California GOP rep's town hall descends into chaos
'That's a lie!' one agitated attended yelled. Other's blurted out that the lawmaker was an '[expletive]' and another labeled him as 'shameless.' Several lawmakers have now been viciously jeered at while facing their constituents and trying to tout what the GOP sees as victories within Trump's 'One Big, Beautiful Bill,' his sweeping tax cut and spending bill that was signed into law last month.
The Republican was also grilled about Trump and whether Congress will force the administration to release files on [sexual] offender Jeffrey Epstein . 'The speaker of the House released you guys so you didn't have to deal with releasing the files,' one woman reportedly charged. 'You all left.'
LaMalfa admitted it's a 'bad look' for the documents to continually be 'suppressed.' One constituent demanded that LaMalfa 'apologize to the farmers.' The lawmaker shot back that he had no intention of doing so.
After the demand, the lawmaker immediately pivoted to speaking about 'due process for Ghislaine Maxwell, due process for the people on January 6...' before the crowd erupted in chaos.
Many of those in the crowd were concerned about the cuts to social services contained within the Trump-backed bill, particularly to Medicaid and public broadcasters. '[Expletive]' one constituent screamed while the congressman was talking about the bill.
Photos of the town hall show that the event hall in Chico, California, full with some attendees lining the walls. Many held red paper that they waved in disapproval.
Since the president has come back into power and taken drastic action slashing federal jobs with DOGE and deporting over a hundred thousands migrants many who oppose the Republican, many Republican town halls have devolved into chaos.
Rep. Mike Flood, R-Neb., was also met by a combative crowd earlier this month when talking about the multi-trillion dollar package. The Nebraskan similarly faced a raucous crowd that labeled him a 'liar.' LaMalfa's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Disturbing video shows lawmaker stuffing ballots in swing state that Trump only won by 80,000 votes
A chilling video has shown a lawmaker stuffing ballots in a swing state that Trump only won by just over 80,000 votes. Abu Musa, city council member of Hamtramck, Michiga n, was seen in the passenger seat of a car, watching another man deposit three stacks of ballots into a drop box. Michigan State Police have confirmed the authenticity of the video footage, which was filmed on August 1, 2025. The alleged ballot box stuffing incident took place just before the city's latest primary election on August 5. The video comes just days after two of Musa's councilmen colleagues, Muhtasin Sadman and Mohammed Hassan, were charged over forging ballots in the city's tightly fought 2023 election. Musa was previously named as 'under investigation' in the same conspiracy, but was not charged. According to an April document that Attorney General Dana Nessel issued requesting a special prosecutor in the 2023 case, two of Musa's city council colleagues had 'conspired to receive unvoted absentee ballots that had been signed by recently naturalized citizens.' The accused then allegedly proceeded to 'fill in the candidates of their choosing' during the city's 2023 elections. Musa received the most votes in the August 5th primary election, per unofficial election results released on August 6 - receiving 12.5 percent of total votes in a field of 12 candidates. Of the total 1,129 votes received by Musa, 843 were cast by absentee ballot. The 286 total of election day votes received by Musa is only the fifth-highest tally. Two of Musa's colleagues on the city council were charged with felony forgery earlier this month over their conduct during the 2023 city council election. Hamtramck council members Sadman and Hassan were charged on August 11, while two other council members, Musa and Mohammed Alsomiri were not charged at the time. Nessel recused herself from the investigation into the council members because she had previously criticized policy positions taken by the council to ban Pride flags from being flown on city-owned property. The Michigan Attorney General had also 'been criticized for her prosecutions of pro -Palestinian protestors at the University of Michigan.' Nessel was additionally accused of prosecuting the campus protestors due to 'bias against Muslims and/or people of Arab descent' and foresaw similar criticisms coming her way in this case, as five of the defendants 'are of Arab descent.' Hamtamack, a city in Metro Detroit, has a population just over 28,000 residents, which is over 70 percent Muslim. The city became the first in America to be governed by an all-Muslim council in 2022. Detroit's Local 4 News reported that the initial investigation began 'after the city clerk noticed unusual patterns with absentee ballots — including identical handwriting on multiple envelopes and large bundles of ballots submitted at once.' Hamtramck City Clerk Rana Faraj told Votebeat that 'state laws are clear that your ballot should only be handled by you or a family member,' adding that 'everyone's cousins around here.' The council is made up of six members, and three slots are up for election every two years. Members serve four-year terms. Donald Trump won Michigan's 15 electoral votes in 2024 with 49.7 percent of the votes to Kamala Harris' 48.3 percent. Hamtramck's Mayor Amer Ghalib made waves last year after endorsing Trump for President as the mayor of America's first Muslim-majority city.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Rubio says both Russia and Ukraine ‘have to make concessions' for peace deal
In a combative series of interviews on Sunday, the US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, said that 'both sides are going to have to make concessions' for there to be a peaceful resolution to the war that erupted when Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. 'You can't have a peace agreement unless both sides make concessions – that's a fact,' the Trump administration's top diplomat said Sunday on ABC's This Week. 'That's true in virtually any negotiation. If not, it's just called surrender. And neither side is going to surrender. So both sides are going to have to make concessions.' Rubio said the recent talks in Alaska between Russian president Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart Donald Trump toward ending the war had 'made progress in the sense that we identified potential areas of agreement – but there remains some big areas of disagreement'. 'We're still a long ways off,' Rubio added. 'We're not at the precipice of a peace agreement. We're not at the edge of one. But I do think progress was made and towards one.' He declined to go into specific areas of agreement or disagreement, or outline what Trump has described as 'severe consequences' for Russia if its aggression toward Ukraine continued. 'Ultimately, if there isn't a peace agreement, if there isn't an end of this war, the president's been clear – there are going to be consequences,' Rubio remarked. 'But we're trying to avoid that. And the way we're trying to avoid those consequences is with an even better consequence, which is peace, the end of hostilities.' Rubio agreed that no agreement was possible without both sides – including that of Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy – being at the table. 'You're not going to reach a ceasefire or a peace agreement in a meeting in which only one side is represented,' Rubio told ABC News. 'That's why it's important to bring both leaders together – and that's the goal here.' Rubio confirmed that a ceasefire – or, as Trump now reportedly prefers, a straight-to-peace deal – 'is going to be difficult', despite the White House's openly demanding one. The war, he said, has been 'going on for three and a half years'. 'You have two very entrenched sides, and we're going to have to continue to work and chip away at it,' Rubio said. Separately, on NBC's Meet the Press, Rubio said a ceasefire was 'not off the table', though he added: 'It was agreed by all that the best way to end this conflict is through a full peace deal.' He said the US had advocated for a ceasefire, but 'unfortunately, the Russians as of now have not agreed to that. 'But the ideal here, what we're aiming for here is not a ceasefire,' he said. 'What we ultimately are aiming for is an end to this.' Nonetheless, Rubio said he doubted that a new set of western sanctions on Russia would force Moscow to agree to any deal. He also denied that Trump, as critics claim, had merely given the aggressor in the conflict, Putin, an unwarranted place on the world stage. 'Putin is already on the world stage,' Rubio said on ABC News. 'The guy's conducting a full scale war in Ukraine. 'That doesn't mean he's right about the war. That doesn't mean he's justified about the war. You're not going to end a war between Russia and Ukraine without dealing with Putin. That's just common sense. So people can say whatever they want.' On NBC's Meet the Press, the Democratic US senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut countered on Sunday that the Trump-Putin 'meeting was a disaster'. 'It was an embarrassment for the United States,' Murphy said. 'It was a failure. Putin got everything he wanted.' Murphy said that Trump had given Putin 'that photo-op' he wanted and to 'be absolved of his war crimes in front of the world. 'War criminals are not normally invited to the United States of America,' Murphy remarked. Secondly, he said, Putin had not been forced to give up anything. 'President Trump said he wanted a ceasefire – it appears the ceasefire wasn't even seriously discussed,' Murphy added. 'And then, third, there's no consequences. 'Trump said, 'If I don't get a cease fire, Putin is going to pay a price.' And then he walked out of that meeting saying, 'I didn't get a ceasefire. I didn't get a peace deal, and I'm not even considering sanctions.''
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Ghislaine Maxwell files will not be released despite Trump order
Ghislaine Maxwell 's grand jury transcripts will not be released, a federal judge has ruled, saying the Trump administration 's request to do so is a 'diversion'. Paul Engelmayer, a Manhattan District Court judge, suggested the Department of Justice (DOJ) had requested the transcripts be released to create the 'illusion' of transparency. The judge said the files would not reveal any new information, adding that they 'do not discuss or identify any client of Epstein's or Maxwell's'. The decision will come as a blow to Donald Trump, who continues to grapple with the fallout after his administration closed the Jeffrey Epstein case. The administration's refusal to release information surrounding Epstein, the late financier and convicted paedophile, prompted a backlash from some of Mr Trump's most loyal supporters. In an effort to placate his base Mr Trump ordered Pam Bondi, the US attorney general, to seek the release of grand jury testimony related to the case in July. However, in a ruling filed on Monday, Mr Engelmayer said none of the arguments made by the DoJ for unsealing the transcripts met the requirements to authorise the disclosure of grand jury materials. 'The Court's review confirmed that unsealing the grand jury materials would not reveal new information of any consequence,' Mr Engelmayer wrote. He added: 'A member of the public, appreciating that the Maxwell grand jury materials do not contribute anything to public knowledge, might conclude that the Government's motion for their unsealing was aimed not at 'transparency' but at diversion — aimed not at full disclosure but at the illusion of such.' In the 31-page order, Mr Engelmayer said the DoJ's argument that the unsealing of the documents was necessary because of public interest 'fails at the threshold'. He said the suggestion that the transcripts would bring 'meaningful new information' about Epstein and Maxwell's crimes was 'demonstrably false'and the public 'would thus learn nothing new' from their disclosure. The judge said the files 'do not discuss or identify any client of Epstein's or Maxwell's' and 'do not reveal any heretofore unknown means or methods of Epstein's or Maxwell's crimes'. He added: 'They do not reveal new venues at which their crimes occurred. They do not reveal new sources of their wealth. They do not explore the circumstances of Epstein's death. They do not reveal the path of the government's investigation.' Weeks before the Trump administration announced it would not release the so-called Epstein files, Mr Trump was reportedly told his name came up several times in the documents, according to Wall Street Journal. Being mentioned in the files is not a sign of wrongdoing, and the Trump administration said the story was 'fake news'.
