More than 150 staff at airport operator Daa earned over €150,000 last year
Daa
earned above €150,000 each last year, figures show.
Official figures also reveal the chief executive at the group, which runs Dublin and Cork airports and other subsidiaries, is not the organisation's highest-paid staff member in 2024.
Last year one unnamed person had total remuneration of between €475,000 and €500,000. The company's chief executive Kenny Jacobs received a total package of €374,830.
In a statement, Daa said it was a commercial business that received no public funding. It said it had to compete internationally for key personnel.
READ MORE
Eamon Ryan
, then minister for transport, set out remuneration levels for the top earners at Daa in an appendix to a submission sent last summer to a government-appointed pay review for chief executives of commercial state companies.
Mr Ryan's submission, which has been released by the
Department of Transport
, were based on figures for 2023.
Those figures showed three staff were paid more than the chief executive, who that year received total remuneration of €347,457. The three were paid between €350,000 and €375,000.
The document showed 137 personnel received total remuneration of more than €150,000 each in 2023.
Mr Ryan's submission to the senior posts remuneration committee said that 3,864 personnel at Daa group earned less than €50,000, although this included part-time staff.
He said remuneration for CEOs varied across international competitors in the aviation sector.
Mr Ryan noted the head of Fraport, which runs Frankfurt Airport and has contracts at 30 others worldwide, had a total package of €1.65 million while the head of Aena, the state company that manages 46 airports in Spain, was paid €186,575 in 2023.
Daa's annual report for 2024 showed 152 people received €150,000 or more last year.
In addition, 88 employees were paid between €125,000 and €150,000, while 187 earned between €100,000 and €125,000.
The company said: 'The State does not fund the remuneration of Daa staff, as Daa operates as a commercial business and receives no public funding.
'Aviation is a global industry and Daa competes for talent against other international airports and aviation businesses, as well as international retailers.
'Daa is a multinational commercial enterprise with operations in 14 countries across four continents, with several CEOs and management teams.'
The annual report said Mr Jacobs received total remuneration of €374,830 last year – up from €347,457 the previous year. It said this figure included basic salary of €284,235 and pension contributions and other taxable benefits of €90,595 . It said Mr Jacobs did not receive a director's fee.
Last month the Cabinet accepted many of the recommendations of the senior post remuneration committee.
Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers said the upper limit on any proposed package would be the market rate .
However, there would be no backdating of any increases to May 1st of last year, another committee recommendation, and no reintroduction of performance-related bonuses worth up to 25 per cent of salaries, which was also proposed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Irish exports to US drop by 60% in June as effects of Trump's tariffs take hold
Irish goods exports to the US fell sharply in June as Donald Trump's restrictive trade policies impacted the State's transatlantic trade. Latest trade figures from the Central Statistics Office (CSO) show the value of exports from Ireland to the US dropped by almost 60 per cent between May and June, falling from €10.8 billion to €4.4 billion. The June figure was also down by almost a quarter on the same month last year. Exports of pharmaceuticals to the US surged in the first quarter of 2025 as companies stockpiled product in the US ahead of Mr Trump's so-called Liberation Day tariffs announcement on April 2nd. READ MORE The latest figures reflect a levelling off in that surge. [ From pharma to food, the known unknowns of Trump's EU tariffs deal Opens in new window ] 'Ireland's exporters may have dodged a punishing 30 per cent US tariff, but the 15 per cent blanket rate still marks a step-change from the trading conditions of a year ago,' Alex Deaton, junior dealer at global financial services firm Ebury, said. 'Even with firms now benefitting from some certainty, the reality is a far more restrictive environment, one that is going to have knock on consequences for Irish businesses and the economy,' he said. The products that accounted for the largest share of exports to the US were chemicals and related items at €3.2 billion, miscellaneous manufactured articles at €622 million and machinery and transport equipment at €412 million, representing 72.3 per cent, 14.3 per cent and 9.5 per cent of total exports to the US in June. The (unadjusted) value of total goods exports (to all export markets) increased by €801 million (4.8 per cent) to €17.5 billion in June compared with same month last year. Exports for April, May, and June, which comprised the second quarter, were valued at €63.1 billion, up €9 billion (+16.5 per cent) compared with the same period of last year. However, the quarterly total was down €26.1 billion (-29.2 per cent) on the first three months of 2025 because of the volatile US trade. The CSO noted, however, that the value of goods exports for the first six months of 2025 was still up by 41 per cent at €152 billion compared with the same period of last year (€108 billion).
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Former director of Victoria Homes agrees deal with company liquidator to set aside some funds from sale of home, court told
An injunction restricting Patrick (Paddy) Byrne, former director of Victoria Homes Ltd, from dissipating personal assets below €605,536, arising from the sale of his mansion-style home in Co Kildare, was lifted in the High Court today after he had given an undertaking to set aside the money. Barrister Michael Connolly told Mr Justice Liam Kennedy that an agreement had been reached between Byrne and Aidan Garcia, the appointed liquidator to Victoria Homes, whereby €605,536 arising from the sale of Oldtown Manor, Oldtown, Athgarvan, Co Kildare, would be lodged to the account of Byrne's solicitor. Mr Connolly, counsel for the liquidator, said a second court order directing Byrne to disclose all bank accounts in Ireland or worldwide in which he had any direct or indirect legal or beneficial interest, could also be lifted. The restraining injunctions and court directions had been granted by Judge Kennedy against Byrne following the proposed sale of Byrne's Oldtown Manor home which, Mr Connolly had previously told the court, had an estimated value of €2.75 million. READ MORE Mr Connolly, who appeared with William Fry Solicitors, had earlier told Judge Kennedy that it had come to the notice of the liquidator, Mr Garcia, that Byrne intended to sell Oldtown Manor. The court heard that Byrne was the registered owner of Oldtown Manor and, although Byrne claimed he was not the beneficial owner, no evidence had been provided to substantiate this claim. Judge Kennedy had been told that Byrne was claiming Victoria Homes had ceased trading in 2020 but Mr Gardia had highlighted company transactions that had taken place since that time. These, he said, included payments out of a significant company loan to Byrne as well as a company payment of €80,000 rent (to his mother) and €72,000 for the purchase of a Range Rover by the company for his personal benefit. Rather than engaging with the liquidator, the court had been told Mr Byrne had adopted the attitude that 'when the time arises it can be clarified in court.' Mr Connolly, making the earlier applications ex parte, said the liquidator feared that the proceeds from the sale of Oldtown Manor could be dissipated below the €605,536 being claimed as due from Byrne to Victoria Homes. Judge Kennedy struck out the previous court orders on foot of the undertaking by Byrne, who was legally represented in court today.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Manager sacked after ‘joke' sext on colleague's phone gets reduced WRC award
A tribunal has made a reduced award for losses from unfair dismissal to a manager sacked after he admitted taking a colleague's phone and sending her husband a 'sexually explicit' text message as 'a joke'. In an anonymised decision just published, the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) upheld a complaint under the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977 against the man's former employer after concluding it was 'too extreme' to declare that the man's conduct was 'at the high end of sexual harassment'. He said he was being made the 'fall guy' for a workplace culture of 'sexual comments and innuendo' at the financial services company as he pleaded to its board to be let keep his €60,000 a year job, the tribunal heard. The tribunal heard that in January 2024, the complainant took one of his direct reports' mobile phones from her desk and sent a 'sexually explicit WhatsApp message to her husband', which the other worker, Ms A, found out about as she left to go home. READ MORE The complainant 'owned up' and claimed it was 'meant to be a joke', the tribunal noted. Ms A raised it with the CEO of the organisation as soon as he returned from leave, telling him she and her husband considered the message 'vulgar and disgusting'. The text of the message was not included in a WRC decision document published on Friday. The CEO called the claimant to a meeting and suspended him with pay a week after the event, the tribunal heard. The tribunal noted the evidence of the CEO that another senior employee, Ms B, who came to the suspension meeting as a witness, remarked afterwards: 'I can't believe this is happening again.' The CEO told the tribunal he had forgotten about a previous similar incident involving the same manager in September 2022, and told Ms B: 'If we're to do anything about this, I need it documented.' Ms B later wrote a letter of complaint setting out that she had left a personal device in the company's finance office when she went on holiday in September 2022 so a colleague could use a banking app installed on it, the tribunal heard. While she was away, the man had posted 'two sexually offensive messages' on her social media account, the complaint letter stated. Ms B made contact with the manager and told him not to use the banking app, as she feared the phone was 'hacked'. The complaint letter set out that the complainant 'pretended to be serious at first, and then he began laughing and [said] he had posted the messages as a joke', the tribunal heard. Ms B wrote in her complaint letter that she was 'extremely annoyed', but after arranging with the CEO for a dedicated mobile phone for the finance office, took the matter no further. Michael Kinsley BL, appearing instructed by Daniel O'Connell of Kean's Solicitors in the matter, told the Commission the company had failed to examine the position advanced by his client about the 'culture and behaviour of staff in the organisation', which he said had been 'treated dismissively' at all stages. Mr Kinsley said the investigation was 'biased and prejudged' and the decision to dismiss 'wholly unfair and disproportionate'. Lauren Tennyson, for the company, instructed by Sarah Conroy of Beale & Co, said the employer took the view that the external investigator had made 'extremely serious' findings at the 'higher end' of sexual harassment and that the complainant's behaviour 'warranted dismissal for gross misconduct'. Adjudication officer Catherine Byrne wrote in her decision: 'I do not wish to minimise the impact that the incidents had on the two employees,' she wrote. However, she noted that the complainant and Ms B remained friends after the September 2022 incident, while Ms A had stated she had 'just kind of got on with things'. She considered it reasonable that both women would be angry, embarrassed and shocked at the complainant's behaviour, and that it amounted to sexual harassment. However, the conclusion reached by the company investigator that it was a 'high severity of sexual harassment' was 'too extreme' a view, she wrote. She considered it unfair that the employer included the 2022 incident with Ms B's phone in its probe 'to bolster a case for the dismissal of the complainant', having taken no action about it at the time, she wrote. Ms Byrne also found there were 'serious failings' with the process followed by the employer. They 'failed in their duty to properly consider the complainant's defence' – having spent at most 20 minutes considering the worker's position before deciding to dismiss him. Ms Byrne upheld the complaint of unfair dismissal and awarded the worker €22,500 in compensation. She wrote that this was 30 per cent of his estimated losses of €73,500, calculated on the basis that the claimant was out of work six months and was now earning €314 a week less than he had with his former employer.
