GOP concerns about tax cut strategy and Medicaid loom over Senate budget
WASHINGTON — Senate Republicans managed to proceed to debate their massive budget plan Thursday night, but not before an unexpected delay caused by some of their own who have concerns about their strategy on tax cuts and potential cuts to Medicaid.
The delay occurred as those Republicans met with Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., to talk through their concerns.
Some more centrist senators are worried about a budget change the party is using to slap a zero-dollar price tag on extending President Donald Trump's tax cuts, which are estimated by the official scorekeeper in Congress to cost $4.6 trillion over a decade.
Republicans are delaying a reckoning over the issue after they bypassed the Senate parliamentarian on the question of whether they can use "current policy" baseline to treat extending Trump's 2017 tax cuts, which are set to expire this year, as costing nothing. But that means the move could be challenged later, and it would potentially blow up the bill if the parliamentarian rules against it — unless the Senate votes to overrule her, which some have likened to nuking the 60-vote filibuster rule.
A handful of Republicans have concerns that they will be asked to do that later in the process.
'I will just speak for myself and say that I would never vote to overturn the parliamentarian,' Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, one of the senators who met with Thune, told NBC News.
And Thune insists Senate Republicans are just following the law, as he expects to plow through debate, amendments and approve the resolution this weekend. That would just be the beginning of the process.
'We wouldn't have moved forward if we didn't think we were clearly following the law, the Budget Act,' Thune said. 'We got a long ways to go. But you know, the model that we've selected to pursue, we think checks all the boxes.'
Thune said he was 'hearing folks out and obviously giving them a chance to one, explain their concerns and hopefully get some questions answered, and just make sure everybody had a comfort level with you know, proceeding.'
Senate Budget Committee Chair Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., insists he has sole power to decide whether extending Trump's tax cuts should be scored as costing money and that the parliamentarian has no say.
"It's not her decision, it's mine," he said.
Graham said that as long as there are 51 Senate votes to use that budgeting method, that's all that matters. And if not? 'Then that approach would fail. And I'd hate for the party to suffer that because I think current policy is good policy for the economy. I think that's what President Trump wants, what I want,' he said in an interview.
He didn't say what would happen if Democrats ask the parliamentarian to opine and she rules against the GOP approach, saying only that he doubts it will happen that way.
Another senator, Josh Hawley, R-Mo., said he has "a big concern" about the bill slashing Medicaid — and took his concerns directly to Trump in a phone call Thursday evening before the vote.
"I said there's this language in the bill. And he said, 'I want to be crystal clear about this: the House will not cut Medicaid benefits under any circumstance, the Senate will not cut Medicaid benefits under any circumstance, and I will not sign a cut to Medicaid benefits.' So that's good, and I hope our leadership will take that cue," Hawley told reporters before the vote.
Twenty-one percent "of my state receives Medicaid — CHIP or Medicaid. So, I've made clear I'm not going to vote for Medicaid cuts. And I thought the president's assurance to me tonight was completely unequivocal," Hawley added, saying that assurance made him comfortable voting to begin the process.
That's easier said than done. The House-approved budget, which Trump endorsed, makes it mathematically impossible for Republicans to achieve their targets without cutting Medicare or Medicaid. Lawmakers say they want to cut waste and fraud, along with imposing a potential work requirement for Medicaid. Beyond that, they haven't identified ways to reduce spending.
Overall, GOP leaders say they want to find trillions of dollars in spending cuts to balance out the other side of the ledger after their tax breaks, as well as spending hikes on immigration enforcement and the military.
But they continue to lack consensus on what to cut.
Other Republicans remain optimistic that they'll work it out.
Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., who did not attend the meeting Thursday evening, said the leadership was 'not twisting arms,' but 'some folks wanted to make sure that they understood how the process worked. They sat down with a number of folks who were very familiar with it, and went through it. It took a little bit longer to get it done.'
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
16 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Takeaways from AP's investigation of US death benefits program for public safety officers
A federal program that provides benefits to families of police officers and firefighters who die and become disabled on duty is rapidly growing while facing criticism for increasing delays in deciding claims. Congress created the Public Safety Officers' Benefits program in 1976 to guarantee that the spouses and children of officers who put their lives on the line would receive financial support. But repeated expansions in eligibility approved by Congress, including three passed in the last five years, have made the program more popular and complex to administer. Critics say the program fails some families by taking too long to grant or deny benefits and making inconsistent rulings. An Associated Press analysis found that hundreds of families are waiting years to learn whether they qualify for payments, and more are ultimately being denied. For one widow, payment came just as she'd given up hope New Jersey widow Sharline Volcy learned this month that she'd been awarded the benefits, more than 3 1/2 years after her husband, Ronald Donat, died while training at the Gwinnett County Police Academy in Georgia. Volcy said she was grateful for the aid, which will provide some financial security and help pay for her two daughters to go to college. But she said the long wait was stressful, when she was told time and again the claim remained under review and ultimately saw her inquiries ignored. 'They told me they didn't know how long it would take because they don't have a deadline. That's the hardest thing to hear,' she said. 'I felt defeated.' She said lawyers didn't want to take the case, and a plea for help to her congressperson went nowhere. She said she'd given up hope and was lucky she had a job as an airport gate agent in the meantime. The benefits program isn't meeting its timeframe goal Volcy's experience isn't unique, and some cases take longer. As of late April, more than 120 claims by surviving relatives or disabled first responders have been awaiting initial determinations or rulings on their appeals for more than five years, according AP's findings. About a dozen have waited over a decade for an answer. The program has a goal of making determinations within one year but has not taken steps to track its progress, according to a recent Government Accountability Office report. But roughly three in 10 cases have not met that timeframe in recent years. As of late late April, 900 claims had been pending longer than one year. That includes claims from nearly every state. Republican lawmakers have introduced a bill to require the program to make determinations within 270 days. The denial rate for benefits is up, too Over the last year, the denial rate has increased, with roughly one in three death and disability claims getting rejected. Applicants can appeal to a hearing officer and then the director if they choose, but that isn't common. Many say they can't afford attorneys or want to get on with their lives. Justice Department officials, who oversee the program, say they're making complicated decisions about whether cases meet legal criteria. 'Death and disability claims involving complex medical and causation issues, voluminous evidence and conflicting medical opinions, take longer to determine, as do claims in various stages of appeal,' they said in a statement. Claims have doubled in recent years The program started as a simple $50,000 payout for the families of officers who were fatally shot on duty or died as a result of other violence or dangers. But Congress expanded the program in 1990 to cover some first responders who were disabled on duty, which made some determinations harder to reach. A 1998 law added educational benefits for the spouses and children of those deceased and disabled officers. Since 2020, Congress has passed three laws making many other types of deaths and disabilities eligible, including deaths related to COVID-19, deaths and injuries of those working rescue and cleanup operations after the September 2001 attacks, and responders who committed suicide under certain circumstances. Annual claims have more than doubled in the last five years, from 500 in 2019 to roughly 1,200 today. Critics say a key partnership creates a conflict of interest While many applicants have criticized the increasing delays, the leading group that represents the relatives of officers who die on duty has been silent. Critics say that's because the group, Concerns of Police Survivors, has a financial incentive not to criticize the program, which has awarded it tens of millions of dollars in grant funding in recent decades. The Missouri-based nonprofit recently received a new $6 million grant from the program to for its work with deceased officers' relatives, including counseling, hosting memorial events, educating agencies about the program and assisting with claims. The group's founder and retired executive director, Suzie Sawyer, said she was warned many years ago that fighting too hard for claimants could jeopardize its grant funding. But current spokesperson Sara Slone said advocacy isn't the group's mission and that it works 'hand in hand' with PSOB to assist applicants and provide education about benefits. One widow's fight has been remarkable, supporters say Lisa Afolayan's husband died after a training exercise at the Border Patrol academy more than 16 years ago, but she's still fighting the program for benefits. An autopsy found that Nate Afolayan died from heat illness after completing a 1.5-mile test run in 88 degree heat, at a high altitude in the New Mexico desert. The program had awarded benefits to families after similar training deaths, dating back to an officer who died at an academy in 1988. But its independent investigation blamed Nate's death on sickle cell trait, a genetic condition that's usually benign but has been linked to rare exertion-related deaths in police, military and sports training. The program denied Lisa's claim and her subsequent appeals, arguing the death wasn't the result of heat along and didn't qualify. The program stood by its denial in 2024, even after a federal appeals court said it may have failed to adequately consider the weather's role and violated a law barring discrimination on the basis of genetic information.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump gets played as world leaders he admires see through his theatrics
Jen Psaki looks at the effort Donald Trump is putting into trying to make himself look like a third world tough guy even as the tough guy world leaders he admires keep making it clear they don't respect him.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'No Kings' demonstrators to gather across Greater Cincinnati in opposition to Trump
A string of protests is planned throughout Greater Cincinnati as part of a nationwide movement opposed to President Donald Trump and his administration. The June 14 "No Kings" protests, organized by activist group Indivisible and its partners, are described as a "nationwide day of defiance." Events are slated to take place in nearly 2,000 communities across the nation to oppose what organizers describe as "corrupt, authoritarian politics." Numerous protests are scheduled to take place in the afternoon locally throughout Greater Cincinnati, including: Cincinnati – University Pavilion (University of Cincinnati): 2618 University Circle, Cincinnati, Ohio 45219. Union Township – Veterans Memorial Park: 906 Clough Pike, 45245. Loveland – Loveland Elementary School: 600 Loveland-Madeira Road, Loveland, Ohio 45140. Mason – Intersection of Mason Montgomery Road and Tylersville Road, 45040. West Chester Township – Intersection of Tylersville Road and Cox Lane, 45069. Hamilton – Intersection of South Martin Luther King Junior Boulevard and High Street, 45011. Middletown – Towne Mall: 3461 Towne Blvd., 45005. Oxford – Uptown Park: intersection of Main Street and High Street, 45056. Falling on Flag Day and Trump's birthday, the day of protest is intended to help counter Trump's planned Washington, D.C. military parade. It also coincides with large-scale protests in Los Angeles, which erupted in response to Trump's immigration policy. The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency is carrying out a directive from Trump to find immigrants living in the United States without legal status. The aggressive crackdown has fueled anger and protests in Los Angeles and across the country, which have led to hundreds of arrests amid occasional violent clashes, vandalism and looting. Hundreds of demonstrators gathered on June 8 outside the Butler County Jail to protest the arrest of 19-year-old Honduran immigrant Emerson Colindres, who was detained by ICE agents on June 4 during a routine check-in with immigration officials at the agency's office in Blue Ash. The Enquirer will have reporters covering the protests and will update this story. USA TODAY contributed to this report. This article originally appeared on Cincinnati Enquirer: 'No Kings' protests on June 14 to counter Trump, military parade in DC
