Russia set to banish WhatsApp in 'digital sovereignty' push
Russian president Vladimir Putin last month signed a law authorising the development of a state-backed messaging app integrated with government services, as Moscow strives to reduce its dependence on platforms like WhatsApp and Telegram.
Anton Gorelkin, deputy head of the lower house of parliament's information technology committee, said in a statement on Telegram that the state-backed app could gain more market share if WhatsApp leaves.
"It's time for WhatsApp to prepare to leave the Russian market," Mr Gorelkin said, noting that Meta is designated as an extremist organisation in Russia. The company's Facebook and Instagram social media platforms have been banned in Russia since 2022 when Moscow sent tens of thousands of troops into Ukraine.
Meta did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Russia has long sought to establish what it calls digital sovereignty by promoting homegrown services. Its push to replace foreign tech platforms became more urgent as some Western companies pulled out of the Russian market after 2022.
The Kremlin this week published a list of instructions from Mr Putin, including an order to introduce additional restrictions on the use in Russia of software, including communication services, produced in so-called "unfriendly countries" that have imposed sanctions against Russia.
Putin gave a deadline of September 1. Mr Gorelkin, referring to Mr Putin's order, said WhatsApp was likely to be among those communication services restricted.
Reuters
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Irish Sun
2 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Putin's cyber spooks who hacked Skripal's family in series of attacks are unmasked by British intel chiefs
RUSSIAN spies who led a series of attacks on Britain have been exposed by UK intelligence chiefs. Whitehall has imposed sanctions on Vladimir Putin's spooks responsible for years of hacking and other actions in the UK. Advertisement 3 Yulia Skripal and her father Sergei were poisoned by Russian spies in 2018. Yulia was also hacked by Putin's spooks before the attack Credit: East2west News The measures target three Others hit with sanctions are believed to be behind bombings and arson attacks in Britain and Europe in retaliation for support for Ukraine. They face a range of restrictions such as having financial assets frozen. Advertisement Read More on UK News Foreign Secretary "The Kremlin should be in no doubt; we see what they are trying to do in the shadows and won't tolerate it.' Spy chiefs are also probing if Russian agents were behind an incendiary device that ignited at a DHL hub in Birmingham last year. Advertisement Most read in The Sun Exclusive Similar incidents have been reported across Europe. 3 Ivan Yermakov is said to have targeted Sergei Skripal's daughter Yulia five years before Russia poisoned her and her dad Credit: Reuters 3 Aleksey Lukashev is also said to have targeted Yulia before she was poisoned with nerve agent Novichok in Salisbury in 2018 Credit: FBI Nato can destroy Russian enclave 'faster than ever', US general warns…as Putin's henchmen say attack would 'unleash WW3'
RTÉ News
6 hours ago
- RTÉ News
What's in the EU's 18th sanctions package against Russia?
The European Union has imposed its 18th package of sanctions against Russia over its war in Ukraine. The package aims at dealing further blows to Russia's oil and energy industry. Here is a rundown of what is included in the latest sanctions package. Oil price cap Central to the package is a lower price cap on Russian oil - a move designed to shrink Russia's energy revenues without disrupting global markets by severing Russian supply entirely. The EU will impose a moving price cap on Russian crude at 15% below its average market price, EU diplomats said. That means a cap of roughly $47.60 per barrel at present, well below the $60 maximum that the Group of Seven major economies have tried to impose since December 2022. The new price cap will come into force on 3 September and a 90-day transition period will apply to existing contracts, the EU said in a press release. The measure aims to ban trade in Russian crude bought at a higher price by prohibiting shipping, insurance and reinsurance companies from handling tankers carrying such crude. The European Union and the UK have been pushing the G7 to lower the cap since a fall in oil futures made the $60 cap largely irrelevant. However, the US has resisted, leaving the EU to move forward on its own, with limited power to enforce the measure because oil is largely traded in dollars, for which payment clearing is controlled by US banks. Shadow fleet and energy trade The EU will no longer import any petroleum products made from Russian crude after a transitional period of six months, although the ban will not apply to imports from Norway, Britain, the US, Canada and Switzerland, EU diplomats said. The EU sanctions also targeted India's Nayara oil refinery with Russia's largest oil producer Rosneft as its main shareholder. The EU also agreed to end the Czech Republic's exemption from the bloc's existing ban on seaborne Russian crude oil imports, after the country fully switched to non-Russian supplies this year. An additional 105 vessels are banned from accessing EU ports and locks, or undertaking ship-to-ship transfers of oil - an effort to shut down the so-called "shadow fleet" of older oil tankers used to transport Russian oil and circumvent sanctions. The EU also put sanctions on a private operator of an international flag registry, and an entity in the Russian LNG sector, the Council of the EU said in a press release, without naming them. In total, the EU has now imposed sanctions on more than 400 shadow fleet ships. Nord Stream Transactions related to Russia's Nord Stream gas pipelines under the Baltic Sea will be banned, including any provision of goods or services to these projects. Financial sector The EU will ban all transactions with Russian financial institutions - already excluded from the global financial messaging system SWIFT. The ban will include transactions with Russia's sovereign wealth fund - the Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF) - as well as its investments. This aims to further restrict Russia's access to international financial markets and foreign currency. EU countries also agreed to lower the threshold for imposing further sanctions on foreign financial and credit institutions that undermine the sanctions or support Russia's war effort. Export bans, new blacklist entries The EU will blacklist 26 new entities for circumventing sanctions, including seven in China, three in Hong Kong and four in Turkey, diplomats said. Certain chemicals, plastics and machinery have been added to the list of goods EU countries cannot export to Russia. Delayed approval The package of sanctions on Russia is the EU's 18th since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Approval was held up for weeks by Slovakia and Malta. Slovakia had demanded guarantees against potential losses from a separate EU plan to ban imports of Russian gas by 2028, and dropped its veto after the EU offered Slovakia some guarantees earlier this week.
Irish Independent
9 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Meta rejects EU's AI Code of Practice and claims Europe is in trouble
The move comes days before the next phase of the AI Act's enforcement comes into effect on August 2nd. 'Europe is heading down the wrong path on AI,' said Joel Kaplan, chief global affairs officer at Meta. 'We have carefully reviewed the European Commission's Code of Practice for general-purpose AI models and Meta won't be signing it. This Code introduces a number of legal uncertainties for model developers, as well as measures which go far beyond the scope of the AI Act.' The move comes days after OpenAI said that it would sign the Code of Conduct, which is a voluntary set of principles intended to guide companies more clearly to be in compliance with the EU's AI Act. While there is no legal requirement on companies to sign the Code, the Commission has indicated that signing up is an advantage for the purposes of signaling trust and a commitment ot 'ethical AI', which could be weighed heavily in public procurement contracts across the EU. Companies that do not sign may also come under closer scrutiny by regulators for signs of non-compliance with the law. Mr Kaplan claimed that European businesses are largely against the EU's AI Act, pointing to a letter signed earlier this month by 44 of Europe's largest businesses, including Bosch, Siemens, SAP, Airbus and BNP, calling for the Commission to pause the law's implementation. 'We share concerns raised by these businesses that this over-reach will throttle the development and deployment of frontier AI models in Europe and stunt European companies looking to build businesses on top of them,' Mr Kaplan said. In Ireland, some startups have complained that the AI Act prevents them from planning products and services that can compete with companies outside the EU. The Dublin-based founder and CEO of an AI startup, told the Irish Independent's Big Tech Show podcast that he felt forced by legal and regulatory uncertainty in Ireland and the EU to register the company he runs from Dublin outside the EU, in Singapore. 'In the circles I'm in, the perception of the EU is that they're going to be too restrictive and go too far when it comes to regulating AI,' said Dr Richard Blythman, a veteran startup creator whose startup facilitates decentralised infrastructure for AI. ADVERTISEMENT Learn more 'It's the lack of clarity about what might be permissible. AI startups building in Europe are at a disadvantage compared to AI startups building internationally because you are more restricted in terms of building on top of one of the leading open source models.' Mr Blythman cited Meta's AI model, Llama, as an example of a major AI model with restrictions for Europeans because of EU rules. 'That's one of the leading open source models, but they released it in Europe with a much more restrictive licence compared to the US. Llama's model is quite permissive in letting you commercialise whatever you build on top of it. But in Europe, the license was more restrictive so that you couldn't commercialise it because Meta was worried about the implications of the EU AI Act. They were worried they may be held liable for any harmful applications that were built on top of it. Rather than take that risk, they just decided to basically shut down commercial activity on top of Llama so that it won't be held liable in Europe.' Last September, Stripe co-founder Patrick Collison and an array of other senior European tech figures penned an open letter to EU regulators and policy makers warning that Europe faced industrial stagnation through overzealous AI regulation. The letter cited a critical report from former European Central Bank president Mario Draghi which argued that over-regulation was strangling EU industry. Mr Blythman said that the problem of regulatory uncertainty is a widespread fear in Irish startups. 'From what I know, there are quite a few startups that are thinking the same thing,' he said. 'I've spoken to other founders that are registering in the US and yeah, it's just really easy for companies to move around the world. It's not so much the specific details of certain regulation, it's just a perception that Europe is not a good place to build an AI startup. In our case, we didn't know the specifics of how we would be restricted, but the direction that regulation was going and the overall consensus on AI in Europe led us to believe that we would be restricted in future if we built here.'
