
Honolulu City Council adopts $5.19B budget package
The Council unanimously adopted a $3.91 billion executive operating budget, which in general will fund city salaries, police and fire services and street and parks maintenance. The panel also fully passed a $1.28 billion capital improvement program budget meant to pay for infrastructure improvements.
The Council-approved budget is a 10.4 % increase over Honolulu's current $4.7 billion budget, which expires June 30.
Mayor Rick Blangiardi has within 10 days to sign the budget bills into law.
The latest budget includes $1.5 million toward new ambulances and six full-time equivalent positions to improve emergency response times on Oahu, particularly in Maunawili, Ko Olina, and Koolaupoko.
Council additions also include $500, 000 in traffic safety upgrades near school zones, and $400, 000 in community policing support for all eight Honolulu Police Department districts, among other funding.
And under the finalized CIP budget, Council member Andria Tupola successfully added $1.7 million to pay for the long-awaited improvements to an unfinished Waianae Police Station at 85-939 Farrington Highway. 'So we can finish the project, ' she added.
But of note on the Council's latest budget vote was the hours-long delay toward its approval.
Following back-and-forth discussions inside Honolulu Hale's Council Chambers Wednesday, the panel took a meeting recess after 5 p.m. The Council's final votes cast came after 9 p.m., in a meeting that began over 12 hours earlier.
'The extended recesses were required to carefully review and reconcile the Council member's changes in the draft legislation on the floor, ' a Council spokesperson told the Honolulu Star-Advertiser Thursday.
On Wednesday, changes arose after Council Chair Tommy Waters' introduced a new floor draft of Bill 22—the executive operating budget—that morning.
In that bill, Waters looked to redirect up to $19.1 million in previously appropriated but unused, or 'lapsed, ' city departmental funds to bolster the city's sewer fund, as a way to defray the cost of anticipated multiyear sewer fee rate increases expected to start July 1.
'We have established a provisional account with the general fund to allow the sewer fund to access it as a contingency when needed, ' Waters said. 'If the funds go unused for sewer activities they will lapse back into the general fund.'
But city staff balked.
'We were kind of confused and surprised this morning when we saw the posted (floor draft ) by yourself, Chair Waters, ' city Department of Budget and Fiscal Services Director Andy Kawano said at the meeting.
He added, 'It doesn't make sense to take funding out of departments for salaries and current expenses and set aside in a provisional for sewer activities when we, in fact, should not use it.'
Kawano stated such an action could harm the city's AA + bond rating—the city's creditworthiness that impacts its ability to do bond financing—as the city tackles federally mandated, multibillion-dollar upgrades to its sewer treatment infrastructure and related utilities.
Waters' floor draft—opposed by city staffers and questioned by Council members—later evaporated.
Waters' attempt to add general funds mirrored his introduction of Bill 43 last month—a measure which was ultimately postponed during a recent meeting of the Council's Executive Management committee.
On May 5, Waters advanced Bill 43, meant to redirect a portion of the 3 % visitor-generated Oahu transient accommodations tax, which in part is earmarked for Honolulu's rail project, to the city's sewer fund.
But the chief critic of Waters' measure—BFS Director Kawano—asserted such an action was not a feasible option for the city to pursue.
'This measure will negatively impact the city's general fund and deviate from the intended purpose of the TAT, which is to provide general fund capacity to fund city services ; mitigate the strain visitors place on public facilities, emergency serv ices, and natural resources ; and provide additional funding for rail (i.e., 'Skyline') construction, ' Kawano wrote in a May 12 letter to Council.
In related business Wednesday, the Council on a split vote adopted its version of city-initiated Bill 60, which deals with anticipated increases to the city's sewer fee rates.
As part of the budget process, the Blangiardi administration proposed a 10-year, 115 % sewer fee rate increase that's expected to begin this summer.
City officials say sewer fee hikes are necessary to support the city Department of Environmental Services' ongoing wastewater operations and maintenance efforts, as well as a $10.1 billion capital improvement program for Oahu's wastewater collection and treatment system that's planned through 2040.
And they assert the work includes a $2.5 billion upgrade to the Sand Island Wastewater Treatment Plant as required under a 2010 federal consent decree.
On Wednesday, the Council voted 5-4—with Esther Kia 'aina, Scott Nishimoto, Tupola and Waters dissenting—on Budget Committee Chair Tyler Dos Santos-Tam's draft of Bill 60, which shaves the city's decade-long span for increased rates down to about six years.
That plan would start Jan. 1, 2026, and run through 2031.
As approved, Bill 60's sewer fee increases for a household that uses about 6, 000 gallons of water per month—deemed 50 % of all single-family households in Honolulu—equates to a 6 % increase in sewer fees in fiscal year 2026, 7.5 % in fiscal year 2027, 8.5 % in fiscal year 2028, followed by 9 % over the remaining three fiscal years.
After the year 2031, sewer rates would increase 3 %
annually.
As proposed, a household that uses 6, 000 gallons a month is currently charged $99.77 on average. By year 2031, that average bill would rise to $160.85, a more than 61 % increase, ENV data indicates.
Under Dos Santos-Tam's Bill 60, ENV will have authority to set up a program called Customer Assistance for Residential Environmental Services, or CARES, to help with 'affordability and equity ' of increased sewer fee rates.
Sewer customers who qualify based on household income of less than 80 % area median income will be eligible for a $20 to $25 credit on their monthly base fee.
The program will be funded at $10 million per year. Customers will have to apply for the program to prove eligibility and then be re-verified every six months, ENV states.
Still, not all were happy with Bill 60's approval.
'Really listen to your constituents because we're going to feel the effects, ' Oahu resident Tara Rojas said with disappointment, during remote public testimony to the Council. 'And this is only sewer (fees ), not even including anything else.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Journals
4 hours ago
- Business Journals
St. Charles data center dead after developers withdraw their proposal, mayor says
The developers of a massive, secretive and controversial data center project in St. Charles have withdrawn their offer from the city. St. Charles Mayor Dan Borgmeyer told KSDK on Monday that City Council members will no longer vote on "Project Cumulus" after the application's withdrawal. "The vote was whether or not they could use diesel generators for power. That's all the vote was about. As soon as people heard diesel fuel a million gallons in the well field, they became upset. Well, there's 125 generators, so it's not a million gallons someplace. Disrespectful of all that, we don't want one generator to leak. They had measures in place to take care of a lot of that, but the fact of the matter is that it was a lack of information. The culprit was transparency," Borgmeyer said. The data center has received widespread pushback from over 5,500 residents over concerns of water pollution, energy bill increases, and general community impacts. Two members of the City Council recently . GET TO KNOW YOUR CITY Find Local Events Near You Connect with a community of local professionals. Explore All Events Councilmember Justin Foust, who represents Ward 6 in the city, previously said it would be "nearly impossible" for him to support the project. He expressed disappointment after the developers pulled their offer. "Residents deserve better communication, real transparency, and the chance to have their voices recorded through an open vote," Foust said in a statement. "Unfortunately, the decision to pull the application was made by the applicant, not the City Council." Foust urged residents to still attend Tuesday's City Council meeting to make their voices heard on the matter, in case "this applicant returns or another comes forward." The council meeting is scheduled to be held at the St. Charles Convention Center's Junior Ballroom on the first floor. Developers were having little success in convincing residents that the data center would be an ultimate good for the community. Many residents have shown up to give passionate speeches against the data center at past City Council and planning and zoning meetings. A petition to "Stop the Hazardous Data Center" was signed by nearly 5,000 residents a week after it launched. "No Data Center" fliers were recently sent out across St. Charles. The fliers claimed the project was dangerous and wrong for the city for numerous reasons, along with listing numerous data center projects that have been stopped across the country, including in Arizona, Virginia and Tennessee. The flyer was paid for by the "Good Government Committee" and urged people to contact their council members. Some residents said that the format of a recent open house made it difficult to get exact answers about the project, in part because everyone needed to talk over each other to be heard. Others had hoped for the opportunity to speak publicly on their issues, but officials didn't give them a chance to do so. "I think it's very important that people understand, we listened and even if they hadn't withdrawn it, I'm almost positive it would not have made it on Tuesday," Borgmeyer said. Tim Kline, a longtime farmer in the St. Charles area, has been watching the area for years. "The contaminated area is on the far east end of the protected area and this was going to be developed on the far west end of the area, which is over a mile away from where the contamination was from UE and Findett corporations, and I just hope we can get this stopped down here," Kline said. Kline wanted to thank everyone who signed the petition and showed up at the open house. And while he's gotten his wish for now, he's worried the industrial zoning of the area will allow Project Cumulus or another company to try again. "It's our protected water source. So, we need to get together and see if we can get it re-zoned back to agricultural and stop the filling on top of our water source," Kline said. After the open house, Borgmeyer decided to withdraw his support from the project. He added that the non-disclosure agreement went much further than the ones they "do all the time." "This one went to the point where it was just ridiculous. And they needed to step back, and there's a lot of good things about the project, but there's a lot of bad things about the project. And I think until the full scope of it's understood, they've withdrawn. I don't know if they'll come back or not," Borgmeyer said. He also addressed rumours that the original land owners are his cousins, which he says was brought to light by his last opponent for the mayor's office. "I think it's a second or third cousin. I have no idea who the people are. I'm related to just about everybody in St. Charles, the Boscherts, the Echols, and everybody else. I've talked to [St. Charles County Executive] Steve Ehlmann. We had lunch yesterday. He said, 'Yeah, we are,' I'm even related to Steve Ehlmann. So it was a political shot," Borgmeyer said. Project Cumulus attorney Korb Maxwell said he wants residents to know they were heard and that's part of why they pulled the application. "It was time to re-evaluate the approach that we made to the site and look at really focusing on what changes can we make to the site that may garner more support, but also what changes can we make to the process," Maxwell said. KSDK's Laura Barczewski asked Maxwell if they are looking elsewhere or if they will try again on the same site. "I think the project fellows team is always keeping our options open and looking at options all across the nation and in the Ameren service territory, but we really like this site. I think it has a lot to offer. I think it could be a incredibly compelling opportunity for the St. Charles region and for us, if we're able to get out our message effectively and communicate with both the businesses and the city," he said. This is the full statement released by Project Cumulus: "The Cumulus team announced today that it is withdrawing its conditional use permit application from consideration at the August 19th St. Charles City Council meeting. The decision will allow the team to incorporate recent community feedback and prepare a revised proposal for future review. "Over the past months, Project Cumulus has conducted extensive analyses of the project, its impacts, and its anticipated community benefits. While this work has been substantial, the team recognizes the importance of strengthening its outreach process to ensure information is accessible and clearly communicated to the public. "Project Cumulus is committed to working hand-in-hand with the City of St. Charles and its residents. Cumulus believes this project has the potential to deliver significant benefits to the city and the greater St. Louis region, and we want to ensure it is done the right way — with open dialogue and meaningful collaboration. "The Cumulus team will continue working closely with city officials and the public in the coming months to develop a proposal that reflects shared priorities and delivers long-term value to the community." Representatives for the project will still be at the council meeting on Tuesday, and the council will still take public feedback on the issue despite the withdrawal. View KSDK's full report and video here.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why India tops the list of abandoned sailors
Manas Kumar* has been abandoned on a cargo ship in Ukrainian waters since April. The Indian seaman was part of a crew of 14 transporting popcorn to Turkey from Moldova when the vessel was raided on 18 April, as it made its way down the Danube river which divides Ukraine and Romania. Ukraine claimed the vessel, Anka, was part of Russia's "shadow" fleet, which it said was being used to sell "looted" Ukrainian grain to third countries. But Mr Kumar, who is Anka's chief officer, said that the vessel was running under the flag of Tanzania and was managed by a Turkish company. But exactly who owns the ship is not clear from the papers provided by the crew, made up of Mr Kumar, five other Indian nationals, as well as two Azerbaijanis and six Egyptians. All are still on board, five months later - despite Ukrainian authorities informing them they were free to leave as they were not under investigation, Mr Kumar said. The problem is disembarking means the crew losing their salaries - amounting to $102,828 by June all together, according to a joint database of abandoned ships maintained by International Labour Organization (ILO) and International Maritime Organization (IMO). The BBC has reached out to the ship's management and owners on details provided by the crew. Mr Kumar says that the crew was not aware of the ship's past at the time of taking the job. Now stuck in a situation far beyond their control, the crew wants a quick resolution. He says the owner and Indian shipping officials keep asking us for one more day to resolve the crisis but nothing promising has come out yet. "This is a war zone. All we want is to return home quickly," he told the BBC. India is the second-largest supplier of sailors and crew of commercial ships globally. But it also tops the list of crew members known as "abandoned seafarers" - a term used by 2006 Maritime Labour Convention to describe the situation when shipowners sever ties with the crew and fail to provide them for repatriation, regular provisions and wages. According to the International Transport Workers' Federation (ITF), which represents seafarers globally, there were 3,133 abandoned sailors across 312 ships in 2024 - of which Indian nationals accounted for 899. For many, leaving the ship without a salary is not possible - especially if they have already paid hefty sums to agents for landing the job or for acquiring training certifications, Mohammad Gulam Ansari, a former seafarer who helps repatriate Indian crew from other parts of the world, tells the BBC. The most significant reason for abandonment is the widespread practice of registering ships - called flags of convenience - in countries that have weak shipping rules, according to ITF. International maritime rules allow a ship to be registered or flagged in a country different from its owners. "A country can set up a ship registry and charge fees to shipowners, while having reduced standards for crew safety and welfare and often failing to live up to the responsibilities of a genuine flag state," the ITF website states. This system, the group says, also obscures the identity of the real owner, which helps dubious owners ply ships. ITF data shows that in 2024, around 90% of the abandoned vessels sailed under a flag of convenience. But complications arise also because of the globalised nature of the shipping industry, with owners, managers, flags and crews of the ship often coming from different countries, industry observers say. On 9 January 2025, Captain Amitabh Chaudhary* was steering a cargo vessel from Iraq to the United Arab Emirates when bad weather forced him to make a slight detour. Minutes later, Tanzania-flagged Stratos vessel hit rocks underneath and damaged its oil-laden tank, forcing an unplanned stall near Saudi Arabia's Jubail port. The crew - including nine Indians and one Iraqi - made several attempts to float it again but they failed. Stuck, they waited there for help for nearly six months before the ship was refloated. The ship's Iraqi owner, meanwhile, refused to pay their salaries citing losses incurred due to the stalled vessel, Mr Chaudhary told the BBC. The BBC reached out to the owners of the ship for a response to these allegations but they didn't respond. Seafarers often blame India's maritime regulator, Directorate General (DG) of Shipping - which is tasked with verifying the credentials of ships, their owners and recruitment and placement agencies - for lax scrutiny of stakeholders. The DG Shipping didn't respond to a request for comment. Others, however, point out that even the crew needs to be more vigilant. "When you are hired, you get enough time to inform the DG Shipping [about any discrepancies in your contract]," said Sushil Deorukhkar, an ITF representative working for the welfare of the seafarers. "Once you sign the papers, you are stuck and have to knock on every door for resolution." Things can get complicated even for the crew on Indian-owned ships operating within the country's waters for a variety of reasons. Captain Prabjeet Singh was employed on Nirvana, an Indian-owned, Curacao-flagged oil tanker, with 22 other Indian crew members. It had recently been sold to a new owner, who wanted it decommissioned, and their salary was under dispute between the new and old owners. In early April, Mr Singh was taking it to a port in western India's Gujarat state for dismantling when an Indian court ordered its seizure "for non-payment of crew", according to the ILO-IMO database. Within days, the crew realised they were abandoned, Mr Singh said. "We were without adequate food and provisions. The ship had run out of diesel and was in complete blackout," Mr Singh told the BBC. "We were forced to break and burn the ship's wood to cook food." Hired in October 2024, Mr Singh had hoped to earn a decent living with this job, and that is why leaving the ship without salary was not a viable option for him. The crew could finally disembark on 7 July after a court-ordered settlement. But the crew's wages remain unpaid despite the court order, according to the ILO-IMO database. Back in the Gulf, the crew of Stratos said their biggest fear was that the hole in the ship's bottom would sink it. But the immediate challenge, they found, was hunger. "For days, we had to eat only rice or potatoes because there were no supplies," Mr Chaudhary told the BBC last week. After nearly six months, the crew finally managed to float the ship back - but the accident had left its rudder damaged, making it unfit to sail. The crew are still at the ship waiting for their salaries to be paid. "We are still at the same place in the same situation. The mind has stopped working, can't think what [more] we should do," Mr Chaudhary said. "Can we get some help? We just want to go home and meet our loved ones." *Some names have been changed to protect identity Follow BBC News India on Instagram, YouTube, X and Facebook Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Edgewater City Council votes 3-2 to keep moratoriums, defying state's SB 180 mandate
EDGEWATER — A split Edgewater City Council Monday night, Aug. 18, voted 3-2 to keep both moratorium ordinances in place, rejecting the mandate from Senate Bill 180 (or SB 180) requiring Florida cities repeal such measures. Mayor Diezel DePew and Councilmembers Eric Rainbird and Charlotte Gillis voted to keep the moratorium; Councilmembers Mike Thomas and Debbie Dolbow opposed. The decision comes after weeks of deliberation. The board split the same way during the ordinance's first reading. At that time, councilmembers approved a motion for a special meeting to continue the discussion. City Council members who supported keeping the city's moratoriums echoed the vast majority of Edgewater residents' opposition to the new state law. Rainbird and Gillis made emphatic and emotional statements about protecting residents, even if it means challenges could be on the way for the city. Several Edgewater residents and some from surrounding cities spoke in near unison against the new state law and urged council members to keep the moratoriums. Previous coverage: Edgewater residents, city council blast SB 180 requiring end to development moratorium Thomas and Dolbow argued that they are bound to uphold state and federal law, as they swore to upon taking office. They also voiced concerns about how SB 180 will affect Edgewater residents but suggested the city explore other ways of handling the law instead of ignoring it altogether. The City Council in January adopted two moratorium measures — one stopping issuance of building permits in the Florida Shores Drainage Basin if the project would add an impervious surface, and another placing a temporary moratorium on annexations, rezoning, amendments to approved Planned Unit Developments (a type of zoning agreement), Comprehensive Plan amendments, site plans and preliminary and final plats. SB 180, dubbed simply "Emergencies," passed both chambers with just one "no" vote. The law claims to protect homeowners who — following natural disasters such as hurricanes — want to rebuild but may face difficulties posed by local government restrictions. Gov. Ron DeSantis signed SB 180 into law in June, prompting Edgewater and other cities to start the process of repealing existing ordinances, thus putting the state's mandate at odds with the vast majority of residents and city officials who want the flood-stricken city to be better equipped against the yearly threat of heavy storms. City attorney suggested abiding by SB 180's mandate City Attorney Aaron Wolfe provided an overview of SB 180 and what it means for Edgewater. Beyond the law's prohibitions, Wolfe pointed out the new law 'provides for private enforcement action,' meaning 'any city resident or business owner in the city can file suit to enforce SB 180.' 'One compelling reason to repeal the moratoria ordinances is the potential for lawsuits being filed against the city,' Wolfe told the board. 'The city would have to pay all the attorney's fees and costs in those lawsuits. There could be dozens or hundreds of lawsuits filed against the city. It could actually become a cottage industry of attorneys suing Edgewater over SB 180. The cost of that could be very, very substantial to the city.' Part of the new law prohibits municipalities from 'proposing or adopting any moratorium on construction, reconstruction, or redevelopment of any property,' either damaged by Hurricane Debby, Hurricane Helene and Hurricane Milton, or 'more restrictive or burdensome regulations or procedures pertaining to land development,' according to the state. These provisions apply until Oct. 1, 2027, and are applied retroactively to Aug. 1, 2024. In addition, Wolfe said rejecting the state's mandate could open the door for the governor to explore the option of removing councilmembers from office. 'An ethics complaint could be filed against city council members for failing to follow state law,' he said. 'There is also the potential that the government could suspend or remove any city councilmember who violates state law – that could be considered misfeasance or malfeasance.' Wolfe concluded by recommending that the board repeal the city's moratoriums. Residents denounce SB 180, urge City Council to 'protect' the city's interest Mandi Bullard, a Florida Shores resident, has seen her neighborhood flood several times over the past few years, and while her house has been spared due to it being on a hill, her neighbors have faced the worst. She called SB 180 an 'overreach' by the state and urged the City Council to explore all legal options to fight the new state law and keep the moratoriums in place. 'Your seats are ineffective and powerless if you do not fight it,' Bullard argued. 'If your biggest worry is being removed, you're effectively being removed by doing nothing.' She also encouraged the board, as did several other residents, to join in an ongoing effort from South Florida attorney Jamie Cole, of Weiss Serota Helfman Cole + Bierman law firm, who is organizing a coalition of municipalities affected by SB 180 to fight the new law in court. 'We want people that fight for us,' Bullard said. 'We fight for you, so please join the coalition and keep our moratorium.' Gina Holt said she didn't vote 'for one of those guys in Tallahassee.' 'I haven't voted for any of them in a very long time, because they don't know what they're doing,' Holt said. 'I don't think they care about Volusia County. These are lawyers, and they did a lousy, lousy job writing this bill.' She said the new law 'needs to be amended,' and the city needs to 'stand up, join the coalition, and put the pressure back where it belongs.' A local effort is also underway to try to amend the bill, as the Volusia County Council earlier this month voted unanimously to recommend changes to SB 180 through lobbyists. In short, the county's recommended changes would make the state law apply only to hurricane-damaged properties instead of the entire county. Volusia County Council Chairman Jeff Brower attended the Edgewater City Council Aug. 18 meeting and also urged the board to keep its moratoriums. Edgewater City Council voices intent to join legal challenge against SB 180 During his remarks, Mayor DePew pointed out the large support for the moratorium, both from the board and residents. 'It's not in my nature just to stand down and not fight,' he said. 'I think we need to fight, we need to work with our state legislators.' He asked for consensus supporting the county's amendment initiative and for the city to join the coalition of municipalities challenging SB 180. While other members gave consensus, there was no official vote toward these measures. Wolfe also recommended the city join the coalition. Councilman Rainbird said he has not heard from any resident asking him to repeal the moratoriums. 'And hearing these people tell me that they are behind us, I still stand by what I said before: If I get removed, I'll walk through this town with my head held high,' Rainbird said. Gesturing toward the audience, he added: 'I work for you. I'll never forget I work for you.' Councilwoman Gillis said it was 'inspiring' to see residents speak during the meeting. 'I know the rest of the state is watching us and they want to see what we do,' she said. 'And I don't think we can buckle.' Councilman Thomas, while acknowledging SB 180 could negatively impact the city, said he felt 'there is no choice in this matter.' 'When I put my hand on that Bible, and I swore to uphold city law, county law, state law and federal law, then I'm bound to that,' Thomas said. 'There is no way around it.' Thomas said the city should join the coalition and 'do the fight right.' 'I think (SB 180) can be beat,' he said. News-Journal reporter Sheldon Gardner contributed to this report. This article originally appeared on The Daytona Beach News-Journal: Edgewater defies state law SB 180 to repeal building moratoriums Solve the daily Crossword