logo
G7 leaders push for unity as Trump criticizes Russia's removal

G7 leaders push for unity as Trump criticizes Russia's removal

Fast Company9 hours ago

Leaders from the Group of Seven nations began annual talks on Monday with wars escalating in Ukraine and the Middle East, as U.S. President Donald Trump said removing Russia from the former Group of Eight was a mistake.
The G7 leaders from Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the U.S., along with the European Union, are convening in the resort area of Kananaskis in the Canadian Rockies until Tuesday.
With an escalating Israel-Iran conflict, the summit in Canada is seen as a vital moment to try to restore a semblance of unity among democratic powerhouses.
In an early sign that they may struggle to reach agreement on key issues, a U.S. official said Trump would not sign a draft statement calling for de-escalation of the Israel-Iran conflict.
Speaking alongside Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, Trump said kicking Russia out of the former Group of Eight was a mistake. Members removed Russia in 2014 after it annexed Crimea.
'This was a big mistake,' Trump said. 'You wouldn't have that war. You know you have your enemy at the table, I don't even consider, he wasn't really an enemy at that time.'
Canada has abandoned any effort to adopt a comprehensive communique to avert a repeat of the 2018 summit in Quebec, when Trump instructed the U.S. delegation to withdraw its approval of the final communique after leaving.
Leaders have prepared several other draft documents seen by Reuters, including on migration, artificial intelligence, and critical mineral supply chains. None of them have been approved by the United States, however, according to sources briefed on the documents.
Europeans are on the same page on most issues, a European diplomat said. But without Trump, it is unclear if there will be any declarations, the diplomat said.
The first five months of Trump's second term upended foreign policy on Ukraine, raised anxiety over his closer ties to Russia, and resulted in tariffs on U.S. allies.
Talks on Monday will centre around the economy, advancing trade deals, and China.
Efforts to reach an agreement to lower the G7 price cap on Russian oil, even if Trump decided to opt out, were complicated by a temporary surge in oil prices since Israel launched strikes on Iran on June 12, two diplomatic sources said. Oil prices fell on Monday on reports Iran was seeking a truce.
The escalation between the two regional foes is high on the agenda, with diplomatic sources saying they hope to urge restraint and a return to diplomacy and would encourage Trump to sign a declaration.
'I do think there's a consensus for de-escalation. Obviously, what we need to do today is to bring that together and to be clear about how it is to be brought about,' British Prime Minister Keir Starmer told reporters.
Russian elephant in the room
Further highlighting the unease among some of Washington's allies, Trump spoke on Saturday with Russian President Vladimir Putin and suggested the Russian leader could play a mediation role between Israel and Iran.
French President Emmanuel Macron dismissed the idea, arguing that Moscow could not be a negotiator because it had started an illegal war against Ukraine.
A European diplomat said Trump's suggestion showed that Russia was very much on U.S. minds.
'In the eyes of the U.S., there's no condemnation for Ukraine; no peace without Russia; and now even credit for its mediation role with Iran. For Europeans, this will be a really tough G7,' the diplomat said.
Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte will attend the summit on Tuesday. European officials said they hoped to use the meeting and next week's NATO summit to convince Trump to toughen his stance on Putin.
'The G7 should have the objective for us to converge again, for Ukraine to get a ceasefire to lead to a robust and lasting peace, and in my view it's a question of seeing whether President Trump is ready to put forward much tougher sanctions on Russia,' Macron said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Column: Is this the beginning of the end for Tesla?
Column: Is this the beginning of the end for Tesla?

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Column: Is this the beginning of the end for Tesla?

It was always difficult to understand the odd-couple relationship of U.S. President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk. Trump has made it clear that he wants to cut support for electric vehicles, if not generally reduce environmental protections, and Musk owns a company that builds electric cars. Someday, those opposing forces would come to a head, and the only loser would be Tesla. Business and politics mix like oil and water. They eventually separate, and in the Trump-Musk scenario, rather dramatically. Sign up for Automotive News Canada's weekly podcast newsletter for a lively and in-depth discussion of the biggest stories. While Musk was busy angering his liberal customer base by aligning with Trump in the most visible manner possible as the chainsaw-wielding head of the Department of Government Efficiency, the leaders of other auto companies were largely out of the news and focused on battling Trump's tariffs. What they were not doing was making their brands unpopular. Tesla gained a cult-like following partly because Musk was seen as a rebel, but, as we've witnessed, the potential volatility cuts both ways. Interest in Tesla among Canadians with intentions of buying an electric vehicle has fallen to 13 per cent from 29 a year ago, according to the J.D. Power 2025 Canada Electric Vehicle Consideration Study, released May 29. The survey, detailed in a separate story, doesn't get into the reasons Canadians are turning their backs on Tesla, but Musk's politics — and saying Canada isn't a real country — are likely the key driver. In one fell swoop, Musk became a pariah, and Tesla is paying the price. Aside from public protests, several provinces removed Tesla from their EV rebate programs, and Ottawa froze Incentives for Zero Emission Vehicle (iZEV) payments as it investigated the validity of a large number of last-minute Tesla rebate claims. Before the Musk-Trump bromance, people would buy Teslas, seemingly no matter how good or bad the vehicle was, because of Musk. Now, no matter how good or bad the vehicle is, they're less likely to buy because of Musk. It's all so unnecessary. The lesson, which most people in business know, is don't mix in politics. Regardless of whether that's seen as commonplace or even expected in the Trump orbit, the obvious problem is that sharply divisive politics can make permanent enemies out of customers. Musk, in aligning with Trump, had everything to lose and little to gain. Trump for years has openly berated EVs, so it's not like his supporters would be suddenly swayed by the tacky and now-infamous Tesla sales pitch on the White House lawn. And since the Trump-Musk relationship has soured, reports that Trump will sell his Tesla are bound to undo any inroads made. (Not to mention Musk's vilification of Trump on X, formerly Twitter.) So all Musk managed to do was alienate droves of customers and potential customers who feel, well, wronged. The danger for Tesla is that customers don't need the drama or misery (what will Musk do next?) when there are excellent EV alternatives, whether the Chevrolet Equinox EV, Kia EV6 or Hyundai Ioniq 5. According to the J.D. Power survey, Hyundai was the top brand, with 36 per cent of Canadian EV shoppers interested, while Kia, Toyota, Ford and Chevrolet rounded out the top five. It's hard to fathom how Musk, an intelligent individual, did not see this coming. Perhaps he was too disconnected from the car business or that, in his mind, he could do no wrong. Regardless, damage control seems impossible, raising the question of whether Tesla can be pulled from the fire. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump approves US Steel-Nippon merger
Trump approves US Steel-Nippon merger

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump approves US Steel-Nippon merger

This story was originally published on Manufacturing Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Manufacturing Dive newsletter. President Donald Trump signed an executive order Friday approving Nippon Steel's acquisition of U.S. Steel, with the companies promising $11 billion in new investments by 2028. The deal includes an initial investment in a new site that would be completed after 2028, according to U.S. Steel's June 13 press release. The companies have completed the Department of Justice's review process. With all regulatory approvals finished, they said the deal is 'expected to be finalized promptly.' As part of the regulatory approval, the two companies have agreed to sign a national security agreement with the federal government. U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel did not immediately respond to a request for comment regarding what the new project will entail or its value. 'This partnership will bring a massive investment that will support our communities and families for generations to come,' Nippon and U.S. Steel said in a joint statement. 'We look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again.' The merger would retain and create more than 100,000 jobs, according to a study by Parker Strategy Group commissioned by U.S. Steel. Additionally, the agreement involves other commitments related to domestic production commitments, trade and the granting of veto power to the U.S. government in the form of 'golden shares.' The veto power will allow the U.S. government to oversee key decisions to any changes to the company. Nippon initially announced plans to acquire U.S. Steel for $14.9 billion in December 2023, but faced opposition from the Biden administration. Then-President Joe Biden blocked the deal in January, citing national security concerns and a negative impact on domestic steel production. Trump previously opposed the acquisition, saying he would block the deal. The president, however, revived talk of the deal in April, when he ordered the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States to review the proposal. Last month, Trump announced he supported the deal, calling it a 'planned partnership.' The United Steelworkers have also voiced their opposition to the merger. The labor union said Sunday it had not received a copy of the agreement between U.S. Steel, Nippon and the federal government. USW said it's disappointed that Trump reversed course, saying the merger could jeopardize 'the future of American steelmaking.' The union added that Nippon refused to promise USW to not transfer production from any of U.S. Steel's facilities in the country. 'It is left to be seen whether the president's 'golden share' and stated 51 percent control prevents Nippon from doing what has been clear it would do since December of 2023.' USW said in a statement. 'Those that ignore the threat, do so at their own peril. The focus of the International union has always been about protecting the members' job security and employment.' USW's labor agreement with U.S. Steel expires Sept. 1, 2026. The union said it's prepared to engage with Nippon to obtain 'a fair contract, one that maintains our existing facilities and recognizes the decades of contributions to the profitability of the company by USW members.' Recommended Reading Trump to increase steel, aluminum tariffs to 50% Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

MEG Energy's board urges shareholders to reject Strathcona's $4.42 billion offer
MEG Energy's board urges shareholders to reject Strathcona's $4.42 billion offer

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

MEG Energy's board urges shareholders to reject Strathcona's $4.42 billion offer

(Reuters) -Canadian oil producer MEG Energy on Monday urged its shareholders to reject a nearly C$6 billion ($4.42 billion) hostile takeover offer from Strathcona Resources, calling the bid inadequate and not in their best interest. The board also launched a strategic review to explore alternatives that could lead to a better offer than MEG's current plan to be a standalone company. In May, the Canadian oil and gas producer Strathcona Resources said it planned to launch a hostile takeover bid for MEG Energy, valuing its rival's shares at C$23.27 per share. MEG's last close was C$25.71. Later, MEG advised its shareholders to not take action on the unsolicited takeover bid. Since 2020, Strathcona, owned by Calgary-based private equity firm Waterous Energy Fund (WEF), has become one of the fastest-growing oil companies in North America through a series of acquisitions. If the takeover were to go through, WEF would own 51% stake in the combined company, making it a vehicle for WEF and its investors to sell their material ownership over time, MEG Energy said. "This selling pressure, or even the perceived risk of such selling pressure, will place immediate and significant downward burden on the share price of the combined company for a prolonged period of time," the company said in a statement. Strathcona Resources did not immediately respond to Reuters request for comment. ($1 = 1.3563 Canadian dollars) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store