Nimbys are killing London's nightlife, says owner of Ronnie Scott's
London's nightlife is under threat from a 'vocal minority' complaining about noise, the owner of Soho's world-famous jazz club Ronnie Scott's has warned.
John James has said proposals for pubs and clubs in Soho to host more 'quiet nights' threatened to 'kill an international city' and would put the capital far behind rivals such as Paris, Milan and New York.
Labour-led Westminster City Council is consulting on plans to push pubs and clubs in Soho to hold more quiet and alcohol-free activities after 6pm to make central London more peaceful for residents.
Mr James told The Telegraph: 'Every other high street in the land would be deeply envious of what Soho has. And yet we, by the virtue of Westminster City Council becoming restrictive in the granting of planning and licences, are trying to kill off our high street.'
The 72-year-old tycoon runs Soho Estates, a £1.1bn property empire originally built by Paul Raymond, the self-made millionaire and soft-porn baron dubbed the 'King of Soho' who died in 2008. Mr James, who is the son-in-law of Mr Raymond, is preparing to hand over the running of the business to his daughter Fawn next month.
Mr James, who is also a board member of the Soho Business Alliance, said: 'We cannot be competitive if you listen to a resident who says they want it to be quiet after 11 o'clock at night – not only on a weekday, but weekends, any time.
'Westminster are overly listening to the minority resident view, but it seems to be the one that is listened to more keenly than others. It doesn't take into account any of the opinions of thousands of visitors.'
In its Westminster After Dark consultation, the council said its policies would help 'businesses to thrive, visitors to enjoy the city's attractions, and residents to get a decent night's sleep'. Proposals include closing central venues from midnight while 'essential services like cleaning and transport take precedence'.
Mr James described a proposal from Westminster to shift the late-night economy to new 'entertainment zones' in the Strand, Oxford Street and Victoria as 'mind-boggling', adding: 'Who the hell dreamed this up?'
Businesses would also be hit with a so-called late-night levy, a tax on venues supplying alcohol late into the evening. That tax would be used to fund initiatives to reduce 'crime and disorder' in the area.
The consultation has come under fire from business leaders in the area, who have warned that its crackdown on noise will put bars and pubs out of business.
James Raynor, the chief executive of Grosvenor's property company, which owns much of nearby Mayfair, told The Telegraph: 'If you start to limit those sorts of activities, you're going to put a lot of businesses out of business. Which is going to make a lot of people unemployed, which is going to cost the country money and not generate tax revenue.'
Mr Raynor, who is also the incoming chairman of the Westminster Property Association, added: 'Part of the attractiveness of living in [Soho] is being part of it. If people are there and uncomfortable, that's a shame, you don't want them to be. [But] it's a bit like living in Hounslow and then moaning about aeroplanes.'
Mr James said that issues around public safety should be addressed by more investment in the police service, rather than putting more burdens on businesses.
Geoff Barraclough, a Westminster councillor and cabinet member for planning and economic development, said: 'The measures we're consulting on have been designed to add to, not take away from, existing nightlife.
'We want everyone to be able to come to the city and have a great time. Lots of people want to go out for a meal and a few drinks with their friends or go to a club and we'll support that, even designating new areas for late night licences.
'We're looking at creating greater variety, including family-friendly, non-alcoholic alternatives like cinemas and bowling alleys. All of this would be on top of – not instead of – what's already on offer in the city.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
SNP's wish to ‘throw open our borders' would risk security
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch has claimed the Scottish Government's stance on immigration would risk the country's security. Writing in the Daily Mail ahead of the Scottish Conservative conference in Edinburgh, Mrs Badenoch said the SNP's position 'is not remotely serious'. The Scottish Government is much more liberal than both the UK Labour Government and the Tories on immigration, repeatedly calling for more people to be allowed to come to Scotland, but Holyrood does not have the powers to make changes. Ministers have pushed for a shift in the system on a number of occasions, going so far as to propose a separate Scottish visa in 2020 under Nicola Sturgeon – a pitch which was quickly rejected by the Conservative-led government of the time. Mrs Badenoch wrote: 'We need a new, sustainable system that only admits a strict number of people who come here legally, do the right thing, and who contribute to society. 'That means we must introduce a strict numerical cap on legal migration, ensure there is zero-tolerance for foreign criminals, and pass the Deportation Bill to remove those who should not be here. 'The left-wing parties at Holyrood – not just the SNP, but also Labour and the Lib Dems – don't believe tougher action is necessary. Scottish Conservative Party Conference is now in full swing. Follow along to see how @RussellFindlay1 is bringing common sense to Scottish politics 🏴🇬🇧#SCC25 — Scottish Conservatives (@ScotTories) June 13, 2025 'On immigration, those parties have policies student politicians would be ashamed of. 'The SNP's stance, in particular, is not remotely serious. 'If they ever got their way, they would put our citizens' security at risk. It's the nationalists' view that we should just throw open our borders, without any checks or limitations on who comes into the country.' The Scottish Government has been contacted for comment.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The day Britain went bankrupt – but at least Big Ange has something to smile about
Let's call this what it was: the Reform budget. Written by the Chancellor Dalek in a blind panic after the local elections, she doled out cash to town after Reform-target town, some of which she'd never heard of, and several she couldn't pronounce. The kinds of places GB News would host a beauty pageant from: 'Put your hands together for Miss Wigan!' 'We are backing Doncaster airport,' said Davros. There's 'new funding for Padeswood sidings'. Yet the critical investment 'in Peterborough's sports quarter' – to aid 'community cohesion' – raised not a smile from her own back benches. Labour MPs looked suicidal. Had one pulled out a gun and shot himself, I wouldn't have been surprised, and the Chancellor would've carried on speaking. Even Emily Thornberry, rocking a lovely hairdo she got to see the King, looked as if she'd come up empty on another scratch card. Why the long faces? Well, these people can count, they've done their time in the small claims court – and they know that THIS is the day Britain went bankrupt. The review was teased by a punchy PMQs, watched by a delegation of French MPs (stripy shirts, a couple of chickens). When the PM sat down, exhausted, Angela Rayner patted him happily on the shoulder. She's done well from the review: it's reported that she hosted a disco to celebrate, as if under the impression that the money will go directly to her (new lino in the kitchen, a mirror over the bed). Not so much Yvette Cooper, whose brightest spot was a pledge to end asylum seekers living in hotels. Where will they reside instead? Well, social housing will get 'the biggest cash injection for 50 years' – so problem solved! Rachel Reeves, in an olive suit, rolled out such projects at the pace of a high-speed train – Japanese, not British – from the NHS to school meals to teaching teenagers drama (which most angry adolescents don't need), juddering to a halt only to tell gags that fell like lead balloons. The Tories were hardly mentioned; Reform came in for heavy extermination. 'Simply not serious,' she called them, as Nigel shook his head muttering 'oh dear, oh dear'. He is not the friend of the working class, insisted a chancellor who has spent the best part of a decade pretending to be an elite banker – and we heard that she, Rachel Reeves, daughter of the soil, joined Labour in the 1980s because she went to a comprehensive! Ee by gum. This is how deep into their empty barrel of class war Labour now has to scrape. Personally, I joined the party after dining at a Happy Eater in 1987. That experience of raw poverty shapes you for life. The backbenchers cheered at Reeves' hard knock schooling; they delighted in the increases in welfare. But as her investments grew bigger and bigger – why not just pave Swansea in gold? – it must have dawned that none of it made sense. She has spent a year saying there's a black hole and she had to fill it with disabled people and the elderly. But now she sounds like Viv Nicholson winning the pools and screaming that she wants to 'spend, spend, spend!' The truth is, as Mel Stride said, Rachel has bottled it. She's realised Reform is winning and is pump-priming the economy. We'll all have to pay for it in the end.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Spending Review criticised by Tory police leaders
Three Conservative Police and Crime Commissioners (PCCs) in the south of England have criticised the chancellor's long-term spending plans. Rachel Reeves announced on Wednesday that police funding would rise by 2.3% a year to fund 13,000 more neighbourhood officers. But Thames Valley PCC Matthew Barber and Hampshire and Isle of Wight PCC Donna Jones said the increase was funded by an assumed increase in council tax, while Dorset PCC David Sidwick said policing was at risk without "significant investment". Reeves told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme she did not "accept" the need for cuts to police jobs. Reeves' comments were in response to Labour's London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan saying the Spending Review would lead to cuts to frontline policing. Police budgets are made up of funding from both central government and a portion of council tax called the police precept. PCCs can raise this precept by £14 a year for a Band D council tax bill without having to have a referendum. This is in addition to a 5% general rise. "When they talk about spending power, that's predicated on me increasing council tax by £14 every year for the next three years on local taxpayers," said Barber. "The chancellor says no tax rise is needed to fund her spending plans [but] she's simply passing the buck from one place to another, and taxpayers end up picking up the bill." Jones said the plan to increase neighbourhood policing by 13,000 officers was "now merely a pipe dream". "What it is going to mean is that smaller police forces across the country will probably be forced to reduce their head count for police officers, and probably entirely get rid of police community support officers," she said. Sidwick said Dorset residents "already pay over and above what other areas do for their police force" because rurality and seasonality were not considered in the funding formula. "That is not right," he said. "I understand there are tough decisions the government must make - we've had to make many in Dorset due to years of underfunding - but it is clear that serious and very real concerns from all corners of policing have once again not been heeded by those in power." A Home Office spokesperson said: "We are committed to ensuring that police forces have the resources they need to keep our streets safe. "Council tax levels are a local decision, and elected police and crime commissioners will consider the appropriate level for their local priorities. "Further details for next year will be set out in the autumn as part of the annual police funding settlement." You can follow BBC Berkshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram. Winners and losers: Who got what in the spending review? Justice system starved of money, police leaders say Hampshire PCC Thames Valley PCC Dorset PCC
