Tassie Devils CEO Brendon Gale responds to AFL club's ‘giant mess'
Tassie Devils chief executive Brendon Gale put on a brave face on Wednesday evening amid explosive reports the expansion AFL club is fighting for survival.
While a 'very optimistic' Gale spoke confidently about the club being 'on track' and even ahead of schedule, he did float the possibility the club's controversial stadium – if it does go ahead – may not be ready to launch in 2028.
FOX FOOTY, available on Kayo Sports, is the only place to watch every match of every round in the 2025 Toyota AFL Premiership Season LIVE in 4K, with no ad-breaks during play. New to Kayo? Get your first month for just $1. Limited-time offer.
The AFL's 19th franchise went public with a plea to state government figures after Tasmanian Labor on Tuesday filed a no-confidence motion against Premier Jeremy Rockliff.
The extraordinary development means Tasmanians could be heading back to the polls if another election is called.
The move comes amid allegations the Rockliff Government has mismanaged the Apple Isle's budget and bungled key infrastructure projects, including the proposed Macquarie Point Stadium.
That's the venue the Devils hope to call home when they enter the AFL in 2028.
Rockliff has been one of the emerging football club's strongest supporters — even in a climate where there has been widespread anger towards the planned $1 billion stadium.
Kath McCann, the Devils' general manager of marketing, corporate affairs and social impact, on Wednesday broke down in tears at a press conference.
Pressure is seemingly building on the club's entry to the competition, but 56-year-old Tasmanian Gale adopted a confident tone when he discussed the precarious situation on AFL 360.
'There's some uncertainty around the leadership of government and … there's a vote of no confidence in the premier,' he began. 'But as far as we're concerned, it's business as usual.
'We're getting on with the business, we have to, of building an organisation and building teams.
'Clearly our existence is conditioned upon the delivery of a stadium and that's an agreement between the AFL and the state government and that stadium needs to clear passage of both Houses of Parliament.
'That process is underway at the moment and that process will run its course, that hasn't changed.
'There's some uncertainty around leadership and maybe the composition of parliament, but that really hasn't changed.
'We've just got to get on with the job and controlling things we can control.'
The AFL has always maintained a Tasmanian team entering the AFL was dependant on a new stadium being built in Hobart.
The Macquarie Point project has been highly divisive right from the start and that was before estimated costs first began to blow out from an initial figure of $755 million.
It was revealed last month the total cost of the project has blown out to at least $945 million.
The Tasmanian state government has pledged $375 million towards the roofed, harbour-front stadium, while the federal government has committed to $240 million.
The AFL body's $15 million contribution has also been made public, leaving more than over $300m remaining to be funded through state borrowings.
Gale was asked if he felt any unease about the budget blowout.
'Not really,' he said. 'Sorry it's a significant amount of money, but I was aware, I had line of sight.
'And to be fair, when I saw the original quotes three years ago, anyone who's anyone involved in any form of construction or development would be aware of escalation rates the last three or four years.
'So that number was always skinny and always going to be a bigger number.
'It's a big cost, but it's a huge investment, it's a really important investment and it's an investment the government has deemed to be worth making.
'We need as a state to continue to invest in growth.'
Gale then talked through the obstacles facing the club in relation to the stadium and the Tasmanian government.
'At the moment it's on track,' he said. 'It's in parliament now, the legislation which enables the whole development is in parliament and it's been debated and scrutinised.
'It'll need to clear the Lower House and enter the Upper House in late July and if it's cleared, the government walks away with a set of planning approvals really.
'In that respect, were that to take place, it's probably ahead of course.
'It may not be ready by round one, 2028, but there's a process to accommodate that as well.
'As soon as possible is best for us and the AFL and the Tasmanian community, but it's on track.'
Gale remains confident the club will proceed as planned, regardless of who leads the state, declaring it has 'broadbase political support'.
He also emphasised the opportunity the Devils can provide.
'It's not about football, it's about the potential to lift this whole state, and we believe in that,' he said.
'You just saw the response of Kath McCann, it's a responsibility that sits heavily with us.'
An emotional McCann had to compose herself before addressing the media earlier on Wednesday.
'This club is powered by future generations,' she said.
'I've got 50 students out here in my sight line, they power us every single day and they will keep doing that.
'We're going to play on. We want to see this team become a reality because our young people deserve it.'
The football club also released a media statement confessing the political turbulence is threatening the club's survival.
Leading Tasmanian sport journalist Brent Costelloe on Tuesday night told Channel 9 it is a 'giant mess'.
The ABC's Chris Rowbottom also described the precarious position the club finds itself in on X.
'Tasmania's AFL license hangs by the barest of threads,' Rowbottom posted.
'There's an acceptance that an early election spells the end of any stadium, including alternate proposals, and the Devils.'
He earlier reported there was a widely held view the 'Devils will be dead' if a state election is called.
Gale spoke at length about the difficulties in convincing Tasmanians of the stadium proposal, describing them as 'always big, they're expensive and there's always a whole range of other priorities'.
He also said existing stadiums in Hobart and Launceston aren't 'fit for the purpose of providing a sustainable, commercial business model to underpin a team in the big league on a sustainable basis'.
But the former Richmond player and chief executive reiterated his confidence in the project moving forward.
'Recent events might create some more uncertainty, but no I think parliament is very supportive,' he said.
'Even this motion brought in the last 24 hours, wasn't about football or about the stadium, it was about some budgetary concerns, but I guess it sparked this chain reaction.
'So I'm confident the more people in the community understand the importance of the stadium, how it's critical to meet the commercial, financial requirements of a team in the biggest sporting competition in Australia, the more they understand how it will unlock a whole range of other financial, economic, social, cultural benefits, the more people are open to changing their minds and supporting of it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
30 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Melbourne: Home ownership dreams fading as prices outpace incomes by $100,000
Aussies chasing the dream of home ownership now need to earn tens, if not hundreds of thousands more than they did five years ago. Exclusive Canstar data reveals some Melbourne buyers would need nearly $100,000 extra a year to afford the same home they could have bought in 2020. In the city's most exclusive postcodes, such as Toorak and Balwyn, that figure more than doubles. Covid-era interest-rate cuts gave buyers a brief advantage, but a harsh mix of climbing interest rates, escalating home prices and tighter borrowing conditions is now shutting the door on many would-be homebuyers. The figures show a typical household in greater Melbourne must now earn almost $160,000 to afford a median-priced house – a $61,000 increase since 2020. In blue-chip areas like Toorak, Brighton and Malvern, the income jump is even more dramatic. Even assuming a 20 per cent deposit, buyers now need to earn hundreds of thousands more. In Toorak, where the median house price is $3.85m, households must earn over $900,000 a year, $290,000 more than in 2020. In Brighton East, that figure is $490,000, up by more than $200,000. Malvern buyers now need over $700,000, compared to just over $500,000 in 2020. Even once-accessible areas like Ferntree Gully have seen a $66,000 jump in required income, pushing the new threshold above $162,000. In Melbourne's middle ring, affordability is also slipping. Households now need nearly $280,000 in Bentleigh East, close to $260,000 in Box Hill South, and more than $312,000 in Glen Waverley. Canstar research director Sally Tindall said the data laid bare a growing wealth divide. 'It's astonishing to see just what kind of income is now needed to get a foot on the property ladder,' Ms Tindall said. 'For most, the only way they've kept up is by already owning property.' Ms Tindall said intergenerational wealth was increasingly critical. 'Families with equity are passing that on – the Bank of Mum and Dad is more essential than ever,' she said. 'Without it, many first-home buyers are stuck.' Melbourne buyers' advocate Cate Bakos agreed. 'We're seeing more guarantee-backed loans, gifted deposits, and early inheritances,' Ms Bakos said. 'It's not just financial – it's emotional. 'Without that lifeline, many would be locked out.' Ms Bakos said clients were now being forced to compromise on suburb, size or property type. 'The hardest pill to swallow is usually the location,' she said. 'People realise the dream suburb they grew up in is now out of reach.' 'Units, offer a way in, even if it's not the dream home.' Independent economist Cameron Kusher said rising prices – not wages – were driving the surge in income requirements. 'Prices in Melbourne are up nearly 13 per cent since 2020,' Mr Kusher said. 'Borrowing power has dropped while prices have gone up. It's a painful combination.' Mr Kusher said prestige areas like Malvern and Armadale had always been tough for average wage earners, but they're now even more exclusive. 'These buyers aren't typical salaried workers – they've got portfolios, businesses, family support, this isn't a market most households can break into.' Even in outer areas, affordability is slipping. Required incomes in growth corridors have surged, up to $162,000 in parts of the east, and rising steadily across the north and west. More attainable options include Melton at just under $110,000, Wyndham Vale at $120,000, Craigieburn at $125,000, and Pakenham at $130,000. Zippy Financial principal broker Louisa Sanghera said more buyers were accepting smaller deposits and paying lenders mortgage insurance to get in sooner. 'Waiting for a 20 per cent deposit isn't realistic anymore,' she said. 'If they wait, the market moves on without them.' Ms Sanghera said even strong earners were hitting serviceability roadblocks. 'Banks are stress-testing at nine per cent,' she said. 'Add rising living costs, and many buyers can't borrow what they'd hoped.' While prices have softened slightly in some pockets, Mr Kusher warned the crisis isn't easing. 'Rate cuts might help – but they can also drive prices higher,' he said. 'Until we significantly boost housing supply, this problem won't go away.' Top 10 Melbourne suburbs – Highest 2025 incomes needed Suburb 2025 Required Income Increase from 2020 Malvern $1,737,294 $706,059 Portsea $705,192 $397,560 Deepdene $720,862 $335,653 Brighton East $780,848 $316,724 Toorak $906,008 $290,745 Canterbury $639,810 $275,601 Balwyn $538,001 $223,681 Mont Albert $448,334 $217,610 Brighton $579,098 $215,290 Black Rock $448,334 $212,260 Source: Canstar Top 10 Melbourne suburbs – Lowest 2025 incomes needed Suburb 2025 Required Income Decrease from 2020 Melton West $100,876 $42,158 Beveridge $122,638 $41,717 Donnybrook $121,424 $41,172 Brookfield $102,744 $40,883 Laverton $110,216 $38,658 Werribee South $121,891 $37,827 Broadmeadows $109,282 $37,055 Melton $88,733 $36,569 Thornhill Park $108,441 $36,214 Cranbourne South $153,461 $13,020
News.com.au
30 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Staggering pay rise you'd need since Covid to still afford a Sydney house
They're the kind of pay increases that would make doctors, politicians and even some CEOs jealous – but they've become a necessity for those hoping to crack the housing market. Home seekers wanting an average Sydney house will need to have boosted their income by $150,000 a year just to have kept pace with the incredible property price rises since Covid, a new study shows. The Canstar analysis tracked the household income needed to afford a median priced Sydney home in both 2020 and 2025 – taking into account the typical loan rates being offered at the time. The findings have laid bare the once in a generation price rises and interest rate hikes over the tumultuous period, suggesting a market that has run away from even the wealthiest professionals. With Sydney's median price at about $950,000 in 2020, Canstar indicated that buying a typical house was affordable for a couple or individual back then with a pre-tax income of about $145,000 a year. The minimum income required to buy an average Sydney house has since risen to nearly $290,000 a year. It's followed a circa 60 per cent increase in the cost of housing between 2020 and 2025, along with a nearly 4 per cent hike in interest rates – even when accounting for the two rate cuts this year. Canstar director of research Sally Tindall said few workers saw their earnings grow fast enough to keep up with the price changes. She pointed to ABS weekly earnings data that showed wages over the same five-year period increased by just under 16 per cent. This incredible mismatch was leaving more people shut-out of the market and consigned to a life of renting, Ms Tindall said. 'It is astonishing to see just what kind of income is required to get a foot on the property ladder these days,' she said. Part of what was fuelling the incredible rise in property prices was the burgeoning amount of equity upgraders had behind them to channel into their next purchases, Ms Tindall said. 'It's not an even playing field,' she said. 'Very few people have had the kind of pay rises needed to keep pace with the market. 'For most people, the only way they've kept up is because they already own property. Success breeds success.' Increases in the income needed to buy the average houses in some of Sydney's most sought after suburbs were the most extreme, Canstar revealed. Cracking the house market in north shore suburbs Crows Nest and Lane Cove required a yearly income roughly $300,000 higher than in 2020, while in many Harbour-suburbs the difference was $500,000. This was for buyers with a standard loan rate and 20 per cent deposit who wanted to avoid 'mortgage stress' – spending more than a third of their gross income on loan repayments. Luxe areas Bellevue Hill and Dover Heights led the nation for the biggest changes since Covid, with the income needed to afford a median house up $883,000 in the former and $720,000 in the latter. Even apartments in suburbs known as more affordable Sydney enclaves demanded wage rises that few Sydneysiders could match. Buyers needed to earn about $30,000-$50,000 more per year than they did in 2020 to afford units in Penrith, Parramatta, Punchbowl, Seven Hills, Toongabbie and many others. 'Fundamentally, the issue facing first-home buyers across the country is that prices are too high and their wages can't keep up,' Ms Tindall said. 'There are a range of complex reasons we have this problem, but one of the primary factors is that we don't have enough housing supply and we are not building enough to satisfy demand.' Michael White, an agent with inner west group Adrian William, said first-home buyers were often adapting to the difficulties of keeping up with the market by investing in units. These would often be kept for a few years before being resold and used as a springboard for the purchase of a family home, he said. Natalie Wells bought a Newtown unit in late 2019, just before the pandemic hit, and said the difference between the market then and now was huge. She is selling the Enmore Rd property, one of the few rooftop one-bedders with a wraparound balcony in the area, at auction this weekend. 'It was pretty competitive back in 2019,' she said. 'I had to pay a lot more than it was worth then to secure it, but it's nothing like the market now. Demand has changed so much for any property. 'This whole area, it used to be student bars, now it's a mix of much more up-market places. Prices have just accelerated. 'I feel lucky my generation were able to get into the market when there wasn't this supply and demand imbalance. Because we already own properties, it's easier to trade in and out but worry for my kids. How are they going to do it in future?'
ABC News
37 minutes ago
- ABC News
The US dollar's demise has consequences for Australia
"I'll tell you, he's not the first," Donald Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. The US president was referring to Elon Musk's personal attacks towards himself on social media after being asked to leave his administration. "People leave my administration — and they love us — and then, at some point, they miss it so badly, and some of them embrace it, and some actually become hostile." This sort of language could be perceived as unpresidential. As is the phrasing of Trump's so-called "Big Beautiful Bill" — the name given to Trump's budget reconciliation bill that's expected to lead to both a lower tax take, and an increase in the US debt ceiling. It was perhaps, though, the so-called "Liberation Day" tariffs that did the most damage to the Trump administration's reputation within the finance community. Combined, it's led the financial community to question the stewardship of the US economy. And that has important implications for all Australians. It's impossible to dig into every confusing hole of US public policy that's produced anxiety in financial markets. Instead, let's focus on one word that's continuing to unsettle global investors which, in turn, could be hurting the reputation of the world's largest economy. It's "uncertainty". As one trader put it to me this week: "It's like investors are parked on the side of the road waiting patiently, in the cold, for the fog to lift from the highway." AMP's Shane Oliver helps manage billions of dollars for the superannuation giant. "President Trump's tariffs remain a source of ongoing uncertainty," he says. Just in the last two weeks, Trump announced a 25 per cent tariff on smart phones and threatened a 50 per cent tariff on European goods from June, then delayed it until July 9. And this is where concerns around the US dollar's longer-term trajectory come in. The US dollar is inextricably linked to the quality of the US government debt. Oliver is concerned the US government is careening toward a debt crisis. "Higher bond yields since the pandemic have pushed US federal interest payments to a record 18 per cent of tax revenue," he says. Higher US government bond yields, or debt, points to rising nerves about the US government's fiscal position. The US dollar index, which is a measure of the US dollar's value against a basket of currencies, hit a three-year low this week If, as Oliver suggests, the US dollar is losing its post-World War II safe haven status, it will continue to decline in value. "It's possible that the US dollar is losing its 'safe haven' status that could see it fall rather than go up in a crisis." Oliver is referring here to the potential for a US debt crisis. "This means the Australian dollar may behave a bit less as a shock absorber in a crisis by not falling as much as would normally be the case," he says. "Time will tell, but if this is the case then more of the burden could fall on the RBA to help protect the economy in rough times by cutting interest rates by more." This is potentially a double win for many Australians. It could make overseas travel less expensive as the Australian dollar appreciates against the greenback. There could also be further relief for mortgage borrowers as the Reserve Bank lowers interest rates to counterbalance rising global interest rates. But it would be a blow for export-exposed industries, who are hit with a potential double-whammy of falling global demand and a less competitive exchange rate. Others view the US economy, and its international reputation as largely untouchable. "I cannot see a world where the US dollar is not the reserve currency of global flows," Jamieson Coote Bond's James Wilson says. However, as InTouch Capital Markets senior analyst Sean Callow points out, other currencies like the yuan and the euro are keen to move towards the top of the currency podium. "The greenback seems likely to remain dominant in global trade in commodities and many financial contracts, where deep market liquidity is precious," Callow says. "But just as the US relationship with Europe will probably never be the same, the euro is becoming more attractive as a reserve currency, largely at the dollar's expense." It's a rocky road for global financial markets and most are treading very carefully. The uncertainty stems from US economic policy confusion and chaos, which may not go unpunished by investors. Though there is potential for significant upsides for many Australians.
