Deals Reached in Three Education Strikes
Deals that could lead to the end of a province wide strike by education workers were reached today between CUPE locals and the Edmonton Public, Fort McMurray Public and Fort McMurray Catholic school districts.
The settlements, which must still be ratified by CUPE members, would end the strikes at three school districts. About 3,000 CUPE 3550 members have been on strike at Edmonton Public since January 13 and another 1,000 CUPE 2545 and CUPE 2559 members in Fort McMurray have been on strike since mid-November 2024.
The settlements do not apply to the 2,600 support workers on strike in Calgary, Sturgeon, Parkland, Foothills and Black Gold school divisions, however, CUPE Alberta President Rory Gill says those locals will be rushing back to the negotiating table as quickly as possible to try to get a deal.
'I'm in awe of the workers in Edmonton and Fort McMurray who stood their ground, in weather as cold as minus 51 degrees, to win a fair contract,' said Gill. 'Their fortitude, their determination, and their solidarity won the day.'
'Education support workers are critical to our school system, and today they finally won the respect they deserve,' said Gill.
Gill said CUPE won't be releasing finer details of the settlement until members have had a chance to look at it. However, he did confirm that all three deals have wage agreements that are higher than the original wage mandates imposed by the Alberta government, and all three deals were for a period ending in August 2028.
At Fort McMurray Public and Catholic schools, workers will vote on the proposal over a 24-hour period ending on Monday evening. If the proposal is ratified, members will return to work on Wednesday, March 19. There will be no traditional picket lines on Monday or Tuesday.
At Edmonton Public Schools, ratification will occur on Monday or Tuesday, and return to work will happen on Wednesday or Thursday. There will be no traditional picket lines in the meantime.
:clc/cope 491
SOURCE: Canadian Union of Public Employees
Copyright Business Wire 2025.
PUB: 03/15/2025 10:30 PM/DISC: 03/15/2025 10:33 PM
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Pope Leo must stand up to Muslim immigrants seeking to remake Europe
As Muslim migration roils Europe, some Catholic bishops are starting to notice. 'For decades, the Islamization of Europe has been progressing through mass immigration,' Polish Bishop Antoni Długosz said July 13, adding that illegal immigrants 'create serious problems in the countries they arrive in.' Bishop Athanasius Schneider of Kazakhstan spoke more bluntly in March: 'We're witnessing an invasion. They are not refugees. This is an invasion, a mass Islamization of Europe.' Advertisement Yet Pope Leo XIV lives in a different dimension. 'In a world darkened by war and injustice . . . migrants and refugees stand as messengers of hope,' Leo said July 25. 'Their courage and tenacity bear heroic testimony to a faith that sees beyond what our eyes can see and gives them the strength to defy death on the various contemporary migration routes.' Leo's comments express more than blissful sentimentality. They reveal the Vatican's role in encouraging open borders and exempting migrants from accountability. Advertisement In Europe's case, that involves deliberate blindness to the violent, totalitarian nature of Islam and many of its followers. This Catholic approach toward Islam reflects the ideas of Louis Massignon, a French scholar from the early 20th century. Massignon described Islam as 'the faith of Abraham revived with Muhammad,' and asserted that Muslims 'have the right to equality among the monotheisms descended from Abraham.' French Catholic scholar Alain Besançon described the results. 'An entire literature favorable to Islam has grown up in Europe, much of it the work of Catholic priests under the sway of Massignon's ideas,' he wrote. Advertisement Asylum seekers from Afghanistan set up tents inside of the Church of Saint John the Baptist at the Beguinage in Brussels on Jan. 7, 2014. REUTERS/Francois Lenoir Besançon attributed that posture to 'an underlying dissatisfaction with modernity, and with our liberal, capitalist, individualistic arrangements,' a dissatisfaction that the Vatican embodies. 'Alarmed by the ebbing of religious faith in the Christian West, and particularly in Europe,' Massignon's advocates 'cannot but admire Muslim devoutness,' Besançon wrote. 'Surely, they reason, it is better to believe in something than to believe in nothing, and since these Muslims believe in something, they must believe in the same thing we do.' Advertisement The Catholic Church officially embraced Massignon's ideas at the Second Vatican Council in two documents. One, Nostra Aetate, focused on the church's relationship with Judaism but additionally addressed Islam: 'The Church regards with esteem the Muslims. They adore the one God . . . they take pains to submit wholeheartedly to even His inscrutable decrees, just as Abraham, with whom the faith of Islam takes pleasure in linking itself, submitted to God. Though they do not acknowledge Jesus as God, they revere Him as a prophet.' The other, Lumen Gentium, declared that 'the plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator. In the first place among these there are the Muslims, who, professing to hold the faith of Abraham, along with us adore the one and merciful God.' That passage made the Catholic catechism. But what Besançon called 'indulgent ecumenicism' toward Islam goes beyond words. During John Paul II's papacy, the church embraced outright appeasement. Catholic bishops sold underutilized churches and schools to Muslim groups; many of the churches became mosques. In October 2006, the Capuchin Franciscan friars agreed to help the Union of Islamic Communities and Organizations in Italy (UCOII) build a mosque in Genoa next to a monastery. The friars even helped build the mosque's foundation. Advertisement But the UCOII — affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood — advocates 'an extremist version of the Quran, where Christians, Jews and Westerners are criminalized, as well as women and other Muslims who don't submit to their rule,' Magdi Allam, a convert to Catholicism from Islam, reported for Milan's Corriere della Sera. In 2006, the group also demanded Islamic schools, banks and clerical review of textbooks. Its president, Mohamed Nour Dachan, refused to sign a document pledging Muslims to accept Italy's constitution, denounce terrorism and recognize Israel's right to exist. Seven months earlier, a Vatican cardinal even suggested that Muslim students receive Islamic religious instruction in the hour reserved for Catholic instruction in Italian schools. Advertisement 'If there are 100 Muslim children in a school, I don't see why they shouldn't be taught their religion,' said the late Cardinal Renato Martino, then the president of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace. 'If we said 'no' until we saw equivalent treatment for the Christian minorities in Muslim countries, I would say that we were placing ourselves on their level.' In 2008, the Catholic bishops of England and Wales asked Catholic schools to reserve prayer rooms for Muslim students and to adapt bathroom facilities for ritual cleansing before prayer. But the worst example of appeasement took place in Belgium. As part of a campaign to force the government to grant amnesty, Belgium's Catholic bishops turned their churches into homes for Muslim migrants, making them squatters. An Afghan refugee seen at the altar of the Church of Saint John the Baptist at the Beguinage on Jan. 30, 2014. REUTERS Advertisement In May 2006, more than 30 Belgian churches served such a purpose. About 300 Africans occupied Antwerp's Magdalena Chapel. Other churches held as many as 700 squatters. At Our Lady of Succor Church in Brussels, squatters lived in small tents donated by Catholic relief agencies, conducted Muslim services, erected computer tables near the pulpit and even set fires on the floor. Friar Herwig Arts described a scene at Antwerp's Jesuit chapel: migrants 'removed the tabernacle [and] installed a television set and radios, depriving us of the opportunity to pray in our own chapel and say Mass.' He went on, 'For me, the place has been desecrated. I feel I cannot enter it anymore.' Advertisement Belgium's bishops were not amused. Arts was chided by Belgium's leading clergy. 'Solidarity cannot be limited to one's own nation, said the late Cardinal Godfried Danneels, then the country's leading prelate. Monsingor Luc van Looy, then the bishop of Ghent, even said 'illegal fugitives' were 'entitled to a good place in our society. Arts has been silent on the topic ever since. But two decades later, Kazakhstan's Bishop Schneider refuses to stay silent: 'This is a global political agenda by the powerful of the world to destroy Europe.' Leo thus faces an existential challenge, one that blissful sentimentality cannot answer: Will he allow a church that played a pivotal role in creating European civilization to perform a more decisive part in destroying it? This article first ran in The Spectator's US edition.
American Military News
3 hours ago
- American Military News
DNC considering resolution banning US military aid to Israel
The Democratic National Committee is expected to consider a resolution at an upcoming meeting that would call for party members to support the suspension of U.S. military aid to Israel and a ban on weapon sales to the U.S. ally amid the ongoing war between Israel and the Hamas terrorist organization in Gaza. The Intercept reported that while a recent Gallup poll indicated that only eight percent of Democrat Party members support the Israeli military's operations in Gaza, Democratic National Committee leaders have traditionally opposed calls to ban U.S. military aid to Israel. Allison Minnerly, a 26-year-old member of the Democratic National Committee, told The Intercept that Democrat leaders could alienate younger Americans by voting against a resolution she has sponsored to symbolically oppose continued military aid to Israel. 'Our voters, our base, they are saying that they do not want U.S. dollars to enable further death and starvation anywhere across the world, particularly in Gaza,' Minnerly told The Intercept. 'I don't think it should be a hard decision for us to say that clearly.' The resolution proposed by Minnerly calls for Democrat members to support an immediate ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, an arms embargo, and the suspension of military aid for Israel. The resolution also calls for Democrat lawmakers in Congress to recognize Palestine as its own country. READ MORE: New details revealed on Israel's tragic strike on Catholic church in Gaza In response to the resolution calling for a ban on U.S. military aid to Israel, Brian Romick, the president and CEO of Democratic Majority for Israel, released a statement, saying, 'Unfortunately, there has been widespread amnesia about the Israel-Hamas war and how we got here. It's Hamas that started this war and is perpetuating the suffering by not accepting the ceasefire deal.' Romick claimed that the resolution proposed by Minnerly is a 'flawed' and 'irresponsible' resolution that could lead to division in the Democrat Party. 'Shockingly, this resolution does not even mention the barbaric attacks of October 7 nor the terrorist group Hamas at all,' Romick stated. 'It calls on members of Congress to unilaterally recognize a Palestinian state which would only reward Hamas' terrorism. It also wrongly calls for an arms embargo on Israel which will only prolong the war and extend the suffering.' Romick warned that if the Democratic National Committee advances the resolution, it will 'provide a gift to Republicans' ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. In contrast to Minnerly's resolution, Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin has proposed a resolution that calls on Hamas to release the Israeli hostages and that calls for a 'two-state solution' in the Middle East. Martin's resolution does not include a ban on U.S. aid to Israel. Minnerly told The Intercept that the Democratic National Committee is currently scheduled to vote on the contrasting resolutions on August 26.
Los Angeles Times
7 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Letters to the Editor: CAIR's national deputy director defends the group against L.A. Times op-ed
To the editor: Contributing writer Josh Hammer's recent column repeats bigoted, discredited conspiracy theories about American Muslims ('Label the Muslim Brotherhood's branches as terrorist organizations,' Aug. 15). Just as extremists once smeared Catholic and Jewish Americans as disloyal and accused Black civil rights leaders and Vietnam War protesters of being communist agents, Islamophobes today falsely claim that American Muslim institutions are part of a global terrorist conspiracy. The main target of Hammer's article was my civil rights group, the Council on American-Islamic Relations. For more than 30 years, CAIR has defended free speech, racial equality and religious liberty while consistently condemning all forms of bigotry — including antisemitism and Islamophobia — and unjust violence. We have spoken out against terrorism so often that ISIS once put a target on our executive director. Like other American Muslim institutions, CAIR is an independent nonprofit, not an agent of any foreign group. If Hammer's real grievance with CAIR is our advocacy for Palestinian human rights, polls show that most Americans oppose U.S. support for Israel's devastating war in Gaza. Does Hammer smear American Muslim groups because he fears our growing civic engagement will continue to reorient U.S. policy on Israel and Gaza in a more just, humane direction? Anti-Muslim and anti-Palestinian activists are entitled to lash out, but the rest of us should not take their bigoted conspiracy theories seriously. Edward Ahmed Mitchell, Washington, writer is a civil rights attorney and the national deputy director of CAIR.
