logo
Is AI a Career Threat or a Competitive Edge for Attorneys?

Is AI a Career Threat or a Competitive Edge for Attorneys?

Why Lawyers and Firms are Racing to Become Tech Experts
As artificial intelligence promises to reshape the legal profession, much of the conversation centers on which jobs will disappear. But attorneys looking to secure their future may need to flip the script: Rather than viewing AI as a threat, successful lawyers are becoming subject matter experts in the technology itself.
'To be effective counselors, attorneys working at the forefront of innovation need to understand the relevant technology at a deep level,' said Zachary M. Briers, a partner at Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP focusing on complex technology and intellectual property issues.
'When it comes to technology companies, almost all difficult legal issues turn on granular distinctions in technological advancements. This is particularly true with new platform technologies, such as AI, which defy conventional legal analyses,' Briers added.
This need will only increase as litigation around artificial intelligence becomes more complex, according to Nathaniel L. Bach, a partner at Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP.
'The more a lawsuit or advice implicates the inner workings of an AI model, the more attorneys will need to know to properly advise clients, ask the right questions of adversaries, and explain the technology to courts in both accurate and persuasive ways,' said Bach.
Having more than 'a surface-level understanding' of AI may even be a matter of professional competence, said Daniel B. Garrie, a mediator, arbitrator and special master with JAMS, an alternative dispute resolution provider. He is also a founder and partner of Law & Forensics, a legal engineering firm.
'Lawyers are ethically obligated to stay abreast of technological advancements under the ABA's Model Rule 1.1, Comment 8,' said Garrie.
'A deeper comprehension of how AI systems function, including their design, data dependencies, and operational limitations, is crucial for providing competent advice, particularly in areas like eDiscovery, data privacy and intellectual property disputes,' he continued.
Beyond helping to win cases and complying with ethical obligations, understanding AI could be a major career booster. David Lisson, the head of Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP's GenAI litigation initiative, said that the AI space represented a big opportunity for attorneys at the start of their career - a way to stand out from the pack. 'I always think the key to a successful junior associate is being an expert in something. And this is an area that you can really dig into,' he said.
'If you come and figure out what this model is doing and how it's doing it, you'll be the one that the senior attorney comes to, right? And you'll be the one that the client comes to because you're the one that understands what's actually going on.'
From a branding perspective, at least, firms appear to understand the value in highlighting the AI credentials of their attorneys. Over the past two years, a flurry of AI practice groups has emerged in California and elsewhere. But experts, including those who head up these groups, acknowledge that this strategy will need to evolve.
'This trend has begun and will continue, but these groups will almost certainly evolve to be increasingly specialized over time, as it becomes clear that 'AI' is far too broad a category to usefully define a practice,' Keith Enright, cochair of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP's Artificial Intelligence Practice Group said.
Bach said that AI practice groups were both 'a necessity and a calling card' for many firms. To be effective, these groups would need to encompass practice areas spanning intellectual property, privacy and technology.
'The AI space is too big and moves too fast for any one lawyer to know everything,' he said.
That's a sentiment shared by Peter H. Werner, co-chair of Cooley LLP's global emerging companies and venture capital practice group.
He said that the recent emergence of AI practice groups was 'similar to having an 'internet' practice group in the 1990s.'
'Some firms are forming 'AI practice groups' to signal to the market that they're focused on AI-related things. But the ubiquity of AI and related technologies will mean that the work that is done in every practice will be impacted by AI,' he said.
He added that Cooley instead has 'an interdisciplinary, interdepartmental internal task force that's intended to be a clearinghouse to coordinate our work on AI-related matters, many of which implicate multiple practices.'
Briers said that while 'most major firms now have a practice group that is dedicated to AI-related issues,' it was 'not enough that a few attorneys at each firm become familiar with this disruptive technology. It needs to be a firm-wide initiative.'
Attorneys who wish to become AI-literate have options. Law schools appear attuned to the fact that there will be an increasing demand for such knowledge.
A 2024 survey from the American Bar Association found that more than half of respondent schools now offer classes on AI. Many of these initial efforts focus on introducing students to the appropriate and ethical use of AI tools in their practice.
However, some go further: UC Berkeley, for example, will begin offering a specialization in AI law and regulation this summer as part of its executive track LLM program, including a unit on the fundamentals of AI technology. The curriculum for the new certificate was designed in consultation with an advisory group of industry leaders, including representatives from Anthropic and Meta.
Other schools are offering shorter standalone graduate certificates or programs in artificial intelligence for legal practitioners, including USC Gould School of Law and Harvard Law School.
Beyond these programs, attorneys with an existing science, technology, engineering or mathematics (STEM) background might be at an advantage to their colleagues in an AI world, though legal experts disagree on the significance of this.
'The shift to AI is indeed an opportunity for attorneys with a background in computer science, data science, or engineering areas to gain a distinct advantage in understanding the nuances of AI-related legal challenges,' Garrie said.
'As AI legal work often intersects with technical fields like cybersecurity, data analytics and software licensing, firms may increasingly value and recruit legal talent with such dual credentials. This intersectional expertise enhances both client trust and legal efficacy,' he added.
Clinton Ehrlich, a partner at Trial Lawyers for Justice who is a member of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Artificial Intelligence Committee and has a computer science background, said lawyers working on AI cases or issues was analogous to lawyers working in the patent space, where many attorneys have a STEM background.
'This is an area of the law where skills are required beyond those that most generalists have,' Ehrlich said.
'It doesn't mean that a generalist couldn't be involved on a team that's litigating a case involving questions about AI, but I think it's very important to have at least one team member with really deep domain knowledge of how these systems work, so that you aren't just translating everything through the medium of popular science,' he said.
Others were more circumspect, emphasizing that a willingness to learn and engage was far more important than prior education experience.
Werner said that attorneys 'don't necessarily need a technical degree for most things, but you need curiosity. The best lawyers are quick studies. We work with cutting edge technology and life sciences companies, using complex methodologies to do complicated things.'
He predicted that as the law and technology become increasingly intertwined, we could witness 'hybrid teams of people at firms that include lawyers and technologists that collectively pitch for and deliver service to clients – think e-discovery on steroids.'
According to Enright, 'Intellectual fluidity and the ability to frame questions effectively will be vastly more valuable than a STEM background.'
Vivek Mohan, the other co-chair of Gibson Dunn's artificial intelligence practice, said that whenever he talks to law students and recent graduates interested in the practice area, he tells them, 'I look for ongoing, demonstrated interest. Certainly, an undergraduate degree in a related area is a strong signal of interest.'
But he cautioned that an attorney's role is 'not to substitute ourselves for the engineers or AI researchers at our companies. It is to listen carefully, ask probing questions and then provide the best legal advice we can.'
He added that attorneys interested in AI should get comfortable with occasionally not knowing what is going on with AI models, given even their engineers are not always able to explain how a model reached a particular answer.
'Learn what you can, but you have to be able to get comfortable with operating in an environment that carries a certain degree of uncertainty,' he advised.
The other risk of overemphasizing prior education? Instilling a sense that technological stasis is acceptable, said Briers.
'An engineering background might be helpful in understanding these new technologies, but it's not necessary. In my experience, too many attorneys who lack a STEM background use it as an excuse to not learn new technological skills. They do so to the detriment of their clients' interests,' he said.
The Los Angeles/San Francisco Daily Journal is a publication for lawyers practicing in California, featuring updates on the courts, regulatory changes, the State Bar and the legal community at large.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China calls for global 'consensus' on AI regulation
China calls for global 'consensus' on AI regulation

Yahoo

time7 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

China calls for global 'consensus' on AI regulation

Chinese Premier Li Qiang on Saturday urged the international community to build a global consensus on artificial intelligence (AI) governance, highlighting security risks amid the raging tech race between Beijing and Washington. Speaking at the opening of the World Artificial Intelligence Conference (WAIC) in Shanghai, Li said it is prudent to look at "how to find a balance between development and security [which] urgently requires further consensus from the entire society." Li also announced the creation of a Chinese-led body to promote global AI cooperation and open-source development to keep AI from becoming "the preserve of a few countries and a few enterprises." What is the tech rivalry between the US and China? The three-day WAIC event comes amid intensifying US-China competition in advanced AI technology. Just days before, US President Donald Trump announced the slashing of AI regulations to maintain the US' dominance in the field even as Washington continues to restrict exports of high-end chips to China, citing national security concerns. These restrictions are forcing Chinese companies to look for alternatives, with startup DeepSeek introducing an AI model in January that matched the performance of leading US systems, despite working on less advanced chips. Li, without naming the US, criticized monopolistic control and called for open access to AI technologies, warning of insufficient supply of AI chips and restrictions on talent exchange otherwise. "Only by adhering to openness, sharing and fairness in access to intelligence can more countries and groups benefit from (AI)," he said. 'AI a test of international cooperation' At the WAIC opening ceremony, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said in a video message that AI regulation would be "a defining test of international cooperation." More than 800 companies are participating in this year's WAIC, showcasing over 3,000 tech innovations. While Chinese firms like Huawei and Alibaba are the main entrants, international firms including US-based companies Tesla, Alphabet, and Amazon are also present. Edited by: Saim Dušan Inayatullah

This robot system by TikTok parent ByteDance can fold clothes and clear your table thanks to AI
This robot system by TikTok parent ByteDance can fold clothes and clear your table thanks to AI

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

This robot system by TikTok parent ByteDance can fold clothes and clear your table thanks to AI

TikTok parent company ByteDance has built a robotic system that allows bots to perform household tasks such as folding laundry and cleaning tables. The system uses artificial intelligence (AI) that allows robots to follow language commands and carry out tasks. China, where ByteDance is based, has been developing the technology at lightning speed with the development of its DeepSeek and Manus. According to chip designer Nvidia, robotics is the next phase of AI. That's because while tech companies have been trying to build a general-purpose robot for years, programming robots is difficult. However, with AI, it becomes much easier. Related Cannibal robot? Scientists develop a robot that can grow and heal by eating others What did ByteDance do? ByteDance built a large-scale vision-language-action (VLA) model called GR-3, which allows robots to follow natural language commands and do general tasks. GR-3 can be thought of as the brain of the robot. ByteDance used a robot called ByteMini for the experiment. After GR-3 was inserted into it, the robot could put a shirt on a hanger and place it on a clothing rack. Video by the company also shows the robot picking up household items and placing them in a designated spot. It could differentiate between sizes, successfully following commands to pick up the 'larger plate'. It also completed tasks such as cleaning up the dining table. ByteDance's Seed department, which heads the company's AI research and large language model (LLM) development, said it trained the model with image and text data and then fine-tuned it with data from humans interacting in virtual reality. It was also taught to copy the movements of real robots. Related Humanoids will be the next phase of AI. This is how to train a robot, according to Nvidia ByteDance appears to be increasingly focusing on AI, launching the Seed department in 2023. The new development comes as TikTok is facing another threat of being banned in the US unless the company sells its American assets. US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick reiterated this on Thursday, saying, 'China can have a little piece or ByteDance, the current owner, can keep a little piece'. 'But basically, Americans will have control. Americans will own the technology, and Americans will control the algorithm,' Lutnick told CNBC, adding that if this doesn't happen, 'TikTok is going to go dark, and those decisions are coming very soon'.

10 shares I wouldn't want to hold in a stock market crash
10 shares I wouldn't want to hold in a stock market crash

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

10 shares I wouldn't want to hold in a stock market crash

There are several warning signs suggest the stock market may be entering an overheating phase, reminiscent of prior late-stage bull markets. It's certainly more prevalent in the US, but even some UK stocks look a little too hot to touch. Key indicators include technical metrics, valuation levels, investor behaviour, and macroeconomic signals. The S&P 500 is trading significantly above its 200-day moving average, a pattern often seen near market peaks. Meanwhile the market has been climbing the so-called Wall of Worry. Market participants have been shrugging off negative news, fuelling elevated investor optimism despite conflicting signals from credit markets and underlying economic risks. Valuations are looking stretched all over the place, even when accounting for the transformative impact of artificial intelligence (AI). For context, the forward price-to-earnings-to-growth (PEG) ratio for the global IT sector now sits at 1.83, suggesting that growth is more than priced in. High-performing sectors, particularly technology leaders, have experienced the kind of parabolic rallies that historically precede sharp corrections. Modest rallies are typically more indicative of sustainable price movement. And many commentator are highlighting that the market will need to acknowledge some of the broader economic challenges we see today. Inflation is stubborn in many parts of the world, geopolitical tensions remain elevated, and US trade policy will have a material impact on global development. So, which shares would I not want to hold in a stock market crash? Well, stocks with strong momentum that could reverse amid demanding valuations. Stock 6-month price change Arm Holdings -1.5% Holdings 88% Credo Technologies 25.8% Oracle 32% Palantir 96% Quantum Computing Inc 55% Rightmove 21% Rocket Lab 58% SoundHound AI -24% Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) -24% There's no particular pattern here. However, many trade at multiples far in excess of their averages, display unsustainable share price movements, and have an element of speculation baked in. I even owned some until recently, and continue to own Quantum Computing Inc — this is a short-term trade not an investment. I sadly decided to part with my Rocket Lab shares — up 100%, but I think the gains were unsustainable. What's wrong with Tesla? I like Tesla. I own a Tesla. But I wouldn't buy Tesla stock at the current price. Simply, at 177 times forward earnings, the stock is detached from its fundamentals and even its prospects. The stock has become so expensive because of the belief that Tesla will dominate the autonomous driving revolution. Indeed, it's certainly ahead of the game in relative terms, having rolled out robotaxis in limited numbers. However, there is no guarantee it will dominate in the autonomous era. And there's no guarantee uptake will be unanimous. And that's an issue for a company with a price-to-earnings-to-growth (PEG) ratio of eight times. Ironically, Ferrari, the antithesis of autonomous driving, also trades with an outrageous PEG of six times. Long story short, as much as I like the brand, the valuation is built on a degree of speculation. And when the market goes into reverse, speculators get hurt the most. That's why I think investors should consider other stocks with stronger metrics for now. Or possibly sell if they hold them. Nonetheless, I still think there are some excellent investment opportunities out there, even in the current market. The post 10 shares I wouldn't want to hold in a stock market crash appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool James Fox has positions in Quantum Computing Inc. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Oracle, Rightmove Plc, and Tesla. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store