Kerala backs off from enacting black magic law, cites policy decision in High Court
Kochi, The Left Government in Kerala has told the High Court that it will not proceed to enact a law to ban black magic, sorcery, and other inhuman practices, citing a policy decision made by the state cabinet. Kerala backs off from enacting black magic law, cites policy decision in High Court
In an affidavit filed before a division of Kerala High Court, headed by Chief Justice Nitin Jamdar, the state said a draft bill titled "The Kerala Prevention and Eradication of Inhuman Evil Practices, Sorcery and Black Magic Bill, 2022" had been prepared based on recommendations from the Law Reforms Commission.
However, after deliberations, the council of ministers decided on July 5, 2023, not to go ahead with the legislation, it said.
The government submitted that while the court may have noted the social concerns raised in the PIL, it cannot compel the legislature to pass a law.
"A writ of mandamus will not lie against the legislature directing it to legislate on a particular subject," the affidavit said.
Meanwhile, the high court asked the state government to clarify the steps it intends to take to control sorcery and black magic, especially in light of the government's stand that no legislation is currently under consideration.
The court noted that although the K T Thomas Commission report had recommended legislation to curb black magic and related inhuman practices, the government had not taken any follow-up action on the report.
The court has now asked the state to clearly explain how it plans to prevent the practice of black magic and sorcery, even in the absence of a law.
It also directed the government to file a detailed affidavit within three weeks.
The state's home department had filed the affidavit on June 21, 2025, stating that the Council of Ministers had initially discussed the matter but later decided not to proceed with legislation.
The court had earlier asked the state to clarify its position after a public interest litigation filed by the Kerala Yukthivadi Sangham sought a law similar to those enacted in Maharashtra and Karnataka to prohibit harmful rituals conducted in the name of supernatural powers.
The PIL, first filed in 2022, was dismissed in June 2023 due to the absence of representation from the petitioner. It was later restored, prompting the High Court to seek the government's latest stance.
The Yuktivadi Sangham, in its plea, has stated that the Law Reforms Commission, headed by Justice K T Thomas, had submitted a comprehensive report to the State of Kerala in the year 2019, with legislative recommendations based on new social conditions.
"The Kerala Prevention and Eradication of Inhuman Evil Practices, Sorcery and Black Magic Bill-2019, is one of the recommended statutes. But so far, no attempt has been made on the part of the state on the matter," the organisation has claimed.
The plea was filed in 2022 in the wake of a ritual human sacrifice of two women in the Pathanamthitta district of Kerala by three people, including a couple.
The petition has claimed that the states of Kerala and Maharashtra have passed laws against sorcery and black magic.
It has also sought a declaration that "films on big screens and OTT platforms, and several serials and other telefilms, aired on television channels and YouTube, having content of superstitious beliefs, including sorcery and occult practices, exempting those having good intentions and having good artistic values, are illegal".
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
J&K High Court orders protection of deported Pak woman; asks Centre to bring her back
Srinagar: In a judgment that might have far reaching consequences, the Jammu and Kashmir High Court said that a Pakistani woman living in J&K for years with a Long Term Visa should have been protected from deportation during India's retaliatory action after the terror attack in Pahalgam and 'Operation Sindoor'. In the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack in April, the Union government had decided to suspend visa services to Pakistani nationals and directed them to leave India. After the deadline ended on April 27, the authorities deported several Pakistani nationals. Several Pakistani national women living with their husbands since long in Kashmir were deported by authorities to Pakistan. Justice Rahul Bharti on Monday issued the direction while hearing a writ petition (WP(C) No. 1072/2025) filed by Rashida's husband, Sheikh Zahoor Ahmed. The husband challenged her deportation, arguing that she had been living in J&K for years and held a Long-Term Visa, which should have protected her from expulsion. The court expressed deep concern over Rashida's health and humanitarian situation, noting that she had no family or support in Pakistan. Justice Bharti emphasised that 'human rights are the most sacrosanct component of a human life' and said constitutional courts are sometimes compelled to act with 'SOS-like indulgence' in exceptional circumstances. 'Without proper legal scrutiny or a formal deportation order, Rashida was expelled during what critics have described as a mass repatriation drive that failed to account for individual legal statuses', the High Court said. The court noted that Rashida's Long-Term Visa may have made her ineligible for deportation and criticised authorities for acting without due process. 'She has no one in Pakistan for her care and custody,' her husband told the court, adding that she was gravely ill and left alone in a country where she had never lived independently. The court has directed the Ministry of Home Affairs to coordinate her return from Pakistan within ten days and facilitate her reunion with her husband in Jammu. A compliance report is to be submitted by July 1. Advocate Himani Khajuria represented the petitioner, while Deputy Solicitor General Vishal Sharma appeared for the Union of India. This marks the first major judicial intervention, raising serious questions about the treatment of women who had entered J&K under previous cross-border rehabilitation policies. The fate of many such women, who came here as spouses of former militants returning from Pakistan under the J&K government's rehabilitation policy, remains hanging as they lack citizenship or travel rights despite having lived in the region for over a decade.
Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
Supreme Court Rejects Military Service Defense In Two-Decade-Old Dowry Death Case
India's Supreme Court delivered a firm ruling on Tuesday, rejecting a military commando's attempt to avoid surrendering in connection with his wife's death from two decades ago. The case highlighted the court's position that military service, regardless of its nature or distinction, cannot serve as a shield against accountability for domestic violence. The petitioner, identified as a Black Cat Commando with extensive military credentials, had approached the apex court seeking exemption from surrender requirements in the dowry death case dating back 20 years. His legal team argued that his participation in significant military operations, particularly Operation Sindoor, warranted special consideration from the judicial system. During the proceedings, the commando's legal counsel emphasized his client's distinguished service record, noting his two-decade tenure with the Rashtriya Rifles, an elite counter-insurgency force. The defense strategy appeared to center on the argument that his military contributions, including involvement in recent cross-border operations, merited judicial leniency. The counsel specifically highlighted the commando's participation in Operation Sindoor, the recent military action that garnered significant national attention. The legal representative presented this service record as grounds for exemption, suggesting that such distinguished military service should influence the court's decision regarding the criminal proceedings. However, the Supreme Court bench remained unmoved by these arguments, expressing clear disinclination to grant any form of exemption based on military service. The justices demonstrated that the law applies equally to all citizens, regardless of their professional achievements or contributions to national security. Justice Bhuyan, speaking for the bench, delivered particularly pointed observations that underscored the court's reasoning. The justice noted that military service, rather than providing immunity, actually highlighted the accused's physical capabilities and training, which could have been misused in domestic situations. The court's response specifically addressed the apparent contradiction between the accused's professional role as a protector and the allegations of domestic violence. Justice Bhuyan observed that the commando's physical fitness and training, demonstrated through his military service, actually supported the prosecution's case regarding how the alleged crime could have been committed. The judicial reasoning emphasized that military training and physical prowess, while valuable for national service, could potentially be misused in domestic contexts. The court suggested that the very qualities that made the accused an effective military operative might have enabled the alleged criminal acts. The case represents a significant judicial statement about the principle of equality before the law. The Supreme Court's ruling reinforces that professional achievements, military honors, or national service cannot excuse or mitigate criminal behavior, particularly in cases involving domestic violence and women's safety. The dowry death case, spanning two decades, reflects the ongoing challenges in India's justice system regarding delayed proceedings in domestic violence cases. The length of time between the alleged incident and the current legal proceedings highlights systemic issues in handling such sensitive cases. The court's firm stance sends a clear message about the judiciary's commitment to addressing domestic violence cases without regard to the accused's social or professional status. This approach aligns with broader judicial trends emphasizing women's rights and the serious nature of dowry-related crimes. The ruling also addresses broader questions about military personnel's accountability for civilian crimes. While military service is respected and valued, the court's decision establishes that such service cannot create parallel legal standards or exemptions from civilian criminal law. The case conclusion requires the accused to surrender as originally mandated, demonstrating the court's unwillingness to create exceptions based on military service records. This decision reinforces the principle that justice must be served regardless of an individual's professional background or contributions to national security. The Supreme Court's handling of this case contributes to legal precedent regarding how courts should balance respect for military service with the imperative of addressing domestic violence and ensuring justice for victims of such crimes.
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Kerala backs off from enacting black magic law, cites policy decision in High Court
The Left government in Kerala has told the High Court that it will not proceed to enact a law to ban black magic, sorcery, and other inhuman practices, citing a policy decision made by the State Cabinet. In an affidavit filed before a Division Bench of Kerala High Court, headed by Chief Justice Nitin Jamdar, Kerala said a draft bill titled 'The Kerala Prevention and Eradication of Inhuman Evil Practices, Sorcery and Black Magic Bill, 2022' had been prepared based on recommendations from the Law Reforms Commission. However, after deliberations, the Council of Ministers decided on July 5, 2023, not to go ahead with the legislation, it said. The government submitted that while the court may have noted the social concerns raised in the PIL, it cannot compel the legislature to pass a law. "A writ of mandamus will not lie against the legislature directing it to legislate on a particular subject," the affidavit said. Meanwhile, the High Court asked the State government to clarify the steps it intends to take to control sorcery and black magic, especially in light of the government's stand that no legislation is currently under consideration. The court noted that although the K.T. Thomas Commission report had recommended legislation to curb black magic and related inhuman practices, the government had not taken any follow-up action on the report. The court has now asked the State to clearly explain how it plans to prevent the practice of black magic and sorcery, even in the absence of a law. It also directed the government to file a detailed affidavit within three weeks. The Kerala Home department had filed the affidavit on June 21, 2025, stating that the Council of Ministers had initially discussed the matter but later decided not to proceed with legislation. The court had earlier asked the State to clarify its position after a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by the Kerala Yukthivadi Sangham sought a law similar to those enacted in Maharashtra and Karnataka to prohibit harmful rituals conducted in the name of supernatural powers. The PIL, first filed in 2022, was dismissed in June 2023 due to the absence of representation from the petitioner. It was later restored, prompting the High Court to seek the government's latest stance. The Yuktivadi Sangham, in its plea, has stated that the Law Reforms Commission, headed by Justice (retired) K.T. Thomas, had submitted a comprehensive report to the State of Kerala in the year 2019, with legislative recommendations based on new social conditions. "The Kerala Prevention and Eradication of Inhuman Evil Practices, Sorcery and Black Magic Bill-2019, is one of the recommended statutes. But so far, no attempt has been made on the part of the state on the matter," the organisation has claimed. The plea was filed in 2022 in the wake of a ritual human sacrifice of two women in the Pathanamthitta district of Kerala by three people, including a couple. The petition has claimed that the states of Kerala and Maharashtra have passed laws against sorcery and black magic. It has also sought a declaration that "films on big screens and OTT platforms, and several serials and other telefilms, aired on television channels and YouTube, having content of superstitious beliefs, including sorcery and occult practices, exempting those having good intentions and having good artistic values, are illegal".
