Teenager who murdered British mother in her Australian home has sentence REDUCED - as family say they are 'broken' by the decision
The boy, who cannot be named as he was aged 17 at the time of the offences, fatally stabbed Emma Lovell in the heart after he broke into her family house in North Lakes, north of Brisbane, at about 11.30pm on Boxing Day in 2022.
Following a successful appeal on Friday, the teen will now serve a minimum of about eight years and four months in detention instead of about nine years and nine months before he is released under supervision.
Victims of youth crime ambassador Lyndy Atkinson, who had worked with the Lovells since before the original sentencing, said the family now felt additional trauma.
'They are a broken family ... (the teen defendant) will be able to get out and live his best life,' she said.
'Lee Lovell has lost a wife, his two girls have lost a mother. To me, it is still on the side of the offender and victims are continually being left behind.'
Queensland Attorney-General Deb Frecklington said the appeal was an unacceptable outcome and claimed it was caused by the previous government's 'weak laws'.
'I am now looking at my options to make an appeal to the High Court,' she said.
Queensland opposition leader Steven Miles said he did not want to 'score cheap political points' but was shocked by the decision and thinking of the family.
Mrs Lovell's husband Lee, who was wounded during the home invasion, was unable to attend court on Friday when the appeal decision was handed down.
The home invasion led to 'adult crime, adult time' changes in Queensland law that allow for youth offenders to face a mandatory life sentence for murder with a minimum 20 years before parole.
'The murder of Emma Lovell rocked the state and Queenslanders made it very clear enough is enough and change needed to occur,' Ms Frecklington said.
'The community and Emma's family will be devastated by this outcome and our thoughts are with them on another very difficult day they should never have had to endure.'
Justice Tom Sullivan in May 2024 sentenced the teen, then aged 19, to a maximum of 14 years with a requirement to serve 70 per cent of that time in detention, after he found the crime to be 'particularly heinous'.
The Court of Appeal on Friday allowed the teen's appeal against the length of his sentence, with two of the three judges agreeing it was 'manifestly excessive'.
In his dissenting opinion, Justice John Bond stated he was 'respectfully' not able to find the sentence unjust or plainly unreasonable.
Justice David Boddice found the 14-year sentence should stand but reduced the detention period to 60 per cent.
He cited the teen's guilty plea, 'genuine remorse and prospects of rehabilitation' as special circumstances justifying his release from detention after serving less than the statutory 70 per cent.
The teen had appealed Justice Sullivan's 'particularly heinous' finding in a bid to get his overall sentence reduced to 10 years.
However, Justice Boddice found Justice Sullivan's decision to impose the maximum overall sentence available at the time was correct as the offences were 'properly described as provoking a sense of outrage'.
The teen now has five years left to serve in detention after 500 days of pre-sentence custody in May 2024 were recognised as time served.
The teen's male co-offender, also a juvenile, was acquitted of murder at a judge-only trial in October.
He was found guilty of burglary and assaulting Mr Lovell, and in December he was sentenced to 18 months' detention - time he has served.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
31 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Pity the beat cops now that Britain's top policeman has banned them from dancing at the Notting Hill carnival
It's a world in flames. Too much antisocial behaviour, too many street gangs, too few crimes being solved – but fear not, the Metropolitan police commissioner, Sir Mark Rowley, has a plan to fight back. Go to the Notting Hill carnival this weekend, he's told his officers. Keep the peace, lay down the law – and I'd better not catch you dancing. He's right to be concerned. Dancing policemen are a menace. They undermine the tradition and the public's trust. The Laughing Policeman was bad enough, but dancing ones? You wonder how they ever got through the vetting and the training. From now on, perhaps it will be a specific part of the vetting and the training. 'Regan, you almost made it through, but when we played that bit of Rihanna in the final module, you shimmied a bit and there was a definite head bob. I'm sorry, this job isn't for you.' There are many problems in the running of and the policing of the Notting Hill carnival. The numbers are too big, the west London space too small. We know there's crime: two murders last year and melees in which more than 60 officers injured. No one underestimates the challenge. Last week, Tory members of the London Assembly called for City Hall to take over the running of the event, and mooted once again the idea that it could move to a park, Hyde Park perhaps, and become ticketed. No one close to the event and its tradition wants that. But everyone knows that, security-wise, things have to change. Will motionless, ear-plugged officers do that? I'm not sure that's the eureka moment. I can't quite equate the difficulty of keeping roads unblocked and hyped up young men from maiming themselves and others with the dereliction of rogue officers momentarily shaking a leg to Mighty Sparrow, Sean Paul or Shaggy. How does that work in fact? Is that the officer who says: 'There is a punch up over there and I know I should intervene, but I do like this banging tune, and I'm having a nice dance, so I'll wait until it's finished?' I don't think any officer would do that, and I doubt the commissioner really thinks so either. The statement from Scotland Yard says: 'Almost 7,000 officers will be deployed to this year's event. They are there to keep revellers safe, not to join in the revelling. We want officers to positively engage with the carnivalgoers while staying vigilant at all times and remaining able to respond and intervene swiftly as necessary. They can't do this if they are dancing. The standards of behaviour expected as part of the policing operation will be communicated clearly before the event, just as they have been in recent years.' On its face, this last bit appears to reveal that those who have got jiggy wit it at carnival in recent years have been dancing disobediently, perhaps with intent, perhaps with malice aforethought. As for those who have actually danced in actual contact with the revellers, well, bring back Keir Starmer's all-night courts. There is, of course, a simpler explanation for this new diktat, rather than any genuine nexus between carnival crime and the beat officer who likes the beats. It's not really that too many officers over-engage: it's that occasionally one makes a human connection, and someone takes a photo of that, and it ends up on the TV and in the papers – because little else happens on a bank holiday – and the rightwing press goes full tonto about woke coppers who talk to folk they should be tasering. Before you know it, someone is saying that the commissioner himself is a woke disciple who secretly loves Afrobeats and privately takes the knee on Congolese religious holidays, and that we really need new leadership, of the kind that Nigel Farage would seek out were he to reach No 10. And all of that grouching is bad for the top team at Scotland Yard, who'll be forgiven by the right if they never catch another criminal, so long as they don't go woke. So the best thing for them, short of stopping the music itself, is to stop the thin blue line dancing, even for a smiley snapshot. And so they have. It's all quite funny, and it's all quite sad. Because those pictures of communal revelry between the public and law enforcementwere sometimes a bit cringe and often a bit stagey, but they spoke to a desire of some officers to present as a police service rather than a police force – and showed an enthusiasm from carnivalgoers to embrace that. And for those who weren't there, those moments – like the time in 2017 when a PC Daniel Graham threw his shapes and went viral – conveyed a world that doesn't always exist, but one that most of us would like to see. We'll have the old pictures as an archive, but pity the officers deployed to carnival this year: concerned about the crush, concerned about the crime (with optimists at the Mail already predicting 'three days of carnage') and now concerned that a surveillance camera might catch them twerking in the line of duty. Jeez, isn't policing dangerous enough as it is? Hugh Muir is a Guardian columnist
The Guardian
31 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Florida man who fatally stabbed friend over Trump convicted of second-degree murder
A Florida man who fatally stabbed a friend during an argument in 2022 over Donald Trump's businesses having gone bankrupt, is facing possibly spending the rest of his life in prison after being convicted of murder. Donald Jamesbrown Henry, 38, awaits a sentencing hearing tentatively scheduled for October after jurors found him guilty Friday of second-degree murder in the killing of Shawn Popp, whose death came to be regarded by some as an example of the havoc that politics can wreak on interpersonal relationships in the US. Henry's conviction, under Florida law, requires him to serve at least 16 years and nine months in prison without the possibility of parole. The state's maximum punishment for second-degree murder is life imprisonment. According to authorities, Popp was smoking marijuana at a friend's house in the community of Arcadia on 22 October 2022 when he and Henry – another visitor – became locked into an argument about Trump, who at the time was a fellow Florida resident in between his two presidencies. Popp made a statement about 'Trump going bankrupt', investigators wrote in a sworn statement that was later filed in court and reported on by Reuters. Henry, meanwhile, 'strongly believed that Donald Trump did not go bankrupt but instead … chose the wrong individuals to do business with, which caused it to fail', investigators wrote. A number of businesses that Trump ran before winning the 2016 and 2020 presidential races sought federal bankruptcy protection, and it was not clear whether the argument between Popp and Henry focused on any particular one of those cases. Regardless, the two ended up fighting, with Henry convinced Popp 'was talking to him like he was stupid', authorities alleged. Investigators said Henry then plunged the blade of a kitchen knife that he was sharpening into Popp's chest. Popp subsequently walked outside, crossed the street and collapsed dead after being overheard remarking, 'You stabbed me, you son of a bitch,' the news website Law & Crime reported. Once the local sheriff's office was called out to investigate, Henry claimed he had acted in self-defense and therefore had justifiably killed Popp. Henry maintained that fists were 'deadly weapons' and he had first been struck in the face by Popp, prompting him to use the knife and 'stop the threat', deputies wrote in their sworn statement. Deputies also accused Henry of explaining that his family members were high-ranking military members – and of saying that prior 'training' he had received in survival and weapons 'kicked in' during the fracas. Though Henry had 'superficial marks' on his forehead, investigators said they determined he did not have any injuries demonstrating that he needed to defend himself with deadly force. They jailed Henry – and on Friday, after brief jury deliberations at the conclusion of his trial, jurors returned a verdict finding him guilty of murder as well as trying to intimidate a witness out of cooperating with authorities, a statement from the DeSoto county sheriff's office said. 'This verdict is a testament to the dedication and hard work of [law enforcement] who never stopped pursuing justice,' the sheriff's office statement added.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Jamarra Ugle-Hagan makes telling admission about controversial weekend nightclub shooting: 'I'm lucky I wasn't hit'
Jamarra Ugle-Hagan has revealed just how close he came to suffering a serious injury after the footy star was present at a Melbourne nightclub when a firearm was discharged in the early hours of Sunday morning. The Western Bulldogs forward also revealed that he was left feeling 'traumatised' after the incident which is understood to have taken place outside of Prahran's Love Machine nightclub. Police were called to an incident at approximately 2.25am on Sunday morning, having been alerted to a disturbance at the night club. The 23-year-old, who has not featured for the Bulldogs this year due to personal issues, explained to The Herald Sun that he had spoken to Victoria police following the incident and said that he was being treated 'as a witness'. 'It was that close to me, I'm lucky I wasn't hit,' the 2020 No 1 draft pick told the Herald Sun. 'I wasn't involved with anything, as the police know. 'There were 20 people around me and probably another 100 at the venue, but my name is being mentioned like I have some kind of part in it. 'I'm linked just by being there. It's trial by media. 'It is out of my control. 'It is traumatising and no one should be near or see any of that.' The Herald Sun reports that the 23-year-old had been getting into a rideshare vehicle when the shot was fired. He added that the incident had left him feeling fearful of walking around in public, with the event having heightened his anxiety. Ugle-Hagan has previously spoken of his commitment to getting back into Luke Beveridge's first-team and has returned to training in recent months, after heading north to participate in a wellness camp. However, the footy star admitted that being in the nightclub on Sunday morning was not a great look. 'People need to understand I'm safe,' he said. 'Which is the biggest thing – I'm not even involved, but I can't let this get to me. 'I'm lucky I'm alive and nothing happened, as it was only a metre away (from me).' Victoria Police told Daily Mail Australia that no injuries had been reported following the nightclub incident. 'Armed Crime Squad detectives are investigating a firearms incident outside a licensed premises in Prahran on 17 August,' Victoria Police told the Daily Mail. 'Police were called to Malvern Road about 2.25am following reports of a physical altercation between a group of people. 'It is understood that a firearm was discharged during the altercation before the parties fled the scene. 'At this stage, there have been no reports of injuries. The investigation remains ongoing.' Earlier in August, the Bulldogs star, who has not played for his club since March 2025 due to mental health revealed to News Corp that he was 'getting much better' as he looked to make his return to football. 'I'm journaling every morning as soon as I wake up. 'I feel like that is more in my interest now to get me through this tough time. 'I love training myself and putting myself through something I can get better at. It is an easier way for me.' He added that he has been spending time with his supportive friends to help keep his mental health on track. Ugle-Hagan, who was the Doggies' leading goal scorer during the 2024 campaign, has made 67 AFL appearances for the Melbourne-based club, having debuted back in 2021.
