Living in the poorest areas of England could cut five years off your life
Living in the poorest areas of England could cost you almost five years of your life, a report on ageing has revealed.
Men living in the poorest areas of the country can expect to live 4.4 fewer years on average than those living in the wealthiest areas of England. While women live 3.7 years fewer on average.
But when comparing the life expectancy of individual local authority areas, the gap grows even wider to a full decade for men and eight years for women.
These stark differences in life expectancy were highlighted in the State of Ageing report 2025 by the charity Centre for Ageing Better.
Regional inequalities in health are growing, with the bottom fifth of local authority areas in terms of wealth overwhelmingly in the north of England and predominately in urban areas.
Meanwhile, the richest fifth are almost exclusively made up of local authorities from the Midlands, the East of England, London and the South East and are significantly more likely to be rural.
The average life expectancy at birth for men in the local authority areas with the lowest incomes in England is 77 years compared to 81.4 years for men living in the wealthiest.
For women, the average life expectancy at birth in areas with the lowest incomes is 81.2 years, compared with 84.9 years in the highest.
At the local authority level, men living in the district of Hart in Hampshire (83.4 years) can expect to live a full decade longer than men in Blackpool (73.1 years) while women in Kensington and Chelsea (86.5 years) can expect to live almost eight years longer than women in Blackpool (78.9) for women.
To tackle this 'deadly postcode lottery ', the Centre for Ageing Better is calling for the creation of an independent Commissioner for Older People and Aging to create a focus for government departments to reduce inequality later in life.
The charity is also calling for a reversal of cuts that have reduced the public health grant by a quarter over the past eight years.
'Living in a part of the country where good quality jobs and opportunity is scarce, and where financial insecurity and poverty is rife, is robbing people of their health in later life and depriving them of years spent with loved ones. This is the true human cost of our very unequal society,' Dr Carole Easton OBE, chief executive at the Centre for Ageing Better, said.
She added: 'Coordinated, urgent action is needed across government, society, and communities to put us back on the road to recovery. A commissioner for older people and ageing is urgently needed to lead those efforts. Everyone benefits when older people can live fulfilling, engaged, independent lives in age-friendly societies.'
However, it's not just life expectancy that matters when it comes to measuring the nation's health and prosperity – the length of time that's lived in good health also matters.
Healthy life expectancy at birth has undergone a striking decline in England as a whole and in all regions except for London, with the proportion of life spent living in good health at its lowest since 2013.
The charity warned this will have economic implications because health expectancy determines how long we can stay in work, with repercussions for our financial security in later life and our requirements for health and care.
For the period between 2021 to 2023, the average healthy life expectancy in England was 61.5 years for men and 61.9 years for women. So, on average, a man in England can expect to live 78 per cent of his life in good health while the proportion for a woman is 74.5 per cent.
The report also highlighted that older people living in local authority areas with the highest proportion of residents on low incomes are almost three times as likely to be disabled than those living in the areas of the country with the lowest proportions.
People aged 50 to 64 living in Blackpool are almost three times as likely to be disabled (32 per cent) as people living in Elmbridge in Surrey.
A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'Life chances and life expectancy should not be determined by your postcode. Through our Plan for Change, we are shifting focus from sickness to prevention, targeting the drivers of ill health and catching the biggest killers earlier.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
02-05-2025
- Metro
'I was flying high in the corporate world - then I turned fifty'
Sally Wilse was an executive in a global corporation, leading teams and holding her own in the boardroom. She helped the company grow into a successful multinational with 50 offices across the world, and was certainly a force to be reckoned with. But then, as Sally entered her fifties and the menopausal hot flashes and sweats descended, her career took an unexpected turn. 'I absolutely adored my job. I launched some fantastic careers with young people, but when I started my menopause, I had no idea what was going on with me,' Sally tells Metro. 'I was having hot flushes in the boardroom and looking back, I can imagine there might have been a lot of scepticism around the things I was saying because my face was flushing.' Sally, now 63, had been working at home in Canterbury when she was asked to prepare an internal presentation about her recent business wins. Smartly dressed, she came into the office excited to see her team and share her achievements, only to learn her day would go very differently. Instead of heading to the boardroom, a 40-year-old male colleague took her into an office and told her they wouldn't be talking about her successes after all. 'My heart was racing,' remembers Sally. 'He told me that it would be my last day with the company and that he would take my job. I asked: 'What are you talking about? I've been here for ten years. I'm doing so well. On what grounds?' And he replied: 'We just feel you don't fit anymore.' 'I was beside myself. I had pride, so I held back the tears until I got on the train home.' Sally decided to accept her contractual package and try to move on. 'I felt terrible, and for some reason, ashamed. My whole life was turned upside down because I wasn't going to work the next day,' she explains. 'The stigma around that and the fact that it felt like it was handled so poorly affected my mental health.' Sally spoke to a lawyer who advised against an ageism case because 'there would be no public appetite', and with her confidence broken, she backed down. Being told someone over 50 isn't 'the right fit' is a familiar line trotted out in corporate Britain, according to recent research which has found that a 'worryingly high' proportion of the country believes ageist myths around older workers' competency and value. An Age Without Limits campaign survey revealed that assumptions around older workers' ability persist, with many of those in the 50-plus bracket feeling patronised, ignored and dismissed. It found that one in four people believe it does not make business sense to employ someone over 50 because they will be slow and unable to adapt. Meanwhile, over 20% think it is a waste of resources to give on-the-job training to someone 50-plus, according to the survey commissioned by national charity the Centre for Ageing Better. 'The proportion of people who fail to see the value and benefits of employing people in their 50s and 60s is worryingly high, but sadly also not surprising,' Dr Carole Easton OBE, Chief Executive at the Centre for Ageing Better, tells Metro. 'It is so dispiriting that these attitudes persist when older workers have such potential to tackle skills shortages, help businesses thrive and grow our national economy. 'It is also concerning that the prevalence of ageist attitudes is higher among people with the highest educational qualifications, who are most likely to make decisions around hiring, promoting and developing workers who are in their 50s and 60s. Little wonder that older workers are less likely to receive in-work training, are more likely to be made redundant and experience greater difficulties finding work.' Ralph Fergusson-Kelly sent out around 250 applications and went to countless first and second interviews after his job was made redundant at the age of 57. Ralph had been general manager of an engineering business in Yorkshire on a salary just shy of six figures. He had an MBA, nearly 40 years of experience working his way up the ranks and a packed CV when the division he'd been working for shut down. Having planned on working until his mid-sixties, Ralph embarked on a job hunt. 'I knew I wouldn't walk into one, but I felt confident. My company did offer me a job in the existing company, but in a different division, at a level very similar to the one I joined 15 years previously. So it was a sort of non-offer offer with a pay cut of 40%,' he tells Metro. However, Ralph, from Monmouth, remained open-minded about taking a role further down the ladder and was willing to relocate for the right role, but as the months – and then years – went by, he had no luck. Soon, there were glaring gaps and no dates on his CV, while one recruiter even told him he was too old for the job when they met face to face. 'He said: 'I know they're looking for someone younger.' I asked him if he was allowed to say that. But what can you do about it? It was demoralising,' remembers Ralph. 'It feels like age discrimination legislation is only of value for people who are applying for another job in the same organisation, so you know the other people who are applying. 'It was letter after letter, application after application. After a few months, I started to feel quite down about it, and I couldn't enjoy my spare time. I spent three years looking – you get tremendous highs and lows, often very close to one another. 'I'd get a second interview for a job, having ticked every box on the advert, and I would think I had got it, then I'd go for the interview and have to chase them to get a reply, which would be: 'Another candidate more closely matched our client's requirements'. After that, you can't help but feel down and dispirited. 'It was starting to get to me,' adds Ralph. 'It's all you can think about: Can I face another trawl online through the advertisements? You can't concentrate on anything else.' After three fruitless years, Ralph gave up and took early retirement. Now at 67, he is happily enjoying not working, focusing instead on motorbiking, the odd holiday and acting as a 'house husband' while his wife works – but he says many of his friends from university were 'thrown on the scrap heap' before they were ready. 'It was a frustrating experience and it was only after drawing the line under the job search that I realised the weight I was carrying around,' he admits. 'But I've dumped that now and can get on with the rest of my life. It was quite a relief not to be looking for jobs. Although my retirement finances were impacted by being laid off, I had enough savings that I could eke out. I'm far luckier than many people.' Sally, meanwhile, is grateful for her humiliating and unceremonious rejection from a job she'd loved, because without that experience, she wouldn't have gone on to set up a company that supports older people in the workplace. After spotting an article about an American company called 'Seniors Helping Seniors', she set up a franchise in the UK in 2011 and now recruits workers to provide in-home care to keep old people independent and in their homes. The average age of her carers is 59, but they hire younger support workers as well as one who is 80. The programme is popular with former police officers, firefighters and business owners, among others, says Sally. 'The idea is that a client will relate well to a carer of similar age, because they've got a lot in common and plenty to talk about,' she explains. 'My husband and I started to hire older people as carers to run the domiciliary care company in Canterbury, and then we rolled that out as a franchise in the UK, and we've now got ten offices, employing people who are at the end of their careers and are looking for local jobs.' More Trending Sally recently met with a potential franchise partner who had taken early retirement from a hugely successful corporate position. 'I told him about my experience and he said: 'Why do you think I'm here?' He saw the writing on the wall in his role and noticed how he was he was told 'the ideal person would have been younger than you' when promoted, so he negotiated his exit before he was pushed out. He has fifteen years left of management in him and is now looking forward to using his skills to do something good. 'I never saw what was on the cards when I was made redundant at 50, but how I can relate to other people as a result now is fantastic,' Sally adds. 'So I'm very grateful it happened to me because I am so proud of what I am doing now. 'Everybody wants to be purposeful, and older people can use their experience to help others. Especially as they bring life experience to the table and a work ethic that is second to none.'
The Independent
25-03-2025
- The Independent
Living in the poorest areas of England could cut five years off your life
Living in the poorest areas of England could cost you almost five years of your life, a report on ageing has revealed. Men living in the poorest areas of the country can expect to live 4.4 fewer years on average than those living in the wealthiest areas of England. While women live 3.7 years fewer on average. But when comparing the life expectancy of individual local authority areas, the gap grows even wider to a full decade for men and eight years for women. These stark differences in life expectancy were highlighted in the State of Ageing report 2025 by the charity Centre for Ageing Better. Regional inequalities in health are growing, with the bottom fifth of local authority areas in terms of wealth overwhelmingly in the north of England and predominately in urban areas. Meanwhile, the richest fifth are almost exclusively made up of local authorities from the Midlands, the East of England, London and the South East and are significantly more likely to be rural. The average life expectancy at birth for men in the local authority areas with the lowest incomes in England is 77 years compared to 81.4 years for men living in the wealthiest. For women, the average life expectancy at birth in areas with the lowest incomes is 81.2 years, compared with 84.9 years in the highest. At the local authority level, men living in the district of Hart in Hampshire (83.4 years) can expect to live a full decade longer than men in Blackpool (73.1 years) while women in Kensington and Chelsea (86.5 years) can expect to live almost eight years longer than women in Blackpool (78.9) for women. To tackle this 'deadly postcode lottery ', the Centre for Ageing Better is calling for the creation of an independent Commissioner for Older People and Aging to create a focus for government departments to reduce inequality later in life. The charity is also calling for a reversal of cuts that have reduced the public health grant by a quarter over the past eight years. 'Living in a part of the country where good quality jobs and opportunity is scarce, and where financial insecurity and poverty is rife, is robbing people of their health in later life and depriving them of years spent with loved ones. This is the true human cost of our very unequal society,' Dr Carole Easton OBE, chief executive at the Centre for Ageing Better, said. She added: 'Coordinated, urgent action is needed across government, society, and communities to put us back on the road to recovery. A commissioner for older people and ageing is urgently needed to lead those efforts. Everyone benefits when older people can live fulfilling, engaged, independent lives in age-friendly societies.' However, it's not just life expectancy that matters when it comes to measuring the nation's health and prosperity – the length of time that's lived in good health also matters. Healthy life expectancy at birth has undergone a striking decline in England as a whole and in all regions except for London, with the proportion of life spent living in good health at its lowest since 2013. The charity warned this will have economic implications because health expectancy determines how long we can stay in work, with repercussions for our financial security in later life and our requirements for health and care. For the period between 2021 to 2023, the average healthy life expectancy in England was 61.5 years for men and 61.9 years for women. So, on average, a man in England can expect to live 78 per cent of his life in good health while the proportion for a woman is 74.5 per cent. The report also highlighted that older people living in local authority areas with the highest proportion of residents on low incomes are almost three times as likely to be disabled than those living in the areas of the country with the lowest proportions. People aged 50 to 64 living in Blackpool are almost three times as likely to be disabled (32 per cent) as people living in Elmbridge in Surrey. A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'Life chances and life expectancy should not be determined by your postcode. Through our Plan for Change, we are shifting focus from sickness to prevention, targeting the drivers of ill health and catching the biggest killers earlier.'
The Independent
25-03-2025
- The Independent
Mapped: The stark north-south divide in UK life expectancy – and where men and women are dying younger
Men across the country are, on average, living four fewer years than women – but there are stark disparities across the UK, new analysis shows. Research from the Centre for Ageing Better found from 2021-2023, the average life expectancy at birth is 79 years for men and 83 years for women. The charity's 2025 State of Ageing report found men living in the bottom fifth of areas of the country in terms of wealth can expect to live 4.4 fewer years on average than those living in the wealthiest areas of England. The difference in life expectancy for women in the top fifth and bottom fifth of areas in terms of wealth has now reached an average of 3.7 years. There is a clear north-south divide in average life expectancy at birth across England, the report found. The lowest life expectancy at birth for men and women is in the North East (77.4 and 81.4 years respectively), according to the Centre for Ageing Better. The map below shows the life expectancy for men and women in every local authority across the country. The highest life expectancy is in the south east – 80.3 for men and 84.1 for women, the charity found. When drilling down to the level of local authorities, the area with the lowest life expectancy for both men and women is Blackpool (73.1 and 78.9 years respectively). Men living in Hart in Hampshire have the highest life expectancy (83.4 years), more than 10 years longer than men in Blackpool, analysis from the charity found. The highest life expectancy for women (86.5 years) is in Kensington and Chelsea in London. This is almost eight years longer than for women in Blackpool. The 2025 State of Ageing report also found the 10 local authorities with the highest life expectancies at birth for men and women are all in the south of England, and the 10 local authorities with the lowest life expectancies are in the north of England and the Midlands. However, areas in the north of England, such as North Yorkshire, Ribble Valley and Westmoreland and Furness have higher life expectancies than the national average for both men and women. There are also areas in the south of England, such as Folkstone and Hythe, Eastbourne and parts of London, that have lower life expectancies than the national average. Dr Carole Easton OBE, Chief Executive at the Centre for Ageing Better, said: 'The substantial regional inequalities highlighted in our new State of Ageing report are truly a matter of life and death. Living in a part of the country where good quality jobs and opportunity is scarce, and where financial insecurity and poverty is rife, is robbing people of their health in later life and depriving them of years spent with loved ones. This is the true human cost of our very unequal society. 'The really worrying trend is that inequality in life expectancy is increasing almost everywhere. The bombardment of shocks from austerity, Covid and the cost-of-living crisis have compounded longer-term health and inequality issues to ensure we truly are the sick man of Europe.' Dr Easton said urgent action was needed across government, society, and communities 'to put us back on the road to recovery.' 'A Commissioner for Older People and Ageing is urgently needed to lead those efforts. Everyone benefits when older people can live fulfilling, engaged, independent lives in age-friendly societies,' she said. A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'Life chances and life expectancy should not be determined by your postcode. Through our Plan for Change we are shifting focus from sickness to prevention, targeting the drivers of ill health and catching the biggest killers earlier.'
