Israel's moves to secure Lebanon, Syria borders could fuel new threats: analysts
This Week in Asia Politics Published: 6:00pm, 30 Jan 2025 Israel 's continued occupation of southern Lebanon and adjacent areas of Syria reflects a US-backed move to secure the Jewish-majority state's borders, analysts say.
But by attempting to impose an 'ideal solution' to the threat posed by Lebanese Hezbollah and address uncertainty arising from the fall of the Assad regime in Syria, analysts warned that Israel could destabilise the new non-hostile governments of both countries, thereby fuelling threats against itself. Israel's refusal to withdraw from parts of southern Lebanon on Sunday, in accordance with the terms of a ceasefire struck in November with Iranian ally Hezbollah, 'presents an immediate political challenge' to the new government in Beirut, as well as to US President Donald Trump 's administration, said Kristian Ulrichsen, a Middle East fellow at Houston-based Rice University's Institute for Public Policy. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced the decision two days before the January 25 deadline, claiming that the agreement 'has not yet been fully enforced by the Lebanese state' by deploying troops in previously Hezbollah-dominated southern areas and ensuring the group had withdrawn its forces to the Litani River, about 30km north of the Israeli border.
03:29
Ceasefire in Lebanon between Israel and Hezbollah militants takes effect Ceasefire in Lebanon between Israel and Hezbollah militants takes effect
Israel's ambassador to the US, Michael Herzog, last week acknowledged facing challenges in persuading the Trump administration to support the decision.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
3 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
In the Indo-Pacific, ‘America first' looks like American unpredictability
Within around 10 days in late May, three top US leaders – US President Donald Trump , US Vice-President J.D. Vance and US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth – delivered speeches that together outlined the administration's evolving foreign policy vision. Taken separately, each speech reaffirmed the US' commitment to strength and strategic deterrence. Yet when considered as a whole, they exposed a deep tension at the heart of America's global posture – especially in the Indo-Pacific . For America's allies and partners in the region, these mixed messages raise questions about reliability, strategic clarity and long-term alignment. At West Point on May 24, Trump reiterated his 'America first' doctrine, denouncing foreign entanglements and 'absurd ideological experiments'. He asserted that under his leadership, the military will refocus on core missions: 'crushing America's adversaries, killing America's enemies, and defending our great American flag'. This was paired with an aggressive military posture. Trump emphasised overwhelming strength, boasting of new planes, tanks, drones and the creation of a Golden Dome missile defence shield . For regional allies, this blend of retrenchment and military escalation signals a shift from global stewardship to transactional power projection. A day earlier at the US Naval Academy, Vance presented similar realist rhetoric to Trump's, adding a bureaucratic lens. He said past leaders abandoned hard power for soft power and praised the administration's use of force in Yemen as a model of clarity and decisiveness. The US vice-president also spoke of great-power competition, especially with China, and advocated maintaining a technological edge through investment in hypersonics, drones and battlefield innovation. This fusion of restraint and readiness further muddies the message: Is America stepping back from global policing or simply recalibrating how it asserts dominance?
South China Morning Post
4 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
US risks hard-won soft power by alienating Chinese students
While the US has resumed processing of student and exchange visitor visas, the future of Chinese students who are attending Harvard remains uncertain. The resumption followed a federal judge's decision last week to temporarily block a ban on Harvard's qualification to enroll international students. The judge set a June 16 hearing for further arguments in the case. Harvard also vowed to continue its legal battle, while working to ensure its international students and scholars can 'fully' pursue their academic work. While many have highlighted how hard Chinese students have been hit by the ban, since they account for one-fifth of Harvard's international enrollment, the visa restrictions imposed by the White House have sent mixed messages. In a phone call last week with Chinese President Xi Jinping, Donald Trump said the 'US loves to have Chinese students coming to study in America'. Earlier, Trump said he welcomed Chinese students, but not those who caused 'troubles'. It is still not clear what he meant.
HKFP
6 hours ago
- HKFP
Taiwan lawmakers approve higher military pay
Taiwan's opposition-controlled parliament approved Tuesday a pay increase for military service members, in a bid to address a manpower shortage and retain soldiers in the face of Chinese military pressure. China claims Taiwan is part of its territory and has not ruled out using force to bring the self-ruled island under its control. The main opposition Kuomintang (KMT) party and Taiwan People's Party passed amendments to an armed forces pay act granting volunteer service members an additional monthly allowance of NT$30,000 (US$1,000). The law previously did not specify the exact amount for allowances. It is on top of increases announced by President Lai Ching-te in March. 'The armed forces are facing new types of operational needs… allowances should be increased to reflect the sharp rise in unit duties and training frequency,' the KMT said in the document outlining the proposed changes. 'By significantly raising allowances and adding an adjustment mechanism, the aim is to improve recruitment incentives and retain outstanding talent.' Other changes passed by lawmakers Tuesday were for conscripts to receive no less than the minimum wage, additional pay for combat units and overtime. Premier Cho Jung-tai, who belongs to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party, said the government would challenge the amendments after the cabinet was not consulted as required by the budget act.
