Tesla's Musk plans to cut back work with Trump to one or two days per week
Mr Musk said the major work setting up his cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) initiative was done. PHOTO: REUTERS
Tesla's Musk plans to cut back work with Trump to one or two days per week
SAN FRANCISCO - Tesla CEO Elon Musk said on April 22 he will cut back his work for US President Donald Trump to a day or two per week starting sometime in May, after the billionaire's aggressive cost-cutting tactics sparked public backlash and investor concern.
Mr Musk's 130-day mandate as a special government employee in the Trump administration is set to expire around late May.
'I think starting probably next month, in May, my time allocation to Doge will drop significantly,' Mr Musk told investors on a conference call after the electric car marker reported results that topped Wall Street's rock-bottom expectations.
Tesla has faced a troubling few months as deliveries of its ageing line-up of electric vehicles have nosedived, Mr Musk's political activities have drawn protests, and its stock has nearly halved from its December peak.
Many investors had been calling for Mr Musk to leave his work as Trump's adviser and manage Tesla more closely.
Mr Musk said the major work setting up his cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) initiative was done.
Under Mr Musk's leadership and with the stated aim of increasing efficiency, Doge staff upended agencies in a sweeping restructuring that has challenged congressional authority and faced a series of lawsuits.
Mr Musk, the world's richest person, has defended his role as an unelected official who was granted unprecedented authority by Mr Trump to dismantle parts of the US. government.
As of April 22, Doge estimated on its website that it has saved US taxpayers some US$160 billion (S$210.44 billion).
However, the group's calculations have been rife with errors, corrections and incomplete explanations. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
17 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Iran says US attacks on three nuclear sites were ‘savage'
The agency did not confirm whether the sites of Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan had been 'completely and totally obliterated'. PHOTO: AFP Iran says US attacks on three nuclear sites were 'savage' Follow our live coverage here. TEHRAN – Iran's atomic energy agency described US strikes on three key nuclear facilities as a 'savage assault' but pledged not to abandon its nuclear industry after the assault. The 'lawless actions' will not cause 'the development of this national industry to be halted', the Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran said in a statement, according to the state-run IRNA news agency. The agency did not confirm whether the sites of Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan had been 'completely and totally obliterated', as US President Donald Trump said they were in an address from Washington. Iran's nuclear safety authority said it detected no signs of radioactive contamination at the three nuclear sites following the strikes, IRNA said in a separate report. The authority also assessed that there was no threat to residents living near the facilities. Iranian lawmaker Mannan Raisi, who represents Qom – the closest population centre to Fordow – said the facility did not suffer 'serious damage', with most of the impact limited to above-ground structures, the semi-official Tasnim News Agency reported. He added that any material at Fordow that could pose a potential risk to the public 'had already been removed in advance'. BLOOMBERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
33 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Tesla to roll out robotaxis in overdue step toward Musk dream
The launch of a driverless taxi service on June 22 is set to begin modestly, with a handful of vehicles in limited areas of the city. PHOTO: REUTERS NEW YORK – Tesla is rolling out its first robotaxis on the streets of Austin, Texas, after almost a decade of hype from Mr Elon Musk, kicking off a precarious new era for the carmaker. The launch of a driverless taxi service on June 22 is set to begin modestly, with a handful of vehicles in limited areas of the city. Tesla hand-picked initial riders who are expected to offer feedback on the experience, so the general public will still have to wait. The low-key rollout has nonetheless been highly anticipated by investors, who are counting on the new business line to revive a company battered by flagging sales and a consumer backlash against Mr Musk. The Tesla chief executive is betting the company's future on autonomous driving, artificial intelligence and humanoid robots – buzzy but still largely unproven markets. 'This is the first true test,' Mr Gene Munster, managing partner of Deepwater Asset Management, said in an interview. 'Anything that happens will be amplified, especially the negative. There's a lot at stake.' Tesla has ramped up testing recently in the Texas state capital, where Model Y SUVs with manufacturer plates have been spotted regularly in the south and southeast portions of the city. Mr Musk recently promoted a video on social media of one of its vehicles driving in Austin with nobody behind the wheel. Some details of the launch emerged in recent days after several social-media users – known for promoting Tesla – revealed that they were selected for early access to a new robotaxi app and the ride-hailing service. According to the use parameters posted by one account, robotaxis will be available between 6 a.m. and midnight every day within unspecified geofenced areas of the city, not including the airport. The service may be limited or unavailable in foul weather. A 'safety monitor' will be sitting in the front passenger seat for rides during the early access period. Mr Musk has said Tesla would initially roll out 10 to 20 vehicles before expanding to a thousand within a few months, and later introducing a purpose-built Cybercab with no pedals or steering wheel. The CEO has a history of overpromising in the area of autonomy. After hinting at the possibility of an autonomous-car service in a business plan in 2016, he said three years later that Tesla customers would be able to utilize their vehicles as robotaxis by 2020. Tesla has long offered a system called Full Self Driving that, despite the name, requires continual driver supervision and doesn't make vehicles autonomous. The company has said it will operate its robotaxi network using an 'unsupervised' version of the software that will not require a human driver to monitor. Safety is a crucial factor in driverless car operations. Incidents that injure or kill people can bring regulatory crackdowns and negative attention to companies. Cruise, the now-defunct autonomy business of General Motors Co., grounded its fleet in late 2023 and had its operating license suspended in California following an accident that injured a pedestrian. Uber Technologies Inc. ceased testing self-driving vehicles after one of its SUVs struck and killed a pedestrian in Arizona in 2018. Less than three years later, the company agreed to sell its self-driving business. Austin has become a hot spot for autonomous vehicle operations. Waymo, which is owned by Google parent Alphabet Inc., is scaling up in the city through a partnership with Uber. Inc.'s Zoox is also testing there. In Texas, Tesla faces few restrictions to operate autonomous vehicles. Driverless vehicles are required to be equipped with cameras, have insurance and follow traffic rules. A rideshare license in not currently required. At the federal level, authorities are taking steps to ease the deployment of autonomous vehicles without driver controls like steering wheels or pedals. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said this month that it will streamline the process to get an exemption for such vehicles, which under current policy has resulted in lengthy processing times that can last years. BLOOMBERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
33 minutes ago
- Straits Times
With military strike his predecessors avoided, Trump takes a huge gamble
Most importantly, US President Donald Trump is betting that he has destroyed Iran's chances of ever reconstituting its nuclear programme. PHOTO: REUTERS Follow our live coverage here. WASHINGTON – Over the past two decades, the United States has used sanctions, sabotage, cyberattacks and diplomatic negotiations to try to slow Iran's long march to a nuclear weapon. At roughly 2.30am on June 22 in Iran, President Donald Trump unleashed a show of raw military might that each of his last four predecessors had deliberately avoided, for fear of plunging the United States into war in the Middle East. After days of declaring that he could not take the risk that the mullahs and generals of Tehran who had survived Israel's strikes would make a final leap to a nuclear weapon, he ordered a fleet of B-2 bombers halfway around the world to drop the most powerful conventional bombs on the most critical sites in Iran's vast nuclear complexes. The prime target was the deeply buried enrichment centre at Fordow, which Israel was incapable of reaching. For Mr Trump, the decision to attack the nuclear infrastructure of a hostile nation represents the biggest – and potentially most dangerous – gamble of his second term. He is betting that the United States can repel whatever retaliation Iran's leadership orders against more than 40,000 US troops spread over bases throughout the region. All are within range of Tehran's missile fleet, even after eight days of relentless attacks by Israel. And he is betting that he can deter a vastly debilitated Iran from using its familiar techniques – terrorism, hostage-taking and cyberattacks – as a more indirect line of attack to wreak revenge. Most importantly, he is betting that he has destroyed Iran's chances of ever reconstituting its nuclear programme. That is an ambitious goal: Iran has made clear that, if attacked, it would exit the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and take its vast programme underground. That is why Mr Trump focused so much attention on destroying Fordow, the facility Iran built in secret in the mid-2000s that was publicly exposed by President Barack Obama in 2009. That is where Iran was producing almost all of the near-bomb-grade fuel that most alarmed the United States and its allies. Mr Trump's aides were telling those allies on June 21 night that Washington's sole mission was to destroy the nuclear programme. They described the complex strike as a limited, contained operation akin to the special operation that killed Osama bin Laden in 2011. 'They explicitly said this was not a declaration of war,' one senior European diplomat said late on June 21, describing his conversation with a high-ranking administration official. The prime target was the deeply buried enrichment centre at Fordow, which Israel was incapable of reaching. PHOTO: AFP But, the diplomat added, Osama had killed 3,000 Americans. Iran had yet to build a bomb. In short, the administration is arguing that it was engaged in an act of preemption, seeking to terminate a threat, not the Iranian regime. But it is far from clear that the Iranians will perceive it that way. In a brief address from the White House on June 21 night, flanked by Vice-President J.D. Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, Mr Trump threatened Iran with more destruction if it does not bend to his demands. 'Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace,' he said. 'If they do not, future attacks will be far greater and a lot easier.' 'There will be either peace,' he added, 'or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days. Remember, there are many targets left.' He promised that if Iran did not relent, he would go after them 'with precision, speed and skill.' In essence, Mr Trump was threatening to broaden his military partnership with Israel, which has spent the last eight days systematically targeting Iran's top military and nuclear leadership, killing them in their beds, their laboratories and their bunkers. The United States initially separated itself from that operation. In the Trump administration's first public statement about those strikes, Mr Rubio emphasised that Israel took 'unilateral action against Iran', adding that the United States was 'not involved'. But then, a few days ago, Mr Trump mused on his social media platform about the ability of the United States to kill Iran's 86-year-old supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, anytime he wanted. And on June 21 night, he made clear that the United States was all in, and that contrary to Mr Rubio's statement, the country was now deeply involved. Now, having set back Iran's enrichment capability, Mr Trump is clearly hoping that he can seize on a remarkable moment of weakness – the weakness that allowed the American B-2 bombers to fly in and out of Iranian territory with little resistance. After Israel's fierce retaliation for the Oct 7, 2023, terror attacks that killed over 1,000 Israeli civilians, Iran is suddenly bereft of its proxies, Hamas and Hezbollah. Its closest ally, Syria's Bashar Assad, had to flee the country. And Russia and China, which formed a partnership of convenience with Iran, were nowhere to be seen after Israel attacked the country. That left only the nuclear programme as Iran's ultimate defence. It was always more than just a scientific project – it was the symbol of Iranian resistance to the West, and the core of the leadership's plan to hold on to power. Along with the repression of dissent, the programme had become the ultimate means of defence for the inheritors of the Iranian revolution that began in 1979. If the taking of 52 American hostages was Iran's way of standing up to a far larger, far more powerful adversary in 1979, the nuclear program has been the symbol of resistance for the last two decades. One day historians may well draw a line from those images of blindfolded Americans, who were held for 444 days, to the dropping of GBU-57 bunker-busting bombs on the mountainous redoubt called Fordow. They will likely ask whether the United States, its allies or the Iranians themselves could have played this differently. And they will almost certainly ask whether Mr Trump's gamble paid off. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
