PM Modi Concludes Visit To Croatia After Meeting Top Leadership
Zagreb:
Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Wednesday concluded his visit to Croatia, where he held talks with the Balkan nation's top leadership on a range of issues to boost bilateral ties.
PM Modi, who is the first Indian prime minister to visit Croatia, was here on the last leg of his three-nation tour.
"PM @narendramodi emplanes for New Delhi after concluding three-nation tour to Cyprus, Canada and Croatia," the PMO posted on X.
PM @narendramodi held talks with President Mr. Zoran Milanović in Zagreb, Croatia. The leaders reaffirmed their resolve to deepen India-Croatia relations in sectors such as trade, culture and more. @Ured_PRH pic.twitter.com/vSJXIJLapJ
— PMO India (@PMOIndia) June 18, 2025
He arrived in Zagreb earlier in the day and was received by Prime Minister Andrej Plenković at the airport.
PM Modi held delegation-level talks with Plenković and met President Zoran Milanovic to discuss a range of issues to boost bilateral ties.
PM Modi said he and his Croatian counterpart have decided to give a "three-time" pace to the bilateral ties and said a plan would be made to boost defence cooperation between the two countries.
External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, National Security Adviser Ajit Doval and Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri were present during the talks.
The two nations also signed four memoranda of cooperation in the areas of agriculture, culture, and science. Another memorandum was signed between the ICCR and the University of Zagreb, related to the study of Indology.
He reached Croatia from Canada, where he attended the G7 summit and held talks with several world leaders.
In his address at the Summit, the prime minister told the leaders of the seven-nation bloc that India's neighbourhood has become a breeding ground for terrorism and turning a blind eye towards the challenge would be a "betrayal of humanity". He also sought action against Pakistan for its support of cross-border terrorist activities.
He had earlier visited Cyprus as part of the tour, where he held wide-ranging talks with Cyprus President Nikos Christodoulides.
During his visit, PM Modi and Christodoulides also viewed from atop a building the mountains near Nicosia, which are under Turkish control, signalling a message to Turkiye, which had openly supported Pakistan during the recent conflict with India.
His visit to Cyprus assumed significance in the wake of the island nation's strained ties with Turkiye.
This was his first foreign visit after India carried out Operation Sindoor in May during which it destroyed terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir in retaliation to the Pahalgam attack.
During his visit, PM Modi was conferred with the Grand Cross of the Order of Makarios III of Cyprus, the country's highest civilian honour.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Wire
33 minutes ago
- The Wire
India's Disastrous Isolation Around the World
It is pretty clear now that Prime Minister Narendra Modi will probably not join the elite G7 meeting in Alberta, Canada, scheduled from June 15 to 17. Alberta is not among the cities he seems to have seen so far in his 152 foreign visits to 72 countries in the last 11 years. So, it's a bit of a miss on both sides. However, what he may miss more is not being able to hug the new Canadian PM, Mark Carney (what a relief, after that hostile Trudeau!), the new German Chancellor, Friedrich Merz, and his known leaders, like PM Keir Starmer of the UK, French President Emmanuel Macron (after that dreadful family incident) and PM Shigeru Ishiba of Japan. One is not certain if the glamorous Italian PM, Giorgia Meloni, would welcome a public embrace. As for US President Donald Trump – even he does not know whether he'll hug Modi for photo ops, or punch him for denying repeatedly and vociferously that he brokered the Indo-Pak ceasefire. Best to stay clear of him while he plans how to pocket Canada as the 51st American is rather strange (and sad) that a fortnight before the big meet, there is no invitation sent to Modi. After all, he has been a fixture there, rubbing shoulders with the creme de la creme of the world's most powerful capitalist nations, who also flaunt their highest per capita GDP. It really did not strike his enthralled supporters back home that the USA has crossed USD 80,000 as GDP per person. Even the doddering Japan's per capita GDP is USD 32,000, while the sauntering India's is around USD 2,800. We hope the snobs did not use this tiny detail to stop Viksit Bharat at the club may, as well, utilise these pencil-marked 'G7 days' in his diary to flag off some more trains and fire some deadly guns at the opposition in Bihar, since buddy 'Dolun' Trump will not let him point the big guns towards Pakistan. Where Modi is concerned, everything is mumkin and he could actually plan a visit to Manipur after 25 long months, now that his tight schedule is annoyingly relaxed. Or, he may pose for some grim photos in Pahalgam's pristine but now infamous Baisaran Valley, where the clime is almost like Alberta's. There's some talk that he may actually prefer the sunny beaches of the whodunnit mystery deepens – who could have actually stopped Modi from hanging around and twiddling his thumbs as a guest, while the seven hosts attend to their more serious G7 business? After all, he has been attending these upper crust meets for the last 6 years. According to media reports, Canada has invited the political heads of Australia, South Africa, Brazil and even Ukraine, but not India. A good guess is that pesky Khalistanis pressured the Canadian PM not to invite Modi. But can Sikhs, who are just 2.1% of Canada's population, wield such disproportionate clout? It is believed that many (if not most) of them are not in favour of violence or of Khalistan. Or, is it that Canada's police and security don't want messy and TV-magnified anti-Modi demonstrations at the venue? The Five Eyes intelligence-sharing group, consisting of the US, the UK and its three white country cousins – Australia, Canada and New Zealand – were mighty cut up with India after the killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, the Khalistani separatist leader in Canada. Like the UN Security Council, there is a closed door cabal of a handful of nations, the intelligence agencies of which are authorised to eliminate their enemies, wherever they be. Other than the CIA and MI-6, as well as FSS (Federal Security Service), Russia's successor of its deadly KGB, there is darling Israel's Mossad. But others are a strict no-no. This could be a signal by G7 to Modi to start behaving more diplomatically and within his station in life. This may explain why India had absolutely no country on its side, when it attacked terrorist bases deep inside Pakistan – after the unpardonable slaughter of 26 innocents at Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir. Only two arms suppliers, Russia and France, made some interesting noises, but the remaining 70 countries of the world that Modi has visited (in some cases, many, many times) remained mute spectators. It appears strange as they had assiduously supported India's innumerable international resolutions against terror. Obviously, our foreign office miscalculated, busy as it is in converting every Indian mission abroad into an extension camp for core Hindu values. They keep sharp watch on the many brilliant minds among the NRIs and OCIs lest they speak a bit too much in favour of democracy, secularism or constitutional propriety. Off then go their heads (Indian visas) if the conscientious OCIs doth speak too true. Shopkeepers, big businessmen, street-smart deal-makers and even truck drivers, labourers and sweepers of Indian origin abroad – legit or otherwise – have no such worries from our missions, as most are smitten by the infallible leader and swear by him. Never in Indian history have Indian missions abroad been viewed so strangely – like the Chinese or the Russian ones – despite the superb quality of most Indian diplomats and our long tradition of being a plural democracy. They are, after all, being cajoled into this by their former tribal chief, who acts more and more cranky since he was catapulted to the foreign minister's hot seat. He was selected precisely because he knows his flock and can ensure – a la Amit Shah – that there ain't no conscientious dissenters in this vast global network, that now spews whatever boss-man wants. Orders are orders – even if they mean glib-talking about Adani's dubious deals in, say, Kenya or Bangladesh – the backlash for both of which India faces today. One of the biggest irritants that hapless diplomats face nowadays is to work in tandem with the overseas Hindu Right and the 'Friends of India' organisations to round up Indians and fill stadiums when Modi visits. Nothing thrills him more than to address them in massive numbers – amidst wild cheers. Never mind that the expensive jamboree with Trump at Houston in 2019 has more than backfired and the 2023 event in Sydney was a starkly visible flop. Of course, several specific money-ony Indian social groups go into raptures at the very sight of the big man. But what about the impression left behind among the citizens and ruling groups in those countries? In many, Indians are usually accused of ghettoising and only chasing wealth, with little participation in community activities and in integrating. Foreigners there are as delighted as (say) Bangaloreans would be if a Bangladeshi ruler addressed huge numbers of legitimate visa-holding Bangladeshis there. Think of the backlash – because our external affairs ministry has stopped doing so. It looks stumped when it gets zero friends for any worthy cause. Indians were usually viewed in western countries as a peaceable, hardworking lot – unlike those from the Middle East. Monotheistic foreigners looked on as Hindus worshipped their multitude of gods – with Hare Krishna being the most prominent. Hinduism was seen as a less pronounced or disruptive foreign religion. Not any more. With the rapid growth of ostentatious, overwhelming Swaminarayan and associated temples everywhere, and the 'big bang' that follows, the older, quieter temples like those of Ganesh or Vishnu or Devi have been beaten into obscurity. No one pondered over the impact of extra-loud assertions on foreign soil of a religion that is increasingly being viewed as aggressive and intolerant of the world's two biggest religions. Hindu bashing has just begun and, god forbid, may get worse. The friendly Indian, in fact, the sentimental South Asian community that banded together, is now split into fierce groups – which does not enhance a nation's popularity. Loud protests by a vocal and powerful diaspora that takes umbrage at locals or at other brown people for the slightest insult further alienate foreigners about Indians. Anti-Indian demonstrations are on the rise – against attacks on minorities in India or for reasons that protestors consider condemnable. These were usually viewed by Indian diplomats as an occupational hazard. But, nowadays, the sound and ferocity with which each is shouted down by an undiplomatic foreign minister – to please his new Hindu extremist party, its members and the boss – again startles the more diplomatic diplomats. Not a single country or major leader has escaped the wrath of India's current foreign minister – who usually expresses his unduly-aggressive statements in the very countries he may recall how Nehru's pontifications on the big bad Cold War and the holier-than-thou attitude of Indian leaders and ambassadors were torn apart by both blocs. But now, the world sniggers at India's high flaunting principles and statements on world peace and democracy made by a regime that has the lowest credibility abroad. Not one country is India's friend and even a badly-cornered Pakistan has at least three strong supporters – two of which matter a lot. Trump 2.0 is an unmitigated disaster where India is concerned, but while lesser economies like Canada, Mexico and even Brazil gave him large pieces of their mind — and China outstared and out-dared him — India is viewed as a wimpy cringer. We have no Plan B and we refuse to play the China card to cut him to size. Besides, while the media and parliament in India have been beaten into silence by Modi about China's slaughter of 20 Indian soldiers at Galwan in Ladakh and its continued occupation, the whole world has seen how Modi has shied away from retaliation. He has, in fact, rewarded China thereafter, by almost doubling imports – from USD 65 billion in 2020. India's trade deficit with China has surged from USD 50 billion to almost USD 100 billion. Snapping at other countries at the every provocation is not self assertion, but surrendering economically to China is looked down upon by the informed world – but not by Modi's fans in India and (say) in the USA. India's untenable stand at the UN during the Russian invasion of Ukraine, just because Indian private sector refineries were making a cool additional profit of USD 30 billion in 2022-23, was intensely disliked by most countries. India's slimy support to Israel, that is carrying out an extermination programme in Gaza, may be overlooked by obscenely-rich autocratic Sheikhs, but not by conscientious citizens and countries all over the world. Now, we get why India was diplomatically isolated, as never before. It is puerile even to ask whether there is any chance that the seven so-called all-party delegations to 32 countries may swing the world in India's favour. Some 59 MPs and others – representing mainly the ruling alliance and establishment, as well as some who play footsie with them, may sing together with a few handpicked opposition MPs during their vishwa darshan. But we are stuck where we were. Modi has proved once again that Curzon was a child in the 'divide and rule' game and in one stroke, he has satisfied many whining ruling party loyalists who he could not give ministerial berths. But knowing MPs a bit leads me to believe that heart-burning would lap up the disproportionately meagre cost-benefits of the largest parliamentary exercise in global tourism.A couple of hours spent by these teams with a handful of 'intellectuals' or 'policy makers' in distant Congo, Guyana or Latvia are unlikely to convince 32 nations to clap for India and against Pakistan. The literal occupation of the Kashmir valley for five years from 2019 rankles just too many, as does the non-stop minority-bashing by cowardly religious fanatics. India's annoying arrogance-cum-swagger, which is well above its weight and strength, is quite clear to most well-read citizens and leaders across the globe. It is India and its leadership at home that has to introspect and make course corrections. Perhaps, Dale Carnegie's immortal How to Win Friends and Influence People, now priced at just Rs 120, may Sircar is a former Rajya Sabha MP of the Trinamool Congress. He was earlier Secretary, Government of India, and CEO of Prasar Bharati.
Hindustan Times
37 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Hindi default 3rd language in Maharashtra schools unless 20 students pick alternative
Mumbai: Hindi will not be a compulsory third language in Maharashtra state board schools, but it will be the default choice unless at least 20 students in a class opt for an alternative language, according to a government resolution (GR) issued late Tuesday. This comes months after the Maharashtra government's proposal to make Hindi compulsory starting from Class 1 triggered widespread criticism from educationists and opposition political parties, who considered it an imposition of Hindi and an undermining of Marathi. The revised order has reignited criticism of the Bharatiya Janata Party-led Mahayuti government on the topic, with experts and opposition leaders saying it was in effect a backdoor entry of the compulsory-Hindi policy and a betrayal of the Marathi people. As per the new GR, issued by the state school education department, while a third language is mandatory, Hindi will no longer be compulsory. However, it will 'in general' be the third language for Classes 1-5 in Marathi- and English-medium schools. Schools or parents may choose an alternative Indian language, provided that at least 20 students in a class opt for it. If this threshold is met, a teacher for that language will be appointed, or it will be taught online. The GR is part of the ongoing implementation of the State Curriculum Framework for School Education 2024, which is aligned with the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. Critics argued that while the GR appears to offer flexibility, it effectively imposes Hindi by making it difficult to opt for other languages. 'This is again the compulsion of Hindi in another form,' said an education expert, pointing out the practical hurdles in securing a teacher for a different language or getting 20 students per class to opt for it. The new directive appears to contradict the statements of state education minister Dadaji Bhuse in April, assuring that Hindi would not be imposed. After a GR proposing Hindi as a compulsory third language from Class 1 triggered widespread backlash, Bhuse had said that Hindi would no longer be mandatory in the early grades. He later said that the government had received suggestions to introduce Hindi from Class 3 instead, adding that the decision was being reconsidered. He had also said that the three-language formula was 'on hold'. Education experts expressed strong dissent over the new GR. 'The government wants to come in through the back door and crush Marathi children by burdening their fragile brains with Hindi,' said Ramesh Panse, senior educationist and member of the steering committee for the State Curriculum Framework. 'The parents of Marathi children should foil this plot. Political parties that claim to support Marathi must wake up and oppose this policy on a large scale to protect Marathi students.' Vasant Kalpande, former director of school education, argued that the requirement for 20 students to opt for a non-Hindi language and the provision to teach such languages only online are veiled attempts to discourage their selection. 'Although Marathi and Hindi share a similar script, it is too much to expect young students to understand the differences and nuances between them at such an early age,' said Kalpande. He added that Hindi is not a compulsory third language in states like Gujarat and Assam. Deepak Pawar, founder of the Marathi Bhasha Abhyas Kendra, which works to promote the Marathi language, accused the Maharashtra government of breaking its promise. 'The government has betrayed the Marathi people. If we stay silent now, it will pave the way for dismantling the federal structure and erasing the legacy of the Samyukta Maharashtra movement,' he said.
New Indian Express
42 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
50 years on, Emergency victims in Kerala await official recognition
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: A long 50 years after what's termed the dark age of Indian democracy, thousands of Emergency victims in Kerala are yet to be officially recognised. As many as 13 states have accorded them Emergency victims' status, providing them monthly pensions, with Odisha being the latest to announce it this January. Despite Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan himself being a victim, the state government has curiously been unfavourable towards the demand. Ironically, in a first, the CPM plans to observe an anti-Emergency day on June 25 this year on the 50th anniversary of Emergency. Though there are no official data available, it has been estimated that currently around 5,000 people including those arrested or who took part in protests during the 1975 regime, are alive today in Kerala. On its 50th anniversary, the victims continue to knock at the doors of the state government as well as the Centre for acknowledgement of their status. The Emergency Prisoners Coordination Committee had approached both the CM and CPM general secretary M A Baby — another emergency victim — a few weeks ago with their long-standing demand. The government, however, turned down their request, citing a 2019 HC order that had then referred the matter to the Union government. The EPCC had also long wanted the history of Emergency and the resistance it faced, to be made part of school curriculum, with the Emergency torture camp at Sasthamangalam as a memorial. 'Shouldn't the younger generations know that India underwent a dark age for democracy, not long ago? Having resisted it, the Left has an added responsibility to consider these requests. Several other state governments have accorded the victims such a status; why then can't Kerala accord us political prisoner status?' asks P C Unnichekkkan of the EPCC. On the 50th anniversary, the EPCC plans to hold a dharna raising these demands, chips in Dhanuvachapuram Sukumaran of EPCC. It was Punjab's Akali Dal government, which first recognised these prisoners as secondary freedom fighters in 1980 and provided them pension. Later many states followed suit, with the Odisha government being the latest to provide monthly pension of Rs 20,000 to those imprisoned during Emergency.
