logo
Why bobs, perms and beehive hairstyles reveal the stories of women's lives

Why bobs, perms and beehive hairstyles reveal the stories of women's lives

Irish Times2 days ago
Human hair is imbued with meaning. It is not uncommon to keep a lock of hair belonging to a deceased loved one or from a child's first haircut.
Changing one's hair marks rites of passage such as reaching adulthood, ending a significant
relationship
or
becoming a parent
. Hair, as part of our physical bodies, is highly personal and intimate. Yet at the same time,
hairstyles
are visible to others and therefore highly public.
The way we shape, arrange, and decorate our hair signifies status, political and religious beliefs and is a central part of our identities. On top of this, hair is closely linked to gender, and for
women
it is particularly associated with ideas around femininity and female sexuality.
Women's hairstyles change with fashion and the 20th century has seen an explosion of styles, with each decade having different signature looks.
READ MORE
Observing how international hair fashions were adopted by women in Ireland between 1900-1960 and scrutinising the wider commentary about them, is an excellent way of examining women's everyday lives in the past. Hairstyles are of interest of historians because they can tell us about politics, economics, gender, social norms and the overarching cultural attitudes of a time and place.
At the beginning of the 20th century, long hair was very much in vogue for women. Hairstyles immediately communicated where you stood on the social ladder. The upper classes wore their hair in elaborate updos adorned with jewels, shells, ribbons and feathers. These styles were time-consuming, impractical and expensive to create.
They signalled wealth as only the rich could afford the time, money and domestic staff required to produce them. A Dublin-based magazine for women,
Lady of the House, featured tips on achieving these styles, advising: 'We are forced to rely on art to a certain extent when nature fails'.
A portrait of Irish nationalist activist Maud Gonne McBride in the 1890s. Photograph: Keystone/ Getty Images
It recommended using postiches, which were extra hairpieces such as fringes, pompadour rolls and hair pads that added volume and length, much like hair extensions today. Postiches were made by a specialist hairdresser called a posticheur. They used combings (the hair that falls out when brushing) that women saved up and collected, sometimes for years, in a vessel called a hair receiver.
The very rich could also buy hair. Lady of the House explains how a 'really fine suit of hair of the purest blonde type will sell for ... (between) 1,000 and 2,500 francs.' That was a lot of money in 1900.
It was the traders, as opposed to the original owners of the hair, who made big profits from the hair industry. Making postiches was meticulous work that involved shaking out dust and debris from the hair combings, teasing out the individual strands and disentangling them using a hackle or a wire brush. Any nits, which were common, would be squashed and picked out. The hair was then woven into the desired form ready to adorn the heads of wealthy female customer.
[
Why nineties hair is making a comeback
Opens in new window
]
Into the 1910s, the overall look became slightly looser, and the added hairpieces and embellishments were discarded. Women of marriageable age wore their hair up in a bun or a coiled plait either on top of the head or towards the back, with a pompadour puffed-out style at the front. These popular styles had names such as the Psyche Knot, the New Récamier and the Gibson Girl.
During their campaign for the right to vote, suffragettes wore these elegant hairstyles as part of their tactics. Their opponents regularly accused them of being unwomanly, perverted, old hags. To counteract such accusations, suffragettes instituted a uniform to ensure they appeared ladylike, respectable and beyond reproach.
The 1920s brought huge change to Ireland with the establishment of the Free State in 1922. Machines and technology such as cars, electricity and telephones were becoming commonplace. Fashions loosened, skirts got shorter and the bob, a radical new hairstyle became the height of fashion. Antoine, a Parisian hairdresser and an early adaptor of the style said modern women with careers and busy lives required 'small, neat heads, not enormous masses of hair'.
Irish-born architect and furniture designer Eileen Gray in 1914. Photograph: George C. Beresford/ Hulton Archive/ Getty Images
The bob was short, it was all about angles and straight, clean lines representing the ideas of modernism. Androgynous and boyish, it played with strict gendered identities. Coming after the horrors of the , it celebrated youth, life and hedonism and it went hand in hand with the phenomenon of the flapper.
As well as their signature short haircuts, flappers were young women who smoked cigarettes, rode bicycles, went dancing, and wore make-up. In Ireland, as elsewhere, the flapper was derided as a foreign import, representing immorality, disobedience and vice. Historian Louise Ryan has charted attitudes to flappers and 'modern girls' in the Irish press. There was certainly criticism from the pulpits and reports of dismay at young women attending Ceilís organised by the Gaelic League but dressed in the latest Parisian fashions.
Yet the advertisements and the women's pages of the same newspapers often celebrated the independence, vitality and purchasing power of the flapper, demonstrating the different viewpoints at play in 1920s Ireland.
[
Six forgotten Irish women who achieved the extraordinary
Opens in new window
]
From the 1930s – 1950s short, curly hair was fashionable in Ireland. This look could be achieved in various ways. The Marcel wave in which the hair was curled by heated tongs was available in hairdressers, or pincurls, in which damp hair was wound around the finger and pinned close to the scalp and combed out once dry.
However, both methods were laborious and needed constant upkeep. The invention of the permanent wave was a game-changer, meaning even those with naturally straight hair could have it curled, lasting for two or three months at a time. There were various experimental formula for chemical perms throughout the early 1900s, among them the Eugene system, which was heavily advertised in Ireland. It was expensive and time-consuming taking anywhere between three and ten hours.
The smell was unpleasant, and it involved a terrifying looking machine called a chandelier, which used electric rollers to cookthe hair attached with wires to an overhead device.
A model having her hair permed by a permanent wave machine in London, 1928. Photograph: Henry Miller News Picture Service/ Archive Photos/ Getty Images
Electric shocks, burns and damaged hair were too often the result. In 1935 a Dublin woman, Kathleen Crean, sued Neville Ryan, trading as the Grafton Hairdressing Co. for injuries she sustained while getting a perm. The newspaper report stated that she had several burns on her scalp and the backs of her ears, and she was suffering from nervousness. She was awarded £100 (€114) compensation – the monetary award signifying the cultural value placed on a women's hair.
Throughout the 1920s and 1930s, the Free State Government passed a series of laws that restricted women's citizenship by limiting their employment opportunities, excluding them from jury service and banning contraception.
Women's sexuality was tightly controlled and deviance was punished – often through incarceration in religious-run institutions. Where the cutting of hair in the 1920s was act of freedom and rebellion, there are many instances of forced hair cutting which served to humiliate women and control their behaviour.
During the War of Independence
there are numerous reports of both the IRA and the British army violently cutting off women's hair as punishment – either for fraternising with British soldiers, or for being associated with the republican side. The 2021 report of the Mother and Baby Homes commission of investigation documents how nuns cut off the hair of many womenon arrival at the home. They were required to keep it short thereafter.
[
How Irish women failed to persuade Éamon de Valera to treat them as equal citizens
Opens in new window
]
With long flowing hair a potent symbol of female sexuality, nuns themselves covered their hair and usually wore it short. The custom of willingly cutting or shaving hair is an act of religious devotion in many cultures. Before taking their vows, nuns commonly cut off their hair in a symbolic act that renounced vanity and the display of the body.
Vocations were one option for Irish women at a time when emigration was high, employment prospects were low, the marriage bar in effect and motherhood alongside domesticity were championed as the pinnacle of womanhood. The numbers of women in religious orders grew steadily in the first half of the 20th century, peaking in the 1960s.
Dublin-born movie star Maureen O'Hara pictured in 1954. Photograph: Bettmann Archive/ Getty Images
Until the Second Vatican Council in the early 1960s, women had to cover their hair with a hat or a mantilla in a Catholic church or in court. More generally, married women covered their heads to show their marital status.
But equally, there was a practical consideration to this, as headscarves were used by all women to cover hair that was being set into the fashionable curly hairstyles. Historian Caitríona Clear has written that professional women in the 1940s – 1960s wore an unofficial uniform consisting of tailored suits and 'lacquered, helmet-like hair'.
She contends that this was a form of armour which contained and protected women's bodies while in public. At this time women's rights in Ireland were in short supply, demonstrating how social conditions affect fashion choices.
In the early 1950s young people dressed quite formally, in much the same way as their parents did, but by the later years of that decade, international youth styles were appearing on the streets of Dublin.
[
Thirty years retrieving the history of Irish women
Opens in new window
]
The cinema was hugely popular in Ireland and films from Hollywood brought international starlets and the most up-to-date fashions to Irish eyes. For Irish teenagers, hairstyles seen on screen were a relatively quick, cheap and easy way of identifying with new youth culture trends. Young Irish women adopted the beehiveand ponytail hairstyles.
The beehive was a tall hairstyle achieved through big rollers and backcombing until the hair stood vertically. It then was patted into place and secured with lacquer and hairspray. Mentions of the beehive hairstyle first appeared in Irish newspapers and magazines in the very late 1950s. By 1961, it seems to have fallen out of favour and when mentioned, it was in disparaging terms.
Teenage girls enthusiastically adopted the style, but it was considered highly impractical. It required dedication and upkeep and wearers were known to sleep with their heads upright so as not to ruin their hairdo.
A bouffant hairstyle pictured in 1963. Photograph: Getty Images
The beehive and other bouffant styles that were popular in the 1960s were linked to an optimism internationally towards technology, progress and the future. But just like in the early part of the century, these big elaborate hair styles were followed by a dramatic change with the reintroduction of short, angular, bobbed styles once more.
Colouring hair became more acceptable and commonplace from the 1960s onwards. In the 1970s, longer, looser styles followed at a time when women's right were back on the agenda. The marriage bar was finally lifted and there were hard-fought campaigns for equal pay and access to contraception.
Beauty practices such as hairdressing and styling are a common feature of women's culture that is often trivialised. But cutting, styling, colouring and removing hair is not just inconsequential frivolity. It can be an act of sacrifice or submission, of self-preservation, of celebration, rebellion or defiance. Through knowledge of the history of women's hairstyles, we can more easily imagine the everyday lives and connect to the emotional and bodily experiences of women in the past.
Katie Blackwood is Historian in Residence at Dublin City Council
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Revenue lays down the tax rules for Ireland's army of influencers
Revenue lays down the tax rules for Ireland's army of influencers

Irish Times

time7 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Revenue lays down the tax rules for Ireland's army of influencers

At first glance, Donna Dunne appears to fit the standard 'influencer' mould. A popular fitness guru from Kilkenny, her no-nonsense fitness and diet advice, and candid glimpses into her private life – her most recent troubles document a break-in to her camper van on a family holiday in France – has amassed 24,400 followers on Instagram , and more than 22,000 likes on TikTok . But Dunne describes herself as an anti-influencer because she doesn't accept freebies, refuses to promote products, and only ever recalls being offered a €30 voucher from Supermac's which she promptly turned down – she is all about fitness after all, and scoffing a free burger doesn't quite fit the brand. So when Revenue finally published a long-awaited manual on Taxation of Income from Social Media and Promotional Activities last week, Dunne was oblivious. With a day job as a lecturer in exercise science at Carlow's South East Technological University (SETU), her social media presence was never about making money from sponsors or brands, but alerting followers to her online fitness membership plan, which costs from €25.99 per month. 'Legit, I haven't been offered PR stays in hotels or free dinners anywhere,' she said. 'The beautician up the road from me will every now and then tell me to come in for a facial or have a treatment at Christmas, but I always make sure I pay. I see so many influencers on the likes of Instagram and Facebook doing their hashtags left, right and centre for ads or brands or whatever, and all I can think is that these people must have agents because all I was ever offered was a €30 voucher for Supermac's, which I said 'no thanks' to.' READ MORE Dunne's relaxed reaction to the new Revenue booklet is because she has nothing to declare beyond her annual tax declarations for her sideline fitness business. 'I do my fitness stuff online because it keeps me feeling alive and forces me to get up every day and think of something positive to say to all my members,' she said. 'If you're getting paid €10,000 to do an ad, you should be registered as a limited company or a sole trader and that has to go on your books as income. That's what you must do. 'I think what's going to change now is that the gifts will stop coming and everything that happens now will be reported much more. I don't begrudge influencers for making a living, but there has to be transparency not just in what they earn but in what they are promoting.' While the tax obligations of influencers have been quite the talking point in recent years, Revenue's new and updated publication, along with an additional manual on VAT – spoiler alert, 'there are no special VAT rules for influencers' – is now irrefutable. Donna Dunne: 'I do my fitness stuff online because it keeps me feeling alive' Written in layman's terms with examples pertinent to the world of social media personalities, the manual is designed to leave influencers in no doubt about their tax obligations. In one example, the booklet reads: 'Emily, a fashion commentator, is attending a fashion show. She buys a new designer jacket to wear to the show because being well dressed is essential to the success of her online content. The cost of the jacket is not deductible in computing the profits from her trade.' It's the latest unwanted Revenue spotlight to shine on Ireland's budding community of influencers. In March, the tax authorities sent more than 450 tax compliance letters to social media influencers regarding undeclared income, gifts and services, sparking a flurry of calls to accountants from panicked social media personalities. Of course, some haven't helped themselves by underdeclaring their income, whether by misinterpreting their tax obligations or simply not being aware that a #gifted or #ad post can equate to #tax bill. Laura Ellen Ford: 'Once you get into a trade, you're into reporting obligations and annual filings' In March, Irish influencer and OnlyFans star Matthew Gilbert was named in a list of tax defaulters after reaching a settlement of more than €350,000 with Revenue towards the end of last year. 'Influencers have always been subject to tax on their income – in cash or kind – but because of a lack of tax literacy among the general public and among non-tax professionals, it may be that people who are influencing have genuinely not understood their obligations because it's very easy when people are paid cash,' said Laura Ellen Ford, a senior tax associate with Eversheds Sutherland. 'The big thing that a lot of people are struggling with is non-monetary compensation,' she said. [ Honest influencers: I have 'never made any money, ever' from online content Opens in new window ] 'Rightly or wrongly, there may have been this misconception that if Adare Manor or another hotel turns around and says, 'You can come and stay for two nights, you can go to the spa, and you or your partner can do a round of golf on our award-winning course, but you have to post 15 posts or 10 posts over the next two weeks talking about how great we are,' are you actually being paid for those posts? And the fact is yes, you are, but it's non-monetary compensation. 'The problem is a lot of people wouldn't have realised that monetary compensation has a value, and it's the value that you would pay for it and that's the amount you are supposed to be taxed on. 'Revenue has a very good example in the manual: that if you get sent out a product – and we've all seen it on social media where people are sent out a PR package – the tax treatment of that PR package depends on what the person receiving it does with it. 'Or let's say Chapter One turned around to a food blogger and said, 'We really like your material and we know you're trying to get into a more fine dining space, so come have dinner on us,' and then that person creates content on that. Whatever should have gone on that bill could very easily be taxable.' Ford said an interesting aspect of the new manual settles the argument around influencers as tradespeople. 'Once you get into a trade, you're into reporting obligations and annual filings,' she said. 'People assume, 'Oh, I have a job, so this [social media page] couldn't be a trade for me,' but no, you can have a job and have a trade. 'You're talking about tax obligations, annual filings, you might have to pay preliminary tax, and if I was to give anyone on social media advice, it would be to ask, 'Why are you doing this? How often are you doing this? Is this becoming a part-time job for you?' Because then I hope you're tax registered, because social media is now a trade for you.' Another long ambiguous 'perk' among more popular influencers has been the acceptance of car sponsorships. This, too, has now been clearly addressed. Alan Purcell: 'Ignorance is not an excuse' 'There's one very famous influencer at the moment and I saw her a few months ago publicising a motor dealership, and she had a big celebration of, 'Here's me driving away in my new car from this garage and make sure to give this dealership consideration if you're buying a new car etc.' And my first thought was: has she declared that?'' said Alan Purcell, a chartered accountant, chartered tax adviser and founder of CloudAccounts. 'There's a sizeable value on the use of a car for the year and Revenue's manual has specific examples. If influencer A has been given a car to promote a dealership, that needs to be declared for tax purposes. That could be expensive for some people. 'The cars will be a huge one because every Gaelic footballer or rugby player, it seems, has been given a brand ambassadorship and Revenue has specifically mentioned brand ambassadors in its manual. If you are one and driving a car for a year, there is a tax on that.' So how exactly will Revenue keep track of what is a relatively new income earning group on its books? There is no difference between an influencer and a plumber, an electrician, a hairdresser, an accountant or a journalist. You are a business, you earn income, you can adjust your allowable expenses, you can claim capital allowances if that counts, and if you have a profit at the end of the year, you pay your tax — Alan Purcell 'A Revenue officer sitting in the cafeteria during their lunch break and scrolling their Instagram could find about 50 influencers in five minutes if they really wanted to,' said Purcell. 'Influencers are not exactly subtle; what they do is very much flaunted in your face. They are good at their jobs, but I would like to see them paid properly. They are probably kind of taken advantage of, let's be honest. 'A lot of them are young, so if somebody says, 'Do you want a free night in a fancy resort with a spa treatment thrown in and a bottle of wine?' who is going to say no to that? But they don't realise that that could come back and cost them 52.1 per cent of the retail price of that package if they're at the highest rate of tax.' Ford said there are many avenues open to Revenue when determining who is fully tax compliant in the social media sphere. 'For the content producers who are on the likes of Patreon or OnlyFans, which facilitate payments, there's a thing called DAC7,' she said. 'It came out a few years ago and it's an EU law that's been transcribed into Irish law that basically says if you're on a platform selling goods and services, and that platform is facilitating your payment, those platforms are required to get your tax information from content producers and report that back to Revenue. They legally have to do it. 'If you're on OnlyFans or even the likes of Airbnb – any platform where you provide goods or a service and the platform facilitates your payment, and you're an Irish tax resident – then you are reported to Revenue on an annual basis anyway.' And that's not all. 'I don't want to say Revenue people are sitting on their phones scrolling social media searching for you, but if you're a media influencer and you're popping up in The Irish Times or on Ireland AM or for well-known brands on social media, Revenue are humans like the rest of us and are on social media as a matter of course and they will see your content,' she said. 'There seems to be this mental image that everyone in Revenue is an auld fella in their 60s and on typewriters, and that's just not the case. [ Social media influencer posted 'misleading' adverts on Instagram, regulator finds Opens in new window ] 'If your granny knows someone is on social media and making money from it, it's not unfair to assume that someone in Revenue knows who you are. If you're putting yourself out there and making a lot of sponsored content ... Ireland is a small country; it's safe to assume that someone from Revenue is following you.' Purcell agrees. 'The manual states there is no difference between an influencer and a plumber, an electrician, a hairdresser, an accountant or a journalist. You are a business, you earn income, you can adjust your allowable expenses, you can claim capital allowances if that counts, and if you have a profit at the end of the year, you pay your tax,' he said. 'Ignorance is not an excuse – and that's not just me saying it, it's Revenue's line, because you should be aware of your obligations and have spoken to an expert and know that the same rules apply to everybody.'

Hello Ozempic, bye bye body positivity
Hello Ozempic, bye bye body positivity

Irish Times

timea day ago

  • Irish Times

Hello Ozempic, bye bye body positivity

When I was a millennial in my late teens, skinny was the beauty standard. The sort of skinny that simply doesn't lend itself to an Irish constitution and the spud-heavy diet traditionally advocated by generations of Irish mammies. No one here is getting scurvy on mammy's watch – let's put it that way. This idealisation of extreme thinness has haunted millennial women from their girlhood; never mind that it could only be achieved for the vast majority of people through an elective form of malnutrition or a liquid diet following invasive jaw surgery. Yet, we are all the product of time, context and culture. READ MORE Celebrities in the early 2000s largely looked like a younger Lindsay Lohan. It was an intense time in the culture. Kim Kardashian still had her original hair, face and lower body. Paris Hilton's hip bones jutted sharply from low-rise jeans and if your clavicles didn't look like the grab rail in your granny's newly renovated walk-in shower, you were considered overweight. It was common to be told that you were. Eating disorders were, unsurprisingly, widespread. Then, as now, much of our perception of young women's value was tied up in appearance, though boys too are now more subject to similarly untenable aesthetic standards than they once were. In the mid-2000s, we experienced a reactive swing in the opposite direction. Body positivity became almost as overbearingly dictatorial as the overt negativity that had preceded it. During this time, I was a beauty editor in London, working for the sorts of publications that disseminate the standards most of us feel so simultaneously erased by and covetous of. [ Drugs like Ozempic aren't changing negative narratives around diet and weight Opens in new window ] Our bodies are presumed to signal for our values, our habits, our self-discipline and our access to resources. Photograph: Getty Images While editors were putting plus size models in magazines, they were also still personally hyper-conscious about weight. The lunch table at work events still murmured with comments about feared weight gain, the virtue of abstaining from 'bad' foods, or the current popular weight loss trend. Whatever the angle, conversations on weight always seem to adopt a moral quality. That has never changed – our weight is treated as a proxy for virtue. Women have spent the last decade or so talking a big talk about body acceptance, but the desire to shrink clearly never went away. It seems that the rise of GLP-1 weight loss drugs like semaglutide – better known by its brand names Ozempic or Wegovy – has merely proved the purported body positivity movement was at best for many a place holder mentality. It fell from favour as soon as thinness became chemically accessible. Actions are more telling than beliefs, however loudly professed, and thinner frames are once again dominating. While times and trends change, the challenge for anyone who has looked in the mirror and felt inadequate is to somehow maintain a healthy relationship with body image when the standards simultaneously shift and influence how we are treated by other people. Thinness is the standard for women again, though there is now an added pressure for the sort of muscle tone that only strict diet and specific kinds of exercise can achieve as weightlifting becomes more popular. For men, lean mass and impractical (for most) muscularity is the standard. With advancements in aesthetic procedures and science, and with information on nutrition and fitness widely accessible online, beauty is theoretically easier to access now than ever before. But not for everyone. These sorts of aesthetics are tied up with wealth, or at least not with poverty – they require gym access, significant free time for multiple lengthy workouts each week and a protein-rich diet. Beauty standards are always tied to status and wealth. [ Weight loss drug Wegovy to cost around €220 a month as supplies go on market in Ireland Opens in new window ] We judge ourselves and one another by ever-shifting standards while ignoring the mechanism by which they change. Photograph: Getty Images Our bodies are presumed to signal for our values, our habits, our self-discipline and our access to resources. With an estimated 1.25 – 1.5 million people in the UK taking GLP-1 weight loss drugs, the vast majority of whom are paying for them privately, according to The Guardian, a leaner body is very much higher status again. We know that there is advantage in looking as close to whatever the current beauty standard is as possible. There was in the 1920s, when Coco Chanel popularised previously low status tanning as evidence of a moneyed, well-travelled life of leisure. There was in 2015, when Instagram-filler-face made so many celebrities and influencers look like uncanny facsimiles of Kylie Jenner. There was in the early 2000s, when emaciation was associated with youth and self-discipline, and there is now that wealth and thinness are once more (for however long GLP-1s remain expensive) concomitant. We still on some level consider that lack of attractiveness by the current definition equates to lack of value. We judge ourselves and one another by ever-shifting standards while ignoring the mechanism by which they change. Until we can notice them and their influence upon our thinking more actively, we're doomed to perpetuate and fall prey to them endlessly. The challenge now is what it has always been, and it's a struggle conducted internally – to look in the mirror and see value, regardless of the external messaging. That's very tough in a world where distance from the beauty standard means relative disadvantage – none of us would want a harder life.

The environmental cost of that debs dress
The environmental cost of that debs dress

Irish Times

timea day ago

  • Irish Times

The environmental cost of that debs dress

It's debs season for some secondary school students right now and costs have gone through the roof. When it comes to attending a debs, your own or someone else's, girls in particular can bear a big financial burden . Apart from a new dress, there are the shoes and bag to think about. Getting your hair and make-up done professionally, as well as a spray tan, a manicure and a pedicure might also be in prospect. For the boys, it's a tuxedo, shirt, bow tie, some dress shoes and maybe a haircut. Of course, all of these things are optional. But when everyone else is doing them and because how you look is being committed to social media, it can feel hard for teens and their families to opt out. READ MORE There can be a 'TY debs' in transition year, as well as a Leaving Cert teens will attend their events as well as being invitees to others. A new debs dress can cost hundreds of euro. Teens grow and trends change and so an outfit's lifespan can be short. Something can go from cutting edge to dated in weeks. For those conscious of being snapped in the same dress at two different events, one dress may be worn only once. That suits manufacturers and retailers just fine as they constantly push us to buy the next thing. There can be other paraphernalia to think about too – a corsage, food and drinks for a pre-debs family meet and greet and a balloon backdrop for the photos have all become popular additions. Tired of the debs treadmill, some schools have started to take a stand against the cost and waste of it all. Before it's their turn, some class groups are looking at what it would mean to have a more sustainable debs. When it comes to the debs, don't buy new if you can, and swap what you've already got. Photograph: Getty Images The ideas emerging include holding events where students can offer preloved debs dresses and tuxedos free of charge, or at a discount. Borrowing your dress or tux, getting it from a charity or vintage shop, or a resale site like Depop and eBay needs to be normalised, students say. Buying second-hand can broaden your fashion references too, helping to ensure you are not rocking exactly the same look as everyone else. Travelling by bus to the venue, asking the venue about locally sourced, in-season food and avoiding plastic cups and utensils will also make things more sustainable. Avoiding glitter which has microplastics, and swapping helium balloons in favour of biodegradable ones will be better for the environment too. Community groups and county councils are getting in on the act. Wicklow County Council promoted a library event last week to find new owners for preloved debs outfits. Library staff put out the call for old debs dresses and tuxedos. They then hosted a Once Upon a Debs event; a dress and tuxedo swap, where preloved formal wear got a second chance to shine. [ Is your debs coming up? Here's how to be party-ready and planet-friendly Opens in new window ] Debs-goers were invited to come along on a Thursday evening to 'shop' for an outfit new to them. The event follows a growing number of swap events where libraries and schools are trying to fight the cost and waste of buying one-off occasion wear like Halloween costumes and Christmas jumpers too. Recycling isn't the answer to everything, though. Everyone buying a new debs dress every year and donating it doesn't fix the debs dress problem. The endless cycle of shopping, which causes water pollution, greenhouse gas emissions and landfill, is the real problem that needs to be faced. Materials like plastic sequins and polyester in particular will last long beyond the debs. Polyester is a form of plastic usually derived from petroleum. A lot of energy is required to make the stuff, and it pollutes the water and air. Polyester clothing lasts for years and it's headed for landfill where it never biodegrades. So when it comes to the debs, don't buy new if you can, and swap what you've already got.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store