CANADA-CALGARY-G7 SUMMIT-PROTEST
16 Jun 2025, 13:48 GMT+10
(250616) -- CALGARY, June 16, 2025 (Xinhua) -- A protester holds a sign during a rally in Calgary, Canada, June 15, 2025.
A protest took place in Calgary ahead of the commencement of this year's Group of Seven (G7) summit.
Originally scheduled to begin on Sunday, the summit has been shortened to two days and will officially commence on Monday, as world leaders begin arriving in Kananaskis, Alberta, about 100 kilometers away from Calgary. (Photo by Li Haitao/Xinhua)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
9 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Carney's patterns discouraging on human rights front
In his outstanding book, One Day, Everyone Will Have Always Been Against This, author Omar El Akkad criticizes Western governments for their limp and immoral response to the deaths of thousands of innocent children in Gaza. He essentially argues that they invariably look away from the human carnage, calculate their national interests and say that they truly care — though their words never translate into meaningful deeds. Near the end of the book, he asks the reader to finish the following sentence: 'It is unfortunate that tens of thousands of children are dead, but…' There are many other pertinent queries such as, 'What are you willing to give up to alleviate someone else's suffering?' Power? Wealth? Position? Self-interest? Then there's this critically important line in the work: 'I don't know how to make a person care for someone other than their own.' As I scope out my September course at University of Prince Edward Island on international human rights, I'm certain that my students will struggle mightily with that one, too. But I wonder whether Prime Minister Mark Carney — notwithstanding his recent move to advance Palestinian rights — has ever given any thought to whether he cares about the well-being of others outside his own immediate family. Does the advancement of human rights register as a top priority for his government? Or, is it more about words and less about actions for him? I know, I know. Canadian governments never fail to tell us how important values, basic freedoms and human rights considerations are. We are told over and over again that they raise this thorny issue all the time with non-democratic governments around the world. But, alas, then they often quickly move on to more important matters like signing trade deals, investment protection agreements and a slew of lucrative business contracts. In a major foreign policy speech in June to the Munk School of Global Affairs in Toronto, Carney made one or two passing references to human rights, our values and Canada's principles. He made it very clear that 'Canada will lead with the values the world respects, the resources the world wants and an economy that leads the G7.' Again, it looks like economics trumps human rights to me. I understand that Carney has only been in power for a few months now — so we shouldn't judge him harshly on his short record to date. Perhaps he will surprise us yet. But we can already see patterns of behaviour and direct actions thus far that are not very encouraging on the human rights front. Take a look at the recent G7 gathering of Western industrialized countries in Kananaskis, Alta., where there was one joint statement on 'transnational repression' (to appear tough on China). Almost all of the other ones had a commercial or trade component that was said to boost economic prosperity. To add insult to injury, Carney thought it was wise to compose a G7 guest list of what can only be described as international bad boys: Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. If Amnesty International is to be believed, none of these characters has a human rights record that would necessitate a personal invite to such an exclusive G7 gathering. More to the point, humanitarian and human rights crises in Africa alone were not given the time of day. Not a word was uttered about the conflict, sexual violence and displacement in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), the violent conflict, food insecurity and climate shocks in the Sahel region or even the ongoing civil war in Sudan. Lastly, there was a great deal of brouhaha over having Carney use the G7 — especially after word broke that the House of Commons was ready to confer honorary citizenship on Hong Kong media tycoon Jimmy Lai (who is now wasting away in solitary confinement) — to focus the world's attention on Lai and China's massive human rights violations in Hong Kong. Instead, nothing was said at the G7 and the anticipated House of Commons unanimous motion initiative was actually pulled at the last moment. A spokesperson for the Government House Leader's office actually had the temerity to say that a unanimous consent motion was not the best method of conducting Canadian foreign policy. But Russian pro-democracy campaigner Vladimir Kara-Murza was granted honorary Canadian citizenship in June 2023 by unanimous consent in Parliament. Let's be clear: this was all about not offending Beijing. Accordingly, I just don't see Mark Carney incorporating a human rights agenda into his foreign policy posture. This is a Liberal government that will be consumed by commercial and trade matters, investment and economic growth and business deal-making. Perhaps that's a sign of the times. But as El Akkad explains in his thought-provoking book: If that's the case, then world leaders should at least be honest about that and stop pretending and saying publicly just how central human rights are to their governments. Peter McKenna is professor of political science at the University of Prince Edward Island in Charlottetown.
Toronto Star
3 days ago
- Toronto Star
Canada must cut big-business lobbying down to size
U.S. President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Mark Carney at the G7 summit, in Kananaskis, Alberta, on June 16, 2025. Mark Schiefelbein/The Associated Press flag wire: false flag sponsored: false article_type: Opinion : sWebsitePrimaryPublication : publications/toronto_star bHasMigratedAvatar : false : Opinion articles are based on the author's interpretations and judgments of facts, data and events. More details
National Observer
4 days ago
- National Observer
Federal budget watchdog has 'no idea' who successor will be or when the person will be named
Parliamentary Budget Officer Yves Giroux has "no idea" who will be taking over his job when his term ends next month. Giroux, who took on the job in 2018, will mark his final day on September 2. In an interview with The Canadian Press, Giroux said he's reached out to the Privy Council Office multiple times for information over the last few months, noting that he wants to ensure an "orderly and smooth" transition. He says the government has kept "quiet" and has told him there's no news yet to share. "I'm just a bit surprised that they haven't done anything," Giroux said. Asked if he might stay in the role past Sept. 2, Giroux said he hadn't heard anything about a possible extension. The Parliamentary Budget Officer is an agent of Parliament who provides independent economic and financial analysis to the Senate and House of Commons. Giroux said it concerns him that a new Parliamentary Budget Officer has not yet been named, especially with a budget planned for the fall. He said parliamentarians rely on his office to provide them with non-partisan analysis and information. Giroux said the government is soon scheduled to table a budget that could include "significant new spending and policy priorities" and reductions. He says parliamentarians will be in "desperate need" of a non-partisan view on that budget and its impact on the federal government and the Canadian economy. "It would be unfortunate and it would happen at a very unfortunate critical time in the budget cycle for parliamentarians," Giroux said. Giroux said the Prime Minister's Office recommends an appointment and senior staff in the Privy Council Office handle the vetting and interviews if they choose to undergo a competitive process. The government could select an interim PBO at any time by order-in-council but an appointment for a full, seven-year mandate needs to be approved by the House of Commons and the Senate, he said. MPs are set to return to the House of Commons for the fall sitting in mid-September. The Canadian Press has reached out to the Prime Minister's Office and the Privy Council Office for comment but has not yet received a response. Giroux said he can understand the delay, given that the Prime Minister's Office has been busy managing Canada-US relations and recently hosted the G7 summit. Still, he said that when he was appointed, the approval was made a full two months before the position became vacant. "I had a few months to talk to my predecessor and start getting ready," Giroux said. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 15, 2025.
