
US-China Tariff Truce Triggers Cargo Stampede, Scramble to Diversify Beyond China: Analysts
News Analysis
When word broke on May 12 that Washington and Beijing had agreed to a 90-day tariff pause, containers quickly piled up at Shenzhen's Yantian International Container Terminal, the port that handles more than a quarter of U.S.-bound cargo.
U.S. duties dropped from 145 percent to 30 percent and China's from 125 percent to 10 percent. Within a day, rows of outbound boxes jammed major Chinese docks, carriers were
peak-season surcharges for sailings weeks before summer, and spot rates on the Pacific began to soar.
The tariff reprieve expires on Aug. 11. If negotiators fail to reach a broader deal by then, tariffs of up to 54 percent could snap back into place.
Analysts say the 90-day truce offers only a brief lifeline. It has locked in a new playbook of rush shipping, floating-tariff contracts, and multi-country production hedges that will outlast the reprieve. Far from reversing the trend, it reinforces the supply-chain exodus that began in Trump's first term and has accelerated in the current one.
Average weekly bookings from China to the United States
Related Stories
5/18/2025
5/26/2025
Drewry's index shows May 15 spot rates on the Shanghai–Los Angeles lane
'There won't be enough ships for all this cargo. Get ready for surge pricing,' shipping firm Flexport chief executive Ryan Petersen
'The 90-day reprieve simply resets the clock,' U.S.-based economist Davy J. Wong told The Epoch Times. 'We've moved from 'deal or no deal' to chronic confrontation. High tariffs could remain as the baseline, and exemptions become the bargaining chips.'
Washington, he added, can raise or lower duties at will, using them as a lever whenever Chinese industrial policy shifts, the yuan slides, or U.S. inflation flares.
A lasting thaw
of U.S.-China trade tensions
'seems unlikely anytime soon,' Sun Kuo-hsiang, an international affairs professor at Taiwan's Nanhua University, told The Epoch Times.
Each pause-and-rebound cycle, he said, nudges more factories abroad and pushes the higher-margin plants that stay to automate—auto-parts lines already swapping workers for robotic welding arms, appliance makers rolling out smart assembly cells.
Ports Jammed, Contracts Rewritten
The port crunch is already rippling through carrier operations.
With Yantian berths booked solid, German carrier Hapag-Lloyd
Exporters are betting on speed.
An aerial view shows containers stacked at a port in Taicang, in eastern China's Jiangsu province on May 18, 2025.
STR/AFP via Getty Images
Chinese factories are clearing backlogged inventory, high-margin goods, and holiday merchandise first, Sun said, with long-term orders from major U.S. retailers taking priority.
Wong calls the tactic 'ship early and stockpile on the U.S. West Coast'—a reversal of the usual pattern in which U.S. importers build inventories. This time, Chinese exporters are sending even unsold cargo across the Pacific to beat the clock.
If duties return in August, cargo still in transit could be rerouted through Mexico or Southeast Asia for repackaging, dumped into China's domestic market, stripped for parts, or written off if margins vanish, Wong said.
Buyers and sellers are redrafting deals just as fast, he added.
He said contracts now feature floating-tariff clauses, shorter payment terms,
, and non-deliverable forwards—currency contracts to cushion any slide in the yuan that new tariff headlines could trigger.
Sun sees more pay-on-delivery schedules, and explicit cost-sharing formulas when duties change, with tighter termination clauses: 'These instruments are now routine for mid- to large-size exporters.'
Insurance markets have responded in kind: war and political risk premiums, elevated since the Red Sea attacks, now
Factories on the Move
Producers across the Pacific offer a snapshot of how the 90-day truce is accelerating an old trend.
Limoss, a German maker of remote-control systems based in the Chinese manufacturing hub of Dongguan, is seeking to expand operations in Malaysia for U.S. orders because 'crossing our fingers isn't a strategy,' general manager Christian Gassner
That calculation echoes up and down the value chain.
Japanese heavy machinery maker Komatsu
Chinese-made cars, including Volvo and other brands, at a port in Nanjing, in China's eastern Jiangsu province on April 16, 2025.
AFP via Getty Images
The pivot has been underway for years: by 2024, Vietnam was
making
half of Nike's shoes, nearly a third of its apparel,
40 percent
of Lululemon products, and 39 percent
of Adidas footwear—evidence of how first-term Trump tariffs set global supply chains in motion.
A veteran Chinese paper-goods maker surnamed Chen
Vietnam itself was briefly subjected to a 46 percent U.S. reciprocal tariff, but that duty has been suspended at a 10 percent baseline since April 9.
U.S. retailers are adjusting, too. Target is
'treasure-hunt' model—constantly rotating product offerings—to swap in lower-tariff goods.
Automation, 'China + 1' Surge
Sun pegs 2024 to 2026 as the critical window for 'China + 1' migration, keeping a foothold in China while adding at least one production base elsewhere to hedge risk.
Electronics, apparel, toys, and home-appliance makers are leading the charge to Vietnam, Mexico, and Indonesia. Higher-tech firms are splitting new investment between China and alternative sites, he said.
Beijing's counter‐move is rapid
If robots and smart controls can cut unit costs far enough, a handful of high-margin lines might stay despite duties—but Sun concedes most plants can't make the numbers work once U.S. tariffs approach 40 to 50 percent. Either way, the trade-off is fewer jobs at home.
An employee moves parcels from a conveyor belt to an automatic robot at the warehouse of a logistics base of JingDong Group in Wuhan, Hubei province, China, on November 5, 2019.Still, the push is official policy. Under its Made in China 2025 blueprint, Beijing wants domestic makers of robots and control systems to capture 70 percent of the home market by 2025.
Sun expects automation to spread first in higher-margin segments such as auto-parts machining, large-appliance assembly, and the production of industrial PCs and other embedded controllers.
Wong sees the second China + 1 wave cresting in late 2025 as higher-value industries lean into automation, digital twins, and local fulfillment networks to stay nimble.
Bottlenecks for the US, Risks for China
The scramble carries risks beyond freight rates, Wong said.
China still dominates specialty chemicals, active pharmaceutical ingredients, precision machine-tool parts, and rare-earth magnets, he said. Even brief delays can idle U.S. plants for months.
At the same time, the capital that keeps this trade moving is just as exposed to shocks, Sun said.
Much of the rush is bank-financed, Sun added. Short-term loans fund the inventory, and if demand falters, unsold stock becomes 'a liquidity black hole' for small and mid-size exporters.
Chinese lenders have already
Wong fears a wave of non-performing loans at Chinese regional lenders that specialize in trade finance. S&P Global
Conversely, if tariffs jump in August, Wong foresees 'localized, industry-specific layoffs' in export-heavy Chinese hubs like Guangdong and Jiangsu as early as September.
Factories lacking branding and domestic conversion channels would start shedding workers first, he added.
Labor-intensive workshops in toys, apparel, and small appliances are already trimming shifts, Sun said.
Carriers Eye Exit
For ocean carriers, Wong said, the calculus is simple: if demand collapses after August, ships will stay in port despite low fuel prices.
New contracts penalize shippers that default on minimum-load commitments, Sun noted, yet without steady volumes, even penalties may not keep vessels running.
The Trump administration warns higher tariffs will return unless Beijing concedes more ground.
A China Shipping cargo container sits stacked at the Port of Long Beach in Long Beach, Calif., on April 10, 2025.
Patrick T. Fallon/AFP via Getty Images
For now, ships race the calendar.
'The pause-and-rebound cycle is likely here to stay,' Wong said.
Sun echoed the view: every truce triggers a rush to ship, a spike in rates, and a fresh round of hedging.
Businesses on both shores are behaving as if the era of predictable low tariffs is over, Wong added.
They are padding inventories, rewriting contracts, and uprooting supply chains, not for a one-off crisis but for a future in which trade peace lasts only as long as the next 90-day clock.
Gu Xiaohua and Reuters contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Feds seek to ditch settlement over alleged redlining with North Jersey bank
The Trump administration is asking a judge to drop a 2022 settlement the Justice Department had reached with North Jersey-based Lakeland Bank — which was later absorbed by Provident Bank — over allegations of redlining against Black and Hispanic customers. While Provident Bank said it will continue to provide low-cost mortgages to underserved communities, the motion by the U.S. Justice Department to abandon the settlement has drawn the ire of community advocates and legal experts, who say it would make it easier for banks to engage in redlining. 'It goes without saying it's a good thing when financial institutions are complying with those consent orders, but when you take away the teeth — the actual enforcement — who's to say that they will continue to comply,' said Leila Amirhamzeh, director of community reinvestment for New Jersey Citizen Action, a consumer advocacy four-page motion by the Justice Department, filed May 28 in U.S. District Court, seeks to terminate the consent order the Biden administration negotiated with what was then Lakeland Bank. In the initial complaint, the Justice Department said Lakeland violated the federal Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act by deliberately avoiding banking with Black and Hispanic customers, particularly in and around Newark. The discrimination in question allegedly took place between 2015 and 2021, according to the Biden administration. To settle the complaint, Lakeland agreed to pay $12 million to subsidize mortgages, home improvement loans and home refinancing loans for Black and Hispanic residents and open two branches in underserved neighborhoods. Lakeland also had to provide $150,000 a year for advertising, outreach and consumer finance education in the Newark area. Newark Mayor and Democratic gubernatorial candidate Ras Baraka wanted one of those new branches to be in his city, and the Greater Toms River Chamber of Commerce also wanted a branch in its area. According to the Provident Bank website, there are currently four locations in Newark and three in Toms River. After acquiring Lakeland, Provident took ownership of the settlement and the mandate to open two branches in underserved areas of New Jersey. The Justice Department in its motion to terminate the order said Lakeland reached substantial commitment to comply with the consent agreement and it is committed to continuing its disbursement of the loan subsidy. Provident spokesperson Keith Buscio told and the USA TODAY Network New Jersey that the bank remains committed to the loan subsidy initiative. He said Provident is not a party to the litigation and referred other questions to the Justice Department. The Justice Department could not immediately be reached for comment. Baraka's office in Newark said it is planning to hold a press conference about the motion by the Justice Department on June 5. Court filings show two attorneys who helped file the initial complaint against Lakeland, Michael Campion and Susan Millenky, withdrew as counsel from the case. Campion was appointed in 2022 to lead the U.S. Attorney's Office's Civil Rights Division that was created to enforce federal civil rights laws in New Jersey. The Fair Housing Act was passed as part of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 to prohibit landlords and mortgage lenders from discriminating based on race, religion, national origin or sex. Nearly 60 years later, racial wealth disparity remains vast. In New Jersey, the median household wealth of white families is $322,500, compared with $17,700 for Black families and $26,100 for Hispanic families, the New Jersey Institute for Social Justice said. In New Jersey, 77.3% of white residents owned a home in 2020. By comparison, 42.8% of Black residents and 32.7% of Hispanic residents were homeowners, according to the Urban Institute, a research group. Critics said the Justice Department's motion to drop the Lakeland settlement is a step by the Trump administration's bid to reverse diversity, equity and inclusion programs. David Troutt, a professor at Rutgers Law School in Newark, said the motion by the Justice Department to terminate the consent decree is part of a larger campaign by the department to rescind investigations and agreements involving anti-Black racism, while beginning investigations into what it deems 'illegal DEI.' 'The Trump administration's withdrawal from a federal consent decree without justification is an extraordinary act of endorsing racist practices and housing market manipulation,' Troutt said. 'For the very government that successfully enforced those borrowers' civil rights to now repudiate them sends a message unlike any we've seen since the federal government first endorsed redlining in the 1930s,' Troutt said. Lakeland isn't the only New Jersey bank that faced scrutiny under the Biden administration. Toms River-based OceanFirst Financial Corp. agreed to pay $14 million to subsidize mortgages, helping settle a lawsuit that alleged the bank violated federal discrimination laws. Since then, it has improved the rating given by federal bank regulators who oversee investments in underserved communities to 'outstanding.' The Justice Department hasn't filed a motion seeking to terminate the consent order with OceanFirst. But two attorneys who represented the U.S. in the initial complaint, Millenky and Nathan Shulock, have filed motions to withdraw from the case, according to the court docket. A combined 22 Provident and Lakeland branches closed in 2024 following the $1.3 billion merger creating a 'super community bank.' Each branch that closed was within roughly three miles of a nearby branch. Activists and opponents warned that the merger would mean fewer banking services would be available for underserved communities, such as people of color, the elderly and disabled. New Jersey Citizen Action applauded Provident for its continued commitment to the terms of the consent order. But the group said the Justice Department should continue to enforce it. 'When you actually terminate these consent orders, there's no deterrence, and it's basically telling financial institutions that the Department of Justice is going to be taking a hands-off approach to fair lending issues, to redlining,' New Jersey Citizen Action's Amirhamzeh said. Daniel Munoz covers business, consumer affairs, labor and the economy for and The Record. Email: munozd@ Twitter:@danielmunoz100 and Facebook Michael L. Diamond is a business reporter for the Asbury Park Press. He has been writing about the New Jersey economy and health care industry since 1999. He can be reached at mdiamond@ This article originally appeared on Feds seek to drop Lakeland Bank settlement over alleged redlining

Los Angeles Times
9 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump formally asks Congress to claw back approved spending targeted by DOGE
WASHINGTON — The White House on Tuesday officially asked Congress to claw back $9.4 billion in already approved spending, taking funding away from programs targeted by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency. It's a process known as 'rescission,' which requires President Donald Trump to get approval from Congress to return money that had previously been appropriated. Trump's aides say the funding cuts target programs that promote liberal ideologies. The request, if it passes the House and Senate, would formally enshrine many of the spending cuts and freezes sought by DOGE. It comes at a time when Musk is extremely unhappy with the tax cut and spending plan making its way through Congress, calling it on Tuesday a 'disgusting abomination' for increasing the federal deficit. White House budget director Russ Vought said more rescission packages and other efforts to cut spending could follow if the current effort succeeds. ' Here's what to know about the rescissions request: The request to Congress is unlikely to meaningfully change the troublesome increase in the U.S. national debt. Tax revenues have been insufficient to cover the growing costs of Social Security, Medicare and other programs. The Congressional Budget Office estimates the government is on track to spend roughly $7 trillion this year, with the rescission request equaling just 0.1% of that total. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters at Tuesday's briefing that Vought would continue to cut spending, hinting that there could be additional efforts to return funds. 'He has tools at his disposal to produce even more savings,' Leavitt said. Vought said he can send up additional rescissions at the end of the fiscal year in September 'and if Congress does not act on it, that funding expires.' 'It's one of the reasons why we are not putting all of our expectations in a typical rescissions process,' he added. A spokesperson for the White House Office of Management and Budget, speaking on condition of anonymity to preview some of the items that would lose funding, said that $8.3 billion was being cut from the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development. NPR and PBS would also lose federal funding, as would the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, also known as PEPFAR. The spokesperson listed specific programs that the Trump administration considered wasteful, including $750,000 to reduce xenophobia in Venezuela, $67,000 for feeding insect powder to children in Madagascar and $3 million for circumcision, vasectomies and condoms in Zambia. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., complimented the planned cuts and pledged to pass them. 'This rescissions package reflects many of DOGE's findings and is one of the many legislative tools Republicans are using to restore fiscal sanity,' Johnson said. 'Congress will continue working closely with the White House to codify these recommendations, and the House will bring the package to the floor as quickly as possible.' Members of the House Freedom Caucus, among the chamber's most conservative lawmakers, said they would like to see additional rescission packages from the administration. 'We will support as many more rescissions packages the White House can send us in the coming weeks and months,' the group said in a press release. Sen. Susan Collins, chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, gave the package a less optimistic greeting. 'Despite this fast track, the Senate Appropriations Committee will carefully review the rescissions package and examine the potential consequences of these rescissions on global health, national security, emergency communications in rural communities, and public radio and television stations,' the Maine lawmaker said in a statement. Boak writes for the Associated Press.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Citigroup reverses firearms policy after pressure from Trump administration on big banks
A month after the 2018 mass school shooting in Parkland, Florida, Citigroup enacted restrictions for its clients that sold firearms — the first major bank on Wall Street to do so. On Tuesday, the bank rolled back that policy. 'We also will no longer have a specific policy as it relates to firearms,' the company said in a statement Tuesday. 'The policy was intended to promote the adoption of best sales practices as prudent risk management and didn't address the manufacturing of firearms.' The decision comes as the Trump administration alleges that Wall Street is biased against conservatives — a right-wing talking point since more than a dozen state auditors accused Bank of America of 'politicized de-banking' in an open letter last year (de-banking is when a bank closes an account for a customer it deems high risk). At the time, Bank of America said it has 'no political litmus test.' On Tuesday, Citi said it was 'following regulatory developments, recent Executive Orders and federal legislation.' In 2018, Citi said it would ban banking services to businesses that sold firearms to those under 21, those who didn't pass a background check, or sold bump stocks (used by the gunman in the 2017 mass shooting in Las Vegas) or high-capacity magazines. The policy applied to small businesses, commercial and institutional clients, and credit card partners, but did not restrict how individual customers used their cards. Big banks have recently caught the ire of the president as well as the crypto industry. In January at the annual World Economic Forum, President Donald Trump scolded Brian Moynihan, the CEO of Bank of America. 'You've done a fantastic job, but I hope you start opening your bank to conservatives, because many conservatives complain that the banks are not allowing them to do business within the bank,' Trump said. 'You and Jamie and everybody… What you're doing is wrong,' referring to JPMorgan Chase head Jamie Dimon. Citigroup also announced on Tuesday that it will update its employee Code of Conduct and its external Global Financial Access Policy 'to clearly state that we do not discriminate on the basis of political affiliation in the same way we are clear that we do not discriminate on the basis of other traits such as race and religion.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data