Nolley targets LaHood, prioritizing working-class concerns
Nolley is running as a Democrat for Illinois' 16th Congressional seat in 2026, to represent Northern and Central Illinois, including Rockford, Peoria, Bloomington, Harvard, and Galena.
Nolley took to the local IBEW Hall, where he addressed a crowd of supporters. He accused LaHood of 'being afraid of his constituents.'
'I'm not scared of my community, I'm not afraid to meet with people, to hold meetings and hear different voices, even those that I disagree with, and I think that the incumbent is scared to meet with his constituents,' said Nolley. 'So, I'm just a regular person here to serve the people, and I'm happy to meet with and hear the voices, concerns and issues of regular people. I believe that Darin LaHood is not okay with that.'
'Our politics are broken. Too many politicians have forgotten who they work for. They work for the people, not the big corporations and donor class,' Nolley said a month ago. 'I'm running because it's time for regular people to stand up and say enough is enough. Working families have been hit hard by policies from both parties for decades, and too many people struggle to get by while corruption runs wild in Washington and the ultra-rich have watched their wealth grow to unimaginable levels.'
Nolley has served as executive director of Project First Rate, which works with union contractors and tradespeople, since 2020.
'I'm from a working-class family and grew up working at the local racetrack, in kitchens, retail, and farm fields, not around the powerful and well-connected. I'm here to provide a new vision and opportunity for residents of the 16th, and that campaign begins today,' Nolley said in April.
According to a press release, Nolley 'is centered on protecting Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid; rebuilding American manufacturing and family farms; rooting out pay-to-play corruption; strengthening unions and workers' rights; and investing in policies that make raising a family in today's economy easier.'
Nolley is running against incumbent LaHood (R), Joe Albright (D), and John Kitover (R).
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Fact Check: Viral Stimulus Check Claims for Summer Are False, IRS Will Not Send New Checks This Summer
The federal government has confirmed that it will not be issuing new stimulus checks this summer, debunking circulating online rumors. What Happened: On Friday, the internet was abuzz with rumors that the U.S. government was planning to distribute stimulus checks to certain income brackets in the near future. However, the IRS has clarified that no such legislation has been passed by Congress, and therefore, no new stimulus checks will be issued in the upcoming weeks, reports the Associated Press. Claims that the Internal Revenue Service and the Treasury Department had approved $1,390 stimulus checks for low- and middle-income taxpayers by the end of the summer were also debunked by the IRS. As per the repot, an IRS official stated that this claim is false and no new stimulus checks will be distributed this summer. Earlier this year, the IRS had announced plans to distribute about $2.4 billion to taxpayers who failed to claim a Recovery Rebate Credit on their 2021 tax returns. However, the IRS official confirmed there is no new credit that taxpayers can claim. Republican Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri had introduced a bill in July proposing tax rebates to qualified taxpayers using revenue from tariffs instituted by President Donald Trump. However, this bill has not been passed by either the Senate or the House. Also Read: Public Opinion Divided Over Donald Trump's Tax-And-Spending Law, New Poll Reveals Earlier this year, the IRS announced that it would distribute $2.4 billion to taxpayers who failed to claim on their 2021 tax returns a Recovery Rebate Credit, a refundable credit for individuals who did not receive one or more COVID-19 stimulus checks. The maximum amount was $1,400 per individual. Individuals who had not yet filed their 2021 tax return were required to do so by April 15 in order to claim the credit. According to an IRS official, no new credit is currently available for taxpayers to claim, reports the outlet. Previous stimulus payments were made possible only through legislation passed by Congress. For instance, the relief checks issued during the COVID-19 pandemic were authorized under three major laws: the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, the COVID-Related Tax Relief Act, and the American Rescue Plan Act. Why It Matters: The rumors of new stimulus checks had sparked hope among many taxpayers who are still grappling with the economic fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic. The clarification from the IRS, however, has put these hopes to rest. The absence of new stimulus checks could potentially impact consumer spending, which is a key driver of the U.S. economy. The proposed bill by Senator Hawley, if passed, could provide some relief to taxpayers, but its future remains uncertain. Read Next Independent Voters' Approval Rating Of Donald Trump Plummets, Latest Poll Indicates Image: Shutterstock/Alex Millauer Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Fact Check: Viral Stimulus Check Claims for Summer Are False, IRS Will Not Send New Checks This Summer originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Sign in to access your portfolio
Atlantic
an hour ago
- Atlantic
The Pull—And the Risks—Of Intensive Parenting
This is an edition of The Wonder Reader, a newsletter in which our editors recommend a set of stories to spark your curiosity and fill you with delight. Sign up here to get it every Saturday morning. In 2024, Russell Shaw made the case for the Lighthouse Parent. 'A Lighthouse Parent stands as a steady, reliable guide,' Shaw writes, 'providing safety and clarity without controlling every aspect of their child's journey.' The term, used by the pediatrician Kenneth Ginsburg and others, is a useful rejoinder to the strong pull of intensive parenting. Parents' first instinct is often to give a solution, to get involved, to fix it. It's a natural impulse—'we're biologically wired to prevent our children's suffering, and it can be excruciating to watch them struggle,' Shaw writes. But that mindset is both exhausting for adults and damaging for kids. Instead, try to think of yourself as a lighthouse: ready to illuminate the way when your kid needs you, ready to stand back when they don't. On Parenting The Gravitational Pull of Supervising Kids All the Time By Stephanie H. Murray When so many people think hovering is what good parents do, how do you stop? Read the article. The Isolation of Intensive Parenting By Stephanie H. Murray You can micromanage your kid's life or ask for community help with child care—but you can't have both. Read the article. Lighthouse Parents Have More Confident Kids By Russell Shaw Sometimes, the best thing a parent can do is nothing at all. Still Curious? What adults lost when kids stopped playing in the street: In many ways, a world built for cars has made life so much harder for grown-ups. How to quit intensive parenting: It's the prevailing American child-rearing model across class lines. But there's a better way, Elliot Haspel argued in 2022. Other Diversions
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
NFL's Washington Redskins should restore name, logo says family of Indian chief it was based on
In July 2020, the NFL's Washington Redskins announced it would drop its name and Native American logo, which some deemed offensive. The team adopted the name Commanders in 2022. But the family of the man the logo was based upon — Blackfeet tribal chief John Two Guns White Calf — says no one bothered to ask their opinion. Below, his nephew, Thomas White Calf, tells The Post President Trump's recent support for the team's Blackfeet heritage gives the family hope for the first time that its voice will be heard. Blackfeet Chief Two Guns White Calf was my great uncle and a great American icon. Americans know his face: he was the face of the Washington Redskins for 48 years, until he was cancelled in 2020. Americans once knew his story. Advertisement White Calf defended tribal traditions in our Blackfeet homeland in Montana, where many of us still live today. He went to Washington D.C. where he forced the U.S. government to honor Indian treaties. He served as a model for the U.S. Mint's famous 1913 'Indian head' nickel. White Calf's face is still a collector's item. The family Chief Two Guns White Calf wants his image restored to the NFL team. Getty Images Uncle Two Guns was friends with Teddy Roosevelt Jr., New York Gov. Al Smith and made President Calvin Coolidge a member of the Blackfeet Nation. White Calf was so famous in his era that his death in 1934 was front-page news across the country. Advertisement White Calf became the proud warrior face of the Redskins in 1972, championed by Blackfeet leader Blackie Wetzel and with support of Native Americans across the country. Cancel-culture racists decided at some point they wanted to get rid of Indian images in the public domain. The Redskins and Two Guns were their No. 1 target. White Calf's name was dropped from the Redskins narrative. His life story was erased from history. Even worse: Uncle Two Guns was dehumanized. He was ridiculed as a 'savage and clownish mascot.' The National Congress of American Indians Fund, which led the effort to erase and ridicule Uncle Two Guns, was funded in part by the George Soros foundation. Advertisement They reduced a hero to a clown so they could remove American Indians from American history. Polls by the Washington Post and others showed that 90% of Indians supported the Redskins. Nobody cared what Indians thought. Nobody asked the White Calf family for our opinion. The family of Blackfeet chief John Two Guns White Calf is deeply grateful to President Donald Trump for his bold calls to bring back the Washington Redskins and expose racial injustice. Washington's NFL team is now known as the Commanders. Getty Images Advertisement President Trump cares. And here is our opinion: it is time to correct history and end racial injustice. We ask that the Washington Redskins — still the Redskins to us — work with President Trump to reclaim their rightful name and their proud image of American hero John Two Guns White Calf. We ask that the White Calf family be given a seat at the table. We ask that a Hall of Honor be established within a new Redskins stadium where the public can celebrate Two Guns White Calf, the Blackfeet people and American Indian contributions to the founding of the United States. Finally, we ask that the American Indian never be erased, dehumanized or forgotten again. God Bless the Blackfeet. God Bless President Trump. And God Bless the United States of America.
