Rising cost to build a wake-up call on housing dream
Construction costs rose 0.5 per cent in the June quarter, picking up slightly from a 0.4 per cent rise in the March quarter, according to property analyst Cotality's latest Cordell Construction Cost Index.
The re-acceleration is likely to weigh on inflation outcomes because the cost of new dwellings comprises the largest weight in the consumer price index, Cotality research director Tim Lawless said.
While noting the increase was half the pre-pandemic decade average of one per cent, Mr Lawless said builders struggle with feasibility assessments amid high material and labour costs.
"With the cost of building a new home continuing to rise, the (government's) stretch target of building 1.2 million new homes by July 2029 is looking harder and harder," he said.
Property Council of Australia policy and advocacy executive Matthew Kandelaars said the uptick in construction costs "chips away at the feasibility of new housing projects" when the nation needs to be accelerating towards the target of 1.2 million new homes.
Better investment and tax settings are needed, Mr Kandelaars said, along with smarter and more efficient approvals and more skilled workers to build the homes.
"Without this balance, we'll remain stuck in a doom-loop of low margins, constrained project feasibility, cost blowouts and delivery delays."
Independent government advice body the National Housing Supply and Affordability Council warned the federal government in a May report that it would fall short of its 2029 goal by about 300,000 dwellings.
Western Australia recorded the largest quarterly increase in construction costs in the three months to June at 0.7 per cent, followed by Victoria (0.6 per cent), NSW and South Australia (0.5 per cent) and Queensland (0.4 per cent).
Cotality said the latest data reinforces commentary from the Reserve Bank in its July 8 decision to maintain the cash rate at 3.85 per cent, which highlighted as a concern the re-acceleration of growth in the cost of new dwellings via the monthly CPI indicator.
In her rates commentary, the central bank's governor Michele Bullock noted certain components of monthly inflation - particularly home-building costs - had been "slightly stronger than expected", which contributed to the decision to hold rates.
The RBA added that high construction expenses continue to exert upward pressure on inflation, reinforcing its cautious stance.
Competition for skilled trades also remains intense amid a record level of public infrastructure spending, with Infrastructure Australia forecasting a mismatch between the demand and supply of labour until mid-2028.
This means continued inflation pressure is likely from building costs centred on the labour market, Mr Lawless said.
A rise in construction costs is likely to stoke inflation while pushing home-building targets further out of reach, fresh data analysis suggests.
Construction costs rose 0.5 per cent in the June quarter, picking up slightly from a 0.4 per cent rise in the March quarter, according to property analyst Cotality's latest Cordell Construction Cost Index.
The re-acceleration is likely to weigh on inflation outcomes because the cost of new dwellings comprises the largest weight in the consumer price index, Cotality research director Tim Lawless said.
While noting the increase was half the pre-pandemic decade average of one per cent, Mr Lawless said builders struggle with feasibility assessments amid high material and labour costs.
"With the cost of building a new home continuing to rise, the (government's) stretch target of building 1.2 million new homes by July 2029 is looking harder and harder," he said.
Property Council of Australia policy and advocacy executive Matthew Kandelaars said the uptick in construction costs "chips away at the feasibility of new housing projects" when the nation needs to be accelerating towards the target of 1.2 million new homes.
Better investment and tax settings are needed, Mr Kandelaars said, along with smarter and more efficient approvals and more skilled workers to build the homes.
"Without this balance, we'll remain stuck in a doom-loop of low margins, constrained project feasibility, cost blowouts and delivery delays."
Independent government advice body the National Housing Supply and Affordability Council warned the federal government in a May report that it would fall short of its 2029 goal by about 300,000 dwellings.
Western Australia recorded the largest quarterly increase in construction costs in the three months to June at 0.7 per cent, followed by Victoria (0.6 per cent), NSW and South Australia (0.5 per cent) and Queensland (0.4 per cent).
Cotality said the latest data reinforces commentary from the Reserve Bank in its July 8 decision to maintain the cash rate at 3.85 per cent, which highlighted as a concern the re-acceleration of growth in the cost of new dwellings via the monthly CPI indicator.
In her rates commentary, the central bank's governor Michele Bullock noted certain components of monthly inflation - particularly home-building costs - had been "slightly stronger than expected", which contributed to the decision to hold rates.
The RBA added that high construction expenses continue to exert upward pressure on inflation, reinforcing its cautious stance.
Competition for skilled trades also remains intense amid a record level of public infrastructure spending, with Infrastructure Australia forecasting a mismatch between the demand and supply of labour until mid-2028.
This means continued inflation pressure is likely from building costs centred on the labour market, Mr Lawless said.
A rise in construction costs is likely to stoke inflation while pushing home-building targets further out of reach, fresh data analysis suggests.
Construction costs rose 0.5 per cent in the June quarter, picking up slightly from a 0.4 per cent rise in the March quarter, according to property analyst Cotality's latest Cordell Construction Cost Index.
The re-acceleration is likely to weigh on inflation outcomes because the cost of new dwellings comprises the largest weight in the consumer price index, Cotality research director Tim Lawless said.
While noting the increase was half the pre-pandemic decade average of one per cent, Mr Lawless said builders struggle with feasibility assessments amid high material and labour costs.
"With the cost of building a new home continuing to rise, the (government's) stretch target of building 1.2 million new homes by July 2029 is looking harder and harder," he said.
Property Council of Australia policy and advocacy executive Matthew Kandelaars said the uptick in construction costs "chips away at the feasibility of new housing projects" when the nation needs to be accelerating towards the target of 1.2 million new homes.
Better investment and tax settings are needed, Mr Kandelaars said, along with smarter and more efficient approvals and more skilled workers to build the homes.
"Without this balance, we'll remain stuck in a doom-loop of low margins, constrained project feasibility, cost blowouts and delivery delays."
Independent government advice body the National Housing Supply and Affordability Council warned the federal government in a May report that it would fall short of its 2029 goal by about 300,000 dwellings.
Western Australia recorded the largest quarterly increase in construction costs in the three months to June at 0.7 per cent, followed by Victoria (0.6 per cent), NSW and South Australia (0.5 per cent) and Queensland (0.4 per cent).
Cotality said the latest data reinforces commentary from the Reserve Bank in its July 8 decision to maintain the cash rate at 3.85 per cent, which highlighted as a concern the re-acceleration of growth in the cost of new dwellings via the monthly CPI indicator.
In her rates commentary, the central bank's governor Michele Bullock noted certain components of monthly inflation - particularly home-building costs - had been "slightly stronger than expected", which contributed to the decision to hold rates.
The RBA added that high construction expenses continue to exert upward pressure on inflation, reinforcing its cautious stance.
Competition for skilled trades also remains intense amid a record level of public infrastructure spending, with Infrastructure Australia forecasting a mismatch between the demand and supply of labour until mid-2028.
This means continued inflation pressure is likely from building costs centred on the labour market, Mr Lawless said.
A rise in construction costs is likely to stoke inflation while pushing home-building targets further out of reach, fresh data analysis suggests.
Construction costs rose 0.5 per cent in the June quarter, picking up slightly from a 0.4 per cent rise in the March quarter, according to property analyst Cotality's latest Cordell Construction Cost Index.
The re-acceleration is likely to weigh on inflation outcomes because the cost of new dwellings comprises the largest weight in the consumer price index, Cotality research director Tim Lawless said.
While noting the increase was half the pre-pandemic decade average of one per cent, Mr Lawless said builders struggle with feasibility assessments amid high material and labour costs.
"With the cost of building a new home continuing to rise, the (government's) stretch target of building 1.2 million new homes by July 2029 is looking harder and harder," he said.
Property Council of Australia policy and advocacy executive Matthew Kandelaars said the uptick in construction costs "chips away at the feasibility of new housing projects" when the nation needs to be accelerating towards the target of 1.2 million new homes.
Better investment and tax settings are needed, Mr Kandelaars said, along with smarter and more efficient approvals and more skilled workers to build the homes.
"Without this balance, we'll remain stuck in a doom-loop of low margins, constrained project feasibility, cost blowouts and delivery delays."
Independent government advice body the National Housing Supply and Affordability Council warned the federal government in a May report that it would fall short of its 2029 goal by about 300,000 dwellings.
Western Australia recorded the largest quarterly increase in construction costs in the three months to June at 0.7 per cent, followed by Victoria (0.6 per cent), NSW and South Australia (0.5 per cent) and Queensland (0.4 per cent).
Cotality said the latest data reinforces commentary from the Reserve Bank in its July 8 decision to maintain the cash rate at 3.85 per cent, which highlighted as a concern the re-acceleration of growth in the cost of new dwellings via the monthly CPI indicator.
In her rates commentary, the central bank's governor Michele Bullock noted certain components of monthly inflation - particularly home-building costs - had been "slightly stronger than expected", which contributed to the decision to hold rates.
The RBA added that high construction expenses continue to exert upward pressure on inflation, reinforcing its cautious stance.
Competition for skilled trades also remains intense amid a record level of public infrastructure spending, with Infrastructure Australia forecasting a mismatch between the demand and supply of labour until mid-2028.
This means continued inflation pressure is likely from building costs centred on the labour market, Mr Lawless said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
10 hours ago
- The Age
‘It only gets worse': How it got even harder to buy a home
House prices have skyrocketed to a fresh record of close to 14 times the average annual wage, compared to around just three times the wage 100 years ago when both figures started being tracked. It's also jumped from 4.5 times the wage in 1975, 6.5 times in 2000, nine times in 2015, to 13.9 now, according to new longitudinal data. There's even little relief in sight when home prices are matched to median household disposable income. In 1981, when those figures were first collated, home prices were three times the size of income; now they're eight times more. AMP chief economist Dr Shane Oliver, who compiled the research, said these are deeply disturbing results. 'It's awful, and we complain about it, but it only gets worse,' he said. 'House prices compared to both wages and income are now around record levels and, while there was a bit of a dip last year, it's now bounced back again. 'Some states are pulling the ratios down, like Victoria and Tasmania, but other states are pulling them up, and now prices are rising across the country, it's likely to get even higher.' Loading Oliver's study, using figures from the Australian Bureau of Statistics, Cotality and AMP, delivers grim tidings to potential property buyers. First time home buyers, he estimates, would only be able, on average, to borrow $520,000 to buy a house. When the median house price in Sydney sits at $1,722,443 and in Melbourne $1,063,719 on the latest Domain House Price Report, many would be unable to get into the market, without additional funds from, for instance, the bank of mum and dad.
Sydney Morning Herald
10 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘It only gets worse': How it got even harder to buy a home
House prices have skyrocketed to a fresh record of close to 14 times the average annual wage, compared to around just three times the wage 100 years ago when both figures started being tracked. It's also jumped from 4.5 times the wage in 1975, 6.5 times in 2000, nine times in 2015, to 13.9 now, according to new longitudinal data. There's even little relief in sight when home prices are matched to median household disposable income. In 1981, when those figures were first collated, home prices were three times the size of income; now they're eight times more. AMP chief economist Dr Shane Oliver, who compiled the research, said these are deeply disturbing results. 'It's awful, and we complain about it, but it only gets worse,' he said. 'House prices compared to both wages and income are now around record levels and, while there was a bit of a dip last year, it's now bounced back again. 'Some states are pulling the ratios down, like Victoria and Tasmania, but other states are pulling them up, and now prices are rising across the country, it's likely to get even higher.' Loading Oliver's study, using figures from the Australian Bureau of Statistics, Cotality and AMP, delivers grim tidings to potential property buyers. First time home buyers, he estimates, would only be able, on average, to borrow $520,000 to buy a house. When the median house price in Sydney sits at $1,722,443 and in Melbourne $1,063,719 on the latest Domain House Price Report, many would be unable to get into the market, without additional funds from, for instance, the bank of mum and dad.
7NEWS
a day ago
- 7NEWS
Petrol and diesel prices to rise following another fuel excise increase
Australians will pay more for petrol and diesel following another fuel excise increase from today, August 4, prompting renewed calls for the 'hidden tax' to be axed in favour of a national road user charge. The second increase this year will see the fuel excise on petrol and diesel rise from 50.8 to 51.6 cents per litre, an impost that fuel retailers will be forced to pass on to consumers at the bowser. Victorian Automobile Chamber of Commerce (VACC) CEO Peter Jones said the latest fuel excise increase was 'a predictable six-monthly tax grab' that will hit the pockets of families and businesses already struggling with cost-of-living pressures. CarExpert can save you thousands on a new car. Click here to get a great deal. 'This is an indiscriminate tax that disproportionately affects low-income earners and families who rely on their vehicles for work and essential travel,' said Mr Jones in a statement. The VACC says fuel excise is effectively a hidden tax, because unlike other government charges it's built into the price displayed at the pump, meaning consumers are often unaware they're paying this substantial government levy on every litre purchased. Motorists are then forced to pay the 10 per cent Goods and Services Tax (GST) on top of the fuel excise, effectively making it a tax on a tax. 'It's a clear double dip by the Federal Government. Motorists are being slugged with excise, then charged GST on that excise. It's no wonder Australia continues to have some of the highest fuel costs in the developed world,' said Mr Jones. 'Motorists deserve transparency about how their fuel is priced. They need to understand that fuel excise isn't a static tax – the government increases it every six months, and it's a significant component of what they pay at the pump.' Fuel excise increases twice annually in line with the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which rose by 0.7 per cent in the June quarter and 2.1 per cent in the 12 months to June. The August 4 fuel excise increase amounts to about 1.5 per cent. Fuel tax was originally designed to fund road infrastructure and maintenance, but research by the AAA found only 57 per cent of fuel excise revenue in the decade to the 2022-23 financial year was reinvested in public transport and roads. Prior to the last federal election the Opposition promised to halve the controversial tax for 12 months, claiming savings of $700 per year for motorists. That didn't happen and Australian Government revenue from fuel excise is now expected to increase over the next few years to about $17.7 billion in the 2026-27 financial year – up from $15.71bn in 2023-24. The Opposition also promised to abolish fines for auto brands that exceed tightening CO2 limits across their model ranges under the New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES), which is designed to accelerate the uptake of zero- and low-emissions vehicles between 2025 and 2029. But as more Australians transition to hybrids (HEVs), plug-in hybrids (PHEVs) and battery-electric vehicles (EVs), fuel excise revenue is expected to decline significantly, creating pressure on government to develop alternative funding mechanisms for road infrastructure. The VACC is among a number of auto industry organisations now advocating for a national road user charging system, which it says would 'ensure fair contributions from all road users whilst avoiding a patchwork of state-based policies'. Zero- and low-emissions vehicle charges implemented or planned by states including Victoria, NSW, South Australia and Western Australia to help fund road maintenance have now been scrapped following a 2023 High Court ruling which deemed Victoria's levy on EV and PHEV drivers as an excise and therefore invalid under the Constitution, which states that only the Commonwealth Parliament (not states or territories) can 'impose duties of customs and excise'.
