What's in China-US trade deal? Tariff cuts and key details
BEIJING, May 12 (Reuters) - China and the United States announced a truce in their trade war on Monday after talks in Geneva that will roll back the bulk of tariffs and other countermeasures by Wednesday.
The United States is dropping the extra tariffs it imposed on China this year to 30% from 145%, while China is cutting them to 10% from 125%.
Tariffs imposed before April 2, including those dating back to U.S. President Donald Trump's first term, and other restrictions, such as the U.S. measures to end low-value package tariff exemptions, known as the "de minimis" rule, appear to remain.
The United States has agreed to adjust or remove three executive orders, which collectively put 115% tariffs on imports from China.
Washington agreed to drop its so-called "Liberation Day" tariffs from 34% to 10% for 90 days, and remove all tariffs imposed during the tit-for-tat escalation that followed.
China has matched the de-escalation, removing all but 10% of the tariffs imposed since April 2, leaving the current rate at 10%.
However, that leaves China still facing a 30% tariff once duties imposed before April 2 are counted, including the two rounds of fentanyl tariffs imposed in February and March.
Chinese products ranging from electric vehicles, steel and aluminium will also still face separate tariffs imposed over the past several years.
China also committed to removing non-tariff countermeasures imposed against the United States since April 2, although it remains unclear how some of these measures will be walked back.
As part of its retaliation in April, China added rare earths to its controlled export list, opened an anti-dumping probe into chemical firm DuPont's China business and blacklisted some U.S. defense and tech firms.
The wording of the agreement suggests those firms will be removed from the list, which barred trade and investment with China and the anti-dumping probe shelved.
The statement only said countermeasures imposed after April 2 will be removed, which would therefore not include a dozen companies blacklisted in March, and the anti-dumping investigation into Google announced in February.
DuPont did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
In the case of rare earths, because China's decision applied to all countries, it is unclear whether it will count as a U.S.-specific countermeasure under the agreement.
There is no mention of the U.S. in the original Ministry of Commerce announcement, opens new tab, which required all exporters to seek licenses before shipping seven types of rare earths.
Reuters reported last month that U.S. clients were likely to face a long and uncertain wait for licenses given the trade war.
China's Ministry of Commerce did not immediately respond to faxed questions about the rare earths restrictions.
A Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson referred questions on the subject to the text of the agreement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
29 minutes ago
- Reuters
Morning Bid: No relief from US-China trade truce
A look at the day ahead in European and global markets from Johann M Cherian European investors are set to wake up to a souring mood as rapidly rising tensions in the Middle East and yet another tariff salvo from U.S. President Donald Trump triggered a new wave of dollar-selling and risk-off moves. The much-hyped U.S.-China talks culminated in a fragile truce that may have put a lid on simmering trade tensions between the world's top two economies for now but the lack of details has left investors unnerved. For starters, China President Xi Jinping is yet to give his approval on the 'deal'. And details on how the new tariffs will be implemented are yet to be ironed out and U.S. export restrictions on high-end artificial intelligence chips are still in place. And with the July 8 deadline on worldwide tariffs fast approaching, Trump is back to his unilateral style of policymaking as he said he would send out letters in one to two weeks outlining terms of trade to dozens of other countries, which they could embrace or reject. Markets will be hoping for another TACO moment. While backward looking inflation reports are yet to reflect the price pressures, companies are starting to sound the alarm. Zara-owner Inditex ( opens new tab was the latest to issue a disappointing quarterly report and flag headwinds from trade uncertainty. And as if investors did not have enough to juggle with already, geopolitical tensions in the Middle East are flaring, adding to the risks of rising crude prices fuelling inflation pressures. Supply concerns out of the oil-rich region pushed Brent and West Texas Intermediate futures to two-month highs of nearly $70 a barrel each. In all of this, as my colleague Jamie McGeever points out, valuations in equities and stocks are beginning to appear stretched, compounding the risks to investors in the event of a market selloff. European futures were down 0.7%, while futures in the U.S. are pointing to a lower open on Thursday, but the benchmark indexes in the regions are just about 2% away from their respective record highs. Further, investors continue to question the dollar's safe-haven status. On Thursday, the euro hit a seven-week high and is up 11% this year, poised for its biggest yearly advance since 2017. The central bank bonanza next week could perhaps throw more light on the global economy's outlook. The U.S. Federal Reserve along with the Bank of Japan and the Bank of England are due to announce their policy decisions. Meanwhile, investors will look for a string of UK economic data including reports on gross domestic product and manufacturing output later in the day. Both are expected to reflect a decline in activity on a monthly basis, reigned in by the BoE's cautious approach to monetary policy easing. Key developments that could provide more direction to markets on Thursday: - In the UK: GDP, industrial output, manufacturing output and trade data - In the U.S.: Producer inflation data, initial weekly jobless claims report and an auction of 30-year bonds worth $22 billion - Policymakers expected to speak include ECB's Jose Luis Escriva, Reserve Bank of Australia's David Jacobs - UniCredit ( opens new tab CEO sees slim hopes of BPM ( opens new tab deal, says Commerzbank ( opens new tab too costly - Oracle (ORCL.N), opens new tab raises annual forecast on robust cloud services demand - Warner Bros' (WBD.O), opens new tab credit rating downgraded to junk by Fitch on split-up
Finextra
30 minutes ago
- Finextra
My Big Coin founder fined for crypto fraud
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission today announced the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts entered a final default judgement against Mark Gillespie of Michigan, John Roche of California, My Big Coin Pay, Inc., and My Big Coin, Inc., both of Nevada. 0 This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author. The order requires Gillespie, My Big Coin Pay, Inc., My Big Coin, Inc., and Roche to pay, jointly and severally a $19,326,324 civil monetary penalty and $6,442,108 in restitution to defrauded victims in connection with their role in a digital asset fraud scheme. The order also imposes a permanent injunction against the defendants and bans them from trading in any CFTC-regulated markets; entering into any transactions involving commodity interests or digital asset commodities; and registering with the CFTC. Case Background The default order finds from at least January 2014 through June 2017, Gillespie, My Big Coin Pay, Inc., My Big Coin, Inc., and Roche, together with co-defendant Randall Crater, one of the other co-defendants named in the CFTC's amended complaint, operated a digital asset scheme in which they fraudulently offered the sale of a fully-functioning virtual currency, My Big Coin (MBC), a commodity in interstate commerce. The CFTC dismissed its enforcement action against named co-defendant Michael Kruger because of his death. The defendants obtained more than $6 million from at least 28 customers through fraudulent solicitations, including false and misleading claims and omissions about MBC's value, usage, and trade status, and that MBC was backed by gold. Crater misappropriated virtually all the money solicited from customers, using those misappropriated funds wrongfully. The order resolves the claims against Gillespie, Roche, My Big Coin Pay, Inc., and My Big Coin, Inc., in the CFTC's enforcement action. [See CFTC Press Release 7678-18] The court had previously entered a consent order resolving the CFTC's claims against Crater, who is currently imprisoned for his role in the scheme. [See CFTC Press Release 9051-25] The CFTC cautions that orders requiring repayment of funds to victims may not result in the recovery of any money lost because the wrongdoers may not have sufficient funds or assets. The CFTC will continue to fight vigorously for the protection of customers and to ensure the wrongdoers are held accountable. Parallel Criminal Action On January 18, 2022, a grand jury returned an eight-count superseding indictment charging Crater with wire fraud, unlawful monetary transactions, and operating an unlicensed money transmitting business based on the same conduct alleged in the CFTC's amended complaint. [United States v. Randall Crater, No. 1:19-cr-10063-DJC (D. Mass. Jan. 18, 2022)).] Crater was found guilty of those charges on July 21, 2022, and was sentenced to 100 months in prison and ordered to pay $7,668,317.50 in restitution to defrauded customers and to forfeit $7,668,317.50, which represented the proceeds he received from his violations. The CFTC appreciates the assistance of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Massachusetts, the Fraud Section of the U.S. Department of Justice, and the FBI. Division of Enforcement staff responsible for this case are Traci Rodriguez, Daniel Ullman II, Chrystal Gonnella, Dmitriy Vilenskiy, Paul G. Hayeck, and former Division staff members Jonah E. McCarthy, Jason Mahoney, John Einstman, Hillary Van Tassel, Patricia Gomersall, and Kyong J. Koh.
Reuters
35 minutes ago
- Reuters
Bunge nears China ruling for $8.2 billion Viterra merger, Bloomberg News reports
June 10 (Reuters) - U.S. grains merchant Bunge (BG.N), opens new tab is close to getting a ruling from Chinese regulators on its $8.2 billion purchase of Glencore-backed (GLEN.L), opens new tab Viterra with a verdict expected within days, Bloomberg News reported on Wednesday. The merger, first announced in 2023, would create a global crop trading and processing giant closer in scale to chief rivals Archer-Daniels-Midland (ADM.N), opens new tab and Cargill. Regulatory approval in China remains among the last remaining hurdles to the deal's closing. Bunge and Viterra said in two separate, similarly worded statements to Reuters that the companies were in the final stage of regulatory approval and thanked Chinese officials for "constructive dialogue throughout the review process." China's commerce ministry did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. The deal has secured most global approvals required for the merger, including from the EU and Canada. The completion deadline, originally scheduled for mid-2024, has been extended multiple times, with the current date set for June 13.
