American B-2 stealth bombers with terrifying capabilities 'are on the move' as Iran tensions heat up
Six B-2 stealth bombers, docked at Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri, appeared to be on the move on Saturday morning, according to Fox News.
The bombers are said to have been refueled, which means they could have launched without full tanks due to the extraordinarily heavy bunker-buster bombs.
The B-2 is capable of carrying a 30,000-pound bomb, which experts have concluded could be the only way to destroy Iran's most heavily fortified nuclear site, Fordo.
The bomb, known as the GBU-57 or the Massive Ordinance Penetrator, is something only the US military possesses.
The Fordo fuel enrichment plant is buried deep within a mountain system in Iran, but experts don't know exactly how deep, which complicates a potential US mission to neutralize it.
Experts who spoke to The New York Times believe the facility at its shallowest is 250 feet deep, but could be as much as 30 feet deeper.
Nonetheless, GBU-57 is the only way to assuredly wipe out the facility, short of using a nuclear device.
These aircraft are capable of carrying a payload as heavy as the 30,000-pound bunker buster bomb (pictured) that the US military could use to destroy a fortified nuclear facility in Iran called Fordo
Jonathan Ruhe, the director of foreign policy for the Jewish Institute for National Security of America, said this type of bomb is designed to use the force of gravity to 'penetrate through any mixture of earth, rock, and concrete before the bomb itself then explodes' underground.
Ruhe told Fox News that the explosion could take out the facility fully or 'collapse the structure' around the target 'without necessarily obliterating it.'
America's possible escalating involvement in the Middle Eastern conflict comes as Israel and Iran have been launching tit-for-tat airstrikes against one another for the last week.
The war between the two countries began when Israel launched what it called Operation Rising Lion on Friday, June 13.
Israel targeted nuclear sites and military sites within Iran, while also killing many of Iran's top military commanders.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the operation against Iran would last 'as many days as it takes.'
'We struck at the heart of Iran's nuclear enrichment program. We struck at the heart of Iran's nuclear weaponization program. We targeted Iran's main enrichment facility in Natanz. We targeted Iran's leading nuclear scientists working on the Iranian bomb. We also struck at the heart of Iran's ballistic missile program,' he said in a seven-minute video released shortly after what Israel called pre-emptive strikes.
So far, Israel's strikes have killed 657 people in Iran, while Iran has killed 24 people in Israel.
Israel's objective, to stop Iran from compiling enough fissile material to make a nuke, cannot be completed until the Fordo facility is destroyed.
That's why Israel has been asking the Trump administration to get involved in the conflict, since the US is the only nation with the capability to strike at Fordo.
For days, Trump has been coy about whether the US will in fact enter the war and fly a mission to Fordo.
On Wednesday, he told reporters who were asking him about it: 'You don't seriously think I'm going to answer that question. Will you strike the Iranian nuclear component?'
'I may do it, I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do. I can tell you this, that Iran's got a lot of trouble. And they want to negotiate. And I say why didn't you negotiate with me before all this death and destruction,' he said.
Trump warned that Tehran has a 'maximum' of two weeks to avoid possible American air strikes if they don't abandon their nuclear ambitions. At a conference on Thursday, Karoline Leavitt said Trump would be making a decision in the next 14 days.
Trump recently publicly disagreed with Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who testified in March that there is 'no evidence' Iran is building a nuclear weapon.
'She's wrong,' Trump said Friday in New Jersey just off to the side of Air Force One. 'My intelligence community is wrong.'
Gabbard has since reversed course and clarified that Iran could produce nukes 'within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the assembly.'
'President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree,' she added.
Back in March 2023, the International Atomic Energy Agency said that some uranium at the Fordo site had been enriched to 83.7 percent purity - dangerously close to the 90 percent level necessary for nuclear bombs.
Fordo is smaller than the Natanz site, which has already been targeted by Israeli strikes.
There are possible complications that could arise if the US strikes Fordo, located 60 miles southwest of Tehran, with the bunker-buster bomb.
As well as being some 260 feet under rock and soil, the site is reportedly protected by Iranian and Russian surface-to-air missile systems.
Those air defenses, however, are believed to have been weakened by recent Israeli attacks.
Additionally, any US strike carries significant political and diplomatic risks for Trump, who has long warned against entangling the US in overseas conflicts.
For example, Russia has warned that US involvement could 'radically destabilize the Middle East.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
DC's liberal residents slam Trump for 'overstepping' with takeover of their city... but admit crime is rampant as troops prepare to flood streets
Despite being up in arms after President Donald Trump 'overstepped' and federalized the local police on Monday, Washington, DC residents admit that crime is a problem. They just don't think Trump's takeover is the solution. The president announced Monday that Washington's Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) will now be under the control of Attorney General Pam Bondi and the Department of Justice (DOJ). In addition, 800 National Guard troops will be deployed in the district to, in Trump's words, 'rescue our nation's capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse.' The forces are expected to appear in town this week and work on shifts to defend the capital around the clock. In over half a dozen interviews with DC locals, most expressed skepticism over the White House 's new initiative while simultaneously telling the Daily Mail that additional resources could help crack down on crime. 'I think it might be an overreaction,' Carson, a young man in his early twenties who just moved to DC, told the Daily Mail. 'I don't think you need like FBI agents to stop violent crime around.' 'Their presence is good if the DC police need assistance ... but I don't think they need to really take over,' another resident said of the troop deployments. 'I've been robbed and everything, but that doesn't mean that we need the National Guard.' While many criticized Trump's move as an overreach, some grudgingly shared that there are challenges facing the city. Jacqueline Turner, a great-grandmother, told the Daily Mail that young people are 'getting kind of outrageous' and sided with Trump on parents being held accountable for their naughty children's bad behavior. 'The young people figure they can do what they want and they're not going to be punished. And that's not right ... Maybe their parents ought to be persecuted, or ... penalized if they can't control their children and raise them decently,' the great-grandmother told the Daily Mail. Mobs of kids in their teens have frequently shown up in popular shopping and dining areas around DC, including the neighborhoods around Navy Yard, the Wharf and downtown, according to local reports. Still, Jacqueline called Trump's move to bring in the National Guard 'ridiculous.' 'He wants to take control of DC,' John, another resident, said. 'Crime has been down as far as I know.' MPD statistics do show that violent crime is down year over year, but many locals still fret over high-profile incidents, like the recent fatal shooting of a congressional intern, a tragedy the president has spoken about. 'Of course, you're going to take precautionary measures,' John added. 'You're going to make sure that you're vigilant about where you're walking.' Recently, a high-profile former DOGE employee nicknamed 'Big Balls' was mugged in DC while out on the town. The assailants severely beat the ex-DOGE aide leaving him bloodied, according to reports. Trump said he was lucky to be alive, but it didn't move residents to support Trump's action. 'He's using that as this catalyst to militarize DC, which is insanity to me,' Tim, a DC resident of 15 years, told the Daily Mail. He called Trump's decision to federalize MPD and deploy the National Guard an 'insane overreach.' 'It's completely unnecessary. It's on something that is completely baseless,' Tim added. Others understood the president's perspective. 'He's doing what he feels like he needs to do, but I don't think he's in DC enough to actually know exactly what's going on in our city,' Daniel shared. 'Have I heard gunshots? Yes,' he continued. 'Have I seen someone like get assaulted? No. Have I seen people get in fights? Yes. Do I feel safe here? 100 percent sure.' But another man named, Rey, offered: 'It's never bad to send more enforcement to help a city that's in need.' It's not much of a surprise Trump's policing initiative fell flat with Washington residents. He won just 5 percent of the vote in the District of Columbia in 2024.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Massachusetts sheriff charged with extortion over $50,000 stock deal with cannabis company
A prominent Massachusetts sheriff has been arrested after federal investigators allege he shook down a national cannabis retailer for more than $50,000 worth of stock before the firm went public. The FBI said it arrested Steven Tompkins, the sheriff of Suffolk county – which encompasses Boston and the outlying counties of Chelsea and Revere – for allegedly threatening to revoke his office's partnership with the company unless it agreed to the deal. Tompkins was also accused of demanding to be repaid after the value of his shares in the cannabis company sank below his initial investment, according to court documents. Agents took Tompkins into custody on Friday in Florida. 'Elected officials, particularly those in law enforcement, are expected to be ethical, honest and law abiding – not self-serving,' US attorney Leah Foley said in a statement. An indictment against Tompkins, who has served as sheriff since 2013, charged him with two counts of extortion under color of official right. Each count carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in federal prison. Described as a 'ubiquitous, glad-handing Democrat in Boston political circles' by the Boston Globe, Tompkins oversees the largest county correctional system in Massachusetts. The sheriff has previously come under the scrutiny of authorities. In 2023, he paid a $12,000 fine for creating a no-bid job for his niece several years earlier and for asking subordinates to run personal errands. He also paid another $2,500 fine for asking business owners to remove his political opponent's campaign signs from their windows. 'Every one of us in elected office is held to a high standard, and whenever there are law enforcement officials that there's anything coming into question with the law, it is a very serious allegation,' said Michelle Wu, Boston's mayor, to reporters on Friday. Tompkins's indictment is likely to cast a spotlight on Massachusetts' legalized marijuana industry, which has come under scrutiny since the state legalized the drug in 2016. Two years before Tompkins's arrest, Massachusetts formed a Cannabis Control Commission after a series of scandals, including the dismissal of its top commissioner for bullying and making racially inappropriate comments. The indictment against Tompkins does not name the cannabis company involved in the alleged plot. But media reports have identified it as Ascend Mass, part of Ascend Cannabis, a multi-state retailer. A close friend of Tompkins, Andrea Cabral, once ran Ascend Mass. According to documents outlining the circumstances of his indictment, Tompkins allegedly told a member of the company he 'wanted to get in on the stock so [he] could make some cannabis money'. He was initially rebuffed but continued to pressure an Ascend official that the company needed his cooperation to renew its license. The company then sold 28,000 shares for $50,000 to Tompkins. They rose in value to $138,403 after Ascend went public in 2021 but later sank below the value of his holdings. Tompkins then allegedly demanded a refund on his $50,000 to pay for 'his campaign and personal expenses'. 'We believe what the sheriff saw as an easy way to make a quick buck on the sly is clearcut corruption under federal law,' Ted Docks, FBI special agent in charge of the agency's Boston division, said in a statement. 'The citizens of Suffolk county deserve better, not a man who is accused of trading on his position to bankroll his own political and financial future. Public servants must be held to the highest of ethical standards, and those falling short will be rooted out.'
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
‘I'm going to Russia': Trump appears to forget Alaska is in US as he frets over facing Putin amid DC crime
President Donald Trump appeared to mix up Russia with Alaska ahead of his meeting with Russian leader Vladimir Putin, during a White House press conference about crime in Washington, DC and his plans to deploy the National Guard and put the city's police under his control. Trump delivered the news from the podium in the press briefing room — joined by Attorney General Pam Bondi, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and newly confirmed DC U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro — where he decried the level of crime in Washington, DC. 'This is a tragic emergency, and it's embarrassing for me to be up here,' Trump told reporters. 'You know, I'm going to see Putin. I'm going to Russia on Friday. I don't like being up here, talking about how unsafe and how dirty and disgusting this once-beautiful capital [is].' Trump is not going to Russia, but rather to Alaska to meet with Putin. He is set to meet with the Russian president to discuss bringing an end to the war in Ukraine that Russia initiated when it invaded the sovereign nation in February 2022. 'The highly anticipated meeting between myself, as President of the United States of America, and President Vladimir Putin, of Russia, will take place next Friday, August 15, 2025, in the Great State of Alaska,' Trump posted last week on Truth Social. The meeting will be the first between a US president and Putin since 2021, when Joe Biden met the Russian president in Switzerland. It's also the first time Putin has been to the US in a decade. This comes despite the fact that Putin is the subject of an arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court. Last week, Alaska's senior Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski expressed her concern, but also cautious optimism, about the meeting taking place in Alaska. 'President Trump announced he will meet with President Putin in Alaska next Friday to continue negotiations to end Russia's catastrophic war in Ukraine,' Murkowski, a supporter of Ukraine, said in a statement. 'This is another opportunity for the Arctic to serve as a venue that brings together world leaders to forge meaningful agreements. While I remain deeply wary of Putin and his regime, I hope these discussions lead to genuine progress and help end the war on equitable terms.' Critics of the announcement flagged the fact that Russia once claimed Alaska at the beginning of the 1770s and had native Alaskans hunt fur for Russians, before the United States purchased Alaska from Russia in 1867. Russians, for their part, hailed the decision to have the summit in Alaska. 'Born as Russian America — Orthodox roots, forts, fur trade — Alaska echoes those ties and makes the U.S. an Arctic nation,' Russia's special economic envoy Kirill Dmitriev said in a statement on X (formerly Twitter). Meanwhile, Konstantin Malofeyev — a billionaire sanctioned by the Obama administration for funding Russian separatists — said Alaskans 'respectfully remember their Russian past and their Orthodox present.' Trump said he wanted to see a meeting take place between Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. But he also expressed his frustration with Zelensky. 'I was a little bothered by the fact that Zelensky was saying, 'Well, I have to get constitutional approval,'' Trump said. 'He's got approval to go into war and kill everybody, but he needs approval to do a land swap, because there'll be some land-swapping going on. I know that through Russia, and through conversations with everybody. To the good, for the good of Ukraine — good stuff, not bad stuff; also some bad stuff for both.' Trump said the negotiations would be very complex. 'And the word that they will use is, you know, they make changes,' he said. 'We're going to change the lines, the battle lines they need. But I want to have a meeting set up between the two leaders.' Trump has found the war in Ukraine to be one of his most vexing problems. In the past, he said he could end it within 24 hours. But despite his antagonistic attitude toward Zelensky and Ukraine, he has at times been frustrated with Putin and has continued to deliver arms to Ukraine.
