Defence budget misses ‘crucial opportunity' to prepare for challenges
Australia risks falling behind on current defence spending levels with a major re-armament under way in the Indo-Pacific, a report warns.
The Australian Strategic Policy Institute released its analysis of the 2025/26 defence budget on Thursday, claiming defence funding fails to address the seriousness of threats facing the nation. The budget misses a 'crucial opportunity' to prepare Australia's military and defence industrial base for future challenges, the report says.
Under the Albanese government's spending plans, defence spending is set to rise to about 2.3 per cent of GDP within a decade. While the government has committed to bringing forward $1 billion in funding, the report says no 'significant uplift' is expected until after 2028/29, despite the current era being described by authorities as the most dangerous since the end of World War II.
The nation's strategic environment was deteriorating rapidly, the report's principal author and former Home Affairs department deputy secretary Marc Ablong said.
'Australia faces a real risk of being left behind at the very time when the potential use of the ADF as a military force is rising,' he told AAP.
The government needs to urgently reform defence so it can better collaborate with industry, said Ablong, who is a senior fellow of the institute. He said the nation needed to acquire capability fast, and attempts to 'Australianise' everything through modifications took time, introduced risk and added costs.
The report recommends the government commit to funding national resilience measures across the economy and society to ensure Australia is ready to manage potential national security crises. It also calls for improved transparency and for defence to increase its public messaging.
In the information war, Australia needs a defence communications strategy to combat nations with propaganda expertise.
'The bureaucracy is being beaten by loud voices amplified by foreign adversaries,' the report said.
Ablong said Defence culture should be overhauled, with the biggest change being an embrace of risk, while labelling it's decision making process 'too slow'. He said the military had struggled to integrate women and minorities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
'Where is Jim Chalmers': Coalition accuses Treasurer of going into 'hiding' as opposition to unrealised gains tax ramps up
The federal Coalition has accused Treasurer Jim Chalmers of 'hiding' from media scrutiny amid growing opposition to Labor's plans to tax unrealised gains in superannuation accounts. The Albanese government has proposed doubling the tax on superannuation accounts with a balance over $3 million. The tax would also apply to unrealised capital gains, which critics claim will set a dangerous precedent as it taxes perceived wealth rather than actual income. The legislation has also raised questions about fairness, with Employment and Workplace Relations Minister Amanda Rishworth admitting on Sunday that politicians on defined benefit schemes – such as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese - will be 'treated differently'. Speaking to Sky News Australia on Monday, newly appointed shadow finance minister James Paterson questioned why the Treasurer was leaving it to other ministers to explain his policy. 'I've got to ask the question… where is Jim Chalmers? He's barely been seen or heard from since the election,' Senator Paterson said. 'He's letting other ministers like Amanda Rishworth front the Sunday shows to try to explain his complicated and confused and contradictory policy, and he's in hiding.' Senator Paterson said different treatment for politicians grandfathered into the now-abolished defined benefits pension scheme showed how the legislation was going to be a 'mess to legislate and to implement and to administer'. 'I think he should front up today and explain the rationale for this dodgy exemption that he's given his boss and whether or not Anthony Albanese participated in the decision to grant that exemption,' he said. The legislation for the new tax scheme was introduced in 2023 and has already passed the lower house of parliament. The Coalition has come out strongly against certain elements in the proposal, specifically the tax on unrealised capital gains and indexation of the threshold. However, shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien and the shadow finance minister have flagged there is scope for a deal with the Coalition. Mr O'Brien told The Australian the opposition was willing to engage with Labor on the proposed super changes if the government ditches the two controversial elements. Yet the tax barely featured a mention during the last election campaign – a fact many Liberals are citing as one reason for the Coalition's historic election defeat. On Monday, Senator Paterson admitted that under the leadership of Peter Dutton, the Coalition had failed to put forward an economic platform which was consistent with Liberal values. 'We must be consistent with our values,' he said. 'I think our values are timeless and that past elections have earned the overwhelming support of the Australian people, but some of the policies that we took to the last election were inconsistent with those values.' The Victorian Senator pointed to the decision to oppose Labor's tax cuts as one major error. 'Even though Labor's tax cut was meagre and miserly and wouldn't have made much of a difference, it doesn't matter. The Liberal Party should never oppose a tax cut,' the shadow finance minister said. 'We should never go to an election proposing to increase taxes. And we should never allow Labor to make the audacious claim that they are the party of lower taxes. 'That is core to who we are. It is core to our DNA as a Liberal Party and our National Party colleagues as well. 'And in the next election, we must take a bold, ambitious economic policy that gives people hope for the future. That gives people the hope that their lives and their personal circumstances will be better off if they vote Liberal and National.'
Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Ditch unrealised gains tax, index threshold for Coalition to consider bipartisan support on super tax, shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien and James Paterson declare
Two leading Coalition ministers have called on Labor to scrap taxing unrealised gains and index the threshold in its controversial superannuation proposal if the opposition is to consider bipartisan support for the plan. The Albanese government's proposal to double the tax rate to 30 per cent on funds in super accounts above $3 million has drawn backlash over plans to hit unrealised gains and maintain the threshold over time despite inflation pushing more Aussies into the higher bracket. It has sparked fears for small business owners, farmers who hold properties in their self-managed super funds, and startup investors, who use SMSF's as an investment vehicle. The groups are are particularly concerned about paying tax on paper gains they have not realised. Newly appointed shadow finance minister James Paterson said the two controversial components of the bill were core reasons why the Coalition continues to oppose it. 'We're going to fight this every step in the way because we think it's wrong in principle,' Mr Paterson said on Sky News' AM Agenda. 'Unless the government was willing to walk away from the two key principles in this bill, which is taxing unrealised gains and failing to index the threshold, then there's no conceivable world in which we could support it. 'We're very proud to oppose it because we think it is bad tax law.' It follows shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien telling The Australian the opposition is willing to engage with Labor on the proposed super changes if the government ditches the two controversial elements. 'We will be constructive, but (Treasurer) Jim Chalmers has to be prepared to change his direction on this,' Mr O'Brien said. 'What is being put forward really does breach a red line in taxing unrealised capital gains. 'But if Jim Chalmers is prepared to be humble for a moment and realise he's made a mistake and wishes to engage with me, my door is open.' The Coalition's call for negotiation on the super tax comes as Labor needs only the Greens' support in the senate to legislate the change. The Greens expressed support for taxing unrealised gains but urged Labor to lower the threshold to $2m but index this with inflation. Labor's plan will hit more people than the Greens' counterproposal over the long term, according to the Australian Financial Review. The Greens' lowered threshold would immediately capture an extra 16,000 taxpayers in the first year but would hit less Aussies after about 16 years. Mr Chalmers has claimed the tax would initially only hit 80,000 Australians, however, Assistant Treasurer Danile Mulino conceded about 1.2 million, or 10 per cent of taxpayers, will face the tax within 30 years. Leading fund manager and Wilson Asset Management founder Geoff Wilson supports the Greens' call, but wants the threshold indexed well above the rate of inflation. 'With the Greens indexing it to the CPI (consumer price index), the risk there is young people are going to be significantly disadvantaged again because superannuation (is something) you effectively invest in assets,' Mr Wilson told in May. 'What it would make sense for them to be looking at is growth in asset prices, which runs at probably double, if not more, than the CPI growth. 'If you want young people not to be disadvantaged, that's what you need to do.' Modelling by AMP deputy chief economist Diana Mousina shows a 22-year-old on an average income would breach the $3m threshold by the time they turn 62. She took to LinkedIn last month with a diagram showing how an Aussie earning a three per cent annual wage growth and receiving the 12 per cent super guarantee would breach the threshold. Ms Mousina also told Sky News her diagram may have even underestimated how quickly the 22-year-old's super account would hit $3m. 'Average super returns have been about nine per cent in Australia in the last 30 to 40 years and I'm using assumptions closer to six per cent,' she said. On plans to hit unrealised gains, Mr Wilson said this would impact the 'lifeblood of Australia' as people would restructure their investments away from risk. He also warned it could 'destroy innovation' and entrepreneurialism as a large amount of investment into technology start-ups comes from self-managed super funds.
Perth Now
4 hours ago
- Perth Now
‘Money back': Lambie's rogue reply to US demand
Australia should be looking to cut 'waste' in the Australian Defence Force before looking to pump more cash into it, independent senator Jacqui Lambie says. Senator Lambie on Monday reacted to the Trump administration calling on Canberra to boost the defence budget amid increased Chinese aggression the Indo-Pacific. A veteran and fierce advocate for the ADF, Senator Lambie quipped that the Albanese government should 'just ask Donald Trump to give us their money back for our submarines mate'. Senator Jacqui Lambie says Australia should cut ADF 'waste' before boosting the defence budget. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia 'It'd be nice to lift our defence spending – there is no doubt about that,' she told Sky News. 'Things are pretty tough out there at the moment, but I think it's more the waste. 'We waste so much money in defence procurement, and that's where we should be looking.' Senator Lambie pointed to the drawn-out build timelines for the AUKUS submarines. Under the trilateral defence pact, Australia is set to build five of the nuclear-powered boats in South Australia. The first is expected to be finished by the early 2040s. 'You've only got to see those submarines,' Senator Lambie said. 'Four billion dollars so far – we haven't got one scrap of bloody steel sitting in a harbour yet ready to go. 'I mean, that is just disgusting waste at its best.' Washington's call for Australia to step up military spending came from a bilateral meeting between Defence Minister Richard Marles and his US defence counterpart Pete Hegseth. The two senior officials met over the weekend on the sidelines of the Shangri La Dialogue in Singapore over the weekend. In a read out, the US Embassy said the two senior officials 'discussed aligning investment to the security environment in the Indo-Pacific, accelerating US force posture initiatives in Australia, advancing defence industrial base co-operation, and creating supply chain resilience'. 'On defence spending, Secretary Hegseth conveyed that Australia should increase its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of its GDP as soon as possible,' the embassy said. Mr Hegseth used his address at the Shangri La Dialogue to warn of an 'imminent' threat from China, saying Beijing could invade Taiwan as early as 2027. Such a move would deal a major blow to global supply of semiconductors and likely massively disrupt vital trade routes. 'Let me be clear, any attempt by Communist China to conquer Taiwan by force would result in devastating consequences for the Indo-Pacific and the world,' Mr Hegseth told the conference. 'There's no reason to sugar-coat it. The threat China poses is real and it could be imminent. 'We hope not but certainly could be.' China has criticised the United States for inciting tensions at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore. This comes after US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth warned allies at the summit that any attempt by China to conquer Taiwan would result in devastating consequences. A Chinese spokesperson responded to this, saying Beijing would continue to seek dialogue – however, Mr Hegseth's comments were inciting division and would destabilise the region. Asked what Australia could do in the event of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan, Senator Lambie replied: 'I don't know, have you seen the size of the Chinese army? 'That's the first thing, and the second thing is this – have you seen the condition that ours is in?' 'We have a personnel crisis in our military, and something needs to be done. 'The only way young people are going to go and join is when people in that uniform go out there and brag how great that job (is).' She said the recruitment crisis was 'the biggest problem you have with our national security right now'. 'People do not want to join defence, and people do not want to stay in,' Senator Lambie said. She also said Australian troops were 'not in the condition to being in a war zone'. Labor has pushed back against Mr Hegseth's call to lift the defence budget, with Anthony Albanese saying his government was already spending record amounts on the military. Assistant Foreign Affairs Minister Matt Thistlethwaite on Monday echoed the Prime Minister. 'We are increasing our defence spending over the course of the next three years,' Mr Thistlethwaite told Sky News. 'Defence spending increases by about 10½ billion dollars and about $50bn over the course of the next decade.' Mr Thistlethwaite added that the Albanese government was increasing defence spending to '2½ per cent of GDP', including through AUKUS. The Trump administration's demand came just days after a leading defence think tank said Australia must bolster its immediate readiness to go to war or risk having a 'paper ADF'. The Australian Strategic Policy Institute warned that while Labor was spending on longer-term projects it was not pumping nearly enough cash into keeping Australia combat-ready in the near term.
