logo
Trump's moves toward taking over Washington are unprecedented. Here's what the law says

Trump's moves toward taking over Washington are unprecedented. Here's what the law says

CTV News5 hours ago
National Guard troops and the U.S. Capitol Police keep watch as heightened security remains in effect around the Capitol grounds in Washington, March 3, 2021. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
WASHINGTON — U.S. President Donald Trump took unprecedented steps toward federalizing Washington, D.C. on Monday, saying it's needed to fight crime even as city leaders pointed to data showing violence is down.
He took command of the police department and deployed the National Guard under laws and Constitutional powers that give the federal government more sway over the nation's capital than other cities. Its historically majority Black population wasn't electing its own city council and mayor until 1973, when Republican President Richard Nixon signed the Home Rule Act.
The measure still left significant power to the president and Congress, though no president has exercised the police powers before.
He activated the National Guard
The Constitution calls for the creation of the District of Columbia to serve as the federal seat of power under the jurisdiction of Congress rather than any state.
While the Home Rule Act allowed for greater local control, the president can still call up the National Guard in Washington. His administration did it during Black Lives Matter protests in 2020, when members were later faulted for flying a helicopter too low over a crowd. The Guard was called out again during Trump's first term on Jan. 6, 2021, when his supporters overran the Capitol.
Trump's second-term moves in Washington come as the legal battle continues over his deployment of the National Guard in another Democratic-led city, Los Angeles, despite the objections of Gov. Gavin Newsom.
His authority is less clear there, but an appeals court has so far refused to intervene. A lower-court judge was starting a trial Monday to determine whether the deployment violated another federal law.
He took over the police
Section 740 of the Home Rule Act allows for the president to take over Washington's Metropolitan Police Department for 48 hours, with possible extensions to 30 days, during times of emergencies. No president has done so before, said Monica Hopkins, executive director of the ACLU of Washington.
Trump cited a number of recent high-profile incidents, including the killing of a 21-year-old congressional intern and the beating of a DOGE staffer during an attempted carjacking.
'This is liberation day in D.C. and we're going to take our Capitol back,' the president said.
The Democratic mayor of D.C., Muriel Bowser, called the takeover 'unprecedented.' She said that violent crime overall in Washington has decreased to a 30-year low, after a rise in 2023. Carjackings, for example, dropped about 50 per cent in 2024, and are down again this year. More than half of those arrested, however, are juveniles, and the extent of those punishments is a point of contention for the Trump administration.
He didn't specify how long it would last
It wasn't immediately clear how long the takeover might last or exactly what it might mean. It could also face challenges in court.
Congress still has power over things like the budget and laws passed by the city council, but would have to repeal the Home Rule Act to expand federal power in the district.
It's something a few Republican lawmakers have pushed to do, but such an overhaul would almost certainly run into steep resistance from most Democrats, making it difficult to achieve.
The law is specific to D.C., and doesn't affect other communities around the U.S. referred to as having their own 'home rule' powers in relationship to their state governments.
Hopkins said Trump's moves in Washington could foreshadow similar tactics in other cities. 'That should alarm everyone,' she said, 'not just in Washington.'
Lindsay Whitehurst, The Associated Press
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Federal judge refuses Trump administration's request to release Ghislaine Maxwell transcripts
Federal judge refuses Trump administration's request to release Ghislaine Maxwell transcripts

National Post

time2 hours ago

  • National Post

Federal judge refuses Trump administration's request to release Ghislaine Maxwell transcripts

New York — A federal judge on Monday rejected the Trump administration's request to unseal grand jury transcripts from the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell, the convicted accomplice of sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Article content District Judge Paul Engelmayer said there is little in the transcripts that is not already in the public record, and they do not identify anyone other than Maxwell and Epstein as having had sexual contact with underage girls. Article content Article content The Justice Department had sought to release the transcripts to help defuse spiralling anger among President Donald Trump's own supporters over what they have long seen as a cover-up of Epstein's crimes and high-level connections. Article content Article content 'Its entire premise — that the Maxwell grand jury materials would bring to light meaningful new information about Epstein's and Maxwell's crimes, or the Government's investigation into them — is demonstrably false,' he wrote. Article content 'Insofar as the motion to unseal implies that the grand jury materials are an untapped mine lode of undisclosed information about Epstein or Maxwell or confederates, they definitively are not that,' the judge said. Article content 'There is no 'there' there.' Article content The Manhattan-based judge also cast doubt on the Trump administration's motivation for seeking the public release of the Maxwell transcripts and suggested it was 'disingenuous.' Article content Article content 'A member of the public, appreciating that the Maxwell grand jury materials do not contribute anything to public knowledge, might conclude that the Government's motion for their unsealing was aimed not at 'transparency' but at diversion — aimed not at full disclosure but at the illusion of such,' he said. Article content Article content Maxwell, 63, is serving a 20-year sentence after being convicted in 2021 of recruiting underage girls for Epstein, who died in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting trial for sex trafficking. Article content Her lawyers had opposed releasing the transcripts, saying it could potentially impact her ongoing legal appeals of her conviction. Article content The Justice Department is also seeking the release of the secret grand jury transcripts in Epstein's case. That request is being handled by a different judge. Article content Trump's supporters have been obsessed with the Epstein case for years and have been up in arms since the FBI and Justice Department said last month that the wealthy financier had committed suicide while in jail, did not blackmail any prominent figures, and did not keep a 'client list.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store