Opinion: Keep legal gambling out of Utah
In short, gambling is creating what could be a mammoth health crisis that American governments need to take seriously.
This study examines the growth of sports gambling since the Supreme Court legalized it on the state level in 2018, and it asks important questions about the negative health effects that are silently harming too many individuals and families in the United States.
For Utah lawmakers, this research comes just in time. Sen. David P. Hinkins, R-Ferron, is sponsoring legislation that would make pari-mutuel horse racing and wagering legal in Utah. The bill, SB156, barely passed out of the Senate Business and Labor Committee last week and is headed for the Senate floor. It deserves to be soundly defeated.
Are Utah lawmakers no longer aware of the timeless wisdom passed down by generations who have seen, time and again, how gambling leads to corruption and despair?
If this bill ever finds its way into law, social costs would follow, affecting individuals and families, and Utah no longer would be one of only two states (alongside Hawaii) that hasn't dipped its toe into the foolish wave of legal gambling. Residents of the Beehive State should be thankful they have stood firm so far against this national tide, which feeds off a destructive, something-for-nothing ethic.
The research published in JAMA found that sports wagers have gone from $4.9 billion in 2017 to an astounding $121.1 billion in 2023. This pokes a deep hole into counter-arguments that say legalization was necessary to control and legitimize what has been a vast underground gambling culture. In fact, legalization has acted as leaven, growing and expanding gambling in ways far beyond the small amounts that may have existed before.
Once the Supreme Court issued its 2017 ruling in Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, which struck down a law that prohibited states from allowing or promoting sports gambling, the proliferation started in earnest. Almost overnight, the number of states allowing sports gambling went from one to 38.
The research found a substantial and corollary increase nationwide in the number of online searches related to gambling addiction. These searches included terms such as 'addiction,' 'addict,' 'anonymous' and 'gambling addiction hotline.' They are evidence of desperation on the part of people who have awakened to their own compulsive and destructive behavior patterns. These search terms were especially high in states that have allowed online sportsbooks, letting residents gamble any time they want using computers or smartphones.
The 'key points' section of the investigation report says, 'These findings emphasize the need for public health efforts to study and address the potential harms associated with the rapid growth of sports betting.'
And yet, researchers said, states that reap the financial benefits of legal gambling rarely allocate any meaningful amount toward the treatment or, just as importantly, prevention of those health effects. In most states, the amount set aside is less than $1 million, with many contributing significantly less. That is scandalous.
Meanwhile, as we reported earlier, gambling companies have exhibited predatory behavior toward problem gamblers, often encouraging them to spend more. Last year, The Wall Street Journal said sports betting companies 'deploy so-called VIP hosts who form personal relationships with the biggest spenders, frequently handing out betting credits to encourage gamblers to deposit more of their money.' Often, those big spenders are compulsive gamblers who need help.
The evidence against gambling, and particularly sports betting aided by smartphone apps, is mounting. We agree with Manhattan Institute fellow and City Journal editor Charles Fain Lehman, who wrote last year in The Atlantic that the nation doesn't need any more evidence to shut everything down.
'If the states are 'laboratories of democracy,' then the results of their experiment with sports gambling are in, and they are uniformly negative,' he wrote. 'Better to end the study now than prolong the suffering.'
It's also better to end things now before major sports leagues suffer more gambling-related scandals, such as those that recently affected the NBA, NFL, Major League Baseball and the NHL.
An America that is obsessed with sports should be concerned about the integrity of the games it loves to watch, as well as about the changing nature of sports, where spreads, parlays and proposition bets take precedence over team loyalties.
Most of all, however, the nation should worry about the lives that are being ruined away from the spotlight, and the precious few resources those victims can turn to for help.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
12 minutes ago
- UPI
Intelligence chief Tulsi Gabbard announces cuts to office
1 of 4 | Tulsi Gabbard, director of National Intelligence, speaks during a news conference in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House in Washington, D.C., on July 23. On Wednesday, she announced 40% cuts to staff at the ODNI. File Photo by Eric Lee/UPI | License Photo Aug. 20 (UPI) -- Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard announced Wednesday a plan to cut 40% of her office's staff by October in an effort to save taxpayers about $700 million per year. She said the overhaul of the Office of the Director National Intelligence will reduce "bloat" and refocus the agency's mission "in the most agile, effective and efficient way." Gabbard dubbed the plan ODNI 2.0. "Over the last 20 years, ODNI has become bloated and inefficient, and the intelligence community is rife with abuse of power, unauthorized leaks of classified intelligence and politicized weaponization of intelligence," she said. "Under President [Donald] Trump's leadership, ODNI 2.0 is the start of a new era focused on serving our country, fulfilling our core national security mission with excellence, always grounded in the U.S. Constitution, and ensuring the safety, security and freedom of the American people." Congress created the ODNI to oversee all 18 intelligence community agencies within the U.S. government in 2004 as a response to to the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks in New York City, Washington, D.C., and Pennsylvania. Since its founding, the staff of the ODNI grew to about 1,850, 500 of whom the Trump administration has already cut since the start of the president's second term. In addition to cutting staff, the ODNI won't rehire vacant positions. The cuts will see the duties of the Foreign Malign Influence Center, National Counterproliferation and Biosecurity Center and Cyber Threat Intelligence Integration Center absorbed into the ODNI's Mission Integration directorate and the National Intelligence Council. Additionally the work of the National Intelligence University will now fall under the Defense Department's National Defense University. The External Research Council will be shuttered and the ODNI's facilities in Reston, Va., will be closed and moved to headquarters. This week in Washington President Donald Trump, alongside commissioner of the Social Security Administration Frank Bisignano, shows his signed proclamation marking the 90th anniversary of the Social Security Act in the Oval Office of the White House on Thursday. Photo by Will Oliver/UPI | License Photo
![[LIVE 08/21 at 10:30AM ET] Migrants Tested for Anti-Americanism; Musk Could Be Changing Third Party Plans](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimg.theepochtimes.com%2Fassets%2Fuploads%2F2025%2F08%2F20%2Fid5903879-082125_REC.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
Epoch Times
39 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
[LIVE 08/21 at 10:30AM ET] Migrants Tested for Anti-Americanism; Musk Could Be Changing Third Party Plans
People looking to immigrate to the United States could soon be questioned on just how much they love the country—and could face rejection if it turns out they're anti-American. And in other news, Elon Musk may be changing his plans of creating a new political party to instead back a future presidential campaign for JD Vance, acc...


The Hill
41 minutes ago
- The Hill
GOP senator: US stake in Intel would be ‘step toward socialism'
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), a libertarian-minded Republican, criticized the Trump administration's push to acquire a stake in U.S. chipmaker Intel, suggesting the move would be a 'step toward socialism.' 'If socialism is government owning the means of production, wouldn't the government owning part of Intel be a step toward socialism?' Paul said on Wednesday in a post on the social platform X. 'Terrible idea,' he added, linking to a news story about the latest effort. The Trump administration is in talks to secure a 10 percent stake in the company, which would make the U.S. government one of Intel's largest shareholders. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said Tuesday that the money for the stake would come from previously allocated Biden-era funding. Media reports have suggested that the stake would be in exchange for converting grants pledged to Intel under the CHIPS and Science Act. 'The president figures out that we should get, America should get the benefit of the bargain,' Lutnick told CNBC's 'Squawk Box.' 'I mean, that is exactly Donald Trump's perspective, which is, why are we giving a company worth $100 billion this kind of money?' he continued. 'What is in it for the American taxpayer? And the answer Donald Trump has is we should get an equity stake for our money.' Paul has long pushed for the federal government to play a smaller role in the daily lives of Americans and the U.S. economy. He voted against Trump's legacy-defining policy bill, citing concerns about increased spending and the national debt.