Home ‘flipping' hotspots where properties are re-sold within months revealed
Property firm Hamptons used Land Registry house sales data covering England and Wales, to make the analysis.
It defined a flipped home as a property that was bought and then sold within a 12-month period.
In the first quarter of 2025, 2.3% of homes that were sold had been flipped. This was the lowest proportion since the first quarter of 2013 when a figure of 2.3% was also recorded, and down from 3.6% in the first quarter of 2024.
The average gross profit (the difference between the sale and purchase price, before other costs are factored in) earned on a flipped property in the first quarter of 2025 was £22,000.
Average gross profits were calculated as an average across all sales – including those where sellers made a loss, or broke even.
Four-fifths (80%) of flipped homes selling in the first quarter of 2025 did make a gross profit – but Hamptons said the proportion of people making a profit would be reduced when stamp duty costs were factored in. Stamp duty applies in England and in Wales, the land transaction tax applies.
Average gross profits have nearly halved since they last peaked at £38,000 in 2022, Hamptons said.
It added that higher costs generally, such as materials and labour, and slower house price growth, will have weighed on the appetite for property investing.
The North East of England remains a hotspot for flipping, with Redcar and Cleveland being particularly popular, according to the analysis.
In the North East, 4.7% of all homes sold in the first quarter of 2025 had been bought within the previous 12 months.
In the first quarter of this year, 61% of flipped properties were in the Midlands, North of England or Wales, up from 50% a decade ago, Hamptons said.
In London, just 1.5% of homes sold in the first quarter of 2025 were bought within the previous 12 months. As well as stamp duty costs, weaker house price growth in the capital has also dampened investor returns, Hamptons said.
Aneisha Beveridge, head of research at Hamptons, said: 'Rising upfront costs have pushed investors further north.'
She added: 'It's also where more house price growth has been concentrated over the last few years. While the returns aren't as high as with homes in the south in cash terms, higher yields and lower tax bills continue to make the north the homeland of flipping.'
Here are the proportions of home sales which are flipped by region and nation, followed by the average gross profit (before costs such as stamp duty) in cash and percentage terms:
North East, 4.7%, £14,250, 12%
Wales, 3.1%, £25,000, 17%
Yorkshire and the Humber, 3.0%, £18,995, 11%
East Midlands, 2.8%, £13,500, 7%
North West, 2.8%, £25,000, 16%
West Midlands, 2.5%, £25,000, 15%
South West, 2.2%, £20,000, 8%
East of England, 1.8%, £22,000, 7%
South East, 1.8%, £23,000, 7%
London, 1.5%, £59,000, 16%
Here are the local authorities with the highest proportions of flipped homes in the first quarter of 2025, according to Hamptons:
1. Redcar and Cleveland, North East, 7.6%
2. Co Durham, North East, 6.6%
3. Hartlepool, North East, 6.5%
4. Burnley, North West, 5.8%
5. Bassetlaw, East Midlands, 5.2%
6. Newport (City of), Wales, 5.0%
=7. Rhondda Cynon Taf, Wales, 4.9%
=7. Merthyr Tydfil, Wales, 4.9%
=9. North Tyneside, North East, 4.8%
=9. Sunderland, North East, 4.8%
=9. Great Yarmouth, East of England, 4.8%
=9. Neath Port Talbot, Wales, 4.8%
13. Blaenau Gwent, Wales, 4.7%
14. Torridge, South West, 4.6%
15. Pendle, North West, 4.5%
=16. Erewash, East Midlands, 4.4%
=16. North East Derbyshire, East Midlands, 4.4%
=18. West Lindsey, East Midlands, 4.3%
=18. Caerphilly, Wales, 4.3%
20. Wigan, North West, 4.2%
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
7 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK's Empiric Student Property agrees to Unite's $860.59 million takeover proposal
Aug 14 (Reuters) - British real estate investment trust Empiric Student Property <ESP.L, opens new tab agreed to student accommodation developer Unite Group's (UTG.L), opens new tab 634 million pound ($860.59 million) take over proposal, the companies said on Thursday. ($1 = 0.7367 pounds)
Daily Mail
7 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
How Reeves's inheritance tax changes will affect families
The Autumn Budget might be two months away, but speculation over which taxes the Chancellor will increase has already begun. Rachel Reeves is constrained by her manifesto pledges to keep income tax, VAT and National Insurance at the same level, despite calls to 'substantially' increase taxes. What inheritance tax do people pay now? IHT has historically only affected the very wealthy. At the moment, just 4 per cent of estates pay it. That is set to rise because house prices are increasing, while the threshold over which people pay inheritance tax stays the same. IHT being levied on private pensions left to descendants from 2027 will drive a further increase. Since 2009, an individual has needed to be worth £325,000 if you are single, or £650,000 if married or in a civil partnership, for beneficiaries to incur any death duties. This allowance is known as the nil-rate band. If you are married, own a property and leave your main home to direct descendants (children or grandchildren) you each get a further £175,000 allowance, known as the residence nil rate band. Collectively, it means a couple that meet this criteria could pass on £1million tax-free. The £325,000 nil rate band has been unchanged for 16 years, which means that rising property prices have dragged more people into paying IHT. Had it risen in line with inflation, it would be £585,996, meaning fewer people would be affected. How gifting can reduce inheritance tax There are some ways to minimise the amount of IHT paid, by gifting money to beneficiaries while you are still alive. You can gift £3,000 a year, and unlimited small gifts of up to £250, free from tax. However, if you die less than seven years after making the gift then you will start to pay IHT. This is levied on a sliding scale, from 8 per cent if gifts were made 6-7 years before death, to 40 per cent, if made within a year. This rule is designed to stop people making large gifts to family just before they die, in a bid to avoid IHT. Like the nil rate band, the gifting allowance has not changed since its introduction in 1986. If it had risen in line with inflation, it would be quadruple its current level at £12,297. As more people gift cash or assets to beneficiaries, they are more likely to fall foul of the rules. Why is Reeves looking at the gifting rules? Financial advisers tell This Is Money there has been a significant behaviour shift among their clients. More individuals are gifting their money to children and grandchildren to minimise their inheritance tax burden ahead of the pension changes in 2027. However, figures show that most people are not paying tax on their gifts, even if the giver has died within seven years. This is because you can actually gift far more than the £3,000 gifting allowance, so long as it doesn't breach the £325,000 nil rate band. These gifts will form part of your estate - but if it is below that threshold, you still won't pay tax. For example, if you have very few assets and you gift £10,000, and remain within the nil rate band, your estate will not pay tax on it. It means that it's very difficult to know how many people are gifting money tax-free, and likely why Reeves is eyeing changes to the rules. How much does the Treasury make from tax on gifts? A Freedom of Information request by This Is Money shows the number of families that are taxed on gifting was relatively low in the three years to 2021-22, the latest figures available. The figures have remained stable, with around 1,000 families being stung by IHT on their gifts each year, but some advisers suspect this doesn't paint the full picture. 'There will be people who gift and die within 7 years and then it's clawed back from the nil rate band, which don't appear in the figures,' says Lisa Caplan, director of advice and guidance at Charles Stanley. Shaun Moore, tax and financial planning expert at Quilter, also suspects 'people are gifting within the allowances and not suffering tax on the gifts.' For example, a gift of £250,000 wouldn't appear in the gifting table, but the estate will pay the tax because they've lost that amount from the nil rate band. Caplan predicts that the number of people who fall into the 'gfiting trap' will be higher as more people take out their tax-free cash early and start the seven-year clock. But this may not go far enough for Reeves, who needs to plug a £40billion black hole. What could Rachel Reeves change? Reeves is reportedly looking at a lifetime gifting allowance to minimise the amount people can pass on to their beneficiaries without incurring tax. The Guardian reported that the Treasury is mulling a lifetime cap to limit the amount of money or value of assets an individual can give away. This would be an additional administrative burden and mean HM Revenue & Customs would have to hold long-term records of gifts over decades. Rachel Griffin, chartered financial planner at Quilter says a cap 'might encourage people to make large gifts earlier in life to use up their allowance, potentially moving significant assets out of their control before they are financially ready.' Gianpaolo Mantini, chartered financial planner at Saltus, thinks Reeves could introduce lifetime capital transfer charges, as is already the case with trusts. 'They might do something like the French system where you can give a certain amount within a 15 year period [but] I think it would be very difficult logistically.' Another option for Reeves is to extend the seven-year rule to 10 years, although this would fly in the face of the reduction to five years, as first explored by the now-defunct Office for Tax Simplification. This is likely to receive significant backlash and only encourage people to gift earlier before they can afford to do so, experts say. Instead, it is more likely that the Treasury, which the Guardian reports is reviewing taper relief rules, removes the taper entirely. Taper relief is widely misunderstood and is generally only available to small numbers of the very wealthiest. Individuals only get taper relief if the value of the gift takes you above the nil rate band of £325,000. So if you gave someone £100,000 and then you died within 7 years, all that has done is reduce the available nil rate band, and the taper relief would not apply. As such, taper relief tends only to benefit the very wealthy, according to advisers. This could be a more palatable way for Reeves to change IHT rules for the wealthy, without imposing a wealth tax. One of Reeves' other options is to hand over more powers to HMRC and the Probate Office to ensure people are properly reporting gifts. 'I suspect there's a bit of underreporting [of gifts],' says Mantini. 'The solicitor doing probate might not know of any gifts made within seven years unless they go through bank records to see large sums given out. 'Unless the family or beneficiary declares it to the executor might not have any realistic way of knowing. 'A lot of gifts are small in nature and the larger ones might not always be fully declared.' This would mean more investment in public services at a time when the public purse is stretched as is, and it would prove difficult to establish whether a large sum is a gift or payment. Finally, Reeves could change capital gains tax (CGT) rules - the tax people pay when they make a profit on selling assets such as a house or shares. Currently, when you inherit assets the CGT slate is wiped clean and the base cost of is reset at the value at the date of death. So if someone inherited their parents' house, then sold it straight away, capital gains tax would only be payable on any profit they made above the value of the property when they inherited it - likely nothing. Reeves could change this, so families may have to pay tax on the entire 'profit' made by the child. It could make some families pay the double hit of CGT - up to 24 per cent - and IHT at 40 per cent. What it means for you Any changes to the IHT rules are intended to bring more people into the tax net. A lifetime gifting cap would mark a significant departure from the way IHT has historically been imposed, and advisers say it would mark a huge change to the way families pass on wealth. 'Such a cap would bring more gifts into scope for IHT and could capture not just large transfers designed to reduce tax bills but also modest, routine support between family members,' says Griffin. Ingrid McCleaver, partner at DMH Stallard, says a lifetime cap could spell the end of the 'bank of mum and dad', with children who receive a house deposit potentially facing an IHT bill. 'Not only are parents that work hard and save having to pay income tax on their salaries and savings, they may after the next budget suffer an additional tax on death, on amounts they have not had the benefit of for possibly years,' she says. Despite possible changes to how IHT is imposed, experts advise not to make drastic changes. Daniel Hough, wealth manager at RBC Brewin Dolphin says: 'There is a fine line between passing down wealth as efficiently as possible and enjoying a comfortable retirement. There are important discussions you need to have about the sustainability of your retirement pot and that may require scaling back ambitions – or you may find that you have to live with the consequences of your pension running out in your 80s or 90s.'
Scottish Sun
36 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
GDP slows to just 0.3% growth in second quarter – what it means for YOU
Go to the bottom of this story to find out what the latest figures mean for your wallet MONEY TALKS GDP slows to just 0.3% growth in second quarter – what it means for YOU Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THE UK's economy grew in the three months to June but slowed on the first quarter of the year. The latest figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) reveal Gross Domestic Product (GDP) grew by 0.3% between April and June. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 The UK economy has grown but slowed compared to the start of the year Credit: Getty This is lower than the 0.7% recorded between January and March, but stronger than expected by analysts. GDP grew in the second quarter of the year mostly due to the services and construction sectors. It's worth bearing in mind these latest quarterly figures are estimations and are open to be revised at a later date. Liz McKeown, director of economic statistics at the ONS, said: "Growth slowed in the second quarter after a strong start to the year. "The economy was weak across April and May, with some activity having been brought forward to February and March ahead of Stamp Duty and tariff changes, but then recovered strongly in June. "Across the second quarter as a whole growth was led by services, with computer programming, health and vehicle leasing growing. "Construction also increased while production fell back slightly. "Growth for the quarter was also boosted by updated source data for April, which while still showing a contraction, was better than initially estimated. "Services also drove growth in June with scientific R&D, engineering and car sales all having a strong month. "Within production, which recovered, manufacture of electronics performed especially well." Understanding GDP and Its Impact on the Economy The data today was largely expected by analysts to show the UK economy slowed to just 0.1% growth in the second quarter of 2025 after a strong start to the year. Last Thursday, the Bank of England forecast second-quarter UK GDP growth of 0.1%, slowed from 0.7% in the first quarter. Figures have already shown that GDP contracted by 0.3% in April and 0.1% in May. Plus, figures on Tuesday showed the UK jobs market weakened again, but overall wage growth remains strong, prompting traders to trim their bets on the possibility of another Bank of England rate cut this year. Separate figures published by the ONS today showed GDP grew by 0.4% in June. Patrick O'Donnell, chief investment strategist at Omnis Investments, said: "It appears that the economy is weathering any uncertainty associated with tariffs and tax policy for now. "The probability of a further cut from the BoE by the end of the year has reduced somewhat following their recent guidance and labour market data. "The next signpost for the market will be next week's inflation report, where particular focus will be paid to the services component, given the historical correlation with wage inflation. "We still expect a further cut from the BoE this year and the cycle to continue into 2026 but appreciate that there will be market volatility as data evolves between now and then." What it means for your money GDP measures the economic output of companies, individuals and Governments. If it is rising steadily, but not too much, it's a sign of a healthy and prosperous economy. This is because it usually means people are spending more, the Government gets more tax and businesses get more money which then means pay rises for workers. When GDP is falling, it means the economy is shrinking which can be bad news for businesses and workers who face pay cuts or even losing their job. The Bank of England (BoE) also uses GDP and inflation as key indicators when determining the base rate. This decides how much it will charge banks to lend them money and is a way to try to control inflation and the economy. If GDP is low, the BoE cuts its base rate in order to encourage people to spend and invest money. If it is higher, the BoE may keep its base rate higher in order to keep inflation in check. What is the base rate and how does it affect the economy? NINE members of the Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee meet eight times each year to set the base rate. Any change to the Bank's rate can have wide-reaching consequences as it directly influences both: The cost that lenders charge people to borrow money The amount of savings interest banks pay out to customers. When the Bank of England lowers interest rates, consumers tend to increase spending. This can directly affect the country's GDP and help steer the economy into growth and out of a recession. In this scenario, the cost of borrowing is usually cheap, and the biggest winners here are first-time buyers and homeowners with mortgages. But those with savings tend to lose out. However, when more credit is available to consumers, demand can increase, and prices tend to rise. And if the inflation rate rises substantially - the Bank of England might increase interest rates to bring prices back down. When the cost of borrowing rises - consumers and businesses have less money to spend, and in theory, as demand for goods and services falls, so should prices. The Bank of England is tasked with keeping inflation at 2%, and hiking interest rates is a way of trying to reach this target. In this scenario, the losers are those with debt. First-time buyers will lose out to cheaper mortgage rates, and those on tracker or standard variable rate mortgages are usually impacted by hikes to the base rate immediately. Those on a fixed-rate deal tend to be safe if they fixed when interest rates were lower - but their bills could drastically increase when it's time to remortgage. The cost of borrowing through loans, credit cards and overdrafts also increases when the base rate rises. However, the winners in this scenario are those with money to save. Banks tend to battle it out by offering market-leading saving rates when the base rate is high. Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@ Plus, you can join our Sun Money Chats and Tips Facebook group to share your tips and stories
