Fact checking Fox News claims on crime rates and migration in Ireland
In the TV piece, Fox News alleged that Dublin has gone from being one of the safest cities in Europe in 2003 to one of the most dangerous in 2024.
To support this claim, Fox News showed a screenshot of an article published in 2024 by the Irish newspaper Sunday World titled "Dublin ranks among the top ten most dangerous major cities in Europe, survey claims."
However, when investigating the claim, EuroVerify found that the article uses data sourced from a survey carried out by online betting platform the OLBG (Online Betting Guide).
"The main reason why this research was conducted was to reveal the best cities in Europe for nightlife, and as part of the study, safety scores for each city were analysed", a spokesperson for the OLBG told EuroVerify.
The reliability of the survey is questionable given that OLBG sourced its data from Numbeo, a platform which relies on crowd-sourced data and warns there is no "assurance that any statement on the website is correct or precise."
Meanwhile, the Global Peace Index, which is produced by the Australian-based NGO, the Institute for Economics & Peace, has consistently ranked Ireland as one of the safest countries in the world, placing it in second position in 2025.
Rising crime in Ireland
During the piece, the channel aired two graphs side by side on screen — on the left one showing rising immigration in Ireland, while the one on the right displayed figures for rising crime — in turn implying that there is a causal link between migration and crime.
Contacted by EuroVerify, Ireland's Department of Justice said that it was not "aware of any credible evidence that would suggest a causal link between immigration and crime in Ireland."
"Over the past 10 years there has been a large increase in the numbers of non-Irish people employed in Ireland. They bring essential skills and experience that are much needed in the current labour market. There has been no corresponding change in crime levels over this period," the spokesperson added.
Ireland experienced unprecedented levels of immigration in the year leading up to April 2024, with a population increase of 98,700, which amounts to positive net migration of 79,300, meaning that more people have been arriving in Ireland, than those leaving.
Fox News also stated that robberies had increased by 18% and violent crime by 10%. However, these selected crime and robbery statistics are misleading because the country's statistics office does not classify crimes under the broad labels of "robbery" and "violent crime."
More specifically, the 18% figure cited by Fox News appears to refer to an increase in "robbery, Extortion & Hijacking" from the first quarter of 2023 to the first quarter of 2024, while the 10% figures refer to an increase in crime incidents involving "weapons and explosives offences."
What the segment fails to mention is that other crimes decreased between the first quarter of 2023 and the same period of 2024, with homicide and sexual offences dropping by 8% and 12% respectively.
How disinformation is fuelling hate crimes in Ireland
Over the course of the summer, a spate of brutal attacks predominantly targeting South Asian migrants occurred in Ireland.
"A series of highly publicised, very violent attacks targeting members of Ireland's Indian community have spread fear. A lot of the attacks were initiated by misinformation and disinformation, for instance through lies spread about crime", Teresa Buczkowska, the CEO of Immigrant Council of Ireland told Euronews.
On 19 July, an Indian man was attacked by a group of men in southwest Dublin, who beat him and accused him of inappropriate behaviour with children.
While Irish authorities stated that the allegations against him were unfounded, footage of the aftermath of the attack spread online according to Irish broadcast RTE, leading the footage to gain traction as anti-immigration accounts reshared it.
This led the country's Indian embassy to issue a safety warning to its citizens following what it qualified as "an increase in the instances of physical attacks reported against Indian citizens in Ireland recently."
"Everything changed after the Dublin riot in 2023, when we saw a huge level of violence erupting in Dublin city centre against migrants and that really kind of was the starting point for the physical violence we are seeing today", said Buczkowska.
"The shifting narrative we are hearing in politics and false allegations that migrants are raising crime rates are leaking into everyday conversations and opinions, which is a worrying trend", added Buczkowska.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
7 hours ago
- LeMonde
Sylvie Kauffmann: 'Putin can pretend to negotiate and engage in endless talks that never lead anywhere'
A bilateral meeting lasting under three hours, followed by a 12-minute joint press conference with no announcements: The Friday, August 15, summit between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in Alaska left many questions unanswered. By Saturday morning, as European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky began reacting, Le Monde columnist Sylvie Kauffmann spoke with readers during our live coverage of the war in Ukraine. Pierre: Diplomacy is sometimes a theater, with each side seeking to claim success and assign blame in case of failure. Trump had gotten us used to breaking with tradition. Today, he is acting out a classic scenario. Isn't that already a sign that this summit has failed? Sylvie Kauffmann: Calling the summit a failure depends on what was expected of it. If people were hoping Vladimir Putin would commit to a serious ceasefire, then yes, it was clearly a failure. But I do not think that was a reasonable expectation. At this stage, with no results announced, it is neither a success nor a failure. We will have to judge based on the reactions of Europeans, so far very cautious, and the Trump-Zelensky meeting on Monday. There is, however, a significant risk, well known to Europeans: Putin can buy time by pretending to be ready to negotiate and engage in endless talks that never lead anywhere, while his army continues to gain ground and bomb Ukraine. That was essentially the tactic he used after the annexation of Crimea and the first invasion of Ukraine in 2014, during the Minsk negotiations with France, Germany and Ukraine. Let's discuss: How should we interpret the welcome given to President Putin as he came off his plane – with the red carpet, applause and a show of military strength featuring American jets in the background? S.K.: Trump is fascinated by Putin as a figure – he generally gets along well with "strongmen," but he is particularly interested in the Russian leader. He calls him by his first name, Vladimir, which he never does with Zelensky. All of this staging, on a US military base, was meant both to demonstrate American power to Putin and to treat him as the leader of another major power, worthy of every honor. This treatment is all the more ironic since Putin is not only the aggressor of an independent country, in violation of international law, but also subject to an arrest warrant for war crimes. Dodochampion: On the Russian side, did this summit have any other ambitions beyond relaunching Russia's international trade? S.K.: Putin's goal at this summit was first to gain respectability and second to buy time. On both counts, he succeeded: The welcome by the US president on American soil, with great ceremony, rehabilitated him on the international stage, even if he is a pariah in Europe. Furthermore, by engaging in this form of dialogue with Trump, he managed to get the ultimatums and the threat of further sanctions against Russia lifted – at least for the time being: Trump said on Fox News that the issue of sanctions was off the table for two or three weeks. That matters to Putin because the Russian economy is showing serious signs of weakness. And in the meantime, he can keep bombing Ukraine and continue his offensive in the east of the country. On the other hand, Putin failed to turn this meeting into a major Russo-American summit on economic and trade relations or on strategic dialogue regarding arms control. Nice: The statements from Trump and Putin were devoid of substance, suggesting there was no progress. On the US side, shouldn't this lead to a North Korea scenario – that is, the United States losing interest in the matter (and leaving it to the Europeans)? S.K.: Yes, that's possible. Several American experts have drawn a parallel with the 2018 Trump-Kim Jong-un meeting, in which Trump invested a great deal (with the difference that he also wanted to invite Kim to ride with him in The Beast, the presidential limousine, but at the time his advisers convinced him not to – which was not the case with Putin...). Then he lost interest in the North Korea issue after there was no progress. If Trump decides to lose interest in the Ukrainian issue, it will be up to the Europeans to handle it alone. The question then is what level of American military assistance they can still count on, particularly in intelligence and satellite reconnaissance. But they now know that under Trump, the US will disengage from Europe. Vice President JD Vance stated clearly last week that the US would no longer fund Ukraine's defense. So the dynamic is clear. Patrick: Don't you think Trump's attitude puts the US in a position of weakness? It's obvious Trump is afraid of Putin, which puts the latter in a position of strength, with the likely consequence of destabilizing the West for Russia's benefit. What cards does the West have left to ensure its own survival and that of Ukraine? S.K.: You raise a crucial point, but first, speaking of "the West" raises the question of whether that concept still exists under Trump. Clearly, the fate of Ukraine does not have the same meaning or importance for the current Washington administration as it does for the majority of Europeans. For Europe, Ukraine's survival as a sovereign and independent state is existential; for Trump's America, it is not. Yes, the American president is impressed by Putin, and that may seem like a weakness to us, but he sees Putin as a "strong" leader of another major power that, incidentally, has "a lot of land, a lot of rare earths and oil," and with whom he believes he can do "great things," as he has said. The cards the Europeans can play are unity and firmness, particularly in defense, a field where they have a lot of ground to make up, but which they have started to address. That will require significant political effort.
LeMonde
9 hours ago
- LeMonde
After the Trump-Putin summit, Europe must make a move
Everything unfolded just as the Europeans had expected. The summit on Friday, August 15, between Presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in Anchorage, Alaska, ended without any concrete prospects for a ceasefire in Ukraine. However, it worked to the advantage of the Russian president, who found himself rehabilitated on the world stage thanks to the event. The aggressor of an independent country, Ukraine, which he claims as his own, and wanted by the International Criminal Court for war crimes, Putin was treated on Friday by the United States with all the honors reserved for a respected leader of a major power. Greeted as he stepped off the plane by President Trump, invited to walk the red carpet with him to the American president's limousine and then invited inside, the Russian president clearly appreciated these gestures. To express his gratitude to Trump, he echoed two grievances dear to the Republican president: that the 2020 presidential election, won by Joe Biden, was fraudulent, and that the war in Ukraine would never have started if Trump had been president. As for the rest, while describing the meeting as very "productive" and on "the path to peace in Ukraine," Putin merely reiterated, during a brief joint appearance before the press, the "underlying causes" of his conflict with Ukraine. The talks lasted just over two and a half hours, whereas the Kremlin had planned for "six to seven hours" of discussions. The scheduled lunch did not take place, journalists were not allowed to ask questions and the exchanges apparently did not touch on commercial or economic matters, nor on arms control – contrary to Moscow's wishes. For his part, Trump showered "Vladimir" with praise, calling him "a strong guy (...) tough as hell." He spoke of a "very productive" meeting where there were "many points that we agreed on," except for one, "probably the most significant," which he did not specify. The American president, who had threatened Russia just a few days earlier with "very severe consequences" if it failed to achieve a ceasefire in Ukraine, stated on Fox News on Friday that the question of new sanctions was not under consideration for the time being, but that he might have to think about it in two or three weeks. In light of this lack of results, the ball is now in the Europeans' court. On Saturday morning, Trump briefed them, as well as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, on his discussions and the points of agreement he mentioned. Even before speaking to them, he offered this advice to Zelensky on Fox News after the summit: "Make a deal!" From the way Putin and Trump presented matters in Anchorage, it can be inferred that the proposed "deal" is not in Kyiv's favor. Echoing Trump, Putin said he hoped the Europeans "won't throw a wrench in the works and not make any attempts to use some backroom dealings to conduct provocations to torpedo the progress." Keen not to miss any chance to end the war, the Ukrainian president nonetheless responded positively to the idea of a three-way meeting with Putin and Trump, and decided to travel to Washington on Monday to discuss it. The scenario Europeans have feared – a settlement hashed out behind their backs by the Russian and American leaders – cannot be ruled out. However, unlike Trump, Putin acknowledged that they, together with Kyiv, have cards to play. The time has come to use them, and to do so with resolve.
Euronews
2 days ago
- Euronews
Australian lawyer apologises for AI-generated errors in murder case
A barrister was forced to apologise after AI created fake quotes and made-up judgments in submissions he filed in a murder case in front of an Australian court. Defence lawyer Rishi Nathwani, who holds the prestigious legal title of King's Counsel, took 'full responsibility' for filing incorrect information in submissions in the case of a teenager charged with murder in front of the Supreme Court of Victoria state in Melbourne. 'We are deeply sorry and embarrassed for what occurred,' Nathwani told Justice James Elliott on Wednesday, on behalf of the defence team. The fake submissions included fabricated quotes from a speech to the state legislature and nonexistent case citations purportedly from the Supreme Court. The errors were discovered by Elliott's associates, who could not find the cases and requested that defence lawyers provide copies. The lawyers admitted the citations 'do not exist' and that the submission contained 'fictitious quotes,' court documents say. The lawyers explained that they had checked the initial citations and assumed the others were also accurate. The AI-generated errors caused a 24-hour delay in resolving a case that Elliott had hoped to conclude on Wednesday. Judge Elliott ruled on Thursday that Nathwani's client, who cannot be identified because he is a minor, was not guilty of murder because of mental impairment. 'At the risk of understatement, the manner in which these events have unfolded is unsatisfactory,' Elliott told lawyers on Thursday. 'The ability of the court to rely upon the accuracy of submissions made by counsel is fundamental to the due administration of justice.' The submissions were also sent to prosecutor Daniel Porceddu, who did not check their accuracy. The judge noted that the Supreme Court released guidelines last year for how lawyers use AI. 'It is not acceptable for artificial intelligence to be used unless the product of that use is independently and thoroughly verified,' Elliott said. Not the first case of AI court hallucination In a comparable case in the United States in 2023, a federal judge imposed $5,000 fines (€4,270) on two lawyers and a law firm after ChatGPT was blamed for their submission of fictitious legal research in an aviation injury claim. Judge P Kevin Castel said they acted in bad faith, but he accepted their apologies and remedial steps in lieu of a harsher sentence. Later that year, more fictitious court rulings invented by AI were cited in legal papers filed by lawyers for Michael Cohen, a former personal lawyer for US President Donald Trump. Cohen took the blame, saying he did not realise that the Google tool he was using for legal research was also capable of so-called AI hallucinations. UK High Court Justice Victoria Sharp warned in June that providing false material as if it were genuine could be considered contempt of court or, in the 'most egregious cases,' perverting the course of justice, which carries a maximum sentence of life in prison. In a regulatory ruling following dozens of AI-generated fake citations put before courts across several cases in the UK, Sharp said the issue raised 'serious implications for the ... public confidence in the justice system if artificial intelligence is misused."
