logo
First climate fee bills pass initial hearing, with concerns

First climate fee bills pass initial hearing, with concerns

Yahoo05-02-2025

Gov. Josh Green's bills to fund Hawaii's climate change response by increasing the state's hotel room tax and dedicating all of the interest from the $1.5 billion rainy day fund were unanimously passed out of a House committee Tuesday, but with concerns that they need 'a lot of work.'
'There's a lot of work to be done on this and the subsequent bill, ' said state Rep. Nicole Lowen, who chairs the House Energy and Environmental Protection Committee, which passed House Bills 1076 and 1077 Tuesday.
'The governor's team, if they want to work on it, needs to put some work in, ' Lowen said. 'We're going to leave it to them to work on it.'
Specifically, Lowen said, 'There's a lot of concerns about what this might be used for. The bill language is extremely open-ended. Climate mitigation and resilience, as laid out in this bill, could apply to almost any project.'
HB 1076—and its Senate companion bill, Senate Bill 1396—would create a Climate Mitigation and Resiliency Special Fund to be paid for by dedicating all of the estimated $66 million interest earned annually on the state's $1.5 billion rainy day fund to address climate change and better prepare for wildfires.
HB 1077—and its Senate companion bill, SB 1395—would create a Climate Mitigation and Resiliency Special Fund and Economic Development and Revitalization Special Fund by increasing the state's transient accommodations tax.
Don 't miss out on what 's happening !
Stay in touch with breaking news, as it happens, conveniently in your email inbox. It 's FREE !
Email 28141 Sign Up By clicking to sign up, you agree to Star-Advertiser 's and Google 's and. This form is protected by reCAPTCHA.
Will Kane, a senior adviser to Green, said in a statement : 'We are open to working with the legislature to more clearly find those parameters and come to an understanding that's going to serve the needs of our residents and future generations.
'The Governor's administration is seeking to establish a fund to address mitigation and resiliency projects across the state that are currently funded, as well as those that need to be funded in the future, ' Kane said. 'And what that entails will definitely evolve over time as we face new and different challenges.'
Green has previously told the Honolulu Star-Advertiser that the state needs at least $200 million annually to respond to climate change, especially following the deadly Aug. 8, 2023, Maui wildfires, which killed 102 people and all but wiped out Lahaina.
Hawaii's visitor industry and business organizations have opposed previous, unsuccessful efforts to increase the TAT alone.
So Green this year wants to use a combination of rainy day fund interest and an increase on the TAT to ease the burden on visitors.
But the tourism industry continues to push back on any increase in the TAT.
The bills that moved out of the House Energy and Environmental Protection Committee on Tuesday are just the first to be heard in the Legislature this year among several others to pay for the state to adapt to climate change.
Others are also aimed at tourists, such as HB 1139 and its companion bill, SB 1458, which would create an 'environmental stewardship fee program ' that would charge only visitors for an 'environmental stewardship license ' that would be valid for one year.
Neither bill specifies how much the license would cost.
The license would allow nonresidents to access state beaches, parks, forests, trails, recreational natural areas and coastlines.
The revenue would be used to 'protect, restore, and manage natural and cultural resources through grants to nonprofit organizations, ' according to both bills.
A new Environmental Stewardship Commission would make recommendations to the state Board of Land and Natural Resources on how to spend the new revenue.
Support for dedicating all of the interest from the rainy day fund and increasing the hotel room tax came from state agencies, including the state departments of Land and Natural Resources, Economic Development and Tourism, Defense, the Energy Office and Green's Climate Advisory Team.
Others in support include organizations such as Coalition Earth, Climate Protectors Hawai 'i, the Pacific Whale Foundation and Care for 'Aina Now Coalition.
The Climate Advisory Team said in written testimony that the hotel room tax would go up to a total of 12 % while 'minimizing any direct financial hit to residents and the most vulnerable populations of our state. … Hawai 'i's tourism industry depends on our state's land and natural resources. Investing now to protect our natural environment and local communities from the devastating impacts of climate-related disasters will help ensure Hawai 'i remains a desirable travel destination for visitors.'
But opposition remains from individuals, Hawaii's tourism industry, the Maui Chamber of Commerce and the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii, which argued in its written testimony, 'Support for a TAT increase is often based on the faulty notion that the effect of the tax hike will fall exclusively on tourists. However, the TAT also directly affects Hawaii residents who need to stay in local transient accommodations when traveling interisland or simply seeking to enjoy a 'staycation.' … (A ) large body of research demonstrates that increasing taxes on tourists can also affect both the competitiveness of Hawaii's tourism industry and the health of local businesses that depend upon tourism dollars—which means the tax affects most, if not all, Hawaii residents, albeit in many cases indirectly. … A study of the Maldives, a country that earns as much as 70 % of its revenue from tourism taxes, found that a 10 % increase in tourism taxes—an amount significantly lower than the increase contemplated in this bill—reduces demand by 5.4 %. To put it plainly, increasing tourism taxes decreases the number of visitors.'
Mufi Hannemann, president and CEO of the Hawai 'i Lodging &Tourism Association, called the proposed higher hotel room tax a 'nearly 20 % increase.'
'Hawai 'i already has the highest tourism tax rates in the nation, a fact consistently reported in national tourism publications, ' Hannemann wrote in opposition. 'Further increasing the TAT risks making our state less competitive as a visitor destination, potentially driving business away at a time when we need to rebuild.'
Instead, he urged the Legislature to better ensure that short-term rentals collect TATs because 'there remains a significant disparity between the TAT collected from transient vacation rentals and the actual number of rented room nights. A more rigorous and targeted approach to enforcement would not only boost TAT revenues but also level the playing field by ensuring that all accommodation providers contribute their fair share.'
Instead of increasing the TAT, Hannemann repeated his call for more popular state attractions to charge tourists to visit them, which already include Diamond Head State Monument among others.
While he served on the Honolulu City Council before being elected Honolulu mayor, Hannemann successfully drafted a plan to charge visitors to access the city's Hanauma Bay, which has helped preserve it as a marine sanctuary.
'There are millions of dollars that could be recouped through such strategies, helping to address the funding goals without placing additional burdens on our lodging industry, ' Hanne ­mann wrote.
Barbara Richards of the ministry group G International Inc. wrote simply, 'let (sic ) God deal with the weather. and let Humans live out their lives. stop messing with Mother Nature.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ukrainian delegation to brief senators amid Russia sanctions push
Ukrainian delegation to brief senators amid Russia sanctions push

Politico

time17 minutes ago

  • Politico

Ukrainian delegation to brief senators amid Russia sanctions push

A Ukrainian delegation is set to brief U.S. senators Wednesday as lawmakers weigh a sweeping sanctions bill targeting Russia and its biggest energy customers, China and India. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), who told POLITICO he organized the meeting with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), said all 100 senators were invited to attend the closed-door session. 'It's a pivotal moment in Ukraine — and crunch time for the Senate on this bill,' said Blumenthal, noting that the legislation now has 82 co-sponsors, evenly divided between Democrats and Republicans. The visiting delegation, he told POLITICO, includes Andriy Yermak, a top adviser to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Ukraine's deputy defense minister, Serhii Boyev, is traveling with Yermack. The sanctions package from Blumenthal and Graham is designed to increase pressure on Russia's wartime economy by targeting countries that buy oil and gas — a move Blumenthal said could be a 'game changer.' He also pointed to recent long-range drone attacks deep inside Russia — dubbed 'Operation Spiderweb' — as evidence of Ukraine's agility and resolve. Those strikes, he said, counter 'a false narrative that Ukraine is losing the war,' and could shift momentum in Washington in favor of increasing aid for Ukraine.'They can strike air bases 4,000 miles from Ukraine; They can hit anywhere,' Blumenthal said. 'Just in the skill and audacity of these attacks, it will rank with the United States raid on Osama bin Laden and the Israeli pager operation as one of the great military achievements in recent years.' Blumenthal said the White House remains hesitant to support the sanctions bill, but the battlefield momentum could sway President Donald Trump and skeptical lawmakers. 'Events will move the White House — and maybe some of the president's friends here,' he said, referring to Graham. 'Congress can … move ahead. [Trump] doesn't have to support it.'

Trump formally asks Congress to claw back approved spending targeted by DOGE
Trump formally asks Congress to claw back approved spending targeted by DOGE

San Francisco Chronicle​

time24 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Trump formally asks Congress to claw back approved spending targeted by DOGE

WASHINGTON (AP) — The White House on Tuesday officially asked Congress to claw back $9.4 billion in already approved spending, taking funding away from programs targeted by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency. It's a process known as 'rescission,' which requires President Donald Trump to get approval from Congress to return money that had previously been appropriated. Trump's aides say the funding cuts target programs that promote liberal ideologies. The request, if it passes the House and Senate, would formally enshrine many of the spending cuts and freezes sought by DOGE. It comes at a time when Musk is extremely unhappy with the tax cut and spending plan making its way through Congress, calling it on Tuesday a 'disgusting abomination' for increasing the federal deficit. White House budget director Russ Vought said more rescission packages and other efforts to cut spending could follow if the current effort succeeds. 'We are certainly willing and able to send up additional packages if the congressional will is there,' Vought told reporters. Here's what to know about the rescissions request: Will the rescissions make a dent in the national debt? The request to Congress is unlikely to meaningfully change the troublesome increase in the U.S. national debt. Tax revenues have been insufficient to cover the growing costs of Social Security, Medicare and other programs. The Congressional Budget Office estimates the government is on track to spend roughly $7 trillion this year, with the rescission request equaling just 0.1% of that total. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters at Tuesday's briefing that Vought — a 'well-respected fiscal hawk,' she called him — would continue to cut spending, hinting that there could be additional efforts to return funds. 'He has tools at his disposal to produce even more savings,' Leavitt said. Vought said he can send up additional rescissions at the end of the fiscal year in September 'and if Congress does not act on it, that funding expires.' 'It's one of the reasons why we are not putting all of our expectations in a typical rescissions process,' he added. What programs are targeted by the rescissions? A spokesperson for the White House Office of Management and Budget, speaking on condition of anonymity to preview some of the items that would lose funding, said that $8.3 billion was being cut from the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development. NPR and PBS would also lose federal funding, as would the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, also known as PEPFAR. The spokesperson listed specific programs that the Trump administration considered wasteful, including $750,000 to reduce xenophobia in Venezuela, $67,000 for feeding insect powder to children in Madagascar and $3 million for circumcision, vasectomies and condoms in Zambia. Is the rescissions package likely to get passed? House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., complimented the planned cuts and pledged to pass them. 'This rescissions package reflects many of DOGE's findings and is one of the many legislative tools Republicans are using to restore fiscal sanity,' Johnson said. 'Congress will continue working closely with the White House to codify these recommendations, and the House will bring the package to the floor as quickly as possible.' Members of the House Freedom Caucus, among the chamber's most conservative lawmakers, said they would like to see additional rescission packages from the administration. 'We will support as many more rescissions packages the White House can send us in the coming weeks and months,' the group said in a press release. 'Passing this rescissions package will be an important demonstration of Congress's willingness to deliver on DOGE and the Trump agenda.' Sen. Susan Collins, chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, gave the package a less optimistic greeting. 'Despite this fast track, the Senate Appropriations Committee will carefully review the rescissions package and examine the potential consequences of these rescissions on global health, national security, emergency communications in rural communities, and public radio and television stations,' the Maine lawmaker said in a statement. Why does the administration need Congress' approval? The White House's request to return appropriated funds is meant to comply with the 1974 Impoundment Control Act. That law created the process by which the president can formally disclose to Congress the appropriated money it intends to not spend. Congress generally has 45 days to review and approve the request, but Vought is arguing that the end of the fiscal year would enable the administration to bypass a vote. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a fiscal watchdog group, said in a 2018 backgrounder that the Senate can pass rescission packages with a simple majority, instead of the 60 votes needed to overcome a possible filibuster. Between 1974 and 2000, presidents requested $76 billion worth of rescissions and Congress approved $25 billion. Bobby Kogan, senior director of federal budget policy at the Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank, said in an emailed statement that the Trump administration was already 'illegally impounding additional funds,' as withholding money has 'always been illegal without explicit Congressional approval.' On CNN on Sunday, Vought insisted that the Trump administration was complying with the law, but it simply had a different view of the law relative to some Democrats. 'We're not breaking the law,' Vought said. 'Every part of the federal government, each branch, has to look at the Constitution themselves and uphold it, and there's tension between the branches.'

The populist right takes a victory lap
The populist right takes a victory lap

Politico

time28 minutes ago

  • Politico

The populist right takes a victory lap

MORAL COMPASS — A who's who of Republican elites is set to gather this evening at the National Building Museum for a swanky gala hosted by American Compass, the institutional home of conservative economic populism in Washington. The black-tie affair is nominally being held to commemorate the fifth anniversary of the think tank, which was founded in 2020 by the conservative economist and former Mitt Romney adviser Oren Cass. But among American Compass's supporters in the capital, the event is broadly understood to represent a victory lap of sorts, marking the ascendancy of Cass's brand of economic populism in the Trump era and the newfound prominence of two of American Compass's primary political allies: Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio — both of whom are scheduled to speak at tonight's event. Yet despite American Compass's success in establishing itself as a buzzy hub of new conservative economic thinking in Washington, the gala comes at a particularly fraught moment for this ascendant wing of the GOP. Cass's brand of economic thinking — which rejects the GOP's traditional mélange of free trade, tax cuts and deregulation in favor of trade protectionism, industrial policy, immigration restriction and a relatively friendlier stance toward organized labor — has made definite inroads in Washington, as the Trump administration's aggressive tariff policies and public courting of organized labor suggest. But the limits of the administration's commitment to American Compass-style populism have been put on stark display in recent weeks thanks to the fight over Trump's 'big, beautiful' domestic spending bill. The legislation, which is currently under consideration in the Senate, includes a slew of decidedly un-populist provisions — tax cuts for corporations and high-earners, rollbacks to Medicaid coverage and funding cuts for food assistance programs for low-income Americans — and has been met with unusually strong resistance among populist-leaning Republicans in the upper chamber, especially Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley, who has publicly opposed the bill's Medicaid cuts. Notably, Cass has also spoken out publicly against some of the bill's tax provisions. In a recent interview with POLITICO Magazine, Cass criticized congressional Republicans for their inability to articulate a coherent economic rationale for proposed tax cuts, calling the negotiation process 'a death march through a series of choices that nobody really wanted to be making.' He also called out the House package for exacerbating America's ongoing 'fiscal crisis' by adding to the national debt — a claim that the Trump White House continues to deny, despite multiple independent estimates showing that the bill would add over $3 trillion to the debt over the next decade. The tension inside the Building Museum will be heightened by the presence of Vance and Rubio, both of whom serve as ambassadors of sorts between the GOP's economic populist wing and the Trump White House. In the Senate, both Vance and Rubio emerged as leading champions of Cass-style economic populism, with Vance taking a stand on tariffs and rail-safety regulation, and Rubio positioning himself as a vocal advocate of targeted industrial policy as a tool for the U.S. to compete with China. Vance's elevation to the No. 2 spot in the administration was also a major win for the cohort: Vance and Cass have been friendly for nearly a decade, Cass told me, dating back to the publication of Hillbilly Elegy in 2016. The two have deepened their political ties in recent years as well, with Vance headlining a conference hosted by American Compass in 2023 and hiring the group's former research director to his Senate office. But now that both men have left the Senate for Cabinet-level roles in the administration, they have had to downplay any ideological daylight between Trump's economic agenda and the conservative populist's vision. That's especially true on tax reform — where American Compass and others in the movement have unsuccessfully urged the administration to raise rates on corporations and high-earners — and welfare cuts, where populist have come out against the 'big, beautiful' bills cuts to Medicaid and other popular social safety net programs. The departure of Vance and Rubio from the Senate has also thrust Cass and his fellow economic populists into another sort of political bind. When acting as a unified bloc in the upper chamber, Vance, Rubio and Hawley (and, to a lesser extent, other populist-curious Republican senators like Tom Cotton and Eric Schmitt) wielded significant leverage over leadership. But with Vance and Rubio now out of the picture, Hawley has been forced into the uncomfortable position of allying with more moderate (and MAGA-skeptical) Senate Republicans like Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski to push populists' preferred changes to Trump's mega-bill. That dilemma points to a broader challenge facing Cass and his fellow conservative populists at the dawn of the second Trump administration. Although American Compass has found champions among a handful of high-profile Republicans in Washington — and, importantly, has made inroads with a broad swath of younger Republican staffers on the Hill — they've yet to win broad-based support among rank-and-file Republicans. In particular, Republicans in the House have kept American Compass's heterodox economic argument at a comfortable arm's length, giving the anti-tax budget hawks in the Freedom Caucus disproportionate power over the economic agenda in the lower chamber. That lack of broad-based political support is partly a function of the relative novelty of American Compass's message — it is, after all, only five years old — and partly a result of the personality of its founder. Cass, a bespectacled and soft-spoken budget wonk, has always appealed more to the self-styled conservative intellectuals in the Senate than he has to the conservative bomb-throwers in the House. Cass is also not a typical go-along-to-get-along creature of the Washington swamp: As his recent criticisms of the 'big, beautiful' bill suggest, he is one of the few MAGA-aligned conservatives in Washington who is still willing to offer principled criticisms of the administration's actions — a tendency that has not always endeared him to White House officials. A self-described policy nerd, he is also something of an odd fit within the smashmouth rhetorical frame of the MAGA mainstream. With all these low-level tensions simmering in the background, the gala represents an opportunity for two of the administration's high-profile emissaries to tend to some sore spots between the White House and the GOP's economic populists. Vance — who is slated to sit for a Q&A with Cass at the gala — has emerged as a particularly adept mediator among MAGA's various factions: In March, he used a similar speech at a high-profile gathering of right-leaning tech figures to broker a truce of sorts between the tech right and the populist-right. In that respect, the Building Museum serves as a thematically appropriate venue for the event. With Trump's domestic policy agenda dangling in a delicate legislative limbo, the administration needs to quickly build some bridges with the party's economic populists to get the bill across the finish line. Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Reach out with news, tips and ideas at nightly@ Or contact tonight's author at iward@ or on X (formerly known as Twitter) at @ianwardreports. What'd I Miss? — Congress finally gets Trump's request to codify DOGE cuts to NPR, PBS, foreign aid: President Donald Trump has sent Congress a request to nix $9.4 billion in current funding for public broadcasting, National Public Radio and foreign aid — the first test of Republicans' willingness to back the administration's gutting of federal agencies. The 'rescissions' memo was officially transmitted today to Capitol Hill, according to Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine), but it has yet to be publicly released. The request now starts a 45-day clock — not counting breaks longer than three days — for Congress to either approve or rebuff Trump's request to claw back funding that's supposed to be flowing now. — Fetterman's chief of staff leaves amid string of departures: Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman's chief of staff is leaving her post, two people familiar with the matter confirmed to POLITICO today. The move is yet another key departure for a congressional office that's been marked by turnover amid mounting questions about the Democrat's health and shifting political persona. Axios first reported Krysta Sinclair Juris' plans to part ways with Fetterman's office. POLITICO has learned Cabelle St. John, who previously served as Fetterman's deputy chief of staff, senior adviser and scheduling director, is taking over as his new top aide. — Navy set to rename ship honoring Harvey Milk amid DEI purge: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is set to rename a naval vessel named after gay rights activist Harvey Milk, with several other ships honoring civil rights activists and women also potentially being rechristened. The move targeting the ship named after the gay rights icon comes as LGBTQ+ communities kick off pride month celebrations across the country. The step furthers Hegseth's agenda to stomp out DEI initiatives at the Pentagon, which has included removing books from service academies and scrubbing some mentions of women and people of color in the armed services from DOD websites. — Musk goes nuclear on Trump's 'big beautiful bill': Elon Musk came out swinging against President Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill' today, slamming the reconciliation package as a 'disgusting abomination' in a massive break from the president just days after stepping away from his role in the administration. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk wrote on his social media platform X. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' Musk, who Trump had tapped to lead the federal expense-slashing Department of Government Efficiency, went on to criticize the bill for setting up Congress to 'increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!)' and saddle Americans with 'crushingly unsustainable debt.' AROUND THE WORLD SPY GAME — Ukrainian spies launched an underwater assault against the pillars of the Kerch Bridge connecting Russia's mainland with Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula, which Moscow has illegally occupied since 2014. 'The underwater supports of the piers were severely damaged at the sea bottom level — 1,100 kg of explosives in TNT equivalent contributed to this. The bridge is in an emergency state,' the Security Service of Ukraine, or SBU, Kyiv's main counterintelligence agency, said in a statement today after the attack. The bridge was closed for transport as of 3 p.m., Russian authorities reported, issuing no more details. The attack on the Kerch Bridge happened just two days after the SBU's daring Spiderweb drone operation damaged dozens of strategic bombers thousands of kilometers inside Russia. The Kerch Bridge was personally opened by Russian President Vladimir Putin in 2018 and today marked Ukraine's third attempt to strike it. QUITTING TIME — Dutch far-right figurehead Geert Wilders announced this morning that his party would quit the government in The Hague, throwing the Netherlands into turmoil. Wilders' Party for Freedom (PVV) left the coalition in a heated dispute over the government's position on asylum. 'No signature for our asylum plans. No changes to the [coalition] agreement. PVV is leaving the coalition,' Wilders posted on X. Prime Minister Dick Schoof announced this afternoon that he'd hand in the resignation of the government to the King, triggering a new election less than a year after his government took office. While the PVV members of the government are resigning, Schoof said that the remainder of the government — including himself — would stay on in a caretaker capacity until there's a new administration. Schoof called Wilders' move 'unnecessary and irresponsible.' But, he said, 'if one party lacks the will to continue [to carry out the government program], you cannot move forward with each other.' The outgoing Dutch government, a coalition between Wilders' far-right PVV, the populist Farmer-Citizens Movement (BBB), the centrist New Social Contract (NSC) and the liberal People's Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD), had scheduled crisis talks this morning to discuss Wilders' demands for stricter asylum measures. Nightly Number RADAR SWEEP AI ANXIETY — While the advent of generative AI has bolstered unconventional uses of large language models like ChatGPT, it has also become a go-to therapist and interpreter for relationship woes. Users appreciate the platform's constant availability for emotional analysis and its stark evaluations of personal conversations. However, WIRED's Megan Farokhmanesh reports that such practices actually promote greater social anxiety in users while inhibiting the growth of their interpersonal communication skills. Privacy concerns also abound as users upload extensive chat records and personal information into the model to have it fully assess their emotional needs. Parting Image Marisa Guerra Echeverria contributed to this newsletter. Did someone forward this email to you? Sign up here.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store