logo
Honolulu City Council considers sponsorships for public facilities

Honolulu City Council considers sponsorships for public facilities

Yahoo26-02-2025

STAR-ADVERTISER / 2014 A sponsorship between a private supporter and the city would create alternate revenue streams that can go toward the upgrading and modernization to the 60-year-old Blaisdell Center.
1 /2 STAR-ADVERTISER / 2014 A sponsorship between a private supporter and the city would create alternate revenue streams that can go toward the upgrading and modernization to the 60-year-old Blaisdell Center.
STAR-ADVERTISER / 2019 The name change of the SimpliFi Arena at Stan Sheriff Center in 2020 was part of a sponsorship agreement between the University of Hawaii and Bank of Hawaii.
2 /2 STAR-ADVERTISER / 2019 The name change of the SimpliFi Arena at Stan Sheriff Center in 2020 was part of a sponsorship agreement between the University of Hawaii and Bank of Hawaii.
STAR-ADVERTISER / 2014 A sponsorship between a private supporter and the city would create alternate revenue streams that can go toward the upgrading and modernization to the 60-year-old Blaisdell Center.
STAR-ADVERTISER / 2019 The name change of the SimpliFi Arena at Stan Sheriff Center in 2020 was part of a sponsorship agreement between the University of Hawaii and Bank of Hawaii.
A Honolulu City Council measure to allow private sponsorship of city parks and other public facilities to garner more revenues for the city is scheduled for further review today.
Introduced in January by Council member Radiant Cordero, Bill 4 revisits aspects of a prior law, Ordinance 17-16, that established nonproperty tax revenue sponsorships in 2017. That law all but disappeared after the pilot measure's five-year repeal clause took effect in 2022.
As drafted, Bill 4 would seek to 'create and enhance public-private relationships, including with individuals, corporations, and other organizations, through the creation of commercial sponsorships.'
'Private sponsorships will create alternate revenue streams that will increase the city's ability to deliver services and to maintain city assets, including its facilities, parks, programs, equipment, and tangible property, and provide enhanced levels of service and maintenance beyond the core levels funded from the city's general fund for the benefit of users and the community at large, ' the bill states.
The bill would allow the director of a city agency to enter into a sponsorship agreement, but only for a term of less than five years, with a financial contribution of less than $50, 000.
'All sponsorship agreements for a financial contribution of $50, 000 or more must be approved by a resolution adopted by the Council, ' the bill states.
'All sponsorship agreements for a period of five years or more must be approved by a resolution adopted by the Council.'
Don 't miss out on what 's happening !
Stay in touch with breaking news, as it happens, conveniently in your email inbox. It 's FREE !
Email 28141 Sign Up By clicking to sign up, you agree to Star-Advertiser 's and Google 's and. This form is protected by reCAPTCHA.
During the Council's Jan. 29 meeting, the panel reviewed and adopted Bill 4 on the first of three readings.
Winston Welch, executive director of The Outdoor Circle, said his environmental group generally opposed the bill's current language. He said Hawaii's 1926 law that prohibits outdoor signage and billboards—created with the advocacy of The Outdoor Circle during Hawaii's territorial days—should not be overlooked.
'Our concerns are especially about the signage, and I think the reason why this bill was not utilized before (was because ) it became toxic, ' Welch said at the meeting. 'And we don't need to go down that road again.'
Such an ordinance also contributes to the 'over-­commercialization of our public spaces, ' he added.
But Council Chair Tommy Waters challenged Welch's assertions that the new measure would harm the environment. And he noted that under Bill 4 all sponsorship agreements must first be approved by a resolution adopted by the Council.
Waters said the potential for revenue-­generating sponsorship 'was vitally important ' to the city.
Bill 4 is also being advanced with accompanying legislation. City Council Resolution 50 urges the city Department of Enterprise Services to specifically pursue the sponsorship of naming rights for the city-owned Neal S. Blaisdell Center.
Typically, naming rights means the city may grant individuals or organizations the opportunity to have their names associated with a facility, like a stadium or arena, in exchange for financial contributions.
'Such a sponsorship would provide the city with an alternate revenue stream and thus enable it to make much needed upgrades and modernization improvements to the more than 60-year-old Blaisdell and increase services offered to users and the community at large, ' the legislation indicates.
As an example, the resolution notes that in 2020 the University of Hawaii and the Bank of Hawaii entered into a 10-year, $5 million sponsorship agreement for the naming rights of the Stan Sheriff Center—now known as the SimpliFi Arena at Stan Sheriff Center—at UH's Manoa campus.
DES Director-designate Dita Holifield has said her department was excited to pursue this revenue-­generating opportunity to improve the Blaisdell campus. But Holifield noted that based on discussions with the city Department of the Corporation Counsel, existing city laws do not allow for the sponsorship of naming rights.
The Blaisdell Center, originally called the Honolulu International Center, was built in 1964.
Today's City Council meeting begins at 10 a.m.
inside the City Council Chamber, 530 S. King St.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kahnawake Mohawk Council changes up portfolios
Kahnawake Mohawk Council changes up portfolios

Hamilton Spectator

time2 hours ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Kahnawake Mohawk Council changes up portfolios

The Mohawk Council of Kahnawake (MCK) announced that the portfolios of certain Council chiefs have been adjusted following a review - although none were made in terms of changing leads. David Diabo is no longer on the heritage file, Ryan Montour is no longer on sustainable development, Ross Montour was added to lands and development, and grand chief Cody Diabo switched from health to governance. Although he characterized the changes as 'minor,' the review and the changes are still important internally and externally for the Council. 'It's important in terms of not only accountability to the community, to show people what people are working on, but internally as well because you have staff that need direction on things,' said Cody. He said that having this review a little less than a year after this Council was elected was a matter of timeliness. 'I don't want to wait too long, and I know that in the past, just because of by-elections and stuff like that, you're kind of a little bit past halfway through the term. And, really, you're spending a year-and-a-half maybe in a portfolio that you don't need to be there, or just have too many portfolios,' said Cody. He switched from health to governance for those reasons. 'I had jumped on health at the beginning of the term to help out Arnold (Boyer), because nobody else was jumping on it,' said the grand chief. But, his role as grand chief aligned better with the governance portfolio, leading to the switch. Ryan Montour was in a similar position, as a large workload as lead on public safety along with being on four other files than sustainable development led to him dropping the file. 'I have fairly large files; the public safety portfolio has a lot of different files under it,' said Ryan. That includes things like the clean soil policy, the Sanitary Conditions Law, housing, the ongoing efforts to make Route 207 safer, and more. He said that his responsibilities on the file were for things like greenhouses, which organizations in town outside the MCK have been developing on their own. 'I felt that it was definitely a change that I could do to alleviate some of the workload. I wasn't really being a productive member of my portfolio, so I decided to lighten my load to concentrate on other things,' said Ryan. David, for his part, dropped the heritage portfolio in part because of his added workload from his addition on the duty-to-consult file and because of a relative lack of action in the tourism file. 'It was just getting to be too much,' said David. 'Everybody wants to be on stuff, but you can really start seeing your workload and where your attention is needed, or your interest as well,' said Cody. David echoed the grand chief's thoughts. 'It's important, if not critical. Once we get a good feel for the work that we're doing after being elected, it's easy to assess where your efforts are needed most, and where they're having the most impact,' he said. The changes came into effect following the May 26 council meeting. olivier@ Olivier Cadotte, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Honolulu City Council adopts $5.19B budget package
Honolulu City Council adopts $5.19B budget package

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Honolulu City Council adopts $5.19B budget package

Two late votes by the Hono ­lulu City Council Wednesday evening finalized approval of a $5.19 billion budget package for the city's 2026 fiscal year, which begins July 1. The Council unanimously adopted a $3.91 billion executive operating budget, which in general will fund city salaries, police and fire services and street and parks maintenance. The panel also fully passed a $1.28 billion capital improvement program budget meant to pay for infrastructure improvements. The Council-approved budget is a 10.4 % increase over Honolulu's current $4.7 billion budget, which expires June 30. Mayor Rick Blangiardi has within 10 days to sign the budget bills into law. The latest budget includes $1.5 million toward new ambulances and six full-time equivalent positions to improve emergency response times on Oahu, particularly in Maunawili, Ko Olina, and Koolaupoko. Council additions also include $500, 000 in traffic safety upgrades near school zones, and $400, 000 in community policing support for all eight Honolulu Police Department districts, among other funding. And under the finalized CIP budget, Council member Andria Tupola successfully added $1.7 million to pay for the long-awaited improvements to an unfinished Waianae Police Station at 85-939 Farrington Highway. 'So we can finish the project, ' she added. But of note on the Council's latest budget vote was the hours-long delay toward its approval. Following back-and-forth discussions inside Honolulu Hale's Council Chambers Wednesday, the panel took a meeting recess after 5 p.m. The Council's final votes cast came after 9 p.m., in a meeting that began over 12 hours earlier. 'The extended recesses were required to carefully review and reconcile the Council member's changes in the draft legislation on the floor, ' a Council spokesperson told the Honolulu Star-Advertiser Thursday. On Wednesday, changes arose after Council Chair Tommy Waters' introduced a new floor draft of Bill 22—the executive operating budget—that morning. In that bill, Waters looked to redirect up to $19.1 million in previously appropriated but unused, or 'lapsed, ' city departmental funds to bolster the city's sewer fund, as a way to defray the cost of anticipated multiyear sewer fee rate increases expected to start July 1. 'We have established a provisional account with the general fund to allow the sewer fund to access it as a contingency when needed, ' Waters said. 'If the funds go unused for sewer activities they will lapse back into the general fund.' But city staff balked. 'We were kind of confused and surprised this morning when we saw the posted (floor draft ) by yourself, Chair Waters, ' city Department of Budget and Fiscal Services Director Andy Kawano said at the meeting. He added, 'It doesn't make sense to take funding out of departments for salaries and current expenses and set aside in a provisional for sewer activities when we, in fact, should not use it.' Kawano stated such an action could harm the city's AA + bond rating—the city's creditworthiness that impacts its ability to do bond financing—as the city tackles federally mandated, multibillion-dollar upgrades to its sewer treatment infrastructure and related utilities. Waters' floor draft—opposed by city staffers and questioned by Council members—later evaporated. Waters' attempt to add general funds mirrored his introduction of Bill 43 last month—a measure which was ultimately postponed during a recent meeting of the Council's Executive Management committee. On May 5, Waters advanced Bill 43, meant to redirect a portion of the 3 % visitor-­generated Oahu transient accommodations tax, which in part is earmarked for Honolulu's rail project, to the city's sewer fund. But the chief critic of Waters' measure—BFS Director Kawano—asserted such an action was not a feasible option for the city to pursue. 'This measure will negatively impact the city's general fund and deviate from the intended purpose of the TAT, which is to provide general fund capacity to fund city services ; mitigate the strain visitors place on public facilities, emergency serv ­ices, and natural resources ; and provide additional funding for rail (i.e., 'Skyline') construction, ' Kawano wrote in a May 12 letter to Council. In related business Wednesday, the Council on a split vote adopted its version of city-initiated Bill 60, which deals with anticipated increases to the city's sewer fee rates. As part of the budget process, the Blangiardi administration proposed a 10-year, 115 % sewer fee rate increase that's expected to begin this summer. City officials say sewer fee hikes are necessary to support the city Department of Environmental Services' ongoing wastewater operations and maintenance efforts, as well as a $10.1 billion capital improvement program for Oahu's wastewater collection and treatment system that's planned through 2040. And they assert the work includes a $2.5 billion upgrade to the Sand Island Wastewater Treatment Plant as required under a 2010 federal consent decree. On Wednesday, the Council voted 5-4—with Esther Kia 'aina, Scott Nishimoto, Tupola and Waters dissenting—on Budget Committee Chair Tyler Dos Santos-­Tam's draft of Bill 60, which shaves the city's decade-­long span for increased rates down to about six years. That plan would start Jan. 1, 2026, and run through 2031. As approved, Bill 60's sewer fee increases for a household that uses about 6, 000 gallons of water per month—deemed 50 % of all single-family households in Honolulu—equates to a 6 % increase in sewer fees in fiscal year 2026, 7.5 % in fiscal year 2027, 8.5 % in fiscal year 2028, followed by 9 % over the remaining three fiscal years. After the year 2031, sewer rates would increase 3 % annually. As proposed, a household that uses 6, 000 gallons a month is currently charged $99.77 on average. By year 2031, that average bill would rise to $160.85, a more than 61 % increase, ENV data indicates. Under Dos Santos-Tam's Bill 60, ENV will have authority to set up a program called Customer Assistance for Residential Environmental Services, or CARES, to help with 'affordability and equity ' of increased sewer fee rates. Sewer customers who qualify based on household income of less than 80 % area median income will be eligible for a $20 to $25 credit on their monthly base fee. The program will be funded at $10 million per year. Customers will have to apply for the program to prove eligibility and then be re-verified every six months, ENV states. Still, not all were happy with Bill 60's approval. 'Really listen to your constituents because we're going to feel the effects, ' Oahu resident Tara Rojas said with disappointment, during remote public testimony to the Council. 'And this is only sewer (fees ), not even including anything else.'

Permission granted for former chippy to be turned into 3 bedsits
Permission granted for former chippy to be turned into 3 bedsits

Yahoo

time14 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Permission granted for former chippy to be turned into 3 bedsits

A former Bury chip shop has been given the official go-ahead to be converted into three bedsits. The building at 89 Wood Street, which was the home of Wood Street Chippy for more than 40 years, will be used to house for up to four occupants. Planning was granted by the council on May 30 to convert the end terrace, which sits at the junction of Ashworth Street. All three bedrooms will have separate en-suite facilities, with residents using a shared kitchen with separate lounge and dining area. Given the occupancy levels, the property does not require a house in multiple occupation (HMO) licence. Get the latest news delivered straight to your inbox by signing up to the Bury Times morning newsletter as well as our breaking news alerts. Conditions state that the basement must not be used as a bedroom 'to ensure the development would not result in sub-standard living". An intercom system will be used for visitor access, along with space in the back yard to store up to three bikes and waste bins. There is no off-street parking available at the property which was highlighted in some of the 42 objections received on the council's planning portal, along with fears about road safety, anti-social behaviour and noise levels. READ NEXT: 'Rogue' park peacocks spotted in gardens across borough READ NEXT: Eight Bury schools set to receive share of £54m funding for essential work One resident said: 'I object to the HMO…one house is going cause more parking problems, my car gets damaged daily due to the state of how many cars are already on the street. 'I have a baby and cannot even park outside my own address have to park on the street next to my house or the back street." Another said: 'It is common that these sorts of premises accommodate occupants for easy money with a high turnover of occupants. 'This risks the safety of all the local residents and stability in the area by accommodating the unknown.' Developer Mark Houghton, owner of Tottington-based HDC Properties, spoke to the Bury Times in April about the concerns raised. He said: 'People tend to fear the unknown, and when they hear 'house of multiple occupancy' they fear the worst. 'Some objectors seem to be concerned that the property will bring the area down and is going to be used to house 'undesirables'. "It's my house so I'm not going to let just anybody live there." "There will be careful vetting, and because it's combined living, it's important that I get the balance right.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store