Atlantic writer claims Elon Musk has fathered more than 100 children with a baby-mama 'harem'
A journalist for The Atlantic has claimed that Elon Musk could have fathered in excess of 100 children as part of his 'harem'.
Speaking on the 'Sanity' podcast that went live on Friday, the outlet's Elizabeth Bruenig made the claim about the Tesla CEO and X boss.
She said: 'I believe he has 14 known children, but people who spoke to the Wall Street Journal for their exposé on his childbearing habits suggested the number is much higher. I have heard people estimate [it] at 100 or more.'
Bruenig, who authored a piece titled 'The Harem of Elon Musk', contended that such a number would 'surprise her', saying: 'It's definitely higher than 14.
'And so far, I think there are four women he's had children with. Let's see. Possibly five with the addition of Ashley St. Clair, but I think it's four.'
Podcast co-host Alisyn Camerota also claimed that the women Musk has had children with have signed non-disclosure agreements.
She said: 'The reason we don't know about all these other children and women is because he makes his baby mamas sign NDAs and he's very lawyered up and he's litigious and he does suit them if they speak.'
MAGA influencer St. Clair claimed earlier this month that Musk had offered her $15 million and $100,000 a month to not publicly disclose he was the father of their son Romulus.
She said that Musk's fixer Jared Birchall told her that similar agreements had been made with the other moms of his kids, including pop star Grimes and Neuralink executive Shivon Zilis.
St. Clair also said that Musk had demanded that she deliver the baby via a caesarian section - he believes doing so allows for a baby to have a larger brain - and not undergo a circumcision. St. Clair is Jewish and wanted a natural birth so she rejected both.
St. Clair did comply, however, with the request of leaving Musk's name off of Romulus' birth certificate - which Birchall made while she was inducing labor - but she did prepare by hiring an attorney, against Birchall's wishes.
Camerota later questioned how the family values of the Republican Party crossover with Musk's habits.
She added: 'There's something very dystopian about this and dark and, I mean and hypocritical, wildly hypocritically, because let's remember that it's Republicans who have always championed family values.
'How is this family values? He doesn't acknowledge some of his children. And he refuses to be on the birth certificate. Of some of his children. He pays off the women.
'He attacks them in court. He, as you know, he's estranged from one of his, children, Vivian. I mean, this flies in the face of anything that any sane person sees as family values.'
The report by the Wall Street Journal alleged that Musk is building a massive brood ahead of a prospective population collapse.
The billionaire went on to publicly belittle the outlet after they published their extensive report, touting them as worse than TMZ.
Publicly, Musk is known to have children with four women - six with his ex wife, Justine; three with singer Grimes; four with a former employee Shivon Zilis; and one with St. Clair.
Speaking at a Wall Street Journal event back in 2021, Musk said low and rapidly declining birth rates were 'one of the biggest risks to civilization,' and claimed that 'there are not enough people' in the world.
When asked if that was why he had so many children, the businessman said he was trying to set a good example, and said that he has to practice what he preached.
At that point he was already a father to 11 kids, but sadly his first child Nevada - whom he had with his first wife Justine Wilson - died of sudden infant death syndrome in 2002 at the age of 10 weeks.
Publicly, Musk is known to have children with four women - six with ex wife, Justine; three with singer Grimes; four with a former employee Shivon Zilis; and one with St. Clair.
Following the tragic death of his son Nevada, Musk went on to have five more children with Canadian author Wilson, 52.
Musk and Wilson had married in January 2000 and decided to use IVF to continue their family.
In 2004, they welcomed twins Griffin and Vivian, who is transgender and has a contentious relationship with her father.
Musk also shares triplets named Kai, Saxon and Damian with Wilson, who were born in 2006.
The couple divorced two years later in 2008, and in a 2010 essay she wrote for Marie Clare, Wilson said she felt more like an 'employee' to Musk than a partner.
In 2018, it was revealed that Musk was dating Canadian singer/songwriter Grimes - whose real name is Claire Elise Boucher.
The couple welcomed their first child, X, in May 2020 and originally gave their son the name X Æ A-12, which would have violated California regulations as it contained characters that are not in the modern English alphabet.
They then changed the child's name to X Æ A-Xii and received plenty of criticism for choosing a name perceived to be impractical and difficult to pronounce.
The following year they welcomed their daughter Exa Dark Sideræl via surrogacy.
In between then and welcoming their son Tao in 2023, the couple 'semi-separated' and in January 2022, Grimes said of Musk: 'I would probably refer to him as my boyfriend, but we're very fluid.'
Musk has a further three children with one of his Neuralink employees Shivon Zilis.
Shortly before Grimes welcomed their daughter Exa, Zilis, 39, gave birth to a set of twins named Strider and Azure in June 2021.
Zilis, who was born in Ontario, Canada, met Musk through OpenAI, the artificial-intelligence research-and-deployment nonprofit Musk cofounded in 2015, Insider reported.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Auto Blog
a day ago
- Auto Blog
These 10 Used Cars Saw the Biggest Value Losses in 2025
Tesla dominated the depreciation charts, but it wasn't alone. From luxury EVs to plug-in hybrids, these models lost thousands in value over the past year. A good time to be a buyer Used car prices are finally starting to creep upward after two years of post-pandemic corrections, but that doesn't mean every vehicle is gaining value. According to a new study by iSeeCars analyzing 2.4 million used sales in May 2024 and May 2025, several once-popular models are still dropping fast, especially in the electric vehicle and luxury categories. While the average 1- to 5-year-old used car now costs $32,317 — up 2% from a year ago — some vehicles lost 10% or more of their value. Here are the top 10 biggest losers in 2025. Tesla Model S Tesla Model S — Source: Tesla No vehicle lost more value this year than the Tesla Model S. Once a status symbol for early EV adopters, the average used Model S dropped 16% year-over-year, shedding $8,837 to land at an average price of $46,503. For a vehicle that started well north of $80,000 when new, that's a significant fall, and a reflection of how quickly electric luxury sedans are depreciating. While newer versions still offer jaw-dropping performance and range, the used market is clearly pulling back as buyers consider alternatives with newer battery tech or lower operating costs. Tesla Model Y Tesla Model Y — Source: Tesla The Model Y may be Tesla's best-selling vehicle, but it couldn't avoid a steep value drop. Over the past 12 months, the average used Model Y declined by 14.2%, losing $4,945 in value to settle at $29,789. Several factors likely contributed to the slide, including Tesla's repeated price cuts for new vehicles, increasing competition from other EV crossovers, and growing scrutiny of the brand's quality and leadership. For used buyers, however, this could be a golden opportunity to get into an EV with solid range at a relatively affordable price. Porsche Taycan Porsche Taycan GTS and GTS Sport Turismo — Source: Porsche With an average price of $75,644, the Porsche Taycan remains one of the priciest used EVs on the market, but it's also one of the fastest depreciating. Over the past year, Taycan prices dropped 12.7%, a raw-dollar loss of nearly $11,000. This luxury electric sedan wowed buyers with its performance when it launched, but newer rivals and rapid improvements in EV technology have chipped away at its appeal. Add in the fact that high repair and ownership costs are common with premium German vehicles, and it's no surprise the Taycan is struggling to hold its value. Ford Explorer Hybrid 2025 Ford Explorer — Source: Ford Not all of the biggest depreciation stories are luxury EVs. The Ford Explorer Hybrid lost 11.3% of its value over the past year, dropping by $4,044 to an average of $31,811. The hybrid version of this three-row SUV offers better fuel economy than its gas-only counterpart, but not enough to justify the price premium in the eyes of many used car shoppers. Combined with lackluster reviews and a competitive midsize SUV segment, the Explorer Hybrid has become a tougher sell on the used market. Tesla Model 3 2024 Tesla Model 3 Performance — Source: Tesla Even Tesla's most accessible model isn't immune to falling values. The Model 3 saw a 10.8% decline in resale value this year, losing $3,078 to reach an average used price of $25,361. For years, the Model 3 was seen as the EV market's standard bearer, but recent price drops on new versions and a flood of supply on the used market have pushed values lower. That's bad news for current owners, but for buyers, it means it's now possible to find a well-equipped used Model 3 for under $30,000. Jeep Gladiator 2025 Jeep Gladiator — Source: Stellantis The Jeep Gladiator blends pickup utility with Wrangler off-road DNA, but its value hasn't held up. Over the past year, Gladiator prices dropped by 10.7%, translating to a $4,112 decline and bringing the average price down to $34,253. Part of the problem may be that the novelty of the Gladiator has worn off, and high fuel costs aren't doing rugged, body-on-frame trucks any favors. Still, for fans of outdoor adventure and removable doors, the falling price could be an invitation. Ford Escape Plug-In Hybrid 2023 Ford Escape Plug-In Hybrid — Source: Ford The second Ford on this list is the Escape Plug-In Hybrid, which saw its average resale price drop by 10.7%, or $3,139, bringing it to $26,201. Plug-in hybrids occupy a strange space in the market — not quite electric, not quite gas — and that ambiguity seems to be hurting their resale values. While the Escape PHEV offers decent range and good efficiency, used car buyers may be opting for more straightforward hybrid or EV options instead. Mercedes-Benz GLB 2025 Mercedes-Benz GLB — Source: Mercedes-Benz The Mercedes-Benz GLB is a boxy compact luxury SUV that offers surprising space for its size. Even with that practicality, the GLB lost 9.9% of its value in the past year, about $3,566, bringing its average price to $32,403. Luxury brands often depreciate quickly, especially in the entry-level segments, and the GLB appears to be no exception. Buyers who want a badge and some upscale features without paying new-car prices might find this model appealing — just be ready for premium maintenance costs. Maserati Levante 2021 Maserati Levante Hybrid Maserati's Levante SUV combines exotic styling and performance with an SUV form factor, but its resale value is anything but stable. Prices dropped 9.5% year-over-year, falling by $4,663 to an average of $44,433. That's a steep decline for a vehicle that often carried six-figure MSRPs when new. As with many ultra-luxury brands, the Levante suffers from high depreciation, limited service networks, and concerns about long-term reliability — all of which make used buyers cautious. Tesla Model X Tesla Model X — Source: Tesla Rounding out the list is Tesla's largest vehicle, the Model X. This full-size SUV with its distinctive Falcon Wing doors saw a year-over-year price drop of 8.9%, or $5,292, putting the average price at $54,004. As new EV SUVs enter the market and Tesla's own software and hardware evolve quickly, older Model X units may start to feel dated. Still, for families seeking an all-electric ride with plenty of space and performance, a used Model X is now significantly more attainable than it was even a year ago. Final thoughts As a whole, used car prices are trending upward, but these 10 models show that the market is still volatile for certain segments. Electric vehicles, plug-in hybrids, and luxury SUVs are depreciating quickly, offering opportunities for savvy buyers willing to take on the risks that come with advanced tech or high-end nameplates. For sellers, the message is less optimistic. Anyone trying to offload a used Tesla, Maserati, or hybrid SUV may be in for a surprise, especially compared to the sky-high values seen in 2021 and 2022. But for buyers, particularly those hunting for an electric deal, 2025 may be the best time in years to find one. About the Author Elijah Nicholson-Messmer View Profile
NBC News
a day ago
- NBC News
Who benefits from Republicans' 'big beautiful' bill depends largely on income. Children are no exception
House reconciliation legislation, also known as the One, Big, Beautiful Bill, includes changes aimed at helping to boost family's finances. Those proposals — including $1,000 investment 'Trump Accounts' for newborns and an enhanced maximum $2,500 child tax credit — would help support eligible parents. Proposed tax cuts in the bill may also provide up to $13,300 more in take-home pay for the average family with two children, House Republicans estimate. 'What we're trying to do is help hardworking Americans who are trying to provide for their families and make ends meet,' House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said during a June 8 interview with ABC News' 'This Week.' Yet the proposed changes, which emphasize work requirements, may reduce aid for children in low-income families when it comes to certain tax credits, health coverage and food assistance. Households in the lowest decile of the income distribution would lose about $1,600 per year, or about 3.9% of their income, from 2026 through 2034, according to a June 12 letter from the Congressional Budget Office. That loss is mainly due to 'reductions in in-kind transfers,' it notes — particularly Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, formerly known as food stamps. 20 million children won't get full $2,500 child tax credit House Republicans have proposed increasing the maximum child tax credit to $2,500 per child, up from $2,000, a change that would go into effect starting with tax year 2025 and expire after 2028. The change would increase the number of low-income children who are locked out of the child tax credit because their parents' income is too low, according to Adam Ruben, director of advocacy organization Economic Security Project Action. The tax credit is not refundable, meaning filers can't claim it if they don't have a tax obligation. Today, there are 17 million children who either receive no credit or a partial credit because their family's income is too low, Ruben said. Under the House Republicans' plan, that would increase by 3 million children. Consequently, 20 million children would be left out of the full child tax credit because their families earn too little, he said. 'It is raising the credit for wealthier families while excluding those vulnerable families from the credit,' Ruben said. 'And that's not a pro-family policy.' A single parent with two children would have to earn at least $40,000 per year to access the full child tax credit under the Republicans' plan, he said. For families earning the minimum wage, it may be difficult to meet that threshold, according to Ruben. In contrast, an enhanced child tax credit put in place under President Joe Biden made it fully refundable, which means very low-income families were eligible for the maximum benefit, according to Elaine Maag, senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. In 2021, the maximum child tax credit was $3,600 for children under six and $3,000 for children ages 6 to 17. That enhanced credit cut child poverty in half, Maag said. However, immediately following the expiration, child poverty increased, she said. The current House proposal would also make about 4.5 million children who are citizens ineligible for the child tax credit because they have at least one undocumented parent who files taxes with an individual tax identification number, Ruben said. Those children are currently eligible for the child tax credit based on 2017 tax legislation but would be excluded based on the new proposal, he said. New red tape for a low-income tax credit House Republicans also want to change the earned income tax credit, or EITC, which targets low- to middle-income individuals and families, to require precertification to qualify. When a similar requirement was tried about 20 years ago, it resulted in some eligible families not getting the benefit, Maag said. The new prospective administrative barrier may have the same result, she said. More than 2 million children's food assistance at risk House Republican lawmakers' plan includes almost $300 billion in proposed cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, through 2034. SNAP currently helps more than 42 million people in low-income families afford groceries, according to Katie Bergh, senior policy analyst at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Children represent roughly 40% of SNAP participants, she said. More than 7 million people may see their food assistance either substantially reduced or ended entirely due to the proposed cuts in the House reconciliation bill, estimates CBPP. Notably, that total includes more than 2 million children. 'We're talking about the deepest cut to food assistance ever, potentially, if this bill becomes law,' Bergh said. Under the House proposal, work requirements would apply to households with children for the first time, Bergh said. Parents with children over the age of 6 would be subject to those rules, which limit people to receiving food assistance for just three months in a three-year period unless they work a minimum 20 hours per week. Additionally, the House plan calls for states to fund 5% to 25% of SNAP food benefits — a departure from the 100% federal funding for those benefits for the first time in the program's history, Bergh said. States, which already pay to help administer SNAP, may face tough choices in the face of those higher costs. That may include cutting food assistance or other state benefits or even doing away with SNAP altogether, Bergh said. While the bill does not directly propose cuts to school meal programs, it does put children's eligibility for them at risk, according to Bergh. Children who are eligible for SNAP typically automatically qualify for free or reduced school meals. If a family loses SNAP benefits, their children may also miss out on those benefits, Bergh said. Health coverage losses would adversely impact families Families with children may face higher health care costs and reduced access to health care depending on how states react to federal spending cuts proposed by House Republicans, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. The House Republican bill seeks to slash approximately $1 trillion in spending from Medicaid, the Children's Health Insurance Program and Affordable Care Act marketplaces. Medicaid work requirements may make low-income individuals vulnerable to losing health coverage if they are part of the expansion group and are unable to document they meet the requirements or qualify for an exemption, according to CBPP. Parents and pregnant women, who are on the list of exemptions, could be susceptible to losing coverage without proper documentation, according to the non-partisan research and policy institute. Eligible children may face barriers to access Medicaid and CHIP coverage if the legislation blocks a rule that simplifies enrollment in those programs, according to CBPP. In addition, an estimated 4.2 million individuals may be uninsured in 2034 if enhanced premium tax credits that help individuals and families afford health insurance are not extended, according to CBO estimates. Meanwhile, those who are covered by marketplace plans would have to pay higher premiums, according to CBPP. Without the premium tax credits, a family of four with $65,000 in income would pay $2,400 more per year for marketplace coverage.
Telegraph
2 days ago
- Telegraph
Staff sergeant defrauds regiment to buy cars and hair transplant
An Army staff sergeant who defrauded his regiment out of more than £330,000 to buy luxury cars, a hair transplant and 'adult services' has been jailed. Andrew Oakes, 39, used his position as financial systems administrator at the Catterick Garrison base in North Yorkshire to transfer £336,448 of public funds into his personal accounts. He used the funds to buy three Tesla cars, a Mini Cooper and a Nissan Qashqai, along with Apple products, a hair transplant and spent £16,500 on 'adult services'. He also paid off debts by writing cheques to himself and disguising the transactions by falsifying stubs in the names of legitimate suppliers, including a regimental accountant and tailoring company. Oakes appeared for sentence on Thursday at Teesside Crown Court after pleading guilty to three counts of fraud by false representation, fraud by abuse of a position of trust and acquiring criminal property between February 2021 and October 2024. He was jailed for three-and-a-half years. 'Multiple suspicious transactions' Prosecutor Tabitha Buck said the role as a financial systems administrator was given to 'trustworthy' personnel because it gave them restricted but 'significant' access to MoD funds. In August 2024, Oakes was quizzed by his military line manager after she uncovered 'multiple suspicious transactions in the system' and reported this to the Royal Military Police. It emerged the scam first got under way in February 2021 when Oakes falsified his bank statements to try to prove that he had £300,000 available to secure a mortgage for a property, claiming he had won the money in 'the army lottery'. Between July 2021 and April 2022, he created false local authority and utility documents to claim £1,584 of mileage allowance. It was in May 2024 that the deception originally came to light, by which time Oakes had written 28 government cheques to himself. The investigation was then passed on to MoD's Economic Crime Team. He was fraudulently taking 'extensive periods of leave' on compassionate and medical grounds claiming that a family member had died. Oakes took 66 medical-leave days and 12 on 'compassionate' grounds, which first 'raised a red flag' among his military bosses. His military line manager said she had been supportive and sympathetic towards Oakes due to the 'family bereavement' and his perceived personal circumstances, which gave rise to his request for leave on compassionate grounds. Oakes, who was representing himself in court, said: 'I just want to apologise to everyone I've hurt – family and the Army especially. I was in a very bad place, drinking a lot of alcohol.' He said he wasn't a 'stable' individual at the time, adding: 'I regret everything I've done.' Judge Nathan Adams said that Oakes had 'wholly abused' a position of trust, prestige and 'high responsibility' in which he was given 'significant' access to state defence funds. He added: 'The impact of your offending is not simply the financial loss to the public purse but also the reputational damage caused to the organisation as a while, to Catterick and your battalion. 'Those officers who supported you with your personal problems felt significantly betrayed when they found out what was really going on and it's had a significant impact on the morale of your battalion in Catterick.' Mr Adams acknowledged Oakes did have genuine personal issues at the time, including the breakdown of his relationship with his former partner, which led to a drink problem. Oakes, of Station Road, Winsford, Cheshire, received a three-and-a-half-year jail sentence but was told under the Government's early-release scheme he would serve less than half of that time behind bars before being released on licence.
