logo
50 Years of Summits: Can G7 Countries Play Role in Ensuring Global Stability?

50 Years of Summits: Can G7 Countries Play Role in Ensuring Global Stability?

Yomiuri Shimbun10 hours ago

The Group of Seven advanced countries, which share values such as democracy and the rule of law, have taken the lead in shaping the international order. Disarray among the G7 countries could destabilize the world further.
It is important to end the aggression and fighting that is spreading around the world. To that end, the G7 members must first unite.
A G7 summit is scheduled to be held in Kananaskis, western Canada, from Sunday to Tuesday. This year, the group will mark 50 years since its first summit, at which the leaders of six countries — Japan, the United States and European nations — met in 1975. Canada was not included at that time.
Initially, the agenda was how to deal with economic crises, such as the oil shock and currency issues. At Japan's suggestion, the G7 countries decided to hold a summit every year, and topics have widened from economic issues to also include politics and security.
Fifty years ago, the member countries collectively accounted for 60% of the global gross domestic product, but with the rise of China and other countries, the figure currently stands at 40%. After the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the Group of 20 major economies began to play an active role. Many people have noted the decline in the G7's presence.
However, the G20, which includes China, Russia and India as members, often faces conflicting national interests, so it is an insufficient framework for resolving issues. With the U.N. Security Council also falling into disarray, the G7 must play a role in restoring world peace and stability.
A source of concern is the presence of U.S. President Donald Trump, who will be returning to the G7 summits.
At one point, Trump leaned toward Russia, which has continued its aggression against Ukraine. He was involved in ceasefire talks, but his attempt did not go as intended. Recently, he has begun to distance the United States from Russia.
European and other countries have condemned Israel's attacks that have caused many casualties in the Palestinian territory of the Gaza Strip, but the United States has continued to provide military support to Israel. In addition, Israel would not have been able to conduct airstrikes on Iran if the Trump administration had opposed them.
Although a rift has widened between the United States and European and other countries, it is unlikely to be possible to resolve various conflicts without the involvement of the United States, which has overwhelming military power.
Washington's high tariff policy is also causing discord within the G7.
Canada, which currently holds the G7 presidency, reportedly intends to forgo issuing a leaders' joint statement, which typically summarizes the outcomes of the summit, and instead plans to compile separate documents of agreement on individual issues such as the economy and security. This approach appears to be aimed at allowing the G7 countries to reach agreements as much as possible by seeking common ground with the United States on individual issues.
It is difficult to say that the administration of Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has been actively engaged with providing support to Ukraine and resolving conflicts in the Middle East. At the G7 summit, Ishiba should make clear Japan's stance to contribute to restoring peace.
(From The Yomiuri Shimbun, June 15, 2025)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Golden Share' Served as Solution in Trump's Approval of U.S. Steel Acquisition; Solution Found but Challenges Remain
‘Golden Share' Served as Solution in Trump's Approval of U.S. Steel Acquisition; Solution Found but Challenges Remain

Yomiuri Shimbun

timean hour ago

  • Yomiuri Shimbun

‘Golden Share' Served as Solution in Trump's Approval of U.S. Steel Acquisition; Solution Found but Challenges Remain

The Yomiuri Shimbun U.S. President Donald Trump speaks at a U.S. Steel Corp. steel plant in Pennsylvania on May 30. With U.S. President Donald Trump having approved a partnership between Nippon Steel Corp. and U.S. Steel Corp., the Japanese company's acquisition of U.S. Steel is expected to be realized. The Trump administration appears to have concluded that by signing a national security agreement with Nippon Steel and acquiring a 'golden share' in U.S. Steel the administration can contain opposition from hard-liners who support an 'America First' policy. Eighteen months after the plan was announced, negotiations between Japan and the United States over the acquisition, a development that escalated into a diplomatic issue, are set to conclude. Change of mind Trump, who views the steel industry as a critical sector directly linked to national security, has referred to U.S. Steel — once the world's largest steel manufacturer — as a 'symbol of America' and had opposed Nippon Steel's bid to acquire it. What prompted Trump to change his mind were Nippon Steel's proposed additional investments and the Japanese company's measures to mitigate security threats. Nippon Steel increased the amount it would invest in the U.S. company after acquiring it from $2.7 billion to $14 billion (about ¥2 trillion). It is also believed that Nippon Steel promised that the majority of U.S. Steel's board members would be U.S. nationals and that the company's production capacity would not be reduced. In response to these proposals, local lawmakers and other interested parties in Pennsylvania, where U.S. Steel is headquartered, moved to persuade Trump, apparently by pointing out the economic benefits of the acquisition, such as employment and plant modernization. In addition, key U.S. Cabinet members including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent — who also chairs the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, whose duties include reviewing foreign acquisitions — and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick are said to have urged Trump to approve the acquisition. Trump himself began to judge that Nippon Steel's huge investment would benefit his administration and leaned toward approving the acquisition. Political risk However, the acquisition could give the impression to the American people that a symbolic U.S. company is being sold to a foreign company, which would pose a significant political risk for Trump. Even within his administration, senior officials who support his 'America First' policy position opposed the acquisition. Avoiding backlash from his supporters was also necessary with the 2026 midterm elections in mind. As negotiations between the Japanese and U.S. steel companies progressed behind the scenes, there emerged the idea of issuing a golden share to the U.S. administration to grant it veto power over important management decisions. According to sources, the initial U.S. plan was to approve the acquisition on the condition that a national security agreement was signed, but in the final stages of the negotiations, the U.S. side demanded a golden share. Trump apparently judged that acquiring a golden share in U.S. Steel as a symbol of 'U.S. control' would help persuade opponents of the acquisition and gain the understanding of Trump's supporters. The executive order that Trump signed Friday also made no mention of the fact that U.S. Steel would come under foreign ownership. Intentions of both sides It can be said the golden share proposal led Trump to be able to successfully utilize Nippon Steel's financial strength and technological capabilities without compromising his 'America First' policy stance. Meanwhile, Nippon Steel has concluded that the golden share provides no voting rights and is largely symbolic, so the U.S. administration's influence on management and investment decisions will be limited. 'We will have 100% of the voting rights in U.S. Steel, so management freedom will be maintained,' a senior Nippon Steel executive said. Nippon Steel has previously insisted that 100% ownership of shares is a prerequisite for major investments, and the U.S. government has also refused to compromise over 'U.S. control.' Amid conflicting interests between the two parties, the idea of a golden share ultimately served as a solution, but challenges remain.

Israel and Iran hit each other overnight as conflict continues
Israel and Iran hit each other overnight as conflict continues

Nikkei Asia

timean hour ago

  • Nikkei Asia

Israel and Iran hit each other overnight as conflict continues

JERUSALEM/DUBAI (Reuters) -- Israel and Iran launched fresh attacks on each other overnight into Sunday, killing scores and raising fears of a wider conflict, as U.S. President Donald Trump said it could be ended easily while warning Tehran not to strike any U.S. targets. Israeli rescue teams combed through rubble of residential buildings destroyed by Iranian missiles, using sniffer dogs and heavy excavators to look for survivors after at least 10 people, including children, were killed, raising the two-day toll to 13.

Japan's Marine Product Exports in 2024: Finding New Markets Amid Chinese Ban

time2 hours ago

Japan's Marine Product Exports in 2024: Finding New Markets Amid Chinese Ban

Japan Data A total Chinese ban on Japanese seafood through 2024 meant Japan had to develop new markets. China has maintained a total ban on imports of Japanese seafood products since August 24, 2023, when the first treated water from Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station was discharged into the ocean. Since then, the Japanese government has offered repeated explanations on the safety of the water and proper management of the releases, calling for the lifting of the import ban. On May 30 of this year, it was announced that the Japanese and Chinese governments have agreed to begin procedures aimed at the resumption of seafood exports to China. In 2022, prior to the discharge of treated water, Japan's exports of marine products totaled ¥387.3 billion, with China accounting for ¥87.1 billion or 22.5%, making it the largest export destination. In 2024, when the ban was in effect for the entire year, exports to China plummeted to just ¥6.1 billion, consisting only of non-food marine products such as pearls and koi carp. Despite efforts to cultivate new markets in places including Hong Kong and the United States, total seafood exports for that year were ¥26.4 billion lower than in 2022. Japan's main export marine product is scallops (including fresh, frozen, chilled, and dried). In 2022, exports of scallops reached a record high of ¥91 billion, a 40% increase over the previous year, with exports to China accounting for ¥46.7 billion or 51.3%. Exports of scallops to China only totaled ¥700 million in 2009, but from the following year sales steadily increased. With the boom in Japanese cuisine, fresh scallops in the shell began to be transported by plane to Beijing, Shanghai, and other cities. Chinese businesses also began to import shelled scallops from Japan, shuck them domestically, and then re-export them to the United States, which is the largest consumer of scallops. Scallop exports declined in 2023, clearly reflecting the four months of the ban following the discharge of treated water. The following year, efforts were made to compensate for exports to China dropping to zero by redirecting exports of scallops to the United States. Exports of seafood to the United States also face risk, however, due to the proposed tariffs of President Donald Trump. It is hoped that the resumption of exports to China could help to avoid a further decline in Japanese seafood exports. (Translated from Japanese. Banner photo © Pixta.)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store