Trump-fueled uncertainty is adding chaos as officials try to craft a state budget
That volatile mix is injecting chaos into a process that thrives on predictability. One state budget watcher is calling on lawmakers to pare back revenue estimates by $1 billion — as a starting point. The House's top Democrat, while pledging not to raise taxes or fees in the budget his chamber is
expected to release next week, said he'll likely seek to fund many agencies and accounts at the same level as last year, given the uncertainty. But he warned the state may be unable to avoid mid-year budget cuts if federal aid dries up.
'We're treading on thin ice,' House Speaker Ron Mariano told reporters Wednesday, 'and we don't know what the final numbers are really going to be.'
Advertisement
That's not to say state lawmakers haven't budgeted in unsteady fiscal times before. The Great Recession forced the state to
Advertisement
Ultimately, officials didn't have to take that drastic step. And in both cases, the state benefitted from federal help offered as a cushion against economic stress: billions of dollars through a
No such backstop appears on the horizon now. The Trump administration is aggressively pulling back federal spending through a
frenetic series of
Meanwhile, Congress is pursuing a spending blueprint that Democrats and state officials warn could mean
for its MassHealth program. In all, the state budget typically leans on roughly $16 billion in federal aid — most of which is tied to health insurance for 2 million Massachusetts residents, including children, low-income families and those with disabilities.
The state's own tax revenue also relies directly on its, and the nation's, economic health. Trump's
'Unlike recessions of the past which were created by cheap money, faulty mortgages, excessive risk taking or COVID, this one is self-inflicted, carried out by a single individual,' said Mark Williams, a Boston University finance professor.
Advertisement
Given the 'fragility' of the economy, he said, lawmakers should be downgrading their spending plans to reflect the growing likelihood the state's own tax collections will take a hit.
'Trump['s] economic policies should be keeping state lawmakers . . . up at night,' he said.
President Trump holds an executive order in the Oval Office of the White House.
Uncredited/Associated Press
Evan Horowitz, executive director of Tuft University's Center for State Policy Analysis, said state officials should already be aggressively paring back their spending plans; that should include, he said, cutting their revenue estimates by $1 billion.
He said lawmakers also shouldn't be 'squeamish' about tapping the state's now-record $8 billion emergency savings account should the state slide into a recession. Unlike before, there's 'zero chance' that Massachusetts will get the same kind of substantial help from the federal government during a major downturn, he said.
'We've gotten a lot more certainty on the economy [in recent weeks]. And it's all bad,' he said, adding that the risk of a recession or federal funding cuts have long been hanging over the budget process.
The state has other exposures to changes at the federal level. The salaries of roughly 4,000 state workers — or about 10 percent of the executive branch workforce — are supported through federal funds, according to the Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation, a business-backed budget watchdog.
The state also leans on $5 billion in other federal grants that don't directly prop up the state budget but nevertheless are vital to state government operations, the group said.
'We're building the budget with the best information that we have in front of us at the moment,' state Representative Aaron Michlewitz, the House budget chief, told reporters
Wednesday.
Advertisement
He then added: 'That does change on a daily basis.'
Mariano said his chamber wouldn't seek to automatically scale back spending, but cautioned that lawmakers need to 'be selective' about where they commit funding in the upcoming budget. He said he's repeatedly warned rank-and-file members 'not to expect business as usual' with the budget process.
That could include the House scaling back the
that virtually all lawmakers ask leadership to add to the budget.
The Quincy Democrat provided some clarity on the House's plan on Thursday, when he
told the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce that the House's budget plan would not raise taxes or fees on residents or businesses in Massachusetts.
Other states have responded to the uncertain fiscal moment in a variety of ways. Some are seeking to cut taxes, including Mississippi, where the governor
But others are seeking a mix of ways to generate more revenue, too, either by hiking or implementing so-called sin taxes, said Brian Sigritz, the director of state fiscal studies for the National Association of State Budget Officers, a nonpartisan trade group that tracks state spending plans around the country.
'The proposals have been more limited and more mixed than what we saw a couple years ago' coming out of the pandemic, Sigritz said. 'They're already facing tighter fiscal conditions and tight budgets."
Advertisement
It's likely Massachusetts budget plans could continue to morph. The House will likely pass its plan by month's end, after which the Senate will craft its version in May, with the goal of getting a final proposal to Governor Maura Healey this summer.
A lot, of course, could change by then. Much already has since Healey released her own
'We've got a responsibility to make sure that anything that I sign is within . . . what we can sustain,' Healey told reporters Wednesday. 'The reality also is that every day we continue to see cuts and harm done to us from a federal administration that, you know, just doesn't seem to get it.'
Samantha J. Gross of the Globe staff contributed to this report.
Matt Stout can be reached at
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business of Fashion
19 minutes ago
- Business of Fashion
Surprise! Why Apparel Prices Are Actually Falling
A little over a month into President Donald Trump's new tariff regime, the verdict is in: Clothes are getting cheaper. The US Bureau of Labor Statistics on Wednesday reported that apparel prices fell 0.4 percent between April and May, and were down 0.9 percent from a year prior. Inflation overall was estimated at 2.4 percent, in line with expectations. The data likely reflects pain delayed rather than avoided. Many retailers stocked up before Trump announced a 10 percent tariff on all imports, as well as an additional 30 percent levy on Chinese goods. Inflation figures also don't account for hikes that were announced but have yet to kick in. E.l.f. Cosmetics, LVMH, Nike and many others have said they plan to raise prices this summer. But the downward trend speaks to another truth about fashion's approach to pricing: The tariffs came at a time when brands were already working overtime to convince reluctant shoppers to keep spending. Rather than pass along costs, many companies' instinct is to explore every other option first. Urban Outfitters, Gap and Abercrombie & Fitch fall in that camp, saying they'll hold off on increasing prices even as they warn of shrinking margins. And for brands that engaged in years of post-pandemic price hikes, discounting even in the face of tariffs is still the best way to win back customers. Many luxury labels fall in this category, though plenty of mass-market brands are more expensive than they used to be, too. 'Retailers don't want to scare consumers or the market and suggest they're [raising] prices,' said Sonia Lapinsky, partner at retail consultancy Alix Partners. 'They're refraining as much as possible, they're not talking as much as possible.' Fashion's Falling Prices Apparel prices fell month on month between April and May, and nearly 1 percent in May year on year. The rate of price increases began slowing in 2023, and then declining early this year. This doesn't account for the full impact of tariffs on retailers' margins, which won't be realised until late summer or fall. That is when prices could get 'wildly volatile,' because of brands' individual approaches to pricing in the face of rising costs, said Michael Prendergast, managing director of Alvarez & Marsal Consumer and Retail Group. Some brands will look at this moment as a time to sacrifice margin to gain market share. With expanded margins, thanks to years of rising prices, many retailers are well positioned to absorb the impact. For now brands are doing everything in their power to keep people shopping and drive traffic, said Lapinsky, including upping discounting throughout April and May. Beyond categories like footwear that are highly susceptible to tariffs, brands will get specific about where they raise prices — fashion items may have elasticity, but shoppers would see a more obvious change in basic pieces, for example. Likely, after years of experimenting, brands have learned where their limits are. Planning for the rest of the year is filled with extra risk. Raise prices too much, and kill demand; plan for lower demand and potentially end up with empty shelves. That conundrum will likely come to a head for retailers during back-to-school shopping season. 'We're likely going to have an inventory issue on one end or the other,' said Lapinsky. 'Either we've got inventory in the stores that had to be priced at a point that they can't clear, or retailers may have pulled back and just don't have what customers are looking for.' Mood-Swing Shopping As they make inventory and pricing decisions for the rest of the year, retailers are watching consumer sentiment closely to try to determine whether they'll have the appetite to spend — and to what degree. 'You have to be cautious of exactly what inventory you're taking in, given consumer sentiment and how much they're shopping,' said Jessica Ramírez, co-founder of research firm The Consumer Collective. 'If you're just churning inventory that isn't a priority on your consumers' list, you're not going to do very well.' After falling to its lowest point in years, consumer sentiment got a slight boost in May. Part of that may be thanks to a comparative settling of the news cycle from April, when Trump first announced, and then temporarily paused, levies. But even just the feeling of rising prices and uncertainty can put a damper on shoppers' moods. Plus, more generally, price inflation in other categories will have an impact on consumer appetite to spend on apparel. 'Food and gas prices affect discretionary income,' said Prendergast. 'Gas prices are coming down, that's the good news. The not great news is food continues to rise — that pinches the wallet.' Trouble is Brewing Elsewhere The picture of softened demand is clearer in China, the second biggest fashion market after the US. Earlier this month, China reported consumer prices overall — not just apparel — fell for a fourth consecutive month in May, raising concerns that deflation is here to stay. Meanwhile, wage shrinkage and property value slumps continue. It's already having an impact on fashion, reported Reuters: Amid raging price wars, stores are putting merchandise on steep discount — $30 for a Coach handbag at Super Zhuanzhuan, for example. US-based apparel companies operating in China will face more uncertainty in an already challenged market. Trouble abroad could even be felt back home. 'The more that's happening in the macro, the more concerned the consumer in America is going to be,' said Lapinsky. 'We don't see any end to that in the next few months.' Though, starting in March, China began ramping up fiscal stimulus. And much remains to be seen about how the Chinese consumer will react, said Ramírez. Fashion is still in a wait-and-see phase when it comes to price hikes and planning, but the moment of truth could be getting closer. 'Overall retailers are underplaying the effect of what tariffs and inflation are going to do to their sales and EBITDA,' said Prendergast. 'We're advising clients, take the next two years of your revenue and margin plans down, like, take them down and again, use this opportunity to cut costs internally.'


Forbes
19 minutes ago
- Forbes
Japan's Largest Companies 2025: Rare Interest Rate Hikes Lead To A Volatile Year
Toyota and other Japanese automakers have been hampered by Trump's tariffs. Getty Images Japan's stock market has been on a roller-coaster ride over the past 12 months. Its benchmark Nikkei index reached an all-time high in July 2024, driven by corporate governance reforms and robust company earnings, then crashed more than 25% in less than four weeks on a surprise interest rate hike by the Bank of Japan. Though the index rebounded shortly after, its gains were trimmed in early 2025 as U.S. President Donald Trump ignited his trade war. Japan has 180 companies on this year's Forbes Global 2000 ranking of the world's largest public corporations, down slightly from 182 in 2024, making it the third most-represented country after the U.S. and China. The list weighs market value, revenue, profit and assets equally, using the latest 12 months of data as of April 25. Toyota Motor, the highest-ranking Japanese company, is in a sector particularly hard hit by Trump's sweeping tariffs. The U.S. in early April imposed a 25% tax on foreign-made cars, followed in early May by the same levy on auto parts, a blow to Japan's mainstay industry and its export-led economy. The world's top-selling carmaker slipped three places to No. 14 after its stock tumbled 22% over the year. Though its revenues and profits in the year through December were roughly flat at $309 billion and $34 billion, respectively, Toyota warned that the tariffs would result in a $1.3 billion hit to operating profit in April and May. Some of Toyota Motor's peers suffered even steeper declines. Nissan Motor, long plagued by deteriorating financials, sank 366 spots to No. 707 after its profit in the 12 months through December plunged 76% to $702.6 million. After the cut-off date for the list, the automaker posted a $4.7 billion loss for the three months ended March. Nissan is struggling to restructure after merger talks with larger rival Honda Motor collapsed in February. The failed tie-up, together with the tariffs, relegated Honda to No. 117 from No. 91 as its stock fell 17% over the year. Mitsubishi Motors, whose biggest shareholder is Nissan, tumbled 379 places to No. 1,562 as its shares skidded almost 10%. Companies in the AI space were a bright spot. Billionaire Masayoshi Son's SoftBank investment powerhouse climbed 331 spots to No. 130 on a 425% surge in 12-month profit through December to $5.6 billion, driven partly by increases in the value of portfolio companies such as ByteDance, the Chinese parent of TikTok. SoftBank is ramping up its AI bet, with plans to invest up to $30 billion in U.S.-based ChatGPT maker OpenAI while also investing $100 billion to build AI infrastructure stateside as part of its Stargate Project joint venture with OpenAI and Oracle. The AI boom also lifted Advantest, the world's largest semiconductor testing equipment maker by market share and a supplier to AI-chip giant Nvidia. It scaled 509 places to No. 1,231 as its profit in the year through March more than doubled to $1.1 billion on a 52% surge in sales to $5.1 billion. Other notable climbers included companies in the defense industry. IHI Corp, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) and Kawasaki Heavy Industries (KHI) were among the best performers on the Nikkei over the year as Japan ramped up military spending. IHI, an engineering company that makes everything from turbines for power plants to rocket systems for space travel, debuted on the Global 2000 at No. 1,349 after its stock skyrocketed 176%. A more than doubling in MHI stock elevated the company 75 spots to No. 372 while KHI vaulted 513 places to No. 1,331 on a 52% share increase.


E&E News
20 minutes ago
- E&E News
Wright, Burgum tout LNG deals with Japanese company
Leaders of the Trump administration's National Energy Dominance Council convened Wednesday to laud four deals between Japan's largest power generator and U.S. suppliers of liquefied natural gas. The agreements each involve JERA, which produces about 30 percent of Japan's electricity, and companies with LNG export projects in Texas and Louisiana. Through the new and pending deals, JERA plans to buy up to 5.5 million metric tons a year of the supercooled gas over 20 years. JERA is the 'single largest LNG buyer in the global market,' said Yukio Kani, the company's global CEO and chair, at the Department of Energy's James V. Forrestal Building. Advertisement There — before Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum — Kani praised the leadership of President Donald Trump and said the various agreements mark an 'even deeper commitment to the U.S. energy sector.' The Trump administration said the new deals are projected to support over 50,000 U.S. jobs and add more than $200 billion to U.S. gross domestic product — though not all of the deals are final.