesman for Rep. Derek Schmidt For more Capitol Bureau news, click here. Keep up with the latest breaking news in northeast Kansas by downloading our mobile app and by signing up for our news email alerts. Sign up for our Storm Track Weather app by clicking here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
3 reasons your Obamacare premiums are going up next year
If you happen to be one of the roughly 24 million people in America who buy their health insurance through the Affordable Care Act's marketplaces, you're probably in for some sticker shock next year. Many families could be on the hook for hundreds, and in some cases thousands, of dollars more in premium payments thanks to the expiration of Biden-era coverage subsidies. A little-talked-about change in the GOP's tax bill could also bump up costs by ending a practice among insurers known as 'silver loading,' which juiced the amount of financial help households could qualify for when buying a health plan. Meanwhile, higher premiums and new red tape contained in the GOP's bill are expected to push younger, healthier customers out of the market. As a result, carriers are already signaling their intention to raise their rates by more than usual next year to deal with the cost of a smaller and sicker customer base. Here's what you need to know about the potential triple whammy. The Biden administration temporarily upgraded the Affordable Care Act (ACA) by offering insurance shoppers much larger tax credits to help them buy coverage. Those changes dropped some premiums to zero and decreased out-of-pocket costs for lower-income families, and for the first time, capped monthly payments for households earning more than 400% of the poverty line, limiting costs to 8.5% of their income. The enhanced insurance subsidies are set to expire next year, which means premiums will spike. As the Urban Institute calculated last year, that could leave some lower-income households paying 80% more. People with incomes above 400% of the poverty line — $62,000 for an individual, or $128,000 for a family of four — will no longer receive any help. This year, that would have meant paying an extra $2,900, according to Urban's calculations. These changes are going to be particularly important for freelancers and small-business owners who tend to rely on the individual insurance market, as well as service industry workers who don't receive health coverage through their jobs. For most of this past decade, many marketplace customers have been able to get a free bronze plan or very cheap gold-level coverage courtesy of a quirk that developed after Trump tried to cut funding to Obamacare during his first term. Those days will likely soon be over, thanks to the new tax bill. The backstory is a bit technical: Under the ACA, lower-income households who buy coverage from the marketplace get big discounts that shrink their out-of-pocket expenses like copays and deductibles. The federal government was supposed to pay insurers directly to cover these so-called 'cost-sharing reductions.' But Trump cut off that flow of payments in 2017, seizing on what was essentially a legal hole in the Affordable Care Act after Republicans failed to repeal the statute. The president's move was expected to seriously weaken the markets. Instead, states and insurers found a workaround known as silver loading that made coverage cheaper for many Americans while adding to the federal government's expense. Rather than try to make up for the lost payments by upping the prices of all of their health plans, carriers only increased the cost of the silver plans that are used to calculate the value of the tax credits enrollees could receive. This allowed insurers to recoup their costs and increased the subsidies that households were eligible for, with the side effect that people could suddenly get free bronze or cheaper gold insurance. As part of their tax and spending bill, Republicans are planning to save some money by restoring the old cost-sharing reduction payments. In essence, they'll be restoring this aspect of the Affordable Care Act to how it was originally supposed to work, but it will also make the law's tax credits a bit less generous and kill the option of buying those super-cheap bronze or gold plans. By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's Terms and Privacy Policy The coming cuts to Obamacare's subsidies are expected to lead many young and healthier enrollees to drop their coverage. The same goes for parts of the GOP bill that will likely make buying and maintaining ACA coverage more difficult, such as ending the ability to automatically re-enroll in your health plan from year to year. As a result, experts anticipate that insurers will have to increase the unsubsidized price of coverage by more than usual this coming year, since older, sicker patients cost more to insure. Already, there are signs of that happening. According to a review by the think tank KFF, insurers in Vermont, Oregon, Washington, and Washington, D.C., are requesting an additional 4% increase in their rates for next year, specifically because they expect the market to shrink when Biden's enhanced subsidies expire. Those price hikes won't affect households that get subsidized coverage, which caps their premium payments at a share of their income. But they will be felt by households that earn above 400% of the poverty mark, since they'll no longer receive tax credits. If you're middle-income and self-employed, be prepared for a big pop in your insurance bill. Jordan Weissmann is a senior reporter at Yahoo Finance. Sign up for the Mind Your Money newsletter Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
